1 of 44

Refresh Shipped Device

Experience Audit

2 of 44

Refresh Shipped Device Work Package Milestones

Page 2

Near-term Enhancements

Identify and address near-term opportunities for improvement in user-facing touchpoints by systematically assessing the current user experience.

Service Blueprint

Visual Service Blueprint detailing the end-to-end user experience, illustrating touchpoints, interactions, and processes to provide a comprehensive view of the user journey.

Experience Audit

Translate complex Service Blueprint findings into easily understandable insights for non-design audiences, offering strategic, non-solution-specific recommendations.

Target State

High-level roadmap, outlining key pillars and guiding future design efforts, with a focus on consumer grade acquisition experience principles.

Work package milestone mapping serves as a progress guide demonstrating the journey through a comprehensive package of strategic initiatives aimed at transforming the user experience in the shipped device refresh experience. As we navigate through these initiatives, each step contributes to the overarching goal of transforming the device provisioning experience.

Visioning Workshop

Collaborative Visioning Workshop with a goal of surfacing key themes and insights that shape the strategic direction.

3 of 44

Content Table

Page 3

1.

Refresh Shipped Device Work Package Milestones

2.

3.

Methods and Limitations

4.

User Journey Key Phases

5.

User Journey Key Moments

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

Recommendations

12.

13.

4 of 44

Executive summary

The UX Design team conducted a comprehensive experience audit of the Refresh Shipped Device journey. To perform this audit, the UX team created a service blueprint detailing the experience leveraging UX best practice and overlaying research and analytic insights to identify key moment pain points.

The key moments covered in the audit encompass:

  • Notification and scheduling
  • Shipping and delivery communications
  • Device set up and software acquisition
  • Device return   
  • Asset reconciliation

Page 4

5 of 44

Method and limitations

Method

  • Documentation of the end user is based on the 2022 Refresh experience in the US
  • Information on the behind the scene processes was obtained from the relevant stakeholders (US Depot)
  • Research data was collected from available resources from the UX Research team
  • All the above information was integrated to create a service blueprint (access link and instructions in the Appendix)
  • Conclusions from the analysis of the service blueprint are presented as inisights in this deck

Limitations

  • Analyzed process is specific to the US
  • Documented process reflects the state for December 2022
  • The experience is based on the journey of a regular employee whose primary device is a Windows laptop going through PC Refresh and doesn’t apply to other types of employees, e.g. contractors
  • Research findings come from various work completed over the last few years and as such may not perfectly align with the current state experience (e.g. surveys on various topics surrounding the Refresh experience or usability testing of a DT portal which gave us insights on common needs and expectations)

Page 5

6 of 44

User Journey Key Phases

The Shipped Device Refresh journey can be segmented into three key phases:

Page 6

Work Order Created

1

Setup

User unboxes new device and begins setup and software acquisition. Previous device is returned.

Provision

Device is shipped and delivery logistical communications begin.

Engage

User is notified of refresh eligibility and is instructed to select device.

2

3

PC Delivered

7 of 44

User Journey Key Moments�

Page 7

Engage

Provision

Setup

Refresh Notification

Device Selection

Shipping and Logistical Communications

Device Setup

Return Old Device

PC Delivered

Work Order Created

Software Acquisition

A detailed view of the journey offers nuanced perspective on how the proposed recommendations integrate into the user's experience at key moments within each phase.

8 of 44

Refresh Notification and Device Selection

Users encounter several points of interaction when notified of their refresh eligibility, which can present opportunities for errors.

In some cases, there may be potential points of confusion caused by information being misrepresented or lacking proper context to support the decision-making process. 

Page 8

9 of 44

Refresh Notification

Observation

  • Refresh email is generic and may not present accurate options according to entitlement and availability.
    • Accurate and up to date device selection is only available in the scheduling form (user is not necessarily aware of that).
  • Device specifications are not available at the point of selecting the device (scheduling form).
  • Lack of device recommendations and guidance:
    • No comparison on selection of offered devices1.
    • No comparison of current PC vs. offered devices2​.

