Using mobile technologies to support the acquisition of basic mathematics with children with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities
Professor Nicola Pitchford
University of Nottingham, UK
Background
onecourse technology
Studies
Pitchford et al., 2018
33 children with SEND attending 2 resource centres attached to primary schools in Malawi.
Observational study of children’s disabilities in relation to their interactions with onecourse.
Layachi et al.,
2023
11 neurodivergent children with ADHD, ASD & LD at Hopeview Resource Centre, Malawi.
Observational study of children’s disabilities in relation to their interactions with onecourse.
Gulliford et al.,
2021
4 children with Down Syndrome in UK mainstream primary schools
Single case experimental study to investigate learning of maths with onecourse & engagement with the learning process.
Pitchford & Lurvink, 2023
20 primary schools in two marginalized districts in Sierra Leone.
Focus groups and interviews to explore teacher and community perspectives of using onecourse with children with SEND.
Results
Pitchford et al., 2018
All children with SEND could interact with onecourse.
Child’s progress in learning maths with onecourse was associated with their attention to task and extent of disability, especially sensory & language difficulties.
Layachi et al.,
2023
Children with emotional problems (SDQ) paid high attention to task when interacting with onecourse.
Hyperactive children (SDQ) required a lot of external teacher support to interact with onecourse.
Gulliford et al.,
2021
Learning:
1-3m increase in maths scores, for 3 of the 4 cases of children with Down Syndrome.
Engagement:
Visual analysis showed 3 of the 4 cases engaged well with onecourse.
Pitchford & Lurvink, 2023
Hurdles:
Some children with physical difficulties struggled with using the tablets.
Inclusive learning:
onecourse empowered a sense of belonging and learning of maths by children with SEND.
Results
Pitchford & Lurvink, 2023
Hurdles:
Some children with physical difficulties struggled with using the tablets.
Inclusive learning:
onecourse empowered a sense of belonging and learning of maths by children with SEND.
BUT teachers & community members thought children with SEND needed to be taught in separate onecourse classes, as these children required special attention and encouragement to learn with the technology that could not be easily met in a regular class environment that included non-SEND learners.
Whilst this may conflict with inclusion education policy, creating a safe and supportive learning environment where children with SEND can engage with onecourse aligns with the right to quality education and the right to respect participation in the learning environment.
Technical Review
Conclusion