1 of 88

The Coaching Compass: Navigating a Multi-Tiered System of Support for Coaches (MTSS-C)

TESHA THOMAS, EdD

JENNIFER PARKER, EdD

https://tinyurl.com/CoachFETC25

2 of 88

Jennifer Parker, EdD

drjenniferparker@gmail.com

drjenniferparker.com

3 of 88

4 of 88

The Coaching Compass: Navigating a Multi-Tiered System of Support for Coaches (MTSS-C)

TESHA THOMAS, EdD

JENNIFER PARKER, EdD

https://tinyurl.com/CoachFETC25

5 of 88

Session Objectives

    • Dig into the Coach’s Compass framework and the quadrants that set it apart from other coaching models;
    • Explore how Compass-based coaching looks different at the team, subgroup, and individual levels;
    • Apply practical coaching tools to address real world challenges.

​

6 of 88

7 of 88

The Coach’s Compass

What connections do you make between the Griswold Family Vacation and your journey as an educator?

8 of 88

9 of 88

The Coach’s Compass

WHAT SHOULD YOU PACK?

10 of 88

Mission, Vision, Values, & Goals

WHERE ARE YOU HEADED?

11 of 88

The MTSS-C

Tiers

WHO ARE YOUR TRAVELERS?

12 of 88

Coaching Quadrants

HOW WILL YOU GET THERE?

13 of 88

Coming

Spring 2026

The Coach’s Compass

Navigating Tiered Coaching

in a PLC at Work

​

Tesha Ferriby Thomas, Ed.D.

Jennifer Parker, Ed.D.

14 of 88

The Coach’s Compass

  • Define our direction for coaching and establish True North
  • Ensure the coach and teacher(s) are moving toward the same destination
  • Navigate the complexity of coaching across multiple needs.
  • Make intentional, values-aligned decisions in a PLC context to:
      • strengthens collaboration.
      • build capacity.
      • accelerate student impact.

15 of 88

Guiding Questions

The Coach’s Compass Framework

Who?

MTSS-C

Coaching for all, some, or a few individuals

What?

The Coaching Quadrants

Quadrant 1-Trust and Relationships

Quadrant 2 – Goals and Outcomes

Quadrant 3 – Teaching and Modeling

Quadrant 4 – Support and Resources

Where?

During “coaching interactions”

When ?

During the Coaching Cycle

Why ?

To support the guiding principles of a PLC in an effort to attain high levels of learning for all students.

How ?

Using the Coaching Compass on a journey to find the coach’s True North within a PLC

16 of 88

Tiers

+Quadrants

The

Coach’s Compass

Notice and Wonder

17 of 88

MTSS-C

Coaching Quadrants

Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All

Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some

Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few

The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2026

​

​

​

​

  1. Trust and Relationships

II. Goals and Outcomes

III. Teaching and Modeling

IV. Support and Resources

People

Purpose

Processes

Possibilities

Deconstructing the Coach’s Compass

18 of 88

THREE BIG IDEAS

  1. Focus on Learning
  2. Collaborative Culture
  3. Results Driven Approach

​

FOUR KEY QUESTIONS

  1. What do we want students to learn?
  2. How will we know they learned it?
  3. What do we do if they don't learn?
  4. What do we do if they already know it?

The Coach’s Compass in a PLC

19 of 88

Let

The

Journey

Begin…

​

20 of 88

The MTSS-C

Tiers

Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All

Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some

Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few

21 of 88

Traditional MTSS

​

Tier 2 and 3 = “Struggling Students”

​

These labels negatively influence perceptions about students, changing educator expectations and “impacting students’ opportunities to achieve their full potential”

(Farnham, 2024).

22 of 88

Flipping the Script on Support

“In a field [education] where we are all lifelong learners, what is it about being labeled as “needing help” that makes us feel uncomfortable?”

​

Thomas and Parker - 2026

23 of 88

Rethinking “Support”

24 of 88

MTSS-C

Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All

Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some

Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few

1

2

3

The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2025

25 of 88

Tiered Coaching

Description

Tier I – Team Coaching for All

​

​

Tier II – Subgroup Coaching for Some

​

​

Tier III – Individual Coaching for Few

​

​

  • Strengthens the work of collaborative teams.
  • Explicit learning on the PLC process.
  • Builds collective efficacy.
  • Teams, subgroups and individuals based on need.
  • Targeted, differentiated, and temporary.
  • Connected to team and school goals.
  • Focuses on individual teachers based on need.
  • Coach is acutely aware of team goals, collective commitments, and logistical agreements.