Page 9

Part of the scheduling form with a dropdown field to select PC model

List of PC models from the Refresh email with a note saying that ‘If you have been approved by your service line for a particular device, your options may be limited or different than the below’.

​(1)  From DT usability testing: Users value having choices summarised and seeing a comparison of laptop models.​

(2) From DT usability testing: Users want to pick something that has at least as good specifications as their old PC. Many people are likely to pick the same brand.

PAIN POINT

10 of 44

Refresh Notification

Recommendation

    • Refresh communications should provide accurate information on available options based on entitlement and availability.
    • Device specifications should be made available at the point of selecting the device to aid in the decision-making process.
  • Offer guidance and device suggestions that can aid users in making knowledgeable choices, catering to users who prefer an uncomplicated selection method.

Page 10

Increased efficiency

Providing clear and accurate device selection information can improve efficiency, reducing time and resources required to complete the device selection process.

Reduced service desk volume

Addressing potential points of confusion and errors during the device selection experience can help reduce the volume of inquiries to the service desk.

Improved Satisfaction

Providing a clear and accurate device selection experience that supports decision making can help improve NPS. 

Business Implications

RECOMMENDATION

11 of 44

Device Selection Form

Observation

    • Requires instructions to complete (which are found in Refresh email)
    • Form field logic and order is not intuitive.
    • Form labels misrepresent purpose, and form title and labels are not user friendly.
    • There is no comparison information on current PC vs. offered devices at the point of selecting the new device 1.
    • Users must rely on external sources to research and confirm their new device will be an improvement on their old device at the point of selection.

Page 11

Current scheduling form experience

PAIN POINT

amazon.com: Product-comparison table translates technical attributes into language that is understandable by the average consumer. 2

    • From DT usability testing: Users want to pick something that has at least as good specifications as their old PC. Many people are likely to pick the same brand.
    • https://www.nngroup.com/articles/comparison-tables/

12 of 44

Device Selection Form

Recommendation

    • Form title and labels should be user-friendly and easy to understand, making it easier for users to complete the form and reducing the need for extensive instructions.
    • Form field logic and order should be intuitive, making it easier for users to complete the form.
    • Compare the benefits of new devices with the user's current device to empower users to recognize the substantial performance improvements.
    • Present the modern features and functionalities of the new devices in contrast to the user's current device to create a clear distinction in terms of capabilities.
    • Highlight the benefits of the new device specific to the user's role and responsibilities to make decision-making process more personalized.

Page 12

Increased efficiency

Logic, order and intuitive organization help increase efficiency and reduce time and resources required to complete the scheduling form.

Business Implications

Reduced service desk volume

Addressing potential points of confusion and errors in the scheduling form can help reduce volume of inquiries to the service desk.

Improved Satisfaction

Providing an easy to complete scheduling form and improving the decision making experience can help improve NPS. 

RECOMMENDATION

13 of 44

Shipping and Logistical Communications

Poor organization of instructional content and communication coordination in the device refresh process results in a complex and confusing shipping and delivery experience. 

The volume of logistical emails creates confusion and makes it difficult to locate important information, such as delivery dates and tracking numbers.

Page 13

14 of 44

Shipping and Delivery Communications

Page 14

Observation

    • Instructional content and communication coordination lack organization, making it challenging for users to follow1.
      • Shipping emails from both EY and UPS cause confusion.
      • Multiple sources of information are difficult to follow, leading to confusion and inefficiency.
      • The repetition of certain pieces of information can overwhelm users and reduce their ability to retain important details.
      • The return label is sent prematurely, which can make the overall process appear disjointed and create unnecessary confusion.

Two shipment confirmations sent from different sources.

Return label and instructions sent between the two shipment communications pictured above.

(1) US Autopilot Refresh survey (data from August 2022 to April 2023): improving instructions and communications about the process is one of the most common suggestions from the users (mentioned by 61 out of 116 users who left an answer in the open-ended question ‘What would improve the laptop refresh experience?’)

