Agile Work Philosophy
Convenience Stores
The stores grew up 22% of sales, 82% requested was delivered.
Brand Contribution
COMPARATIVE MAR- FEB 20
Store Contribution
PARTICIPATION SECTION/BRAND
STORES: 107 ACTIVE STORES: 106 CEDIS STORES: 0 CLOSED STORES: 1 (LZ Juan Escutia) NO SALES STORES:0 AVG STORES: 16.48HL COMPARATIVE MAR vs FEB: 15.95% growth |
|
|
|
COMPARATIVE (MAR-FEB)
COVERAGE
ROUTE SUMMARY
100 % |
|
|
|
CUPO | MAR20HL |
Lata | 150 |
Latota | 200 |
Vidrio L | 100 |
Vidrio S | 159.8096 |
Total | 609.81 |
General Analysis
Wholesale Stores and Shows
Summary
(+13%) vs LY
Volumen
(-6%) Vs BGT
(+1%) vs BGT
2193 Clientes
Cobertura
(95%) vs BGT
Punto de Venta
2088 Facturados
Compra por Aplicación
(-3) % Vs BGT
(-48%) vs BGT NR
Marketplace
% Cob vs BGT Abril
% Cob vs LM
(44%) Vs LM NR
Sector B
(+73%) vs BGT
Sector C
(+3) % VS COB
Servicio al cliente
(+19%)- %vs BGT
Creditos
(23.2) PTS
(-5%) vs BGT
(21%) vs LM
(92%) vs 95%
Promocionales
(92%) vs 92%
(82.1%) vs 85%
Tareas
(80%) vs 70%
(88.1%) vs 90%
Enfriadores
9% vs 6%
9% vs 8.7%
(88.1%) vs 88.1%
Venta cero
Aceptados
(82.1%) vs 76.65%
Completados
(80%) vs 84.6%
Productividad
Cobertura
Score
(87%) vs 85%
(87%) vs 87%
Analysis and Action Plan
Action Plan by Segmentation
Wholesale Vs Retailers
Action Plan Coverage
COBERTURA
Numerical weighting
Action Plan Coverage
COBERTURA
Brand Sponsors
Return Analysis
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Action Plan
How is make it?
Relational Data Base
Power Pivot, Power Query, Power BI
SQL Joins
Relational Tables
Prescriptive Analysis, Projection Data
Prescriptive Analysis, Projection Data
Dashboard