CLONING IN BACTERIAL AND YEAST HOST

Sumit sharma Department of Biotechnology

INTRODUCTION

• Cloning in bacterial and yeast hosts is a fundamental technique in molecular biology, allowing the replication, modification, and expression of foreign DNA.

​

​

• Bacteria, particularly Escherichia coli, and yeast, such as Saccharomyces cerevisiae, are widely used as cloning hosts due to their well-characterized genetics, ease of manipulation, and ability to support recombinant DNA technologies.

BACTERIAL CLONING VECTOR

• In bacterial cloning, E. coli is the preferred host due to its rapid growth, simple culture conditions, and efficient transformation. Plasmid vectors such as pBR322, pUC19, and pET series are commonly used for DNA insertion and amplification.

​

• DNA fragments are ligated into these vectors using restriction enzymes and DNA ligase before being introduced into E. coli via transformation methods like calcium chloride-mediated uptake or electroporation.

​

• Selection markers, such as antibiotic resistance genes and blue-white screening using the lacZ gene, facilitate the identification of successful recombinants. Bacterial cloning is highly efficient and serves as a primary tool for DNA manipulation before further functional studies.

YEAST CLONING VECTOR

• Yeast, particularly Saccharomyces cerevisiae, is frequently used for cloning when eukaryotic expression or large DNA fragments are required. Unlike bacteria, yeast can perform post-translational modifications, making it suitable for recombinant protein production. Various yeast vectors, including Yeast Integrative Plasmids (YIp), Yeast Episomal Plasmids (YEp), and Yeast Artificial Chromosomes (YACs), support different cloning applications.

​

• Transformation methods such as lithium acetate treatment, electroporation, and spheroplast transformation introduce foreign DNA into yeast cells.

​

• Selection markers based on auxotrophic complementation (e.g., URA3, LEU2, HIS3) are commonly used for identifying transformed colonies.

CLONING VECTORS

• While bacterial cloning is faster and more efficient, yeast cloning offers advantages for eukaryotic gene expression and large DNA fragment maintenance.

​

• Each system has distinct applications: E. coli is ideal for rapid DNA amplification and simple protein expression, whereas yeast provides a eukaryotic environment for complex protein folding and modification.

​

• The choice between bacterial and yeast hosts depends on the specific requirements of the experiment, such as the need for post-translational modifications or high-throughput DNA replication.

​

• Both systems remain indispensable tools in molecular biology, enabling advances in genetic engineering, biotechnology, and pharmaceutical research.

SALIENT FEATURES

• Cloning in bacterial and yeast hosts is a fundamental aspect of molecular biology, enabling the study and manipulation of genes for various applications, including recombinant protein production, gene expression studies, and genomic analysis.
• While bacteria, particularly Escherichia coli, are widely used for their rapid growth and ease of genetic manipulation, yeast, primarily Saccharomyces cerevisiae, serves as an important eukaryotic host for cloning and protein expression.

SALIENT FEATURES OF BACTERIAL CLONING VECTORS

1. RAPID GROWTH AND HIGH TRANFORMATION: E.coli have short doubling time (-20 -30 min.) allowing for quick expansion of recombinant clones. Transformation efficiency is high, particularly with electroporation or chemically competent cells.
2. WELL-ORGANIZED GENETICS: Decades of research have establishes detailed Knowledge of Ecola Generics, making it preferred system for dna manipulation. Many equalized trains, such as DH5α BL21 have been optimized for specific applications.
3. VERSATILE CLONING VECTORS: Plasmids (eg., pUC, pBR322, pET), bacteriophages (eg., λ phages), cosmids, and bacterial artificial chromosomes (BACs) allow cloning of DNA fragments of varying sizes.

SALIENT FEATURES OF YEAST CLONING VECTORS

1. EUKARYOTIC CELLULAR MACHINERY – Unlike E. coli, yeast possesses cellular machinery for post-translational modifications, proper protein folding, and glycosylation, making it suitable for expressing eukaryotic proteins.

2. MULTIPLE CLONING VECTOR OPTIONS – Yeast vectors include Yeast Integrative Plasmids (YIp), Yeast Episomal Plasmids (YEp), Yeast Centromeric Plasmids (YCp), and Yeast Artificial Chromosomes (YACs), each supporting different applications, from stable genome integration to large-fragment cloning.

3. GENETIC SELECTION METHODS – Unlike bacteria, yeast commonly uses auxotrophic selection markers (e.g., URA3, LEU2, HIS3), allowing transformation without antibiotic resistance genes.

CONT.

4. STABLE EXPRESSION AND MAINTENANCE OF LARGE DNA FRAGMENTS – YACs enable cloning of very large DNA fragments (>100 kb), making yeast useful for genome mapping and studying complex genetic elements.

5. SLOWER GROWTH COMPARED TO BACTERIA – Yeast has a longer doubling time (~90 minutes), making cloning procedures more time-consuming than in E. coli.

SELECTABLE MARKERS

• Selectable markers play a crucial role in molecular cloning by allowing the identification and isolation of successfully transformed cells.
• These markers confer a survival advantage to host cells, enabling them to grow in selective conditions while eliminating non-transformed cells.

SELECTABLE MARKERS FOR BACTERIAL CLONING VECTORS

1. ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE MARKERS

These markers encode resistance to specific antibiotics, allowing only transformed cells to survive in selective media.

​

Ampicillin resistance (bla gene) – Confers resistance to ampicillin by producing β-lactamase, which degrades the antibiotic.

Kanamycin resistance (kan gene) – Inactivates kanamycin via aminoglycoside phosphotransferase.