PAIN POINT

15 of 44

Shipping and Delivery Communications

Recommendation

    • Minimize the number of email communications and ensure shipping-related information is consolidated into one email to prevent confusion.
    • Present information in an intuitive and easy-to-follow manner to help users navigate the process with ease.
    • Avoid repeating information unnecessarily to prevent overwhelming the user with redundant details.
    • Ensure that the return label is sent at an appropriate time in the process to avoid causing confusion and frustration for the user.

Page 15

Improved Satisfaction

Clear and timely shipping and delivery communication can improve the overall experience, which can lead to higher satisfaction rates and improve NPS.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Clear and concise instructions can reduce the amount of time and effort needed by employees to complete tasks, which can lead to increased productivity and efficiency.

Improved Accuracy

Consistent and accurate information in shipping and delivery communications can reduce errors and mistakes, which can help to prevent costly delays, returns, or other issues.

RECOMMENDATION

16 of 44

Device Setup and Software Acquisition

The device setup and software acquisition process presents issues with software, such as a lack of expectation setting on pre-installed software differences, licenses not transferring automatically to the new device, a lack of guidance on how to manually transfer other licenses, and EY AppStore applications requiring re-approval.

At the final stage of the setup process, there is a lack of completion confirmation to ensure setup was successful.

Page 16

17 of 44

Device Setup

Observation

  • No clear support guidance for users if an issue is encountered during the build process.
  • No system to track and monitor progress of the build and setup process.
    • No possibility for proactive support measures without system to track the setup process.

Page 17

PAIN POINT

18 of 44

Device Setup

Recommendation

    • Implement a system to monitor and confirm completion of build and setup with users.
      • Implement a process in which support can be proactive during the build process if an error is encountered during the build process.

Page 18

Improved Satisfaction

Clear and effective device setup process and proactive support can improve the overall experience, which can lead to higher satisfaction rates and improve NPS.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Improving the device setup experience by monitoring progress and confirmation of build can increase user productivity by reducing potential time wasted attempting to reach support for troubleshooting.

Reduced Service Desk Volume

Improving the device setup process can help reduce the number of inquiries and support requests by monitoring issues and implementing proactive resolution measures that do not require agent involvement.

RECOMMENDATION

19 of 44

Software Acquisition

Observation

  • Lack of expectation setting on the difference between the old and new PC pre-installed software1.
  • Lack of findability for necessary applications2.
  • Lack of adoption on recommended bundles3.
  • Some licenses are not transferred automatically to the new device:
      • EY AppStore applications requiring an approval need to be re-approved.
      • Lack of guidance on how to manually transfer other licences.

Page 19

  1. US Autopilot Refresh survey (data from August 2022 to April 2023): users struggle to (mentioned by 30 out of 44 users who left an answer in open-ended question ‘What was difficult to find? )
  2. US Autopilot Refresh survey (data from August 2022 to April 2023): Only 59% people found it Easy or very easy to find the apps they needed from the EY AppStore
  3. US Autopilot Refresh survey (data from August 2022 to April 2023): only 45% of users report to have installed recommended bundles

Current software store home page experience

PAIN POINT

20 of 44

Software Acquisition

Recommendation

    • Set expectations on the difference between the old and new PC pre-installed software.
    • Improve findability for necessary applications.
    • Improve experience to increase adoption on recommended bundles.
    • Set expectations on licenses that are not transferred automatically to the new device.
      • Clearly communicate which applications require approval or need to be re-approved.
      • Provide guidance on how to manually transfer licences that cannot be automatically transferred.

Page 20

Improved Satisfaction

Clear and easy to navigate software acquisition process can improve the overall experience, which can lead to higher satisfaction rates and improve NPS.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Improving the software acquisition process by providing relevant guidance around necessary software can increase user productivity.

Reduced Service Desk Volume

Providing guidance and improving findability during the software acquisition process can help to reduce the number of inquiries and support requests.

RECOMMENDATION

21 of 44

Device Return  

The device return experience is complex and confusing due to the volume of logistical emails, separate and exhaustive return instructions, lack of guidance on data erasure or migration, and inaccuracies in the return form process.