26 of 88

MTSS-C

Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All

Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some

Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few

1

2

3

The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2026

27 of 88

Tier 1: Team Coaching for All

“We do not advocate coaching individual teachers or collaborative teams; we advocate coaching for individual teachers and collaborative teams.”

​

—Many, Maffoni, Sparks, & Thomas, �Amplify Your Impact (2018), p. 7

28 of 88

Tier 1 Example:

Frame the coaching of teams in Tier 1 in your own professional practice.

  • What examples can you think of where you are coaching teams? What challenges or successes did you have?
  • Share an example with a colleague.

29 of 88

MTSS-C

Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All

Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some

Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few

1

2

3

The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2025

30 of 88

Tier 2: Subgroup Coaching for Some

  • Teams who need additional time and support in meeting their goals.
  • Subgroups of individuals who have similar needs.

​

​

31 of 88

Tier 2 Example:

Frame the coaching of teams in Tier 2 in your own professional practice.

  • What examples can you think of where you are coaching subgroups? What challenges or successes did you have?
  • Share an example with a colleague.

32 of 88

MTSS-C

Tier 1 – Team Coaching for All

Tier 2 – Subgroup Coaching for Some

Tier 3 – Individual Coaching for Few

1

2

3

The Coach’s Compass, Thomas & Parker, 2025

33 of 88

Tier III: Individual Coaching for Few

  • “By supporting individual teachers through multiple layers of coaching - and simultaneously supporting the teams with whom those teachers work - coaching becomes part of a system rather than a stand-alone measure intended to “fix” teachers.”
  • Thomas & Parker, 2025

​

34 of 88

Tier 3 Example:

Frame the coaching of teams in Tier 3 in your own professional practice.

  • What examples can you think of where you are coaching individuals? What challenges or successes did you have?
  • Share an example with a colleague.

35 of 88

Tiered �Coaching

WHAT CONNECTIONS DO YOU MAKE TO THE COACHING TIERS AND YOUR SCHOOL?

36 of 88

The Quadrants

  • What is our destination?
  • What route will we take?
  • Who will drive?
  • What should we pack?

37 of 88

  • “The Coaching Quadrants have been comprised through an interweaving of multiple coaching and instructional models, resulting in a system that meets the various needs of teachers and teams.”

​

  • Thomas & Parker, 2025

38 of 88

Coaching Model

Components

Sweeney’s Student-Centered Coaching (2016; 2020)

Emphasizes team building and collaborative inquiry using evidence to guide instructional decisions.

​

Knight’s Impact Cycle (2007; 2017; 2021),

Focuses on goal-setting, learning, and improvement through a partnership approach.

​

Costa and Garmston’s Cognitive Coaching (2015)

Fosters relationship building, active listening, and reflective dialogue.

​

Aguilar’s Transformational Coaching (2013; 2016; 2020)

Supports deep change through mindset and belief shifts.

​

Many, Maffoni, Sparks, and Thomas (2018; 2020; 2022)

Emphasizes collaborative team coaching to enhance collective teacher efficacy and student outcomes.

​

39 of 88

Traveling the Coaching Quadrants:

The Focus of Coaching Interactions

​

​

​

​

  • Trust and Relationships

II. Goals and Outcomes

III. Teaching and Modeling

IV. Support and Resources

People

Purpose

Processes

Possibilities

40 of 88

Quadrant I:

Trust and Relationships�

Connecting with our passengers.

Collective commitments Psychological safety

Mutual accountability

Positive interdependence

Tier 1

Positive interdependence Accountable talk

Openness to failing safely

Tier 2

Care

Sincerity

Empathy

Reciprocity

Tier 3

41 of 88

Which image best represents your interactions with your coachees?

1

2

3

4

5

42 of 88

42

​

“The Four Assessments of Trust”

​

Feltman, 2008

43 of 88

CARE

Do they care about me?

Do they have my best interests in mind?

-Public appreciation

-Protecting confidentiality

-Fair decision-making

SINCERITY

Do they walk the walk?

Are they honest?

-Keeping promises

-Admitting mistakes

-Accepting responsibility

RELIABILITY

Do they keep their promises?

Are they committed to the work?

-Fulfilling responsibilities

-Coming through in a crisis

COMPETENCE

Are they capable?

Do they know enough to do the work well?

-Successful problem-solving

-Results from their work are evident

44 of 88

CARE

Do I show my colleagues that I care about them?

Do I publicly express appreciation?

How good am I about protecting confidentiality?

SINCERITY

Do I keep my promises?

Do I publicly admit my mistakes and take responsibility for fixing them?

