Born Global Foundation
Engineering Internship
TIC: Experimental Component Summary
Wes Yan Sept. 2024
Born Global Foundation
The Born Global Foundation which is a sustainability non-profit focused on harnessing biomimicry to create products for a more sustainable future.
It empowers future professionals to tackle pressing global challenges by combining traditional knowledge with cutting-edge technology, fostering sustainable change across industries and communities.
BGF: Engineering Internship
Market Study and Analysis
Battery Power Requirements by Industry
[2]
Battery Power Requirements over Time
[1]
Most Common Batteries
Battery Type | Pros | Cons | Recycling Rate | Closed Loop Recycling Process |
Lead-Acid | -Low Cost -Durable | -Low Specific Energy -Low Cycle Count -Highly Toxic | 99% | Yes |
Nickel- Cadmium | -High Cycle Count -Extremely Durable | -Maintenance Required -Highly Toxic | 75%-90% | Partial |
Nickel - Metal Hydride | -Low Toxicity -Similar Power Req. as NiCd | -Maintenance Required -Moderate Cost | 50%-70% | No |
Lithium Ion | -Very low maintenance -High Cycle Count | -High Cost -Protective Circuit Required | 5%-10% | No |
[3]
Recycling vs. Refinement for LIBs
[5]
Lithium-Ion Battery Production
[4]
Market Study and Analysis Summary
Exponential Growth in Demand
Lithium Demand Surge
Need for Increased Battery Salt Production
Market Opportunities
State of the Art
Current State of Battery Salt Production Processes
Process | Benefits | Problems |
Hard Rock Extraction: Mining of minerals from hard rock deposits. Requires crushing, high-temperature treatment, and chemical reactions | - Higher lithium concentration - Shorter production cycle - Less water-intensive | - Higher energy consumption - Expensive processing - More waste generation |
Brine Extraction: Extraction from underground salt flats or geothermal brines using solar evaporation or direct extraction techniques | - Low-cost production - Ideal for large-scale operations - Lower carbon footprint | - High water usage - Long processing time (months) - Environmental concerns with land and water use |
Recycling: Recovery of lithium and other valuable metals from spent batteries | - Sustainable and reduces mining dependency - Less environmental impact | - Low recovery efficiency - Complex processing - High cost for small-scale operations |
[6]
Current State of Battery Recycling
Recycling Method | Benefits | Problems |
Hydrometallurgy: Recycle batteries through chemical leaching, precipitation, and purification | -High metal recovery rates -Low emissions | -Safety concerns to due chemical use -Environmental safety concerns |
Pyrometallurgy: Recycle batteries by heating them to high temperatures to separate metals | - Requires minimal pretreatment and accommodating various battery chemistries. | -Requires a lot of energy -Environmental impacts of such a process have not yet been fully assessed |
Direct Recycling: Physically separates and reuses battery components without chemical dissolution | -Low Cost | -Low yield -High automation costs -Safety concerns due to the chemical instability of end-of-life batteries. |
[7]
Customer and Industry Needs
Recycling and Process Innovation
As the demand for battery power increases large players in the industry have a number of requests, particularly noting:
[7]
BGF Potential Solution and Preliminary Experimentation
Battery Salt Filtration
This summer I worked on designing a small scale battery salt filtration system intended to explore the viability of pairing the principles of adsorption and nanofiltration in the separation of battery salts, ultimately contributing to a battery recycling process that is:
System Components and Procedure
The experiment included the use of two different filters: a biochar filter intended to act as an adsorbent surface collecting unwanted ions and a commercially available nanofiltration membrane that could filter the solutions’ contents by size and charge.
Biochar was chosen as the adsorbent in this experiment as it is both environmentally friendly and has already been used as an adsorbent in the industry.
Additionally, using commercially available nanofiltration membranes may show that low-cost and mass-manufactured filters suit this application, which would significantly lower the cost of the process at scale.
System Components and Procedure
The experimental setup is was simple, consisting of a salt solutions of known concentration, conductivity, and pH, that is pumped through the filtration system.