The return label for old PCs is generated and shared with users before delivery without explanation, and there is no guidance on data security.

Page 21

22 of 44

Return Process and Communications

Observation

  • Volume of logistic emails from EY and UPS makes it challenging for users to locate return instructions.
  • Return process and instructions are unnecessarily complex1.
  • Return instructions are located on a separate site.

Page 22

Two shipment confirmations sent from different sources.

Return instructions

(1) US Autopilot Refresh survey (data from August 2022 to April 2023): improving instructions and communications about the process is one of the most common suggestions from the users (mentioned by 61 out of 116 users who left an answer in the open-ended question ‘What would improve the laptop refresh experience?’)

PAIN POINT

23 of 44

Return Process and Communications

Recommendation

  • Reduce the volume of emails and provide a clear and easily accessible location for return instructions, making it easier for users to find the necessary information.
  • Consolidate the return instructions and make them more concise, with relevant information presented in an intuitive and user-friendly way.
  • Integrate return instructions within a main platform or website: Ensure that return instructions are easily accessible from the same platform or website where users initiate the return process, eliminating the need for users to navigate to a separate site.

Page 23

Improved Satisfaction

Simplifying the return process communications and providing clearer guidance can help reduce frustration and confusion for users, leading to higher satisfaction.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Reducing complexity of return communications can help reduce the amount of time and effort required from both users and OSTS and support staff, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.

Reduced Service Desk Volume

Improving the device return communications and guidance can help to reduce the number of inquiries and support requests.

RECOMMENDATION

24 of 44

Return Process and Communications

Observation

  • Return instructions do not include guidance on data erasure or migration1.

Page 24

Return instructions

(1) From DT usability testing: some users, especially those working with sensitive data, expressed feeling uncomfortable to send their old PC back without somehow wiping the data.

Asset removal confirmation email

PAIN POINT

25 of 44

Return Process and Communications

Recommendation

  • Include clear and easy to follow guidance on data erasure or migration in the return instructions to help users understand the process and ensure the security of their data.

Page 25

Page 25

Improved Satisfaction

Simplifying the data erasure and migration guidance and providing clearer instructions can help reduce frustration and confusion for users, leading to higher satisfaction.

Reduced Risk of Data Breaches

Providing guidance on data erasure and migration can reduce risk of sensitive data being exposed/mishandled. This can assure users that data risks have been properly mitigated.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Providing data reassure guidance in return communications can help reduce the amount of time and effort required from both users and OSTS and support staff, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.

Reduced Service Desk Volume

Improving the device return data migration and erasure guidance can help to reduce the number of inquiries and support requests.

RECOMMENDATION

26 of 44

Return Process and Communications

Observation

  • Return label for old PC is generated and shared with user before the computer is delivered with no explanation, which is confusing at this point in the experience1.

Page 26

Shipment Confirmation Email 1

(1) US Autopilot Refresh survey (data from August 2022 to April 2023): improving instructions and communications about the process is one of the most common suggestions from the users (mentioned by 61 out of 116 users who left an answer in the open-ended question ‘What would improve the laptop refresh experience?’)

Return Label Email

Shipment confirmation Email 2

PAIN POINT

27 of 44

Return Process and Communications

Recommendation

  • Provide an explanation for the return label generated, and include clear guidance on how to use it in the return process.

Page 27

Improved Satisfaction

Providing timely communications and guidance on device returns can help reduce frustration and confusion for users, leading to higher satisfaction.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Ensuring timely delivery of return communications can help reduce the amount of time and effort required from both users and OSTS and support staff, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.

Reduced Service Desk Volume

Ensuring timely device return communications and guidance can help to reduce the number of inquiries and support requests.

RECOMMENDATION

28 of 44

Return Form

Observation

  • Return form process offers a digital alternative for completion, but the availability of this option is not clearly communicated, leading to a perception that only a print and complete approach is available1.
  • The physical return form title is misleading and includes fields that may confuse the user.

