1 of 12

The Application and Creation of Tools to Support EWN (and RSM) Decision Making

WEDA– NBS Solutions Engineering and Construction Short Couse– June 27, 2024

Wendy Laurent, PE, Taylor Engineering

2 of 12

Outline and Acknowledgements

| 2

  • Models and tools to support EWN and RSM �(consultants' perspective)

  • RSM toolkit
    • Building Coastal Resilience through dredge material management
    • RSM DST- Quantification of Benefits

David Perkey, PhD- david.perkey@usace.army.mil

Tate McAlpin- tate.o.mcalpin@usace.army.mil

3 of 12

Models & Tools to Support EWN (consulting perspective)

  • Shoaling analysis and BU of dredged material for marshes
    • Coupled (MIKE 3) hydrodynamics, waves, sediment transport, and particle tracking modeling to understand drivers of shoaling
    • Evaluate historical, existing, and future marsh conditions to understand candidate marsh areas for BU placement & restoration

  • Dredging optimization of inland waterways for improvements to navigation
    • Coupled MIKE 3 modeling to understand effects of channel features and drivers of shoaling
    • Economic analysis of dredging operations with and without proposed channel features/alignments

| 3

EXAMPLE PROJECT APPLICATIONS

4 of 12

Models & Tools to Support EWN (consulting perspective)

  • Fort Pierce Inlet shoaling analysis
    • Evaluate inlet dynamics and sediment basin alternatives
    • Develop a coupled MIKE 3 model to understand potential sediment basin dimensions and potential BU placement volume for downdrift beaches
  • Martin County Shore Protection Project resilience study
    • Review of project performance
    • Storm-induced beach evolution modeling with XBEACH to evaluate profile configurations
      • Forcing included: SLR, tropical, extra-tropical conditions
      • Tracked shoreline recession, volume changes, and overtopping

| 4

EXAMPLE PROJECT APPLICATIONS

Martin SPP- Alt 2

Martin SPP- Alt 3

5 of 12

Dredging and BUDM

| 5

6 of 12

Building Coastal Resilience through Dredge Material Management

  • Like most great ideas…

| 6

Goal- create a tool to support data driven decisions and help meet the 70% BU goal

Woolpert, 2020

7 of 12

Building Coastal Resilience through Dredge Material Management

APPROACH

  • Integrate existing tools:
    • NavPortal
    • RSM DST – Regional Sediment Management Decision Support Tool
    • CERI – Coastal Engineering Resilience Index
    • Dredge Optimization
  • Address challenges/objectives:
    • Tool interoperability
    • Data accessibility, security
    • Actionable results, metadata

| 7

Woolpert, 2024

the Building Coastal Resilience Project includes the creation of a web-based, decision-support tool that enhances resilience through strategic placement of dredged material

8 of 12

Building Coastal Resilience through Dredge Material Management

| 8

Multidisciplinary team

Woolpert, 2024

9 of 12

What is the RSM DST?

  • Planning tool accessible in NavPortal (to USACE)
  • Assists in the planning of dredge projects
    • Optimize dredging projects and possible placement options
    • Interactive GIS tool
    • Quantify benefits associated with Beneficial Use (BU) Placements
    • Support USACE goal of 70% BU by 2030

| 9

DST

COST MODULE

BENEFIT MODULE

🡪

+

10 of 12

Cost Module

  • DIS data🡪 $/cy
    • Data varies widely by Division– cost, project size, dredge type etc.
    • Multiple or inconsistent inputs for variables
    • Limitations related to dredge type, transport distance/method, BU project costs
  • Cost Module Inputs
    • USACE division
    • Dredge type and project quantity
    • Work type (new or maintenance)
    • Beneficial use (BU) placement type
    • Sediment type
    • Transport type and distance

| 10

VERSION 2

*not for independent government estimatestool to aid in project planning and understanding of costs

11 of 12

Benefit Framework

| 11

Quantifiable Benefits

Quantifiable using FEMA’s Ecosystem Service Values

Qualitative Benefits

  • Recreation and public access*
  • Raw and construction material provisioning
  • Transport savings
  • Habitat enhancement, creation, or restoration*
  • Hazard protection
  • Aesthetics, public appeal, and socio-cultural
  • Carbon sequestration
  • Hydrologic functions
  • Improved water and air quality (human health)
  • Food provisioning�
  • Education, outreach, and research
  • Collaboration and relationships
  • Potential reuse of contaminated sediment
  • Economic development
  • Greenhouse gas (emission reduction)
  • Biodiversity and ecosystem integrity

* Can also be quantified using FEMA’s ecosystem service values

12 of 12

Summary and Looking Forward

  • Planning level tools to encourage data driven decision making, sustainable RSM and BU placement
    • Support permitting efforts
  • Encourage user testing 🡪 continued improvements
  • Expand on methods to quantify benefits
  • Resource sharing

| 12

What functionality would you like to see in RSM BU tools?

Thoughts/comments/suggestions?

Woolpert, 2024