PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MOD007114
Deep Nanavati : 2045651 Jay Kher: 2060438 Ehtisham Afsal:2129564 Romil Modi : 2055626
Malewar Tanish:2130193 Jorge Locker: 2012469
The brief we have been given is to redesign the SPIDRJet drone made by BAE Systems. The brief states we must reduce the weight of the chassis by 20% by design or material change. Overall weight should be less than 2kg and to redesign the leg to increase the reach up to 300mm while keeping the same electro-mechanical design of 3 joints powered by 3 servo motors.
Market Research
For our market research we decided to focus on other quadrupled drones available on the market.
We found that most bodies were made of ABS or carbon fibre composites while the legs were made from ductile aluminium.
We also found that the leg designs we’re not solid parts, they were framework to form a kind of skeleton frame instead reducing the weight of them. We also noted how these drones have rubber feet on the bottom.
Product Design Specification
Element | Description | Demand or Wish |
Material | Chassis made from a lightweight material | Demand |
Material | Material to be usable with 3D printing methods | Wish |
Weight | Overall design to weigh under 2Kg | Demand |
Weight | Reduce current chassis weight by 20% | Demand |
Safety | Have a safety factor of 2 or lower | Demand |
Safety | Comply with all relevant British Standards | Demand |
Size | Have leg reach up to 300mm | Demand |
Size | Small enough to manoeuvre cave terrain | demand |
Testing | Leg design to pass simulations of loads of 10, 20 and 30 Newtons | Demand |
Performance | Leg design to use 3 joints with servo motors | Demand |
Reliability | Reduce stress concentration on leg hinges | Demand |
Product cost | Be at a competitive price against similar models on the market | Wish |
Disposal | 60% of material to be recyclable or reusable | Wish |
Aesthetics | To have the name of the model on the drone | Wish |
Ergonomics | Easy to access batteries for ability to change out and charge | Wish |
Current Body Design
This is the current design of the drone we was given. It weights 0.548kg and is made from ABS Plastic
Body Concept Design 1
We also decided to change the material to polycarbonate as it has a similar strength to ABS while being more lightweight.
Weight is 0.42 Kg
Body Concept Design 2
Weight = 0.449 Kg
Spacious body, to fit electronics
Dividers for electronic circuits, disable circuits to move inside the body.
Material = Polypropylene
Body Concept Design 3
Current Leg Design
This is the current design for the leg. It is made from ABS Plastic and weighs 0.169kg and extends to 238mm.
Leg Concept Design 1
Leg Concept Design 2
Leg Concept Design 3
Final Design
Overall weight is 1.897 Kg
Materials we used are polypropylene, silicone rubber and steel
Design Review
To pick what concepts we used for the final design, we built full assemblies for them and ran the same simulations on them and analysed the results to see what worked best, what we liked about each design and what would work best for our final design.
Final Design Evaluation
Overall, we like the design we ended up with, if we were to do this again, we would like to test out other materials what wouldn’t be restricted by an overall weight of 2Kg as that restricted us to mainly plastics. When designing the drone, we kept in mind the manufacturability and kept to parts that could be 3D printed. As a group we focused more on the leg designs than the body and after we feel we should have spent more time working on the body to see if we could have made it better.
Finite Element Analysis of Leg
Simulation of Safety Factor under 30N load
Simulation of Von Mises Stress under 30N load
Finite Element Analysis of Complete Assembly
Simulation of Von Mises stress under 30N load spread over the four legs
Simulation showing safety factor under 30N load spread over the four legs
Reviewing Ideas
Failures
As on redesigning we faced some of the failures in the designs such as in above image we observed at the deformation of the structure when applied force on the body of drone.
Failure could be due to :
In our case, in one of our design, failure was because of the design by which body deformed. There was less connectivity between base and pillars.
Value Analysis
Item | Vision | Power (Battery) | Movement | Electronics | Packaging | Additional cost | Total cost of a part | % |
Body | | 2 | | | 7 | 90 | 99 | 14.32 |
Legs | | | 220 | 20 | | 20 | 260 | 37.62 |
Camera | 130 | | | | | | 130 | 18.81 |
Battery | | 20 | | | | | 20 | 2.89 |
Cables | | | | 10 | | | 10 | 1.44 |
Sensors | 110 | | | | | | 110 | 15.91 |
Electric motor fan | | | | 25 | | 10 | 35 | 5.06 |
Circuit board | | | | 15 | | | 15 | 1.73 |
Assembling drone | | | | 5 | 7 | | 12 | 1.74 |
Functional cost | 240 | 22 | 220 | 75 | 14 | 120 | 691 | |
Priority | H | | H | H | | | | |
Recyclability
Conclusion
We feel as a group we have met the brief we were given and have produced a product that would hold up to the task.