Page 28

Digital Return Form

(1) US Autopilot Refresh survey (data from August 2022 to April 2023): improving instructions and communications about the process is one of the most common suggestions from the users (mentioned by 61 out of 116 users who left an answer in the open-ended question ‘What would improve the laptop refresh experience?’)

Physical Return Form

PAIN POINT

29 of 44

Return Form

Recommendation

  • Streamline the return form process by promoting digital options to reduce the need for printing and completing physical forms.
  • Ensure return form title and fields accurately reflect the purpose of the form, and rephrase any confusing or ambiguous language to ensure that users understand what information is required and why.

Page 29

Improved Satisfaction

Providing accessible, convenient digital options for device returns can help reduce frustration and confusion for users, leading to higher satisfaction.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Providing efficient digital return form options can help reduce the amount of time and effort required from both users and OSTS and support staff, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.

Reduced Service Desk Volume

Providing accessible, and easy-to-understand device return form and guidance can help to reduce the number of inquiries and support requests.

RECOMMENDATION

30 of 44

Asset reconciliation

The asset reconciliation process currently faces several challenges that affect the efficiency of tracking PC returns, asset reconciliation, and user experience.

With limited tracking options and a lack of clear guidance, the US Depot and Asset Management team face difficulties in properly accounting for returned assets, leading to delays and potential errors.

Page 30

31 of 44

Asset Tracking

Observation

EY (US Depot and the Asset Management team) is not able to efficiently track PC returns .

    • Integration with UPS does not support easy tracking of all return shipments.
      • US Depot is limited to manually checking only 25 return labels at a time.
    • Assets are only accounted for when they arrive at the Depot after being manually unpacked and entered into the system. This can cause delays and potential errors, including situations where users are still listed as having their old PC even after it has been returned.

Page 31

ups.com manual tracking system

(limited to 25 tracking numbers per inquiry)

PAIN POINT

32 of 44

Asset Tracking

Recommendation

  • Provide a way for the US Depot to check real-time status of return labels without quantity limitations.
  • Provide an efficient way for assets to be properly accounted for including when they arrive at the US Depot so that assets can appear as received if user inquires.

Page 32

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Improving return tracking and enhancing UPS integration can allow for more efficient PC return tracking, saving time and effort for the US Depot and Asset Management team.

Improved Accuracy

Improving asset reconciliation efficiency can lead to a reduction in potential errors, such as users still being listed as having their old PC, resulting in more accurate asset tracking.

RECOMMENDATION

33 of 44

Asset Return Communications

Observation

  • Users are expected to return their old PC within 7 days of receiving the new PC, but the lack of proper tracking makes it difficult to send timely reminders.
  • Return label and instructions are sent prematurely and are easily overlooked by users.
  • Return form compliance is not consistent, and may cause errors or delays in updating asset assignments in ServiceNow.
  • User receives asset unassigned communication when the old laptop has been received and unassigned, causing potential confusion with little context on asset assignment meaning.

Page 33

ServiceNow asset assignment

PAIN POINT

Asset Removed from Inventory Email

34 of 44

Asset Return Communications

Recommendation

  • Provide users with clear, accessible and easy-to-follow instructions for returning old PC.
  • Send return label when it is relevant in the device provisioning process .
  • Keep users informed about the status of their return at regular intervals.
  • Streamline messaging to enhance clarity, making it easy for users to understand information.

Page 34

Improved Satisfaction

Reducing user burden and improving the return process can help reduce frustration and confusion for users, leading to higher satisfaction with the overall experience.

Increased Compliance

By providing users with clear instructions and regular updates, the system can make it easier for them to comply with the 7-day return requirement, reducing the number of overdue returns and associated compliance issues.

Business Implications

Increased Efficiency

Providing efficient return instructions can help reduce the amount of time and effort required from both users and OSTS and support staff, leading to increased efficiency and productivity.

Improved Accuracy

Improving asset reconciliation efficiency can lead to a reduction in potential errors, such as users still being listed as having their old PC, resulting in more accurate asset tracking.

