1 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

WHAT DOES A NEXT GEN COMMUNICATOR DO?

LEARNING PATHWAY TO SUCCESS

LISTENING & SPEAKING

  • TAILORS VERBAL & NON-VERBAL COMMUNICATION BASED ON THE AUDIENCE

WRITING, & DESIGNING

  • USES A VARIETY OF COMMUNICATION TOOLS TO DEVELOP EFFECTIVE MESSAGE USING ESSENTIAL REASONING & EVIDENCE.

READING

  • DETERMINE IMPORTANCE & MAKES DEEP MEANING WHEN READING AND ANALYZING DATA TO MAKE DECISIONS & TAKE ACTION.

2 of 80

EMPATHIZER

INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES

CLICK THE ICONS TO ACCESS INSTRUCTIONAL RESOURCES

3 of 80

DAILY & UNIT ASSESSMENT

LEARNING PATHWAY TO SUCCESS

HOW DO WE KNOW STUDENTS ARE GROWING?

WEEKLY & QUARTERLY SIGNALS

4 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

COMMUNICATOR PILLARS

THREE PILLARS

PEOPLE

HOW DO WE CREATE A COMMUNITY OF READERS, WRITERS, & CRITICAL THINKERS?

PLACE

WHAT SCHOOL-WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCES WILL ASSESS OUR PROGRESS?

PURPOSE

WHAT SHARED SUCCESS SIGNALS WILL MEASURE OUR PROGRESS?

  • AUTHENTIC LITERACY DRIVEN BY STUDENT CHOICE
  • ALL NEXT GEN CLASSROOMS ARE READING , WRITING & CRITICAL THINKING CLASSROOMS
  • SCHOOL WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCES 3X/ YEAR
  • QUARTERLY COMMUNITY ASSESSMENTS

  • COMMUNICATORS ARE CRITICAL THINKERS RUBRIC 6-12
  • 4Cs PROGRESSIONS
  • READING & PROCESSES

5 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

HOW DO WE CREATE A COMMUNITY OF READERS, WRITERS, & CRITICAL THINKERS?

PEOPLE

AUTHENTIC LITERACY DRIVEN BY STUDENT CHOICE

INDEPENDENT READING

STUDENTS CREATE WRITING AND ACTIVE READING WORKS OF QUALITY AND SUBSTANCE.

AT LEAST ONE READING WITH A PEN AND HAND & TEXT DEPENDENT WRITING PER WEEK

NEXT GEN STUDENTS TO WRITE AS CONTENT EXPERTS APPLYING THEIR KNOWLEDGE TO THE KINDS OF QUESTIONS AND PROBLEMS EXPERTS IN THAT FIELD TACKLE.

QUALITY WORK EXEMPLARS

READ WITH A PEN IN HAND

NEXT GEN WRITING TASK EXAMPLES

EXAMPLE 1

EXAMPLE 2

EXAMPLE 3

EXAMPLE 1

EXAMPLE 2

EXAMPLE 3

6 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

THREE PURPOSES FOR WRITING

WRITE TO LEARN

  • Think Like a Scientist Notebooks
  • Reading Responses
  • Extended Responses
  • Writer’s Notebooks
  • Entrance/ Exit Slips
  • Research Papers
  • Analysis of content, process, or texts
  • Lab Reports
  • Articles/ Editorials
  • Speeches/Podcasts
  • Critiques
  • Websites

WRITE TO DEMONSTRATE LEARNING

WRITE FOR PUBLICATION

*ADAPTED FROM KDE COMPOSITION IN THE CLASSROOM*

HOW DO WE CREATE A COMMUNITY OF READERS & WRITERS?

7 of 80

THREE MODES FOR WRITING

MODE

PURPOSE

PREPARING TO WRITE

GATHERING EVIDENCE/ NARRATIVE TECHNIQUES

DISCUSSION

DRAFTING

REVISION

*ADAPTED FROM KDE COMPOSITION IN THE CLASSROOM*

NARRATIVE

03

INFORMATIVE

02

ARGUMENT

01

Beginning in kindergarten, students are asked to communicate their opinions – a building block to writing effective arguments. There is a shift at grade 6 from composing opinion pieces to composing arguments. Argumentation (both writing and evaluating) is a critical thinking skill necessary for students to be literate citizens in a global society. (KDE)

Transition ready students must use writing to “examine and convey complex ideas clearly” and to “demonstrate understanding of the subject under investigation”. This writing is closely related to the reading of complex and varied texts as they must “integrate the information for the purposes of analysis, reflection, and research while avoiding plagiarism”. To be literate citizens, students must demonstrate the ability to synthesize information from a variety of sources in their writing. (KDE)

Narrative writing conveys experience, either real or imaginary, and uses time as its deep structure. It can be used for many purposes, such as to inform, instruct, argue, explain or entertain. Personal narrative is only one form narratives can take. There are many others. In English/language arts, students produce narratives that take the form of creative fictional stories, memoirs, anecdotes, and autobiographies. The narrative category does not include all of the possible forms of creative writing. When students enter the 8th grade, narrative writing as a stand-alone piece diminishes. The Kentucky Academic Standards (KAS) for Reading and Writing requires students in grades 8-12 to be taught to embed narrative writing into argumentative and informative/explanatory writing. (KDE)

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

LINKS & RESOURCES

8 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

WHAT SCHOOL-WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCES WILL ASSESS OUR PROGRESS?

PLACE

SCHOOL WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCES

3X/YEAR

SHARED SUCCESS SIGNALS

9 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

WHAT SCHOOL-WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCES WILL ASSESS OUR PROGRESS?

PLACE

10 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

WHAT SHARED SUCCESS SIGNALS WILL MEASURE OUR PROGRESS?

PURPOSE

  1. UTILIZED IN MULTI PARAGRAPH RESPONSES AND CAN BE CUSTOMIZED FOR ANY CONTENT AREA
  2. COMMUNICATED & UTILIZED BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER THE WRITING PROCESS
  3. DATA FROM STUDENT PERFORMANCE IS UTILIZED TO INSTRUCTION BEFORE, DURING, AND AFTER THE WRITING PROCESS

11 of 80

LEARNER

INDEPENDENT

EMPOWERED

WRITING &

DESIGNING TO SYNTHESIZE INFORMATION/ DATA

LISTENING & SPEAKING TO EVALUATE INFORMATION/ ARGUMENTS

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources to strengthen the claim, background information.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I do not use appropriate citation of my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write reasoning so people can mostly understand my points, but I lack addressing audience needs and understanding what concerns, values, and biases they may bring.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write evidence and surface level reasoning/analysis to explain my evidence to the reader.

NARRATIVE:

  • I attempt to use narrative techniques to develop experiences, events, and or characters to capture the action and convey a vivid picture of experiences/events such as: establishing points of view, dialogue, pacing, description, and/or multiple plot lines.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write insightful reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People not only understand my points, but they can tell why I chose to express myself in that way through explanations of the the evidence and claim/thesis that clarify the strengths and discuss limitations.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can skillfully organize my reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim by using: a variety of transitional phrases, words, and intentional language and creating and clarify strong relationships between reasons and evidence.
  • I can write a thought provoking concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented, leaving my audience with clear takeaways.

NARRATIVE:

  • I can skillfully use narrative techniques to develop experiences, events, and or characters to capture the action and convey a vivid picture of experiences/events such as: establishing points of view, dialogue, pacing, description, and/or multiple plot lines.

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant additional print or digital research/evidence outside of the readings provided in my writing.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write basic reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People understand my points.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write using a structure to develop reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim, including a strong concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented.

NARRATIVE:

  • I can use narrative techniques to develop experiences, events, and or characters to capture the action and convey a vivid picture of experiences/events such as: establishing points of view, dialogue, pacing, description, and/or multiple plot lines.

DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE & PURPOSEFUL MESSAGE

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • My writing does not clearly address the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • My writing lacks professional language and has multiple grammatical and spelling errors.

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can articulate my claim/thesis clearly to convey my purpose by connecting to the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • I can write using professional language , communication techniques (domain-specific vocabulary,word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose throughout the writing.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text to ensure my writing is free of major grammar mistakes..

