1 of 26

by �Yasir Siddiqui

Tiberius Brastaviceanu

www.sensorica.co�contact information:

yasir.siddiqui@gmail.com�http://www.linkedin.com/in/siddiquiyasir

Conversation on financing our open-alliance

For sources, see the full document here:�http://sensoricablog.blogspot.ca/2013/11/blog-post.html�Inspired by the work of the Sensorica community:

http://valuenetwork.referata.com/wiki/Main_Page

Only SENSORICA logo is copyright. Content on this document is Creative Commons (BY NC CA) unless sourced from other sources

2 of 26

Value to the existing open innovation ecosystem

3 of 26

4 of 26

The open alliance

Sensorica - drones, green-wall, Bricobio, Farmhack, JAM, metamaps, collabtechpro, ...

Photo from APRUS

5 of 26

Extended collaboration possibilities

  • Wikispeed

  • Protei

  • p2pfoundation

  • Metamaps

  • Noisebridge

  • Greener Acres

  • Buglabs

See exhaustive list of possible collaborators

6 of 26

Funding ecosystem for diverse needs

7 of 26

Needs

Legal structure

Infrastructure

Administration

Physical resources

SPACE

Drones

Green

wall

Bees

Sensors

Sales

8 of 26

Legal structure

Infrastructure

OVNI

Administration

Physical resources

SPACE

Drones

Bees

Sensors

Firm 2

CRIAQ

CDEC

Immigration Quebec

Funds and grants

Bank national

Student program

Open

value

Network

ONG

ACES-Canada

Financial distribution

Firm 1

Firm 3

Investments

Venture capital

GNOME CANADA

Greener Acres

Crowdfunding

Green

wall

9 of 26

We need to process that together

10 of 26

Purpose capital

Creating the right value for the right audience

11 of 26

Funding the virtual infrastructure

  • Strategic donations based funding
    • from companies: Ingenio (Loto Quebec)
    • from consortiums: Genome Quebec, CRIAQ, METTECH

  • Grants and foundations
    • from Government as academic funding
    • from foundations: J. W. McConnell foundation, Molson, Brofman
    • MIXprize and other like it
    • HORIZON 2020

  • Crowdfunding: donations, pre-purchase and investments
    • Jaime Arredondo - crowdfunding for open source, p2p mode
    • our initiative with p2p foundation

12 of 26

Investment for the projects will depend on how we play the open-game

13 of 26

Funding the projects - non-commons

  • Investment based funding
    • Need guarantees and control
    • Need IP valuation
  • Strategic donations based funding
    • Monopoly by application
    • Use of application
  • Grants and foundations
    • Sometimes require IP
    • Can go directly to projects or to academic partners (see our ENGAGE grant experience)
  • Crowdfunding: donations, pre-purchase and investments
    • (includes all non-institutional funding)

14 of 26

How to play the open-game?

  • Limited time-based IP
  • Commons-based Intellectual Property (IP)
  • Open-source non-commercial
  • Open-source commercial but non-viral
  • Open-source commercial and viral

15 of 26

Governance with financial investors

  • Fixed equity and preferential governance
  • Fixed equity and non-preferential governance
  • Fluid equity and preferential governance
  • Fluid equity and non-preferential governance

16 of 26

Funding projects

  • Projects need the right business model and collaboration model in order to get the funding
    • Trust - not enough collaborators (too open, too closed,...)

  • Projects need the right strategy in order to get the revenues

17 of 26

Thoughts on legal framework

18 of 26

ACES-Canada

19 of 26

Purpose tools and purpose accounting

Charity - �social benefits

Common pool of shareables

Individual pools

Investment pools

Academia

20 of 26

21 of 26

Fablab

ACES-Canada

22 of 26

Choices for the commons

  • (Dis)Allowance on the degree of openness and transparency
  • Membership or non-membership (non-dominium) based legal structure
  • Roles and responsibilities

23 of 26

We need to commit and share the work-load

24 of 26

Important resources

25 of 26

Open-source world unite:��Let’s build our home together!

26 of 26

Thank you