RECOMMENDATION

35 of 44

Recommendations Summary

Page 35

36 of 44

Recommendations

Page 36

Recommendation

Primary Impacted 

Audience

Experience Impact

Impacted Audience Volume

Experience Priority1

Enhancement Phase

1

Help user choose the right device by providing accurate and detailed information when presenting available options, offering device suggestions based on user preferences.

EY Employee

High

All

(100%)

High

Near-term

2

Help in device decision making process by highlighting the benefits of new devices compared to the user's current device to enhance perceived value.

EY Employee

Low

All

(100%)

Medium

Target State

3

Improve selection form usability to help the user submit device selection by providing easily understandable form titles, instructions, and labels, intuitively organizing form field logic and order, and accurately representing the purpose of each field to minimize confusion and errors.

EY Employee

High

All

(100%)

High

Near-term

4

Optimize shipping and delivery communications to allow user to track their order by providing clear, consolidated, and intuitive instructional content, minimizing unnecessary emails and avoiding repetition.

EY Employee

High

All

(100%)

High

Near-term

5

Ensure timely delivery of return labels and minimize redundancy/unnecessary communications to improve user understanding of the process and to promote prompt return completions.

EY Employee

High

All

(100%)

High

Near-term

6

Enable the user to successfully perform set-up by implementing a support and confirmation process for build and set-up completion.

EY Employee

Medium

All

(100%)

High

Target State

7

Help user complete full device configuration by clearly communicating the differences in pre-installed software, automatically transferring all licenses to the new device, and provide guidance for license transfers that cannot be automated.

EY Employee

Medium

All

(100%)

High

Target State

In the U.S. there are 500-2000 refresh users per month. Refresh volume varies based on country and refresh strategy (rolling or total population refresh).

37 of 44

Recommendations

Page 37

Recommendation

Primary Impacted 

Audience

Experience Impact

Impacted Audience Volume

Experience Priority1

Enhancement Phase

8

Optimize the device return process to enable user to complete the return on time by simplifying and clarifying the instructions, reducing the volume of logistical emails, consolidating and streamlining the return instructions.

EY Employee

High

All

(100%)

High

Near-term

9

Improve the clarity and usability of the return form to enable user to complete the return on time by ensuring the title accurately represents its purpose and content, making it straightforward for users to complete.

EY Employee

Medium

All

(100%)

High

Near-term

10

Investigate the need for PC wipe for data protection in certain user groups to provide effective guidance on data erasure and migration.

EY Employee

Low

All

(100%)

Medium

Near-term

11

Enable user to complete the return by including guidance on data erasure/migration and provide clear guidance on data security.

EY Employee

Medium

All

(100%)

High

Near-term

12

Enable accurate asset inventory monitoring during asset reconciliation by providing user with clear instructions and regular updates on return timing and status.

EY Employee

Low

All

(100%)

Medium

Near-term

13

Enhance real-time status checks to improve asset reconciliation efficiency for accurate tracking upon arrival at the Depot giving users a more accurate view of asset removal.

EY Employee

Low

All

(100%)

Medium

Target State

In the U.S. there are 500-2000 refresh users per month. Refresh volume varies based on country and refresh strategy (rolling or total population refresh).

38 of 44

Future Device Refresh Experience Guiding Principles

User-centricity: Keep users at the center of the design process by understanding their needs, goals, and behaviors. Where possible, tailor experiences using attributes such as user's entitlement and availability to inform a relevant and thoughtful experience.

Information Clarity and Accuracy: Ensure that information presented at each stage of the user journey, including delivery dates, tracking numbers and instructions, is clear and accurate. Set expectations by informing users of what they can expect at each stage of the refresh process.

Information Accessibility:  Ensure that all information is easy to find, understand, and act on. Consolidate logistical emails and provide clear links to instructions and information to make them easily accessible for users. Centralize all information in an easily accessible location for users to reference at any point during the device refresh process.

Clear and Concise Communication: Ensure that all instructional content and communication is well-organized and simplified to avoid confusion and frustration for users. Use plain language and avoid jargon.