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can addresses the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • At times, I use professional language , communication techniques (word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text resulting in minimal major grammar mistakes.

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

Resources/tools

USE & CITATION OF MULTIPLE SOURCES

Tools on citations.

REASONING OF ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

ORGANIZATION OF EVIDENCE & ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

NARRATIVE

Resources/tools

CLEAR PURPOSE & AUDIENCE AWARENESS

Resources/tools

LANGUAGE & TONE

Resources/tools

COMMUNICATORS ARE CRITICAL THINKERS

Q1: WHO AM I?

12 of 80

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant additional print or digital research/evidence outside of the readings provided in my writing.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

WRITING &

DESIGNING TO SYNTHESIZE INFORMATION/ DATA

LISTENING & SPEAKING TO EVALUATE INFORMATION/ ARGUMENTS

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources to strengthen the claim, background information.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I do not use appropriate citation of my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write reasoning so people can mostly understand my points, but I lack addressing audience needs and understanding what concerns, values, and biases they may bring.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write evidence and surface level reasoning/analysis to explain my evidence to the reader.

LEARNER

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write insightful reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People not only understand my points, but they can tell why I chose to express myself in that way through explanations of the the evidence and claim/thesis that clarify the strengths and discuss limitations.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can skillfully organize my reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim by using: a variety of transitional phrases, words, and intentional language and creating and clarify strong relationships between reasons and evidence.
  • I can write a thought provoking concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented, leaving my audience with clear takeaways.

INDEPENDENT

EMPOWERED

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write basic reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People understand my points.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write using a structure to develop reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim, including a strong concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented.

DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE & PURPOSEFUL MESSAGE

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • My writing does not clearly address the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.
  • I make minimal attempt or no attempt to include formatting, graphics, and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • My writing lacks professional language and has multiple grammatical and spelling errors.

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can articulate my claim/thesis clearly to convey my purpose by connecting to the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.
  • I can effectively include formatting, graphics, and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • I can write using professional language , communication techniques (domain-specific vocabulary,word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose throughout the writing.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text to ensure my writing is free of major grammar mistakes..

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can addresses the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.
  • I attempt to include formatting, graphics, and multimedia when useful to aiding comprehension.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • At times, I use professional language , communication techniques (word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text resulting in minimal major grammar mistakes.

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

Resources/tools

USE & CITATION OF MULTIPLE SOURCES

Tools on citations.

REASONING OF ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

ORGANIZATION OF EVIDENCE & ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

CLEAR PURPOSE & AUDIENCE AWARENESS

Resources/tools

LANGUAGE & TONE

Resources/tools

COMMUNICATORS ARE CRITICAL THINKERS

Q2: WHO ARE WE?

13 of 80

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant additional print or digital research/evidence outside of the readings provided in my writing.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

LISTENING & SPEAKING TO EVALUATE INFORMATION/ ARGUMENTS

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources to strengthen the claim, background information.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I do not use appropriate citation of my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions.

LEARNER

INDEPENDENT

EMPOWERED

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE & PURPOSEFUL MESSAGE

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • My writing does not clearly address the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • My writing lacks professional language and has multiple grammatical and spelling errors.

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can articulate my claim/thesis clearly to convey my purpose by connecting to the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • I can write using professional language , communication techniques (domain-specific vocabulary,word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose throughout the writing.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text to ensure my writing is free of major grammar mistakes..

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can addresses the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • At times, I use professional language , communication techniques (word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text resulting in minimal major grammar mistakes.

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

Resources/tools

USE & CITATION OF MULTIPLE SOURCES

Tools on citations.

CLEAR PURPOSE & AUDIENCE AWARENESS

Resources/tools

LANGUAGE & TONE

Resources/tools

COMMUNICATORS ARE CRITICAL THINKERS

Q3: WHERE ARE WE GOING?

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write reasoning so people can mostly understand my points, but I lack addressing audience needs and understanding what concerns, values, and biases they may bring.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write evidence and surface level reasoning/analysis to explain my evidence to the reader.

COUNTERARGUMENT:

  • I can address counterarguments but do not go past acknowledging other viewpoints.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write insightful reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People not only understand my points, but they can tell why I chose to express myself in that way through explanations of the the evidence and claim/thesis that clarify the strengths and discuss limitations.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can skillfully organize my reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim by using: a variety of transitional phrases, words, and intentional language and creating and clarify strong relationships between reasons and evidence.
  • I can write a thought provoking concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented, leaving my audience with clear takeaways.

COUNTERARGUMENT:

  • I can acknowledge and distinguish claim(s) from counterclaims through carefully selected evidence to compel my audience.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write basic reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People understand my points.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write using a structure to develop reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim, including a strong concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented.

COUNTERARGUMENT:

  • I can refute opposing claims through personal reasoning and connections but lack textual evidence to counter.

REASONING OF ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

ORGANIZATION OF EVIDENCE & ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

COUNTER-

ARGUMENT

Resources/tools

WRITING &

DESIGNING TO SYNTHESIZE INFORMATION/ DATA

14 of 80

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant additional print or digital research/evidence outside of the readings provided in my writing.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

LISTENING & SPEAKING TO EVALUATE INFORMATION/ ARGUMENTS

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources to strengthen the claim, background information.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I do not use appropriate citation of my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions.

LEARNER

INDEPENDENT

EMPOWERED

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

  • I can synthesize (pull together) ideas from multiple sources and perspectives to strengthen the claim/thesis by providing relevant background information and purpose.

CITATION & MULTIPLE SOURCES

  • I can use relevant multiple print or digital resources but only the readings provided as evidence by my works.
  • I can cite my evidence by paraphrasing details, examples, ideas, data, and conclusions using MLA or APA format.

DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE & PURPOSEFUL MESSAGE

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • My writing does not clearly address the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • My writing lacks professional language and has multiple grammatical and spelling errors.

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can articulate my claim/thesis clearly to convey my purpose by connecting to the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • I can write using professional language , communication techniques (domain-specific vocabulary,word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose throughout the writing.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text to ensure my writing is free of major grammar mistakes..

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE

  • I can addresses the prompt/question supported by essential textual based evidence, facts, & research from a credible source.

LANGUAGE & TONE

  • At times, I use professional language , communication techniques (word choice, symbols, etc.), and tone to connect the audience to my purpose.
  • I can locate and correct errors in a text resulting in minimal major grammar mistakes.

EVALUATING & SYNTHESIZING EVIDENCE

Resources/tools

USE & CITATION OF MULTIPLE SOURCES

Tools on citations.

CLEAR PURPOSE & AUDIENCE AWARENESS

Resources/tools

LANGUAGE & TONE

Resources/tools

COMMUNICATORS ARE CRITICAL THINKERS

WHAT MAKES AN

EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY?

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write reasoning so people can mostly understand my points, but I lack addressing audience needs and understanding what concerns, values, and biases they may bring.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write evidence and surface level reasoning/analysis to explain my evidence to the reader.

COUNTERARGUMENT:

  • I can address counterarguments but do not go past acknowledging other viewpoints.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write insightful reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People not only understand my points, but they can tell why I chose to express myself in that way through explanations of the the evidence and claim/thesis that clarify the strengths and discuss limitations.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can skillfully organize my reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim by using: a variety of transitional phrases, words, and intentional language and creating and clarify strong relationships between reasons and evidence.
  • I can write a thought provoking concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented, leaving my audience with clear takeaways.

COUNTERARGUMENT:

  • I can acknowledge and distinguish claim(s) from counterclaims through carefully selected evidence to compel my audience.

REASONING & ANALYSIS

  • I can write basic reasoning in my analysis that anticipates the audience knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases. People understand my points.

ORGANIZATION

  • I can write using a structure to develop reasons and evidence to strengthen my claim, including a strong concluding statement or section that clearly solidifies the argument presented.

COUNTERARGUMENT:

  • I can refute opposing claims through personal reasoning and connections but lack textual evidence to counter.

