1 of 8

Increasing Engagement with Mental Health Non-Profit Organizations: An Economic Analysis

ECO 499-002: Economics of Altruism with Dr. Gail Hoyt

2 of 8

Group Members

Rowan West

FLIE-Japanese

Senior

John Langhi

Economics Major

Senior

Dana Pangburn

Economics Major

Senior

Alex Wood

Economics and Anthropology

Senior

3 of 8

About NAMI

  • The National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) identifies itself as an advocacy group to educate and aid those affected by mental illness.
  • Founded nationally in 1979, Madison, WI.
  • NAMI Lexington was founded in 1985.
  • Offers a variety of programs and aid to those who are affected by mental illness.

Shannon Baker

Director of Communications and Development

4 of 8

Research Question and Thesis Statement

Research Question: How can mental health non-profit organizations increase their donation and volunteer numbers?

Hypothesis: We hypothesize that stigma and a lack of information are the two greatest barriers to increasing volunteers and donations. Based on the data collected, we will suggest strategies for how NAMI can better target individuals more likely to volunteer or donate. Furthermore, these strategies will be generalized for the use of other, similar mental health organizations.

5 of 8

Methodology

To observe what influences impact whether individuals are willing to volunteer or donate to NAMI and similar mental health organizations, a 90 question survey was administered digitally to University of Kentucky students, receiving 444 responses.

The following linear regression models were utilized to determine which factors have a significant relationship relative to a percentage likelihood of volunteering or donating to NAMI:

namivolunteer = β0+ substanceuse x β1+ namicatsunaware x β2+ valuetime x β3+ republican x β4+ male x β5+ mentalcrimeagree x β6+ mentalillness x β7 + workschizophreniaagree x β8 + ϵ

n = 444, R2 = 0.28

namidonate = β0+ candonate x β1+ namiunaware x β2+ environmentallyconscious xβ3+ workschizophreniaagree x β4+ male x β5+ republican x β6+ valuetime x β7 + mentalillness x β8 + ϵ

n =444, R2 = 0.259

6 of 8

Descriptive Statistics

Variable

Description

Mean or Percentage

Standard Deviation

Male

Respondents who are male

43.2%

Age

Age of respondents

19.3

1.412

Republican

Political Affiliation

50.5%

NamiUnaware

NamiCatsUnaware

Respondents who are unaware of the nonprofit (or the student group)

81.5%

90.1%

ValueTime

Amount of 100 percentage points allocated by respondents to time rather than money

66.3

2.273

MentallIlness

Respondents who know someone who has been negatively impacted by mental illness

61.9%

CanDonate

Respondents who feel they have enough money to donate to charitable causes

49.7%

Variable

Description

Mean or Percentage

Standard Deviation

EnvironmentalConAgree

Respondents who consider themselves environmentally conscious

60.3%

WorkSchizophreniaAgree

Respondents who would be comfortable having a coworker with schizophrenia

50.7%

SubstanceUse

Respondents who believe mental illness is caused by substance use

61.2%

MentalCrimeAgree

Respondents who believe mental illness and crime are correlated

45.7%

7 of 8

Results

Variable

Coefficient

Standard Error

SubstanceUse*

-9.869

4.279

NamiCatsUnaware*

-9.411

4.499

ValueTime*

2.183

0.607

Republican*

-7.236

2.748

Male*

-24.620

2.848

MentalCrimeAgree

3.742

2.721

MentallIlness

1.976

2.865

WorkSchizAgree*

14.678

2.742

Volunteer Regression

Variable

Coefficient

Standard Error

CanDonate*

7.021

2.650

NamiUnaware*

-7.766

3.363

EnvironConAgree*

4.787

1.448

WorkSchizAgree*

10.732

2.725

Male*

-16.226

2.753

Republican*

-8.172

2.703

ValueTime*

1.886

.587

MentalIllness

-.846

2.757

Donating Regression

*An asterisk indicates variables significant at α = 0.05.

8 of 8

Conclusion

  • In regards to demographics, in general NAMI should target individuals who are female and identify outside of the Republican party.
  • People who are unaware of NAMI and NAMICATS are significantly less likely to volunteer or donate, so they should focus on raising awareness of themselves and their student organization on UK’s campus.
  • Since half of the respondents agreed they would be comfortable working with someone with schizophrenia, it may be beneficial for NAMI to target college students as potential volunteers and future donors.
  • On average, respondents answered that they valued time greater than money, which may suggest that college students are more willing to donate money rather than volunteer. However, the coefficient of this variable on both regressions was positive, so there may not be a significant difference.
  • Individuals who know someone affected by mental illness are not more likely to volunteer or donate (variable is insignificant); therefore, it should not be assumed that such individuals are prime targets for volunteers or donors for mental health nonprofits.
  • Environmentally conscious individuals are more likely to donate to NAMI, so NAMI may benefit from collaborating with environmental nonprofits and their donors.