The Coaching Compass: Navigating a Multi-Tiered System of Support for Coaches (MTSS-C)
TESHA THOMAS, EdD
JENNIFER PARKER, EdD
https://tinyurl.com/CoachFETC25
Jennifer Parker, EdD
drjenniferparker@gmail.com
drjenniferparker.com
The Coaching Compass: Navigating a Multi-Tiered System of Support for Coaches (MTSS-C)
TESHA THOMAS, EdD
JENNIFER PARKER, EdD
https://tinyurl.com/CoachFETC25
Session Objectives
The Coach’s Compass
What connections do you make between the Griswold Family Vacation and your journey as an educator?
The Coach’s Compass
WHAT SHOULD YOU PACK?
Mission, Vision, Values, & Goals
WHERE ARE YOU HEADED?
The MTSS-C
Tiers
WHO ARE YOUR TRAVELERS?
Coaching Quadrants
HOW WILL YOU GET THERE?
Coming
Spring 2026
The Coach’s Compass
Navigating Tiered Coaching
in a PLC at Work
Tesha Ferriby Thomas, Ed.D.
Jennifer Parker, Ed.D.
The Coach’s Compass
Guiding Questions | The Coach’s Compass Framework |
Who? | MTSS-C Coaching for all, some, or a few individuals |
What? | The Coaching Quadrants Quadrant 1-Trust and Relationships Quadrant 2 – Goals and Outcomes Quadrant 3 – Teaching and Modeling Quadrant 4 – Support and Resources |
Where? | During “coaching interactions” |
When ? | During the Coaching Cycle |
Why ? | To support the guiding principles of a PLC in an effort to attain high levels of learning for all students. |
How ? | Using the Coaching Compass on a journey to find the coach’s True North within a PLC |
Tiers
+Quadrants
The
Coach’s Compass
Notice and Wonder
MTSS-C
Coaching Quadrants
Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All
Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some
Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few
The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2026
| |
| |
II. Goals and Outcomes
III. Teaching and Modeling
IV. Support and Resources
People
Purpose
Processes
Possibilities
Deconstructing the Coach’s Compass
THREE BIG IDEAS
FOUR KEY QUESTIONS
The Coach’s Compass in a PLC
Let
The
Journey
Begin…
The MTSS-C
Tiers
Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All
Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some
Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few
Traditional MTSS
Tier 2 and 3 = “Struggling Students”
These labels negatively influence perceptions about students, changing educator expectations and “impacting students’ opportunities to achieve their full potential”
(Farnham, 2024).
Flipping the Script on Support
“In a field [education] where we are all lifelong learners, what is it about being labeled as “needing help” that makes us feel uncomfortable?”
Thomas and Parker - 2026
Rethinking “Support”
MTSS-C
Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All
Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some
Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few
1
2
3
The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2025
Tiered Coaching | Description |
Tier I – Team Coaching for All | |
Tier II – Subgroup Coaching for Some | |
Tier III – Individual Coaching for Few | |
MTSS-C
Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All
Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some
Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few
1
2
3
The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2026
Tier 1: Team Coaching for All
“We do not advocate coaching individual teachers or collaborative teams; we advocate coaching for individual teachers and collaborative teams.”
—Many, Maffoni, Sparks, & Thomas, �Amplify Your Impact (2018), p. 7
Tier 1 Example:
Frame the coaching of teams in Tier 1 in your own professional practice.
MTSS-C
Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All
Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some
Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few
1
2
3
The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2025
Tier 2: Subgroup Coaching for Some
Tier 2 Example:
Frame the coaching of teams in Tier 2 in your own professional practice.
MTSS-C
Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All
Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some
Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few
1
2
3
The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2025
Tier III: Individual Coaching for Few
Tier 3 Example:
Frame the coaching of teams in Tier 3 in your own professional practice.
Tiered �Coaching
WHAT CONNECTIONS DO YOU MAKE TO THE COACHING TIERS AND YOUR SCHOOL?
The Quadrants
Coaching Model | Components |
Sweeney’s Student-Centered Coaching (2016; 2020) | Emphasizes team building and collaborative inquiry using evidence to guide instructional decisions. |
Knight’s Impact Cycle (2007; 2017; 2021), | Focuses on goal-setting, learning, and improvement through a partnership approach. |
Costa and Garmston’s Cognitive Coaching (2015) | Fosters relationship building, active listening, and reflective dialogue. |
Aguilar’s Transformational Coaching (2013; 2016; 2020) | Supports deep change through mindset and belief shifts. |
Many, Maffoni, Sparks, and Thomas (2018; 2020; 2022) | Emphasizes collaborative team coaching to enhance collective teacher efficacy and student outcomes. |
Traveling the Coaching Quadrants:
The Focus of Coaching Interactions
| |
| |
II. Goals and Outcomes
III. Teaching and Modeling
IV. Support and Resources
People
Purpose
Processes
Possibilities
Quadrant I:
Trust and Relationships�
Connecting with our passengers.
Collective commitments Psychological safety
Mutual accountability
Positive interdependence
Tier 1
Positive interdependence Accountable talk
Openness to failing safely
Tier 2
Care
Sincerity
Empathy
Reciprocity
Tier 3
Which image best represents your interactions with your coachees?
1
2
3
4
5
42
“The Four Assessments of Trust”
Feltman, 2008
CARE
Do they care about me?
Do they have my best interests in mind?
-Public appreciation
-Protecting confidentiality
-Fair decision-making
SINCERITY
Do they walk the walk?