REASONING OF ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

ORGANIZATION OF EVIDENCE & ANALYSIS

Resources/tools

COUNTER-

ARGUMENT

Resources/tools

WRITING &

DESIGNING TO SYNTHESIZE INFORMATION/ DATA

Q4:

15 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

WHAT DOES IT LOOK LIKE IN A CLASSROOM?

READING, WRITING, & DESIGNING

Common language framing SIGNALS OF SUCCESS and communication scaffolds such as the Toulmin Method (you may see this in NCS as MEAL/MODL or CERCA) are displayed clearly for students to gauge, utilize, and speak to progress towards success.

Students can be seen reading independently with student selected books as well as reading with a pen in hand through nonfiction or fiction pieces that support the learning design.

Outside the classroom, you can see students meeting with public officials, nonprofits, and other community members,where students showcase their findings and recommendations on an issue they’ve researched through written and verbal communication.

Student Showcases (Multimedia portfolios of student work) can are used to communicate learning artifacts.

ALL NEXT GEN CLASSROOMS ARE READING & WRITING CLASSROOMS

To see a teacher scaffolding close reading with students in action, Click HERE.

For a blog-post about note-taking strategies, Click HERE.

Writing is revising. Students should be consistently revising and improving their work throughout the process. Students will need to know how to revise their work. This will need to be modeled.

Peer revision and feedback can be a great tool to build power skills towards effective communication. Students will need models, examples, and clear criteria for effective peer feedback and application of revision feedback.

Active or Close reading scaffolds. Students read with a pen in hand. Students must be taught ways to actively engage with a reading, refer back to the text to support a claim, and analyze what they are reading.

Note-taking: Listening as a part of communication is the ability to synthesize and transfer ideas. Utilize graphic organizers, Cornell Notes, Frayer Models, Visual Notetaking, and chunk notes with collaboration/discussion.

16 of 80

BEFORE WRITING/ READING

DURING WRITING/ READING

AFTER WRITING/ READING

TEACHERS DO:

SO STUDENTS CAN:

  • Provide purpose & context for the reading/writing.
  • Read the prompt & think about what the prompt is asking them to do
  • Connect the reading/writing to the larger Community Question (EQ).
  • Connect to larger themes such as culture, politics, environment, technology, etc.
  • Break down criteria for successful writing or reading (reading w/ pen in hand) for students prior to beginning.
  • Gain awareness of how they will be evaluated and what strategies will help to be successful
  • Provide embedded or supplemental checklists for process.
  • Self assess their progress during the reading/writing process.

TEACHERS DO:

SO STUDENTS CAN:

  • Circulate to gauge needed supports and high quality work assurance.
  • Produce high quality work with needed supports.
  • Chunk the reading/writing to build in scaffolds, discussion, and critical thinking.
  • Deepen their awareness and comprehension of the reading/writing at hand.
  • Build in peer and self assessment points.
  • Identify important next steps to improve and discuss quality work.
  • If the writing is multiple paragraphs, consider chunking and scaffolding across multiple days.
  • Have multiple entry points into the writing.

TEACHERS DO:

SO STUDENTS CAN:

  • Provide examples, protocols, and norms for self and peer assessment.
  • Engage in high quality discussions about quality work and identify next steps for improvement.
  • Provide revision opportunities of work to only accept quality work and embrace the process of growth.
  • Improve work and apply feedback for revision.

THE READING/WRITING PROCESS

ADAPTED FROM KDE’S WRITER’S REFERENCE SHEET

17 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

HOW DO I TEACH STUDENTS TO READ WITH A PEN IN HAND?

READING WITH A PEN IN HAND

THE WHY

BEHIND THE STRATEGY

Close reading or active reading structures are essential to creating a culture of focus and purposeful reading. When planning instruction around reading, As Love & Literacy states, students can use annotations to better understand texts. Teachers can use them to better understand students. Instead of simply saying “read this Chapter”, we must allow students to SEE effective interactive reading strategies to dig deeply into complex texts, we must NAME the strategy to give identity to the process and create a common language (Read with a Pen in Hand, SMART Reading, etc). Finally, students need practice to DO these interactive reading strategies often. To create readers beyond middle school and high school, we must now teach them the process so when they enter into our COMMUNITY as professionals, they can do so as confident COMMUNICATORS.

The Silk Road was a network of trade routes, formally established during the Han Dynasty of China, which linked the regions of the ancient world in commerce,

As the Silk Road was not a single thoroughfare from east to west, the term 'Silk Routes’ has become increasingly favored by historians, though 'Silk Road’ is the more common and recognized name. Both terms for this network of roads were coined by the German geographer and traveler, Ferdinand von Richthofen, in 1877 CE, who designated them 'Seidenstrasse’ (silk road) or 'Seidenstrassen’ (silk routes). The network was used regularly from 130 BCE, when the Han officially opened trade with the west, to 1453 CE, when the Ottoman Empire boycotted trade with the west and closed the routes.

The history of the Silk Road pre-dates the Han Dynasty in practice, however, as the Persian Royal Road, which would come to serve as one of the main arteries of the Silk Road, was established during the Achaemenid Empire (500-330 BCE). The Persian Royal Road ran from Susa, in north Persia (modern day Iran) to the Mediterranean Sea in Asia Minor (modern day Turkey) and featured postal stations along the route with fresh horses for envoys to quickly deliver messages throughout the empire. Herodotus, writing of the speed and efficiency of the Persian messengers, stated that “There is nothing in the world that travels faster than these Persian couriers. Neither snow, nor rain, nor heat, nor darkness of night prevents these couriers from completing their designated stages with utmost speed" (these lines, from his Histories, 8.98, would centuries later form the creed of the United States of America’s post office). The Persians maintained the Royal Road carefully and, in time, expanded it through smaller side roads. These paths eventually crossed down into the Indian sub-continent, across Mesopotamia, and over into Egypt.

FOCUS EQ:HOW DOES THE WORLD WORK TOGETHER TO BUILD SOCIETY AS WE KNOW IT?

AUTHOR’S PURPOSE: TO INFORM THE AUDIENCE OF THE SILK ROAD AND IT’S IMPACT ON SOCIETY AS WE KNOW IT.

PURPOSE: START WITH THE END IN MIND: What do you want students to be able to COMMUNICATE about the text? What is the author’s purpose?

ASSESSMENT:What tasks or questions will require students to closely read the text and utilize evidence to be able to answer it? To see if students get it, see if they can write about it. Write first. Talk second.

EXIT TICKET: USING MEAL AS A SCAFFOLD, ANSWER THE FOLLOWING QUESTION: IN WHAT WAYS DID THE SILK ROAD CONNECT PEOPLE TO BUILD SOCIETY 130 B.C.E.-1400 C.E.?

Interact with the text in the margins by answering the questions provided.

After reading the first sentence, in your own words, briefly summarize the purpose of the Silk Road.

Predict: Think back to the brief clip we watched during our Do Now. What impact do you think this boycott had on the West?

How might this have influenced society at the time socially, culturally, economically, or politically?

ASSESSMENT:Intentional questioning throughout the reading builds habit and stamina for metacognition and text interaction. This also provides you as teacher opportunities to model how you would respond, see what types of responses your students are having to gauge comprehension, and see opportunities to extend or reteach the learning. By circulating while students are reading with a pen in hand, you can quickly collect data to inform your instruction.

SCAFFOLDING:

Consider-What background knowledge or content (thematic, historical, literary) do students need before reading the text? Interactive Direct Instruction, Do Nows, Hooks, etc. can be utilized to build necessary background knowledge for comprehension.

CLICK HERE TO ACCESS CLOSE/ ACTIVE READING STRUCTURE EXAMPLES

CLICK HERE TO ACCESS CLOSE/ ACTIVE READING STRUCTURE EXAMPLES

18 of 80

19 of 80

20 of 80

21 of 80

22 of 80

Main idea

Supporting Detail 1

Supporting Detail 2

Supporting Detail 3

23 of 80

24 of 80

Supporting Detail

Supporting Detail

Supporting Detail

Supporting Detail

MAIN IDEA

25 of 80

TIPS & EXAMPLES

26 of 80

“We learn to read well by reading a lot for meaning: to analyze or support arguments, to arrive at our own opinions as we make inferences or attempt to solve problems.”

-SCHMOKER

27 of 80

“Teacher! I have all this STUFF highlighted/ underlined, so what do I do with it?”

The annotations that you have made now must be sifted through so that you can find the strongest ones to use as evidence for your writing.

How do you do that?

28 of 80

29 of 80

30 of 80

Diamond 9 Directions:

In this strategy, you will rank the nine cards. At the top, place the card that you think has the most essential piece of evidence to support your claim. Continue ranking from most important to least important as you move down the diamond.

MOST ESSENTIAL

LEAST ESSENTIAL

31 of 80

32 of 80

DEVELOPING AN EFFECTIVE & PURPOSEFUL MESSAGE

RARELY

DEVELOPING A COMMUNITY OF CRITICAL THINKERS

PURPOSEFUL READING & DISCUSSION AS EMPOWERED COMMUNICATORS

LIVING RESOURCES

DISCUSSION OF PRACTICE

EMPOWERED PRACTICES

READ COMPLEX TEXT & DISCUSS WITH PURPOSE

BEFORE:

  • Texts are selected with content and language rich non-fiction (60%) and literary works (40%) with a clear purpose for reading including analytic connections to UNIVERSAL THEMES.
  • INDEPENDENT READING:Students not only independently choose and read a variety of texts but also reflect, write, and discuss their independent reading experiences, sharing insights with the peers.

DURING:

  • Students utilize READ WITH A PEN IN HAND annotation methods to include pre-planned annotation questions and intentional PURPOSE aligned interaction with the text. POWERFUL MODELS are used during the process.
  • Students utilize note-taking structures to organize and synthesize information when reading, listening, or engaging in media.

AFTER:

  • Students engage in discussion before, during, and after reading/writing centered on topics that are debatable and provoke high levels of students interest and require compelling textual evidence to be cited when making meaning and connecting to UNIVERSAL THEMES.

WRITING AS EMPOWERED COMMUNICATORS

WRITING IS A PROCESS

BEFORE:

  • Students utilize intentionally crafted pre writing structures requiring compelling evidence from multiple sources of information and connections to UNIVERSAL THEMES prior to writing.

DURING:

  • Students are exposed to, analyze, and incorporate elements of powerful models of writing to understand effective techniques including the MEAL Paragraph.

AFTER:

  • Students demonstrate high level of awareness of indicators for high quality writing with the Communicators are Critical Thinkers Success Criteria, provide constructive feedback, ask probing questions, and to evaluate arguments and effectiveness of messaging.

NEARLY EVERYDAY

RARELY

WEEKLY

NEARLY EVERYDAY

RARELY

WEEKLY

MY CLASSROOM & SIGNALING ASSESSMENTS:

MY CLASSROOM & SIGNALING ASSESSMENTS:

33 of 80

EMPOWERED

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS & CITIZENS

READ WITH

PURPOSE

SPEAK, LISTEN, & DISCUSS WITH PURPOSE

WRITE WITH PURPOSE

“We learn to read well by reading a lot for meaning: to analyze or support arguments, to arrive at our own opinions as we make inferences or attempt to solve problems.”

-SCHMOKER

PEN IN HAND WITH

UNIVERSAL THEMES

COMMUNICATING & THINKING CRITICAL WITH UNIVERSAL THEMES

SCIENTIFIC ADVANCEMENT & TECHNOLOGY

POWER, POLITICS, AND THE PURSUIT OF GOOD V. EVIL

THE NATURE OF HUMAN CONFLICT

INDIVIDUALISM & COMMUNITY

NATURE VS. NURTURE

CHANGE: PROGRESS VS. DESTRUCTION

WE COMMUNICATE WITH CRITICAL THINKING WHEN WE”

  • Intentionally prepare purposeful “read with pen in hand” questions for annotation.
  • Craft discussion questions framed for textual evidence and larger universal themes in order to make deep meaning.
  • Engage in writing as teachers and students with models and questions to dive deeply into evidence and universal themes.

DISCUSSION &

DEBATES

COMMUNICATE AS

CONTENT EXPERTS

POWERFUL

MODELS

34 of 80

35 of 80

QUESTIONING & DISCUSSION

TOTAL PARTICIPATION

QUESTIONING & DISCUSSION

A NEXT GEN classroom is one that is lively with questioning and discussion. When examining what types of questions to utilize with students, the NEXT GEN Professional should reflect on where students are in the process of learning. Are new concepts being presented? Is the focus on deepening the understanding of foundation knowledge?

A FEW QUESTIONING STRATEGIES:

TEACH LIKE A CHAMPION 34: COLD CALL

Cold Call is the pedagogy strategy of calling on students regardless if they have their hands raised and can be especially effective in creating an environment in which students know they will be responsible for the learning. Used correctly, COLD CALL should be positive, predictable, universal, and intentional. Cold Call increases voice equity and shared ownership amongst students, creates a culture of engagement, attention, and warm accountability, checks for understanding, and helps to pace out the lesson.

To see this strategy in action CLICK HERE.

TEACH LIKE A CHAMPION TECHNIQUE 33: WAIT TIME

Wait time if the practice of inserting a short amount of waiting before taking an answer. This allows for more hands to go up, and allows more thinking time to support better more rigorous answers. When engaging in Wait time, consider narrating hands (Two, hands, three hands. Take your time but push yourself to share.”. Prompt thinking skills (“I’m seeing people thinking deeply and jotting down thoughts. I’ll give everyone a few more seconds to do that.”). Make your wait time transparent (“Let’s take 30 seconds….)

TO LEARN MORE ABOUT STRUCTURES FOR

CLASSROOM DISCUSSION CLICK HERE.

“One of the things that we tend to fall back on as teachers is the traditional Q&A, where we shoot out a question, and basically whoever raises their hand gets to answer the question. Total Participation Techniques is changes that,” There are instances when you can simply call on students, but not for higher-level thinking prompts that require more time to process. “The whole idea behind The Ripple is that I am no longer just calling on a kid. When the question is something that I want every student to show me evidence that they understand, then calling on someone is not the first thing I do. I’m going to want to get evidence from every individual student, and then I’m going to let them process it together quickly, and then call on them. “When you call on a student absent of total participation strategies,, everyone else is off the hook. It’s really got to be a mindset of, ‘I want evidence that every student is learning. How am I going to do that?’ When it’s important enough for everyone to learn, you ought to make sure that every single student is going to give you that evidence.” (Persida)

Click the image above for a closer look at Total Participation Strategies

ALL STUDENTS READING, WRITING, THINKING, SPEAKING, EVERYDAY.

CLICK THE IMAGE TO THE LEFT TO ACCESS MORE TIPS & STRATEGIES ABOUT QUESTIONING.

36 of 80

Our brains are wired for speech and visual design. In their everyday lives, our NEXT GENERATION students utilize speech and visual design as the primary way they create and communicate meaning. A feature of good discussions and VERBAL COMMUNICATION in the classroom setting is high student engagement, as indicated by attentive listening and eagerness to contribute. Good classrooms discussions contain students discussion claims, warrants, and conclusions related to a topic or question. Just like in reading verbal and visual communication require background knowledge and purposeful direction. To have students who can successfully utilizer VERBAL & VISUAL COMMUNICATION, we must build habits and principles of discussion and visual communication.

HABITS OF VERBAL COMMUNICATION FOR NEXT GEN LEARNERS

The following habits of VERBAL COMMUNICATION can be utilized in classroom discussion, discourse, or in other professional settings.

