Particle therapy masterclass �LASA and INFN-MI group
Therapy planning for Liver cancer, Prostate cancer and Head and Neck cancer
I.I.S. Cristoforo Colombo - Sanremo
I.I.S. Severi Correnti – MI
IIS Carlo Emilio Gadda - MI
IIS Curie-Sraffa – MI
IIS Ettore Majorana – MI
IIS Jean Monnet – MI
LSS Leonardo Da Vinci – MI
LSS Donatelli Pascal - MI
STUDENTS | |
Ludovica Calabrese | Fabio Deandreis |
Noah Treves | Giulia Gullo |
Riccardo Cova | Alice Tenconi |
Pietro Colombo | Alessia Pasat |
Nicolas De Maddalena | Giacomo Colombo |
Rebecca Bolzoni | Benedetta Vicario |
Massimo Ciambrone | Carmelo Sanfipippo |
Oboni Habib | Federico Baldassare |
Jacopo Feole | Lorenzo Baldo |
Rtage Saleh Aiman Moamed Abdelhami | Tommaso Gambarini |
Sara Brambilla | Martina Locatelli |
Danielle Diba | Giulia Basile |
Emma Ippolito | Simone Chiodini |
Sofia Angiuli | Federico Sprocati |
Emma Podestà | |
IISS Fermi - Arona (NO)
ISIS A. Ponti - Cassano Magnago (VA)
Istituto Superiore G.L. Lagrange - MI Istituto Tecnico e Liceo E. MATTEI – MI
ITIS G. Feltrinelli – Milano
Liceo Federici - Trescore Balneario (BG)
Liceo Scientifico Sereni - Luino (VA)
TABLE OF CONTENT
Liver cancer – comparison between single and multiple photons beams
Liver cancer – comparison between photons, protons and carbon ions beams
Prostate cancer – comparison between single and multiple photons beams
Prostate cancer – comparison between photons, protons and carbon ions beams
Prostate cancer – dose delivery to OARs as a function of the angle for a single photons beam
Head&Neck cancer – comparison between single and multiple photons and multiple protons beams
Head&Neck cancer – comparison between photons, protons and carbon ions beams
6
7
Liver cancer �Comparison between single and multiple photons beams
Three beams
Five beams
Single beam
�
Liver cancer �Comparison between photon, proton therapy and carbon ion therapy
One proton beam
Carbon ions beam
Five photons beams
LIVER: We tried with the paper’s assignment of 5 photon beams of respectively 0-180-225-270-315 deg.�
LIVER: We discovered that with only 1 carbon beam, angled at 0 deg gives us a much better result
LIVER: we discovered that with only one proton angled at 315 deg gives a better results
| mean | std | max | min |
skin | 0,0190 | 0,1357 | 1,7756 | |
stomach | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
heart | 0,0175 | 0,1213 | 1,5711 | |
| mean | std | max | min |
skin | 0.0499 | 0,1732 | 1.5223 | |
stomach | 0,0232 | 0.0469 | 0.2162 | |
heart | 0.2162 | 0.2073 | 1,.5050 | 0.008 |
| mean | std | max | min |
skin | 0,0197 | 0,1512 | 1,8509 | 0 |
stomach | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
heart | 0,0139 | 0,1073 | 1,533 | 0 |
Prostate cancer �Comparison between single and multiple photons beams
Three beams
Five beams
Single beam
We tried with a beam of photons and different angles. 0 degrees is the best angle but is still not optimised. This is because the maximum dose is taken by the bladder and rectum, not by the tumor.
�
Prostate cancer �Comparison between single photons, protons and carbon ion beams
Photon therapy
Proton therapy
We tried with a beam of protons and different angles to find the best option. We found out that 80 degrees is the best one optimizing the result with less damages to the other organs.
We tried with a beam of photons and different angles. 0 degrees is the best angle but is still not optimised. This is because the maximum dose is taken by the bladder and skin, not by the tumor.
Carbon ion therapy
We tried 4 angles in order to reduce the radiation damage to the bladder, rectum,and femoral heads.
�
�
Prostate cancer �Dose delivery to the oars as a function of the angle for a single photon beam
| Mean dose (Gy) | ||
| PTV | Bladder | Rectum |
0° | 2,1216 | 1,8692 | 1,2706 |
25° | 2,1100 | 2,1280 | 1,4466 |
50° | 2,1632 | 2,0136 | 1,4622 |
75° | 2,1769 | 2,3080 | 1,3729 |
100° | 2,1731 | 2,1166 | 1,4064 |
125° | 2,1055 | 1,4663 | 1,9324 |
150° | 2,0980 | 1,4923 | 1,9375 |
175° | 2,1058 | 1,3037 | 1,6685 |
200° | 2,0963 | 1,3960 | 1,7763 |
225° | 2,1055 | 1,4663 | 1,9324 |
250° | 2,1410 | 1,2292 | 1,6173 |
275° | 2,1692 | 1,0810 | 1,2877 |
300° | 2,1710 | 1,7300 | 1,4133 |
325° | 2,1394 | 2,1904 | 1,4909 |
350° | 2,1205 | 1,9565 | 1,3048 |
Head & Neck Cancer�Comparison between single photons, protons and carbon ion beams
Photon therapy
Carbon ion therapy
Protons therapy
�
�
After testing different configurations, we observed that a setup with five photon beams spaced every 72 degrees resulted in the most effective plan. This symmetric distribution ensured good target coverage and a more homogeneous dose delivery, while maintaining a reasonable sparing of nearby organs
After various attempts we noticed that the right values, using a single proton beam, fluctuated close to 180 degrees.
The best therapy we found with carbon ion, using a single beam, was with an 170 degrees.
Head & Neck Cancer�Comparison between single and multiple photons and multiple protons beams
Single Photon therapy
Multiple protons therapy
Multiple Photon therapy
we choose five angles, one every 72 degrees. we managed to get good results for all the organs except the larynx�
After many attempts, we chose 180 degrees as the best therapy, even if it damages the lips.
We used 2 protons bands with 65 and 300 degrees angle. We have managed to lower healthy organs from radiation except the larynx.
Conclusions
Comparing single photons and single protons, the latter avoid the tissues after the tumor
Between one photons beam and 5 photons beams we noted that 5 beams reduces the dose at the skin
The advantages of carbon ion beams compared to proton and photon are reduced dose in the entrance of the body
The advantages of photons are the availability of large number of centers in the world
Thank you �for your attention!