Are they honest?
-Keeping promises
-Admitting mistakes
-Accepting responsibility
RELIABILITY
Do they keep their promises?
Are they committed to the work?
-Fulfilling responsibilities
-Coming through in a crisis
COMPETENCE
Are they capable?
Do they know enough to do the work well?
-Successful problem-solving
-Results from their work are evident
CARE
Do I show my colleagues that I care about them?
Do I publicly express appreciation?
How good am I about protecting confidentiality?
SINCERITY
Do I keep my promises?
Do I publicly admit my mistakes and take responsibility for fixing them?
RELIABILITY
Do I consistently fulfill my responsibilities?
Can my colleagues count on me in a crisis?
Do I do what I say I will do?
COMPETENCE
Do I successfully solve problems?
Are the results of my work evident to others?
Are there areas of professional development that would help me improve?
Checklist of Essential Interactions for the Four Assessments of Trust
Care
Sincerity
Reliability
Competence
Quadrant II:
Goals & Outcomes
Choosing the Destination.
Team generated, data based, SMART, aligned to school and district goals
Tier 1
Aligned to Tier I goals, differentiated based on needs assessment
Tier 2
Co-developed by teacher and coach, individualized to meet teacher needs; may be independent of team goals but are not in contradiction
Tier 3
Which image best represents your current coaching journey?
1
2
3
4
5
Goals and Outcomes:�Choosing the Destination.
Root Cause Analysis
The Problem:
Students are not showing expected growth in Math, even though the school has adopted IXL Math as a core practice tool.
Five Why’s
Why #1
Q: Why aren’t students showing expected growth in Math?
A: Because they are not using IXL consistently or with enough targeted practice.
Five Why’s
Why #2
Q: Why aren’t students using IXL consistently or in targeted ways?
A: Because teachers across the school are using IXL differently, with no shared expectations or routines.
Five Why’s
Why #3
Q: Why are teachers using IXL inconsistently?
A: Because the leadership team hasn’t established a clear schoolwide strategy for how IXL should support instruction and intervention.
Five Why’s
Why #4
Q: Why hasn’t the leadership team established a clear strategy?
A: Because the focus has been on providing access to the tool rather than planning for instructional integration.
Five Why’s
Why #5
Q: Why was access prioritized over instructional integration?
A: Because the team assumed teachers would naturally incorporate IXL into their math blocks without additional guidance.
Root Cause:
There is no shared schoolwide vision or consistent expectations for how IXL should be used to support math growth.
Specific and Strategic
Measurable
Attainable
Results Oriented
Time-Bound
S | Specific and Strategic | Who is the target for growth? What exactly do they need to achieve? |
M | Measurable | How will you measure whether improvement has been made? |
A | Attainable | What is a reasonable growth goal that can be measured quantitatively? |
R | Results-oriented | What makes this goal important to your team and students? How will meeting this goal impact students? |
T | Time-bound | When do you expect the goal to be accomplished? When and how will you measure progress? |
SMART framework (Doran, 1981; Conzemius & O’Neill, 2009)
SMART Goal Frame:
By __[time frame]___, __[number/percent]_______% of all ___[grade/discipline]______ students
will demonstrate proficiency in _______[target area]________
as measured by ______[assessment]_______.
Root Cause ⇒ SMART Goal
ROOT CAUSE:
There is no shared schoolwide vision or consistent expectations for how IXL should be used to support math growth.
SMART GOAL:
By May 2025, 75% of all K–8 students will demonstrate proficiency in grade‑level Math standards as measured by the IXL Diagnostic Growth Report.
Goal Setting Cycle Checklist
Quadrant III:
Teaching & Modeling�
Planning the Route.
Typically takes place during team meetings. Topics may include teamwork, effective meeting practices, responding to the Four Critical Questions of a PLC.
Tier 1
May take place during meetings or during additional professional development time. Topics are targeted based on needs assessment and team goals.
Tier 2
Likely to take place in teacher’s classroom. Topics may include specific instructional strategies, technology use, behavior management, etc.
Tier 3
Which image best represents your current coaching style?
1
2
3
4
5
Teaching and Modeling:�Planning the Route.
Building an
Instructional
Coaching
Playbook
Teaching and Modeling Examples:�Planning the Route.
Pull A Play from the Playbook
Consider your teaching and modeling as a coach.
Quadrant IV:
Support & Resources�
Packing the Suitcase.
Tier 1
All three tiers are provided with supports and resources differentiated according to the team or teacher’s needs and goals.
These may include PLC process templates, instructional practice suggestions, support with technology and infrastructure, and/or direction to outside resources.
Tier 2
Tier 3
Which image best represents the needs of your coachees?
1
2
3
4
5
Coaching Hats
How does each hat represent your work as a coach?
Coach
Collaborator
Facilitator
Consultant
Needs Alignment: Choosing a Hat
Consider the needs of your own coachees.
Coach | Collaborator |
Consultant | Facilitator |
Tiers
+Quadrants
The
Coach’s
Compass
Finding Your True North
Finding Your True North
Thomas & Parker, 2025
My Coaching True North
Finding Your True North
Session Objectives
Coming
Spring 2026
The Coach’s Compass
Navigating Tiered Coaching in a PLC at Work
Tesha Ferriby Thomas, Ed.D.
Jennifer Parker, Ed.D.
https://www.solutiontree.com/
Please complete the session survey!