The pH (top) and conductivity (bottom) of the filtered solution were then measured to determine how the filters altered the solution’s properties.
The battery salt solutions that were tested included common battery materials such as: Sodium Chloride, Lithium Chloride, Cobalt Chloride, and Nickel Chloride.
Preliminary Experimental Results
The conductivity measurements allowed for the calculation of the salt rejection rate, giving insight into how well the system separates various battery salts from water. Paying close attention to the separation factors indicated how much of each mineral or ion is successfully filtered through the system. This is crucial for understanding which materials can be effectively recovered and reused in future battery recycling efforts.
The preliminary results of the experiments were very promising and showed that the prototype filtration system was more effective at filtering out high value salts such as Lithium and Nickel Chloride when compared with Sodium and Cobalt Chloride.
Potential Economic Viability of
Advanced Battery Filtration Systems
Applications of Battery Filtration Technology
The preliminary results of the experiments show potential promise for this technology being implemented in both recycling and material refinement processes.
Battery Recycling
Implementing this filtration technology could improve efficiency and material yield in the later stages of pyrometallurgical or hydrometallurgical processes.
Battery Material Production
Increase yield and process time of brine filtration processes for rare earth material refinement. Additionally it could also be used for increasing the purity of mined materials in hard rock mining.
Potential Value Proposition
This technology poses a number of strong value propositions that may entice investment from battery recycling companies, battery manufacturers, sustainability companies, government agencies, and VC or other private capital.
Efficiency and Cost Savings
Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Market-Ready Solution
Potential Financial Impact
The application of advanced filtration systems for battery salt separation using the technology I researched over the summer could result in cost cuts for large battery recycling or refinement operations.
Reducing Operational Costs
Increased Metal Recovery and Higher Yields
Lower Cost per Ton Processed
Potential Savings for Battery Manufacturers
Potential Revenue Generation
Depending on the financial and exit strategy of a company marketing such filtration technology, there are a number of different possible long term revenue generation sources.
Licensing Revenue
Direct Sales of Filtration Units
Recurring Revenue from Service and Maintenance Contracts
Value-Added Services
Potential Stakeholder Investment
There are a number of factors that would make investment in a company possessing such technology attractive to industry stakeholders
High-Growth Market Potential
Strong Return on Investment (ROI)
Sustainability and ESG Alignment
Scalability and Global Impact
Potential Financial Projections and Revenue
Below is a projection for the potential revenue that could be generated by a new company marketing this advanced battery filtration system to industry partners of varying size (for differences in system sales and leasing opportunities). It does not take into account the costs or initial investment required to create such a company. Additionally it also assumes that this technology has been fully developed and is refined enough to be deployed a the start of year 1.
Revenue Model Overview
Potential Investor Returns
Thank You!
References
[1] Iea. (2023, April). Battery demand by region, 2016-2022 – charts – Data & Statistics. IEA. https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/battery-demand-by-region-2016-2022
[2]Solomon, M. (2024, January 24). The rise of batteries in six charts and not too many numbers. RMI. https://rmi.org/the-rise-of-batteries-in-six-charts-and-not-too-many-numbers/
[3] Battery University. (2021, December 3). BU-107: Comparison table of secondary batteries. https://batteryuniversity.com/article/bu-107-comparison-table-of-secondary-batteries
[4] Lithium production by country (1995-2021). World Economic Forum. (2023, January 5). https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2023/01/chart-countries-produce-lithium-world/
[5] Battery Recycling Market Size & Share Analysis Report, 2030. (n.d.). https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/battery-recycling-market
[6] MIT. (2024, February 12). How is lithium mined?. MIT Climate Portal. https://climate.mit.edu/ask-mit/how-lithium-mined#:~:text=Until%20recently%2C%20most%20lithium%20mining,behind%20lithium%20and%20other%20elements.
[7] Yu, X., Li, W., Gupta, V., Gao, H., Tran, D., Sarwar, S., & Chen, Z. (2022, September 8). Current challenges in efficient lithium-ion batteries’ recycling: A perspective. Global challenges (Hoboken, NJ). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9749077/