RELIABILITY

Do I consistently fulfill my responsibilities?

Can my colleagues count on me in a crisis?

Do I do what I say I will do?

COMPETENCE

Do I successfully solve problems?

Are the results of my work evident to others?

Are there areas of professional development that would help me improve?

45 of 88

Checklist of Essential Interactions for the Four Assessments of Trust

​

Care

  • I begin conversations with empathy and genuine curiosity.
  • I listen actively without interrupting or redirecting.
  • I acknowledge and affirm the teacher’s emotions and experiences.

Sincerity

  • I am transparent about my role and intentions.
  • I set clear boundaries for confidentiality and support.
  • I show humility and stay grounded in the teacher’s goals.

Reliability

  • I follow through on every commitment I make.
  • I show up on time and prepared.
  • I remain consistent, even when conversations get hard.

Competence

  • I provide feedback that is specific, corrective, and criterion-based.
  • I offer strategies grounded in research and instructional best practices.
  • I adjust my coaching to meet the teacher’s unique needs.

46 of 88

Quadrant II:

Goals & Outcomes

Choosing the Destination.

Team generated, data based, SMART, aligned to school and district goals

Tier 1

Aligned to Tier I goals, differentiated based on needs assessment

Tier 2

Co-developed by teacher and coach, individualized to meet teacher needs; may be independent of team goals but are not in contradiction

Tier 3

47 of 88

Which image best represents your current coaching journey?

1

2

3

4

5

48 of 88

49 of 88

Goals and Outcomes:�Choosing the Destination.

  • “Effective coaches start by guiding teams to identify the root cause of an existing challenge, opening the door for dialogue, and helping teams co-create goals that target specific and measurable change around student achievement.”

​

  • Thomas & Parker, 2025

50 of 88

Root Cause Analysis

The Problem:

Students are not showing expected growth in Math, even though the school has adopted IXL Math as a core practice tool.

51 of 88

Five Why’s

Why #1

Q: Why aren’t students showing expected growth in Math?

A: Because they are not using IXL consistently or with enough targeted practice.

​

​

52 of 88

Five Why’s

Why #2

Q: Why aren’t students using IXL consistently or in targeted ways?

A: Because teachers across the school are using IXL differently, with no shared expectations or routines.

53 of 88

Five Why’s

Why #3

Q: Why are teachers using IXL inconsistently?

A: Because the leadership team hasn’t established a clear schoolwide strategy for how IXL should support instruction and intervention.

​

​

54 of 88

Five Why’s

Why #4

Q: Why hasn’t the leadership team established a clear strategy?

A: Because the focus has been on providing access to the tool rather than planning for instructional integration.

55 of 88

Five Why’s

Why #5

Q: Why was access prioritized over instructional integration?

A: Because the team assumed teachers would naturally incorporate IXL into their math blocks without additional guidance.

​

56 of 88

Root Cause:

There is no shared schoolwide vision or consistent expectations for how IXL should be used to support math growth.

57 of 88

Specific and Strategic

Measurable

Attainable

Results Oriented

Time-Bound

58 of 88

S

Specific and Strategic

Who is the target for growth? What exactly do they need to achieve?

M

Measurable

How will you measure whether improvement has been made?

A

Attainable

What is a reasonable growth goal that can be measured quantitatively?

R

Results-oriented

What makes this goal important to your team and students? How will meeting this goal impact students?

T

Time-bound

When do you expect the goal to be accomplished? When and how will you measure progress?

SMART framework (Doran, 1981; Conzemius & O’Neill, 2009)

59 of 88

SMART Goal Frame:

By __[time frame]___, __[number/percent]_______% of all ___[grade/discipline]______ students

will demonstrate proficiency in _______[target area]________

as measured by ______[assessment]_______.

60 of 88

Root Cause ⇒ SMART Goal

ROOT CAUSE:

There is no shared schoolwide vision or consistent expectations for how IXL should be used to support math growth.

SMART GOAL:

By May 2025, 75% of all K–8 students will demonstrate proficiency in grade‑level Math standards as measured by the IXL Diagnostic Growth Report.

61 of 88

Goal Setting Cycle Checklist

​

  • Identify a challenge, issue, or objective and work to identify the root cause.
  • Review data connected to the root cause.
  • Determine how you will make the goal specific, measurable, and achievable.
  • Determine the activities that will be implemented to support the goal, achieve participation and buy-in from all parties, and define accountability.
  • Decide how long the goal should take to achieve, and what resources or support are needed.
  • Investigate the research, professional development, and resources available to support achievement of the goal.
  • Implement activities and ongoing monitoring of implementation in support of the goal.
  • Regroup to review and reflect; redirect if necessary and continue the cycle of improvement.
  • Revisit the goal and make adjustments or move on to the next goal.