  • Project- Speak audibly and make eye contact with all stakeholders.
  • Share- Speak in turn and invite others to engage.
  • Speak- Speak as an informed COMMUNICATOR. Use names of your audience. Utilize complete sentences. Address questions succinctly.
  • Listen- Listen as an COMMUNITY member. Show mutual respect and awareness of multiple perspectives through making eye contact, nodding, and focusing on the speaker.
  • Take Notes- Take Notes as an active COMMUNICATOR. Write down/summarize ke information, evaluate the information, annotate the information to dig deeply.
  • Build- Build on the discussion by agreeing, disagreeing, or examining the perspectives in a different way

HABITS OF VERBAL STAGE SETTING FOR NEXT GEN PROFESSIONALS

During classroom discussions and discourse, the NEXT GEN Professional plays a crucial role in engaging, livening, and digging deeper for student understanding. Here are a few key steps:

  • Activate-Activate knowledge in the COMMUNICATION ( “I’d like to connect Larry’s interpretation of the article to what we read about…)
  • Revoice- Capture what a student is saying “If I understand you correctly….)
  • Press for Reasoning- Prompt students to use evidence. A claim without evidence is just an opinion.
  • Problematize- Name the contradiction, or introduce a counterclaim
  • Sophisticate- Prompt students to dive deeper into the text or apply within a next context (Let’s turn to page….Does it support…)
  • Stamp- Stamp the learning at the end of the discussion. (Using cold call, ask students to voice key points of the discourse, then ask them to retrieve through connecting it to previous learning.)

Think Pair Share is a Total Participation Strategy used to help students to think individually about a topic or answer to a question, teach them to share ideas with classmates, build VERBAL COMMUNICATION skills, and focuses attention to engage students in comprehending the topic at hand.T- (Think)- Ask a questions about the text or topic. Students have a timed period to “think” about what they know and have learned. This may include them referring back to a text or previous learning.P- (Pair)- Each student should be paired or in a small group with other students.S- (Share)- Students will VERBALLY COMMUNICATE their thinking with their partner or small group. Teachers can expand sharing to the classroom after the pair and small group discuss.

To watch the Total Participation Strategy, Gallery Walk, in action, click on the video to the right. You can use Gallery Walk in the following ways:

  • After reading a text to discuss ideas, themes, and characters
  • After completing a lab to discuss findings and implications
  • To examine historical documents or images
  • Before introducing a new topic to determine students’ prior knowledge
  • After students have created a poster or any other type of display project, or even before they submit it for a grade, use I Like, I Wonder, Next Steps (see below)
  • To solve a math problem collaboratively
  • To generate ideas or pre-writes

SETTING THE STAGE

THINK PAIR SHARE & GALLERY WALK

THINK PAIR SHARE

GALLERY WALK

turn

37 of 80

38 of 80

Before You Start a Discussion

To create safe environments where students feel comfortable participating in discussions, have students co-create community expectations and agreements about behavior when participating in discussions.

This may include, but is not limited to, creating classroom contracts for all members of the classroom community and/or developing norms for discussions.

Example Norms

  • Allow everyone the chance to speak.
  • Do not interrupt or engage in private conversations while others are speaking.
  • Keep confidential any personal information that comes up in the conversation.
  • Listen carefully and respectfully, without interrupting.
  • Show respectful listening by facing and looking at the speaker, making eye contact, staying quiet, nodding, etc. Be aware that tone and body language are powerful communicators.
  • Commit to learning, not debating.
  • Challenge or criticize ideas, not individuals.
  • Avoid blame, speculation and inflammatory language.
  • Be careful about putting other participants on the spot. Do not demand that others speak for a group that they are perceived to represent.
  • Learn to be comfortable with silences. Silence doesn’t always mean there is nothing left to say–it might mean peers are processing information.

38

39 of 80

40 of 80

41 of 80

42 of 80

43 of 80

43

Give Students Sentence Stems or Roles in the Discussion

Sentence stems and roles give students guidelines for discussions. This can build confidence and comfort around speaking.

Click for templates!

44 of 80

SENTENCE STEMS

FOR DISCUSSION

45 of 80

46 of 80

47 of 80

48 of 80

RED LIGHTS, YELLOW LIGHTS, GREEN LIGHTS

WHAT MADE YOU STOP

IN YOUR TRACKS?

WHAT DO YOU QUESTION FOR VALIDITY? CONNECTIONS? ETC?

WHAT DO YOU AGREE WITH?

49 of 80

SEE THINK WE ME

50 of 80

“Adolescents will read and write more than at any other time in human history . They will need advanced levels of literacy to perform their jobs, run their households, act as citizens, and conduct personal lives.” -Richard Vacca

51 of 80

“We learn to read well by reading a lot for meaning: to analyze or support arguments, to arrive at our own opinions as we make inferences or attempt to solve problems.”

-SCHMOKER

PURPOSEFUL READING WITH PEN IN HAND

6-12 READING & WRITING PROCESS

PURPOSE & BENEFITS

DRIVEN QUESTIONS,

SOURCES & WRITING

RICH & COMPLEX TOPICS/TEXTS/SOURCES ARE SELECTED IN ALIGNMENT WITH STANDARDS OF SUCCESS

I DO, WE DO,

YOU DO SIGNALING

EMBED DISCUSSION

& DEBATE

INDEPENDENT PRACTICE

MODELING & WRITING

I DO, WE DO,

YOU DO SIGNALING

WRITING IS A PROCESS

MODEL & CLARIFY CRITERIA FOR SUCCESS

SELF/PEER ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK & REVISIONS

STUDENTS WRITE AS CONTENT EXPERTS, APPLYING THEIR KNOWLEDGE TO MAKE MEANING, ANALYZE, & MAKE DECISIONS

52 of 80

53 of 80

SILENT GRAFFITI PROTOCOL

  1. WHILE ON LEVEL 0, GET INTO YOUR SMALL GROUPS & GRAB A WRITING UTENSIL OR MARKER (1 MIN)

2. REMAINING ON LEVEL 0, WRITE “GRAFFITI” ON THE RUBRIC TO ADDRESS THESE QUESTIONS (5 MIN):

-WHAT ARE THE MAIN DIFFERENCES BETWEEN INDEPENDENT & EMPOWERED LEVELS ON THE RUBRIC?

-WHAT IS MEANT BY ESSENTIAL EVIDENCE?

-WHAT WORDS OR SYMBOLS COME TO MIND WHEN YOU

-THINK ABOUT WRITING TO FIT THE AUDIENCE NEEDS?

3. ON LEVEL 1, DISCUSS THE QUESTIONS WITH YOUR SMALL GROUP BEFORE WE DISCUSS WHOLE CLASS. (3 MIN)

54 of 80

RUBRIC & EXAMPLE WRITING SCORING PROTOCOL

  • WHILE ON LEVEL 0, GET INTO YOUR SMALL GROUPS & GRAB A WRITING UTENSIL (1 MIN)

2. ON LEVEL 0, READ THE 3 WRITING EXAMPLES POSTED ON GOOGLE CLASSROOM. AS YOU READ INDEPENDENTLY, COMPARE THE WRITING TO THE RUBRIC.

3. ON LEVEL 1, DISCUSS WITH YOUR GROUP HOW YOU ALL WOULD RATE THE WRITING EXAMPLE (LEARNER, INDEPENDENT, & EMPOWERED). BE PREPARED TO SHARE WHY AS WE REVIEW TOGETHER WHOLE CLASS.

55 of 80

BETTER TOGETHER PROTOCOL

(INSERT LIVE WRITING MODEL-TEACHER SCRIPTS EXAMPLE PARAGRAPH IN REAL TIME)

LOOKING AT MY EXAMPLE PARAGRAPH, IF I WANT TO PUSH MY WRITING TO THE EMPOWERED LEVEL, WHAT MIGHT NEED TO BE EDITED? (EVIDENCE, ANALYSIS, LANGUAGE, AUDIENCE)

56 of 80

BUT, BECAUSE, SO

57 of 80

CLICK ON THE ICON FOR PRINTABLE POSTERS OF TRANSITION WORDS)

58 of 80

NAME: Example DATE:

Who: General George Washington

What: Crossed Delaware river with troops

When: during the AMerican Revolutionary War

Why: Washington hoped to surprise Hessian forces celebrating Christmas

Summary Sentence:

During the American Revolution, General George Washington crossed the Delaware River with his troops because he hoped to surprise the Hessian Forces who were celebrating Christmas.