Page 38

39 of 44

Future Device Refresh Experience Guiding Principles

Device Selection Guidance: Offer recommendations and guidance to assist users during the device refresh notification and scheduling stage to ensure users receive the device that meets their unique needs.

Device Refresh Guidance: Offer effective direction and guidance to assist users during the device refresh process to reduce opportunities for confusion and error.

Confirmation and feedback: Obtain and monitor confirmation of activity throughout the device refresh process, including confirmation of successful set-up and return completion. Additionally, the system should proactively notify the relevant (Service Desk/OSTS) if any issues arise during the process, allowing for timely resolution of any problems. This will help to reduce uncertainty and increase user confidence in the process.

Efficiency and automation: Design the processes to be as efficient as possible, minimizing the need for additional communications or steps that could lead to confusion or delay. Consider automating certain processes, such as transferring licenses, to reduce the burden on users.

Page 39

40 of 44

Appendix

Page 40

41 of 44

Experience Priority Framework

Experience Priority is a framework for assessing recommendation priorities. It evaluates the criticality of recommended improvements by considering two factors:

  1. Experience Impact

Grounded in usability principles, experience Impact evaluates the ease with which a task can be completed, categorizing issues into four levels based on their severity.

2. Impacted Audience Volume

A critical factor in assessing experience priority, this considers the volume of users affected. This important facet is organized into five levels, each representing a percentage of users impacted.

Page 41

Severe (4)

User cannot complete task, and there is no workaround

High (3)

User will experience significant difficulty completing the task. A workaround may exist.

Medium (2)

User will encounter some difficulty. This issue will cause some inconvenience or confusion.

Low (1)

Users encounter a small amount of difficulty. The issue may cause minor inconvenience. More of an opportunity for optimization.

All (5)

100% of users

Most (4)

>60% of users

Half (3)

40-60% of users

Some (2)

<40% of users

Minimal (1)

<5% of users

Experience Impact

Impacted Audience Volume

1

42 of 44

Experience Priority Framework

Experience Priority Scoring

The Experience Priority Framework score is determined by multiplying the Experience Impact and Impacted Audience Volume, resulting in a score that categorizes the recommended improvements into 4 different priority levels.

This scoring system guides our efforts to strategically address critical issues and optimize the overall user experience.

Page 42

Critical (16-20)

Severe impact on a widespread audience.

High (10-15)

Significant impact on a significant audience.

Medium (5-9)

Moderate impact on a moderate audience.

Low (1-4)

Minor impact on a small audience.

Experience Priority

Example Outputs

Low Impact (1) and Some Reach (2): Experience Impact Score = (2) Low

Severe Impact (4) and Some Reach (2): Experience Impact Score = (8) Medium

High Impact (3) and Most Reach (4): Experience Impact Score = (12) High

Severe Impact (4) and All Reach (5): Experience Impact Score = (20) Critical

43 of 44

UX Process Explainer

This experience audit deck contains a comprehensive overview of the Device Refresh process in the US that outlines observations, recommendations and business impact.

  • Based on the severity of the pain points, UX has assigned an impact rating to each recommendation based on how critical it is to the user’s ability to complete a task or achieve a goal
  • The summary of this report paired with UX impact rating can be leveraged to facilitate prioritization discussions with stakeholders based on ease of implementation and technical limitations relative to impact

Page 43

SERVICE BLUEPRINT

Map the current process and user experience.

RESEARCH, ANALYTICS & SUPPORT DATA

Overlay research, analytics or support data over the mapped process.

EXPERIENCE AUDIT

Review the process and end user experience to identify pain points and opportunities for improvement.

FURTHER RESEARCH

Based on the identified pain points and opportunities, conduct in-depth research to gain a deeper understanding and uncover further improvement opportunities.

STAKEHOLDER READOUTS & PRIOTIZATION DISCUSSIONS

Review the outcomes outlined in the insights deck with relevant stakeholders resulting in actionable next steps based on UX and business impact and ease of implementation.

FUTURE DESIGN

Based on learnings from the entire process, we can design a future state process.

44 of 44

Service Blueprint

Page 44