2 of 13

AGENDA

Welcome
Overview of Mode of Instruction requirement
Loading MOI data from your SIS system
Using MiDataHub functionality to import MOI data
Verifying that your MOI data is available for aggregation
Upcoming enhancements for Error Checking and Section 98b queries
Q&A

Note: This webinar will be recorded

3 of 13

OVERVIEW

Section 104a (f) states

(f) The system must provide that, by not later than 30 days after a benchmark assessment or benchmark assessments are administered as described in this subsection, the district shall send benchmark assessment data, excluding data from a local benchmark assessment, as applicable, aggregated by grade level, student demographic subgroups, and mode of instruction to the department. If available, the data described in this subdivision must include information concerning pupil growth from fall 2020 to fall 2021.

Section 98b (1)(a)

(a) By not later than the first meeting of the board that occurs in February of 2022 and by not later than the last day of the 2021-2022 school year, the district superintendent or chief administrator of the district, as applicable, shall present both of the following at a public meeting of the board:

(i) Subject to state and federal privacy laws, the results from benchmark assessments and local benchmark assessments, as applicable, administered under section 104a.
(ii) For each school operated by the district, each school's progress toward meeting the educational goals described in subdivision (d).

(b) The district shall ensure that the information presented under subdivision (a) is disaggregated by grade level, by student demographics, and by the mode of instruction received by the pupils to which the information applies.

4 of 13

MODES OF INSTRUCTION

Mode	Description
FULLY IN-PERSON	Students in this subgroup primarily received instruction in a fully in-person/face-to-face format.
HYBRID	Students in this subgroup primarily received instruction a hybrid format where a portion of their instruction was provided in-person and a portion was provided remotely (e.g., half-day in-person and half-day remote, alternating one day in-person then one day remote, etc.).
FULLY REMOTE	Students in this subgroup primarily received instruction in a fully remote or virtual format.

5 of 13

USING MIDATAHUB FUNCTIONALITY TO IMPORT MOI DATA

Visit MiDataHub.org product catalog page
Search for Mode of instruction

Demonstration

Running the Mode of Instruction Export
Editing the file in Excel
Saving the file as a CSV
Zipping the file
Creating an inbound integration (first time importing only)
Importing the file
Processing the file
Reviewing the error log (if any)

6 of 13

NEED FOR MODE OF INSTRUCTION

Per the Spring Aggregation Rules from MDE: Students should be assigned to one subgroup based on the primary mode in which they received instruction between August 1st, 2021 and June 1st, 2022.
Focus is on the PRIMARY mode of instruction, or the status for each student overall. We know this can change on a daily basis due to many factors.
In MiDataHub, we are receiving the data as StudentCohortAssociations with students tied to each of the three modes as Cohorts
This allows for either a single entry or for multiple entries, whichever is more convenient for the district to track.
Recommend only tracking major changes – lasting a month or longer

7 of 13

LOADING MOI DATA �FROM YOUR SIS SYSTEM

Edupoint Synergy – The standard Synergy process is handled through setting up a group/cohort. Documentation is on a shared secure site. Reach out to Jeanne Fisher (jfisher@cmtonline.com) at CMT if you have any questions or issues accessing the documentation. Tony Howard at GISD has developed an export in the format needed to use the MOI Import.
Infinite Campus – Contact Infinite Campus support.
MISTAR-Q – Contact MISTAR-Q support.
PowerSchool – Submit a ticket to PowerSchool support for instructions.
Skyward

SMS 2.0 – Please see Skyward Documentation for additional resources

Crosswalk Codes: Web Student > Students > Product Setup > Codes > Method of Instruction Codes

Enter Data: Web Student > Students > Student Profile > Special Programs > Method of Instruction

Download Descriptors: Web Student > Federal/State Reporting > Ed-Fi > Product Setup > Configuration > New Ed-Fi Setup > Download All Descriptors

Qmlativ – Please see the Help Center for additional resources

Crosswalk Codes: Administrative Access > Student > Codes > Method of Instruction Offering

Enter Data: Administrative Access > Student > Student Profile > General > Method of Instruction

Download Descriptors: Administrative Access > API > Ed-Fi Application > Ed-Fi Descriptors > Load Descriptors from Ed-Fi

�

8 of 13

HOW TO PROVIDE MODE OF INSTRUCTION

If your district created your own aggregate, use the template found on the MDE Benchmark Assessments website to provide a completed aggregate with MOI data
If your district provided student-level assessment data through MiDataHub AND your SIS has capability to capture MOI, provide it through your SIS
If your district provided student-level assessment data through MiDataHub BUT your SIS does not have capability to capture MOI, provide it through MiDataHub upload functionality

Especially for districts who used the MSDS Import

9 of 13

VERIFYING THAT YOUR MOI DATA �IS AVAILABLE FOR AGGREGATION

Re-Running the Mode of Instruction Export
Mode of Instruction query

Reports>Manage Custom Exports
Use Query Tag dropdown to select

�

10 of 13

UPCOMING ENHANCEMENTS�FOR ERROR CHECKING

Breaking Fall and Spring into two separate categories
Filtering our prior year assessments
Adding Mode of Instruction totals, including an Assumed In-Person total
Looking at ways to tone down the passed/failed status and green/red coloring
Expected completion in Early May

11 of 13

UPCOMING ENHANCEMENTS�FOR SECTION 98B QUERIES

Looking for a template from MDE as was provided for Fall Assessment
Adding Mode of Instruction
Updating with Spring Assessment

Using the last assessment of the year

Some of the queries timed out
Can be run by setting up as an Outbound Integration
support@midatahub.org for help
Webinar when ready

Category	Meeting	Subject	SigBehind	Total	Percent
01 All Students	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	114	440	25
01 All Students	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	104	439	23
02 Econ Disadvantaged	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	24	65	36
02 Econ Disadvantaged	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	21	64	32
05 Female	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	50	208	24
05 Female	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	55	208	26
06 Male	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	64	232	27
06 Male	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	49	231	21
07 American Indian or Alaska Native	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	10	30	33
07 American Indian or Alaska Native	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	12	29	41
08 Asian	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	2	5	40
08 Asian	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	1	5	20

GradeLevel	Meeting	Subject	SigBehind	Total	Percent
0	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	19	30	63
0	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	20	30	66
1	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	1	40	2
1	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	5	40	12
2	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	11	45	24
2	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	8	45	17
3	First Board Meeting	English Language Arts	14	42	33
3	First Board Meeting	Mathematics	10	42	23

1 of 13