62 of 88

Quadrant III:

Teaching & Modeling�

Planning the Route.

Typically takes place during team meetings. Topics may include teamwork, effective meeting practices, responding to the Four Critical Questions of a PLC.

Tier 1

May take place during meetings or during additional professional development time. Topics are targeted based on needs assessment and team goals.

Tier 2

Likely to take place in teacher’s classroom. Topics may include specific instructional strategies, technology use, behavior management, etc.

Tier 3

63 of 88

Which image best represents your current coaching style?

1

2

3

4

5

64 of 88

Teaching and Modeling:�Planning the Route.

Building an

Instructional

Coaching

Playbook

65 of 88

Teaching and Modeling Examples:�Planning the Route.

  • Strategy Modeling Menu
  • Learning Protocols
  • Instructional Playbook
  • Live or Video Modeling
  • Lesson Deconstruction Template
  • Side-by-Side Co-Teaching Plan
  • Think-Aloud Planning Sheet
  • “Look Fors” Observation Guide
  • Modeling & Debrief Protocol
  • Reflective Journal Prompts
  • Gradual Release

66 of 88

Pull A Play from the Playbook

Consider your teaching and modeling as a coach.

  • What examples of teaching and modeling have you tried? What challenges or successes did you have?
  • Share an example with a colleague.

67 of 88

Quadrant IV:

Support & Resources�

Packing the Suitcase.

Tier 1

All three tiers are provided with supports and resources differentiated according to the team or teacher’s needs and goals.

​

These may include PLC process templates, instructional practice suggestions, support with technology and infrastructure, and/or direction to outside resources.

​

Tier 2

Tier 3

68 of 88

Which image best represents the needs of your coachees?

1

2

3

4

5

69 of 88

Coaching Hats

How does each hat represent your work as a coach?

70 of 88

Coach

  • Acts as a thinking partner.
  • Guides the coachee to think through their own problems, challenges, and solutions.
  • Practices active listening, pausing and paraphrasing, posing questions, and presuming positive intentions.

71 of 88

72 of 88

Collaborator

  • Works together with coaches to think through challenges and possible solutions.
  • Engages in joint meetings that promote positive interdependence and individual accountability.
  • Co-creates goals and outcomes.

73 of 88

74 of 88

Facilitator

  • Walks coachees through protocols.
  • Uses tools such as “look fors” and checklists to support implementation.

75 of 88

76 of 88

Consultant

  • Provides technical expertise in specialty areas.
  • Makes recommendations, provides insights and suggestions for improvement.

77 of 88

78 of 88

Needs Alignment: Choosing a Hat

Consider the needs of your own coachees.

  • What hats have you worn? What challenges or successes did you have?
  • Share an example with a colleague.

Coach

Collaborator

Consultant

Facilitator

79 of 88

Tiers

+Quadrants

The

Coach’s

Compass

80 of 88

Finding Your True North

81 of 88

Finding Your True North

  • Your True North is “shaped by your values, your beliefs about teaching and learning and your lived experiences in classrooms.”

Thomas & Parker, 2025

82 of 88

My Coaching True North

  1. The goal of coaching is to support high levels of learning for all students. Every. Single. Day.
  2. Coaching is not about what’s wrong. It’s about what’s next.
  3. Growth is not optional. Continuous learning is our moral obligation as educators.
  4. Educators grow best through reflection, learning, and shared practice.
  5. Good coaches assume positive intent. Everyone cares about kids and is doing the best job that they can.

​

83 of 88

Finding Your True North

  • Why do I coach?
  • What do I believe about teachers and their capacity to grow?
  • What does effective coaching feel like for both coach and teacher?
  • What values do I want to lead with when things get hard?
  • I believe coaching should…
  • Great coaching happens when…
  • Teachers deserve coaching that…

84 of 88

85 of 88

Session Objectives

    • Dig into the Coach’s Compass framework and the quadrants that set it apart from other coaching models;
    • Explore how Compass-based coaching looks different at the team, subgroup, and individual levels;
    • Apply practical coaching tools to address real world challenges.

​

86 of 88

Coming

Spring 2026

The Coach’s Compass

Navigating Tiered Coaching in a PLC at Work

​

Tesha Ferriby Thomas, Ed.D.

Jennifer Parker, Ed.D.

https://www.solutiontree.com/

87 of 88

Please complete the session survey!

88 of 88