A Summary Sentence with Quoted Textual Evidence:

During the American Revolution, General George Washington crossed the Delaware River with his troops because he hoped to surprise the Hessian Forces who were celebrating Christmas. As stated in Washington's own words, "It is with the utmost Importance that the Enemy should not know our real Design" (Washington's Letters, December 25, 1776).

59 of 80

EXAMPLE WRITER’S CHECKLIST FOR SUCCESS

ADAPTED FROM KDE’S WRITER’S REFERENCE SHEET

PURPOSE & AUDIENCE AWARENESS:

  • Read the prompt
  • Think about what the prompt is asking you to do.
  • Identify who your intended audience is for this prompt.
  • Utilize Pen in Hand strategies while you read the provided text set (articles, pictures, charts, tables, maps, graphs).
  • Think about key issues and evidences in the texts that will help you fulfill the purpose of writing your argument.

PRE-WRITING & AUDIENCE AWARENESS:

  • Anticipate your audience’s needs: What word choice, tone, and viewpoints might they bring?
  • Identify your claim to address the prompt and the audience’s needs.
  • Based on your annotation of the text, identify the evidence you will utilize to support your claim.
  • To provide analysis of the evidence, think about related personal knowledge/experiences/examples and or connections to larger themes such as culture, politics, education, technology, etc to support your argument and evidence.
  • Consider your audience. Think of how you will counter/refute opposing claims in your counterargument.
  • Use a pre-writing technique (brainstorming, webbing, drawing, outlining) to organize your ideas for the introduction, body paragraphs and conclusion of your essay. (Ideally provided by the teacher in scaffolding experiences)

DRAFTING:

  • Using your scaffolds (such as MEAL, funnel introduction, conclusion etc) begin construction your paragraphs.
  • When writing your argument did you…
    • Introduce your claim(s) and establish significance of the claim(s)
    • Acknowledge and distinguish the claim(s) from counterclaims (alternate or opposing claims)
    • Refute/counter opposing claims
    • Anticipate the audience’s knowledge and concerns
    • Provide relevant background information and quoted textual evidence from the texts provided (using at least 2 of the provided sources)
    • Maintain a clear focus on the claim(s)
    • Logically sequence and organize claim(s), counterclaims, reasons and evidence
    • Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant evidence (facts, details, direct/indirect quotes and examples) using at least 2 of the provided sources
    • Use transitional words, phrases and clauses to create cohesion and clarify the relationship among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons and evidence
    • Provide a conclusion that supports the argument presented
    • Maintain formal writing style and tone?

REVIEW/REVISE

  • Reread your writing to correct any errors that interfere with your ability to communicate your argument
  • Utilize spell/grammar check.
  • Fix errors identified with spell/grammar check.
  • Provide citation for quoted textual evidence.

Due to the fact that self-driving cars have to be programmed to handle every situation in the same fashion, they can be hazardous to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. According to a study performed by the Toulouse School of Economics, autonomous vehicles will be programmed on how to handle an impossible situation: do you save the driver or pedestrians if there is a choice where one option must be chosen? The results to this study showed that 75% of Americans supported saving the pedestrian when more than one life was on the line. However, that number decreased to 25% when it was down to the driver or one pedestrian being killed. Unfortunately for those who may be faced with this algorithm as a driver or passenger, a computer cannot be conditional in the same way a human can. The vehicle will be programmed to make the same decision, regardless of the number of pedestrians, or the nature of those pedestrians - a group of drug dealers would be saved just as assuredly as a group of school children. While this was not touched on by the Toulouse study, it seems likely that drivers would feel much differently about sacrificing themselves for the drug dealers than they would for the school children. It is for this reason that autonomous vehicles are detrimental to our society. Decisions such as these require a human element that cannot be replicated through artificial intelligence or advanced sensors and cameras. Furthermore, if the car is not programmed to save the driver, what benefit does it have over a human-driven car which behaves in the same manner?

Meaning

Rework 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT Gen

Development

Rework 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT Gen

Organization

Rework 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT Gen

M- Introduce the main idea that you want to focus on.

E-Use EVIDENCE�from the text to support your argument–�

Put in “quotations” if from a text.�

A- ANALYSIS�What does this evidence suggest? Explain the relevance of the evidence.

L LINK Summarize the paragraph and make connections. If composing a multiple paragraph response, link one paragraph to the next to create a cohesive message.

Reminders

  • Transitional Language Textual Evidence Used Quotations Self-Assess

FOCUS EQ:How does Asimov’s stance on wrongness relate to our current society?.

EMBEDDED WRITING MODEL

60 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

WHAT STRUCTURES HELP STUDENTS WRITE A PURPOSEFUL & EFFECTIVE MESSAGE?

WRITING USING CERCA (6-8)

THE WHY

BEHIND THE STRATEGY

Writing and reading go hand in hand. In partnership with purposeful reading comes opportunities to engage in text dependent writing tasks. Writing too needs structures with common language. CERCA provides that common language and writing scaffold for our NCS Middle School COMMUNICATORS to build capacity and stamina to make claims, utilize essential text-dependent evidence, dig into counterclaims, and examine audience. The CERCA writing approach can be used for argumentative, informational, or narrative writing.

61 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

WHAT STRUCTURES HELP STUDENTS WRITE A PURPOSEFUL & EFFECTIVE MESSAGE?

WRITING USING MEAL (9-12)

THE WHY

BEHIND THE STRATEGY

High school writing takes the CERCA approach to deepen and extend the writing into a multiple paragraph and longer form writing with MEAL writing. MEAL writing requires students create meaning, utilize organization, fully develop ideas through evidence and analysis, and link paragraphs through themes and through story-lines to craft their writing, all while using professional and appropriate language for their audience.

Due to the fact that self-driving cars have to be programmed to handle every situation in the same fashion, they can be hazardous to drivers, passengers, and pedestrians. According to a study performed by the Toulouse School of Economics, autonomous vehicles will be programmed on how to handle an impossible situation: do you save the driver or pedestrians if there is a choice where one option must be chosen? The results to this study showed that 75% of Americans supported saving the pedestrian when more than one life was on the line. However, that number decreased to 25% when it was down to the driver or one pedestrian being killed. Unfortunately for those who may be faced with this algorithm as a driver or passenger, a computer cannot be conditional in the same way a human can. The vehicle will be programmed to make the same decision, regardless of the number of pedestrians, or the nature of those pedestrians - a group of drug dealers would be saved just as assuredly as a group of school children. While this was not touched on by the Toulouse study, it seems likely that drivers would feel much differently about sacrificing themselves for the drug dealers than they would for the school children. It is for this reason that autonomous vehicles are detrimental to our society. Decisions such as these require a human element that cannot be replicated through artificial intelligence or advanced sensors and cameras. Furthermore, if the car is not programmed to save the driver, what benefit does it have over a human-driven car which behaves in the same manner?

Meaning

Rework 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT Gen

Development

Rework 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT Gen

Organization

Rework 1 2 3 4 5 NEXT Gen

M- Introduce the main idea that you want to focus on.

E-Use EVIDENCE�from the text to support your argument–�

Put in “quotations” if from a text.�

A- ANALYSIS�What does this evidence suggest? Explain the relevance of the evidence.

L LINK Summarize the paragraph and make connections. If composing a multiple paragraph response, link one paragraph to the next to create a cohesive message.

Reminders

  • Transitional Language Textual Evidence Used Quotations Self-Assess

FOCUS EQ:How does Asimov’s stance on wrongness relate to our current society?.

62 of 80

63 of 80

X – Explain the thesis again.

Y – State WHY the audience should care.

Z – Zing readers with a lasting thought.

CONCLUSION PARAGRAPH ACRONYM

A: ATTENTION GETTER / HOOK

B: BRIDGE / BACKGROUND

C: CLAIM / THESIS

INTRODUCTION PARAGRAPH ACRONYM

64 of 80

What is a hook?

→ A hook is an opening statement (usually the first sentence of an essay) with the goal of grabbing the reader’s attention so that they want to read on.

→ The hook should be related to the overall topic of the paper.

