1 of 16

New proposal:

Laser Control and Collimation of Particle Beams for Higgs Factories

Spencer Gessner, SLAC

FACET-II PAC Meeting

November 20, 2024

Facility for Advanced Accelerator Experimental Tests

2 of 16

Proposal Team

2

S. Gessner, M. Hogan, A. Knetsch, B. O’Shea, T. Raubenheimer, D. Reis

S. Meuren

J. Keintzel, F. Zimmermann

N. T. Hod

I. Drebot

3 of 16

Collimation for Circular Colliders

3

Collimation of particle beams is a major challenge for high-luminosity colliders.

The challenges related to the collimator, which were not properly considered at the time of SuperKEKB design, have surfaced through experience with its operation.

Collimator design is critical to achieving the luminosity goals of a collider.

4 of 16

Collimation for Circular Colliders

4

Collimation of particle beams is a major challenge for high-luminosity colliders.

The challenges related to the collimator, which were not properly considered at the time of SuperKEKB design, have surfaced through experience with its operation.

Collimator design is critical to achieving the luminosity goals of a collider.

5 of 16

Collimation for Linear Colliders

5

Collimation of particle beams dominates the length of the Beam Delivery System.

Novel collimation schemes will reduce cost of a Linear Collider Higgs Factory and enable a 10 TeV Wakefield Collider.

ILC BDS: 1 km of collimation!

Barklow, Gessner et. al. “Beam delivery and beamstrahlung considerations for ultra-high energy linear colliders” JINST 18 P09022 (2023)

6 of 16

The Beam-Beam Flip-Flop Instability

6

Asymmetric scenario:

  • “Weak” beam radiates more beamstrahlung photons than “Strong” beam.

N = N0 + Δ

nγBS

σz = σz0

ξ = ξ0

N = N0 - Δ

nγBS

σz = σz0

ξ = ξ0

Weak

Strong

7 of 16

The Beam-Beam Flip-Flop Instability

7

Asymmetric scenario:

  • Longer/shorter bunch lengths decrease/increase the beam-beam parameter.

N = N0 + Δ

nγBS

σz

ξ

N = N0 - Δ

nγBS

σz

ξ

Weak

Strong

ξy may become very large for the weak beam. Charge and luminosity are lost.

8 of 16

Beam-Beam Instabilities in the FCC-ee

8

Simulations indicate that the growth rate of the instability over ~10000 turns.

At the z-pole, a few percent intensity asymmetry is tolerable.

Asymmetries are balanced through top-up injection.

But the top-up rate is slower than the instability growth rate.

Is there a faster way to control the charge of the colliding bunches?

9 of 16

Science Drivers

9

  1. Develop an “indestructible” collimator.

  • Reduce the length of the collimation system.

  • Provide bunch-by-bunch control of the beam charge.

  • Do all of that with the same tool?

10 of 16

Proposal: Laser Control of Particle Beams

10

Zimmerman, F. New final focus concepts at 5 TeV and beyond. Eighth Advanced Accelerator Concepts Workshop. 1998.

F. Zimmermann, T. Raubenheimer IPAC 2022 https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/ipac2022/papers/wepost010.pdf

Laser collimation of Particle Beams for Multi-TeV Linear Collider

Shot-by-shot control of electron bunch intensity in FCC.

“A Ti:sapphire J-class kHz laser system is ready to be built today [7–9]. Specifically, we consider a laser system operating with 1 J pulses at 3 kHz (the revolution frequency), with an average power of 3 kW, which translates to the same average laser power as for LBNL’s k-BELLA initiative (3 J at 1 kHz) [10].”

11 of 16

E320 is the backbone of this proposal

11

Leverage the E320 infrastructure at FACET-II to provide an R&D platform for:

  • Bunch-to-bunch laser intensity control.
  • Halo collimation.
  • Diagnostics to demonstrate collimation and control of high energy beams.

FACET-II is the only User Facility in the world that combines 10 GeV beams with high-power lasers to accommodate this type of R&D.

12 of 16

Linear Compton Scattering

12

Much of this R&D assumes Linear Compton Scattering.

We prefer long electron beams and stretched laser pulses (σz = 200 μm, σt = 0.66 ps)

Assume 100 mJ laser pulse energy.

The expected cross-section is 550 millibarn.

There are approximately 4 ✕ 1017 photons per pulse.

The interaction probability is 10-3 - 10-2 depending on geometry.

13 of 16

Phase 1: Demonstration of a fast feed-forward system

13

Goals:

  • Mimic feedback mechanism for FCC-ee by demonstrating shot-to-shot feed forward control.
  • Deploy halo characterization diagnostic.

Hardware:

  • No change to E320 setup.
  • Electronics for fast Pockels cell control.
  • AWAKE-style Halo Monitor.

Expected signal:

  • 5✕ 107 scattering events per pulse.

M. Turner, et. al Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 054801 (2019)

14 of 16

Phase 2: Halo Collimation

14

Goals:

  • Interact beam halo particles with an annular laser pulse.
  • Measure jitter tolerances and effects.

Hardware:

  • Laguerre-Gauss or High-Order Bessel Optics.
  • Head-on laser interaction.
  • LBG_LFOV or other sensitive detector.

Expected signal:

  • 7✕ 103 scattering events per pulse.

Gessner, S. et al. Demonstration of a positron beam-driven hollow channel plasma wakefield accelerator. Nat. Comm. 2016.

LBG_LFOV upgrade (Knetsch)

15 of 16

Phase 3: Alternative Schemes

15

Goals:

  • Reduce required laser pulse energy needed for collimation and control by utilizing nonlinear compton scattering and/or alternate geometries.

Hardware:

  • 90o OAP
  • Cylindrical lens
  • Tilted phase front

Expected signal:

  • Depends on scheme

Tilted Phase Front

Cylindrical Lens

Nonlinear Quenched Regime

Operate in a nonlinear regime but still induce a binary interaction.

“Quantum Quenching of Radiation Losses in Short Laser Pulses.” C. N. Harvey, et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 105004 (2017)

16 of 16

Conclusions

16

The R&D topics covered by this proposal have the potential to improve the performance and reduce the cost of future Higgs Factories, while paving the way towards a 10 TeV Wakefield Collider BDS system.

  • The proposal is well-aligned with P5 Recommendations 2.c and 4.a.

The E320 experiment enables rapid implementation and a clear path to results for this proposal.

  • The technical risk for Phases 1 and 2 is low.

The implementation of a Halo Monitor will be broadly useful for the facility.