Proposal Planning and Writing - Discussion
Eric Hintsa
University of Colorado/CIRES and NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory
