1 of 12

Precipitation Data from Field Projects

Brenda Dolan

ECSPrecip Seminar Series #2

20 September 2022

2 of 12

Why are field projects important for observations of precipitation?

  • Intensely observe interesting / critical / missing / remote locations
    • Ocean!
    • Deploy instruments to meet specific scientific goals
  • Challenges with field projects
    • Short time periods
    • Discontinuous in space, time
    • Instrument issues / missing data
    • Different operational characteristics
    • Variety of data formats, PIs, data homes

3 of 12

  • Deployable precipitation radars (X, C, S-band)
  • Cloud and mm-wavelength radars (W, Ka-, Ku-)
  • Shipborne radars
  • Airborne radars
  • Vertically pointing
  • Continuous wave (MRR)

Precipitation Measurements:

Radar

https://metek.de/product/mrr-2/

S-POL

NPOL

NPOL

SEA-POL

XSCAR

SEA-POL

APR-3

D3R

SMART-R

DOW

NOXP

Measurements:

  • Reflectivity, differential reflectivity (Zdr), specific differential phase (Kdp), Doppler velocity

MRR2

4 of 12

  • Pros:
    • Rainfall (or snowfall) over large area
      • Large spatial coverage area (1000 km2)
      • High spatial resolution (~ 1 km)
      • Relatively high temporal resolution
    • Microphysics in the cloud
      • DSD or HID

  • Cons:
    • Products are a derived quantities
      • Different rainfall retrievals between projects
    • Data quality / calibration
    • Blockage, attenuation, precipitation phase
    • Different scanning strategies
      • “Heartbeat”
        • 6, 10, 12, 15, 20 minutes
      • PPI
        • Number of elevation angles, timing
        • Good for rainmapping, widespread coverage
      • RHI
        • High-resolution vertical slices
        • Best for process and microphysics

PRECIP 2022 Yonaguni Japan SEA-POL

Precipitation Measurements: Radar

NPOL OLYMPEX 2015

5 of 12

  • Calculation of R from measurements
    • Z-R, R-Kdp, R-Zdr, Ah-R
    • Blended
    • Some relationships depend on location
      • Derived from other instruments (disdrometers)
  • Uncertainty, Errors
  • Done at lowest level or fixed (gridded) height?

Precipitation Measurements: Radar

R

Z

b

A

From Uijlenhoet (2001)

Z = ARb

6 of 12

Pluvios, Parsivals (APUs), 2D videos, gauges, tipping buckets

Precipitation Measurements: Disdrometers and In Situ

APU

2DVD

HyVIS

Particle Probes

UND Citation

Measurements:

  • Particle size distributions, fall speeds, number concentrations, axis ratios

Balloon and aircraft probes

7 of 12

  • Pros:
    • Size distributions
    • Integrated product to get precipitation amounts
    • High temporal resolution (30 sec – 3 mins)
  • Cons:
    • Quality control
      • Splashing, phase
      • Wind influences
    • Measurement parameters of instrument
      • Large/ small particles
    • Point measurements
      • Variability of precipitation

Precipitation Measurements: Disdrometers and In Situ

8 of 12

  • Optical disdrometers on ships sailing around the world
    • Mounted to freely turn with the winds
    • Snow and rain (precipitation phase)
    • Include a bunch of environmental characteristics as well (SST, T, wind velocity)

Precipitation Measurements: OCEANRAIN

Klepp et al. 2017

9 of 12

Data Access

  • DOE
    • https://adc.arm.gov/discovery/
    • Very nice visualization, organized by data type, field project, location, measurement….
    • Can pick up data from globus, wget file list, thredds
    • Different versions of the data (Raw, QC, moments, products, PI products)
    • Downloads a README, dataquality file, version controlled, DOI provided
  • NASA
    • https://ghrc.nsstc.nasa.gov/home/field-campaigns
    • Organized by field project
    • Qced data available
    • Readme files
    • DOIs provided
    • https data access
  • NSF / NCAR
  • OCEANRAIN
    • https://oceanrain.cen.uni-hamburg.de/index.php?id=2752
    • Qced data from 2011-2020
      • Matched with some environmental information like SST, T,

10 of 12

Data Specifics

  • Radar
    • Typically 2 levels of data
      • “Level 2”: Corrected radial moment data (radar gates, azimuth, elevation, range)
        • Cf Radial files (netCDF compliant)
        • Z, Zdr, PhiDP / Kdp, rhoHV, VR, SW, NCP or SQI
        • Sometimes this includes rain rate or versions of hydrometeor identification
      • “Level 3”: Gridded data products
        • netCDF gridded files
        • Includes “best estimate” products of Rain rate, hydrometeor identification, sometimes calculated DSD
  • Disdrometer
    • Text or netCDF files
    • Bin data – number of drops per bin size, fall speed
    • Integrated data – rain rate, liquid water content, total number of drops, reflectivity

11 of 12

Summary

  • Field campaigns are a critical source of precipitation observations
    • Detailed and targeted measurements in challenging and data-sparse locations
    • Provide high resolution spatial and temporal data related to amounts, types, particles, size distributions
  • Field campaign data can be challenging due to complexities of the instruments, locations, and discontinuities
    • Data often require specialized and careful QC
    • Rainfall from radar is a retrieved quantity – how was it calculated? What are the uncertainties?
    • Different scanning strategies provide different opportunities – what level are the data reported at?

12 of 12

Thank you!