Types of hooks:

→ Questions

→ Quotes

→ Statistics

→ Anecdotes

65 of 80

A Simple Formula for ALL Introductions:

  • HOOK the READER
  • CONNECT the Hook to your claim statement using Background Knowledge!!!
    • Why is your topic important to the reader?
  • Claim Statement

Your claim should include 3 pieces of information or reasons.

66 of 80

General:_____________________________________

Self-Assess

Peer-Assess

Student Notes:List key words, phrases, ideas, & questions.

Scan the notes for important vocabulary. Choose

3 to write down.

1)

2)

3)

Make a Purpose: What is our purpose for taking notes?

What is marketing?

Actively Read: Underline the 3 most important words that will allow you to synthesize the main ideas.

67 of 80

Recall Evidence to Support the Main Ideas: Use these 3 pieces of evidence from your notes that you will use to support your conclusion on the message the author was trying to convey in the Thinking Critically Portion of your SMART Notes

1.

2.

3.

Think Critically:

68 of 80

69 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

PEER FEEDBACK PROTOCOL EXAMPLES (6-12)

Peer Feedback - Silent Conversation Protocol

This is a simple but powerful peer feedback protocol that can be tailored to a variety of needs and ages.

  1. Clarify/review criteria for the feedback session (learning target[s], traits, rubric criteria, specific class needs, etc.).
  2. All participants place drafts on desks/in individual spaces, next to criteria-specific feedback forms (these may include specific questions crafted by participants) or with criteria posted in one common space visible to all critique participants.
  3. Participants move to a piece of work other than their own—the rotation may be predetermined by the critique leader/teacher or participants may go where they choose to begin the session.
  4. One minute (adapt time as fits the draft—more time for longer pieces of work) of silent reading/draft review, with particular attention to critique session criteria or individual questions on feedback forms, if applicable.
  5. Written Feedback: reviewers give feedback in writing on the draft—this may be a simple stars/stairs or praise/polish or bless/press, etc., or may be specifically tailored to participants’ questions or the criteria identified for the critique session.
  6. Rotate: participants move to a new draft for review.
  7. Repeat steps 3-5 or 6, as suits the time and scope of the critique session.
  8. Participants return to their own drafts, review the feedback and set one specific goal for improvement.
  9. Optional debrief: what worked, what were the challenges, and what feedback did you find most useful for moving your work forward?

Variation: Peer reviewers rotate with sticky notes and simply offer stars/stairs or bless/press feedback on other pieces of work.

Peer Critique Protocol

This protocol is a student friendly version of the Critical Friends Protocol revised for students to use with one another.

Non-Negotiables

  1. Be Kind: Always treat others with dignity and respect. This means we never use words that are hurtful, including sarcasm.
  2. Be Specific: Focus on particular strengths and weaknesses, rather than making general comments like “It’s good” or “I like it.” Provide insight into why it is good or what, specifically, you like about it.
  3. Be Helpful: The goal is to positively contribute to the individual or the group, not to simply be heard. Echoing the thoughts of others or cleverly pointing out details that are irrelevant wastes time.
  4. Participate: Peer critique is a process to support each other, and your feedback is valued!

Guidelines

  1. Have the author/designer explain his/her work and explain exactly what type of critique would be helpful (in other words, what questions does s/he have or what is s/he confused about that s/he would appreciate help with).
  2. The critique audience should begin comments by focusing on something positive about the work (“warm” feedback), then move on to constructive sharing of issues or suggestions (“cool” feedback).
  3. When critiquing a peer’s work, use “I” statements. For example, “I’m confused by this part,” rather than “This part makes no sense.” Remember the three important phrases: “I notice….”, “I wonder….”, “If this were my work, I would….”
  4. Use questions whenever possible. For example, “I’m curious why you chose to begin with…?”, or “Did you consider adding…?”

70 of 80

  • I LIKE HOW YOU…
  • I THINK YOUR EXAMPLE IS…
  • THE STRONGEST POINT IS…
  • I CONNECT WITH…
  • I ENJOY YOUR WRITING BECAUSE…
  • SOMETHING THAT STRUCK ME…
  • YOUR CONVERSATION MAKES ME THINK ABOUT…
  • A QUESTION I HAVE IS…
  • DID YOU CONSIDER…?
  • WHAT DID YOU MEAN WHEN YOU SAID…?
  • HOW CAN YOU…?
  • WHY IS…?
  • ONE SUGGESTION WOULD BE…
  • I AM CONFUSED BY…
  • I THINK YOU SHOULD ADD…
  • YOU MIGHT WANT TO CHANGE/DELETE
  • TELL ME MORE ABOUT…

SENTENCE STARTERS

WRITING FORM

STUDENTS WILL...

INTRODUCTION

  • Read your introduction.
  • Highlight in pink where you introduced yourself and talked about why you want to be a part of the program (culture).
  • Highlight in green where you define a culture of success.
  • Highlight in yellow where you stated how you will create a culture of success.
  • Revise.

BODY PARAGRAPHS

  • Read your body paragraphs.
  • Highlight in blue your main idea.
  • Highlight in pink where you explained how your evidence supports your main idea.
  • Highlight in purple the connections you made to the world.
  • Highlight in green where you included your own experiences and or examples.
  • Underline the evidence you used from the text to support your main idea.
  • Did you cite the text (According to) and put quotations around your evidence?
  • Reflect: How does your writing engage the audience? What are you saying that is powerful?
  • Revise

CONCLUSION

  • What type of conclusion did you make? (Summary) (Call to Action) (Story) (Other)
  • Revise
  • Take highlights off after you have revised and gone through the self-revision process.

71 of 80

72 of 80

Every Monday my seventh grade English teacher would have us copy a list of 25 words she'd written on the board. We'd then look up the dictionary definitions and copy those down. For homework, we'd re-write each word seven times.

Good, now you know it. Test on Friday and never for those 25 words to be seen again. Poof. Old school, yes. Mundane task, yes. Did it work? I don't remember. Probably not.

Copying definitions from the dictionary we would probably all agree is not an effective way to learn vocabulary. Passive learning hardly ever is. It's just often the way we learned, and as teachers, we sometimes fall back on using these ways when teaching rather than taking a good look at student data, the latest research, and then trying something new.

The truth is, and the research shows, students need multiple and various exposures to a word before they fully understand that word and can apply it. They need also to learn words in context, not stand alone lists that come and go each week. Of course the way we learn words in context, or implicitly, is by reading, then reading some more. (This is why every classroom should have a killer classroom library stocked full of high-interest, age appropriate books.)

SELECTING WORDS

Ah, so many words, so little time. When choosing which words deserve special instructional time, we don't have to do it alone. One of the biggest mistakes we teachers make in vocabulary instruction is selecting all the words for the students and not giving them a say in the matter.

My first year teaching, before my tenth graders began reading Lord of the Flies, I went through every chapter and made lists of all the vocabulary words I thought they'd have trouble with, so that I could pre-teach them.

When I looked at those long lists, I began to freak out. How will I teach all these words, and still have class time for all the other things we need to do? First off, rather than waste my time compiling lists, I should have let the kids skim the text in chapter one and select their own words.

Then, here's what to do after the students pick their own words:

  • Ask each child to create a chart where he/she writes down words of choice, and rates each one as "know it," "sort of know it," or "don't know it at all."
  • Then, on the same paper, have them write a definition or "my guess on meaning" for the words they know and kind of know (No dictionaries!)

Before they turn in these pre-reading charts, be sure to emphasize this is not about "being right" but that they are providing you with information to guide next steps in class vocabulary instruction.

Read through them all and use the results as a formative assessment. This data will show you which words they know, those they have some understanding of, and those words that are completely foreign to them.

The kids have selected and rated the words, and now it's your turn.

RANKING WORDS

When considering which words need the most instructional attention, let's turn to Isabel Beck's practical way of categorizing vocabulary words into three tiers:

Tier One: Basic words that rarely require instructional focus (door, house, book).

Tier Two: Words that appear with high frequency, across a variety of domains, and are crucial when using mature, academic language (coincidence, reluctant, analysis).