Chloramphenicol resistance (cat gene) – Produces chloramphenicol acetyltransferase to inactivate the antibiotic.

Tetracycline resistance (tetA gene) – Encodes an efflux pump that removes tetracycline from the cell.

CONT.

2. REPORTER-BASED SELECTABLE MARKERS

These markers allow visual or colorimetric detection of transformed cells.

​

Blue-White Screening (lacZ gene) – The lacZ gene encodes β-galactosidase, which hydrolyzes X-gal, producing blue colonies. Recombinant plasmids disrupt lacZ, leading to white colonies.

Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) – Fluorescent marker for real-time tracking of gene expression.

SELECTABLE MARKERS FOR YEAST CLONING VECTORS

1. AUXOTROPHIC MARKERS

Yeast cloning often relies on complementation of auxotrophic mutations, where transformed cells regain the ability to synthesize essential compounds.

​

URA3 (Uracil Biosynthesis) – Restores uracil biosynthesis in ura3 mutant strains.

LEU2 (Leucine Biosynthesis) – Allows growth in leucine-deficient media.

HIS3 (Histidine Biosynthesis) – Enables selection in histidine-deficient media.

TRP1 (Tryptophan Biosynthesis) – Used in strains requiring tryptophan supplementation.

CONT.

2. ANTIBIOTIC RESISTANCE MARKERS

Although less common than in bacteria, antibiotic markers are sometimes used in yeast.

​

Hygromycin B resistance (hph gene) – Confers resistance to hygromycin B.

G418 resistance (kanMX gene) – Confers resistance to geneticin (G418), commonly used in yeast transformation.

BACTERIAL CLONING VECTORS

Bacterial cloning vectors are DNA molecules used to introduce and propagate foreign DNA in bacterial hosts. These vectors serve as carriers for DNA fragments, allowing their replication, selection, and expression in bacteria, typically Escherichia coli. The choice of a vector depends on the cloning goal, such as gene expression, protein production, or genetic manipulation.

GRAM POSITIVE BACTERIA (Bacillus subtilis)

• In Gram-positive bacteria, the base composition of the different genomes ranges from <30% GC to >70% GC.
• Given this disparity in GC content, the preferred codons and regulatory signals used by organisms at one end of the % GC spectrum will not be recognized by organisms at the other end.
• This in turn means that there are no universal cloning vehicles for use with all Gram-positive bacteria.
• Rather, one set of systems has been developed for high-GC organisms (e.g. streptomycetes).
• For low-GC organisms, it comprises bacteria from the unrelated genera Bacillus, Clostridium, and Staphylococcus and the lactic acid bacteria Streptococcus, Lactococcus, and Lactobacillus.

CONT.

• The difficulties experienced in direct cloning in B. subtilis, hybrid plasmids were constructed which can replicate in both E. coli and B. subtilis.
• Originally most of these were constructed as fusions between pBR322 and pC194 or pUB110.
• With such plasmids, E. coli can be used as an efficient intermediate host for cloning.

THE MODE OF PLASMID REPLICATION CAN AFFECT THE STABILITY OF CLONING VECTORS IN B. SUBTILIS

• Early in the development of B. subtilis cloning vectors, it was noted that only short DNA fragments could be efficiently cloned and that longer DNA segments often undergo rearrangements.
• This structural instability is independent of the host recombination systems, for it still occurs in Rec− strains.
• A major contributing factor to structural instability of recombinant DNA in B. subtilis appears to be the mode of replication of the plasmid vector.
• All the B. subtilis vectors described above replicate by a rolling-circle mechanism.
• Nearly every step in the process digresses or could digress from its usual function, thus effecting rearrangements.
• Also, single-stranded DNA is known to be a reactive intermediate in every recombination process, and single-stranded DNA is generated during rolling-circle replication.
• If structural instability is a consequence of rolling circle replication, then vectors which replicate by the alternative theta mechanism could be more stable.

REFERENCES

• Martinez A., Kolvek S.J., Yip C.L., et al. (2004) Genetically modified bacterial strains and novel bacterial artificial chromosome shuttle vectors for constructing environmental libraries and detecting heterologous natural products in multiple expression hosts. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 70, 2452–63.
• Middleton R. & Hofmeister A. (2004) New shuttle vectors for ectopic insertion of genes into Bacillus subtilis. Plasmid 51, 238–45.
• Quandt J., Clark R.G., Venter A.P., et al. (2004) Modified RP4 and Tn5-Mob derivatives for facilitated manipulation of large plasmids in Gram-negative bacteria. Plasmid 52, 1–12.
• Frischauf, A.-M., Lehrach, H., Poustka, A. & Murray, N. (1983) Lambda replacement vectors carrying polylinker sequences. Journal of Molecular Biology, 170, 827–842.
• Iouannou, P.A., Amemiya, C.T., Garnes, J. et al. (1994) P1-derived vector for the propagation of large human DNA fragments. Nature Genetics, 6, 84–89.
• Shiyuza, H., Birren, B., Kim, U.J. et al. (1992) Cloning and stable maintenance of 300 kilobase-pair fragments of human DNA in Escherichia coli using an F-factor-based vector. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 89, 8794–8797. [The first description of a BAC.]
• Sternberg, N. (1992) Cloning high molecular weight DNA fragments by the bacteriophage P1 system. Trends in Genetics, 8, 11–16.
• Yanisch-Perron, C., Vieira, J. & Messing, J. (1985) Improved M13 phage cloning vectors and host strains: nucleotide sequences of the M13mp18 and pUC19 vectors. Gene, 33, 103–119.
• Broach, J.R. (1982) The yeast 2 mm circle. Cell, 28, 203–204.