Tier Three: Frequency of these words is quite low and often limited to specific fields of study (isotope, Reconstruction, Buddhism).

Beck suggests that students will benefit the most academically by focusing instruction on the tier two words (since these appear with much higher frequency than tier three words, and are used across domains). So, this is when you take a look at the pre-reading vocabulary charts your kids created and choose "kind of" and "don't know at all" words that you deem to be tier two words. Go ahead and select some content-specific words (tier three) but only those directly related to the chapter, article, short story, or whatever you are about to read.

You now have a vocabulary list. It's time to teach.

TEACHING WORDS

If you haven't heard of him, I'd like to introduce Robert Marzano. This guy is pretty amazing, having spent countless hours observing students and teachers. An education researcher and teacher, he stresses that in all content areas, direct vocabulary instruction is essential and suggests six steps:

  • Step one: The teacher explains a new word, going beyond reciting its definition (tap into prior knowledge of students, use imagery).
  • Step two: Students restate or explain the new word in their own words (verbally and/or in writing).
  • Step three: Ask students to create a non-linguistic representation of the word (a picture, or symbolic representation).
  • Step four: Students engage in activities to deepen their knowledge of the new word (compare words, classify terms, write their own analogies and metaphors).
  • Step five: Students discuss the new word (pair-share, elbow partners).
  • Step six: Students periodically play games to review new vocabulary (Pyramid, Jeopardy, Telephone).
  • Marzano's six steps do something revolutionary to vocabulary learning: They make it fun. Students think about, talk about, apply, and play with new words. And Webster doesn't get a word in edgewise.

THE RATIONALE

At this point, you might be thinking that there just isn't enough time for all this pre-reading word analysis, direct instruction of vocabulary, and game playing. (You have content to teach!) So, I'd like end with a few quotes for you to consider:

Because each new word has to be studied and learned on its own, the larger your vocabulary becomes, the easier it will be to connect a new word with words you already know, and thus remember its meaning. So your learning speed, or pace, should increase as your vocabulary grows. -- Johnson O'Connor

We think with words, therefore to improve thinking, teach vocabulary. -- A. Draper and G. Moeller

RESOURCES

Books to help you focus and fine-tune your vocabulary instruction:

Bringing Words to Life by Isabel Beck�Vocabulary Games for the Classroom by Lindsey Carlton and Robert J. Marzano�Words, Words, Words by Janet Allen�Teaching Basic and Advanced Vocabulary: A Framework for Direct Instruction by Robert J. Marzano

Websites that share effective and engaging vocabulary activities:

ReadWriteThink�Reading Rockets

Doing It Differently: Tips for Teaching Vocabulary

Tips for teaching vocabulary that include letting students select the words, putting away dictionaries, and creating time for talk and play with new terms.

SLIDESMANIA.COM

73 of 80

INTERACTIVE LECTURE

STUDENT-LED IDENTIFICATION

RANKING/SORTING VOCABULARY

PLAY-BASED

Summary: As a students’ vocabulary grow, so will their comprehension and adaptation to an increased vocabulary in the future. Connections will be more easily made among the Tier 2 category and the Tier 3.

Strategies:

Interactive Techniques

Interactive Vocab Techniques

Magoosh

(1. Writing vocab short stories, 7. Gallery walks 17. Flip for vocabulary activities)

Students self identify unknown vocabulary words from skimming text. Students then rank the words in a “know it,” “sort of,” or “don’t know at all” chart.

Strategies/Resources:

Vocabulary Knowledge Check Chart

Student Choice and the Venerable Vocab List

Summarize:

Three Tiers of Sorting:

1)Common Words- (door, book, house)

2)High Frequency Words (population, domain specific)

3)Uncommon Words (specific not going to see it often)

Students will benefit the most by focusing instruction on Tier 2 Words (multiple and various exposures) Focus on Tier 2 Words students said they didn’t know.

List and Link strategies/ examples to create a resource bank:

Rank & Justify Google Template (1)

Rank & Justify Google Template (2)

Concept Sort

Close and Open Word Sort

https://www.theteachertoolkit.com/index.php/tool/card-sort

Vocabulary Wall

3 Tiers and Handouts

**Vocab Rating

Students periodically play games to review new vocabulary; Games make it fun and encourage application.

Frayer Models

Vocab Cards

Kahoot

Quizlet

Quick Recall

Headbands

Pictionary

Charades

Word Grid Challenge

https://usercontent.one/wp/www.literaturedaydreams.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/Pinterest-Graphics-9.png?media=1628093854

VOCABULARY INSTRUCTION RESOURCE BANK

74 of 80

Frayer Model

(Word/Topic)

Definition

Example

Antonym

Image

75 of 80

GRAPHIC ORGANIZER RESOURCE BANK

ORGANIZER NAME + LINKED EXAMPLE

VENN DIAGRAM

COMPARE & CONTRAST

Math Diagram:

Can be used to break down equations step by step.

Use this when each step needs to be evaluated

Main Idea Web

Use this when needing to understand 1 concept at a time with support. Could be for why, what, or how.

Timeline/Canva

Can be used to establish a visual to track events over time. Also, can create an info-graphic with text and visuals to provide steps or process.

Describing Wheel: CHUNK/ SUMMARIZE MAIN TOPIC

Garden Gate

Structuring talking points/evidence for written response

Frayer Model

Can be used to determine or clarify vocabulary words

76 of 80

77 of 80

78 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

COMMUNICATOR EVIDENCE & SIGNALS OF SUCCESS (6-12)

(6-12) SCHOOL-WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCE (2-3X/YEAR)

(6-8) THINKCERCA READING COMPREHENSION SIGNALS (10X/ YEAR)

(6-8) iREADY DIAGNOSTIC (2-3X/ YEAR)

(9-12) INTERIM ASSESSMENT OR ACT (2-3X/YEAR)

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATOR

DASHBOARD SIGNALS

79 of 80

WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF SCHOOL-WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCE?

PLACE

GROWTH

We know students who write with multiple opportunities to get feedback, receive scaffolded writing instruction, and revise grow. School wide writing assessments provide key opportunities for students and teachers to unite for success towards writing together.

CRITICAL THINKING

Our alignment to C&C themes, questions, and topics allows students to dig deeply into being Contributors, their future stories, and what they seek to create in their Community.

TEACHER CAPACITY

We are all Communication & Critical Thinking teachers regardless of the content area. School wide writing experiences serve as a powerful model of what Communication & Critical Thinking instruction can look like, how to give feedback, and discussion of what high quality writing looks like.

80 of 80

NEXT GEN COMMUNICATORS

COMMUNICATOR EVIDENCE & SIGNALS OF SUCCESS (6-12)

CONTENT AREA

QUARTER 1

QUARTER 2

QUARTER 3

QUARTER 4

AUG

SEPT

OCT

NOV

DEC

JAN

JAN/FEB

FEB

MARCH

MAR/APRIL

MAY

ENGLISH

NARRATIVE SPEECH EMBEDDED IN QCA

INFORMATIVE

FULL EMBEDDED IN QCA

ARGUMENTATIVE EMBEDDED IN QCA

ARGUMENTATIVE FULL EMBEDDED IN QCA

SCIENCE

TCT EMBEDDED IN CQA

TCT EMBEDDED IN CQA

TECHNICAL SCIENCE WRITING FUL L EMBEDDED IN QCA

SCIENCE WRITING EMBEDDED IN QCA

SOCIAL STUDIES

SOURCING EMBEDDED IN QCA

ARGUMENTATIVE FULL EMBEDDED IN QCA

ARGUMENTATIVE FULL EMBEDDED IN QCA

SOURCING EMBEDDED IN QCA

SCHOOL WIDE WRITING EXPERIENCE

HOUSE + C&C IDENTITY FULL ESSAY

FUTURE STORY & GOAL SETTING FULL ESSAY

REFLECTION & RENEWAL/ CELEBRATION OF GROWTH FULL ESSAY

6-12 COMMUNICATORS ARE CRITICAL THINKERS

ANNUAL PLAN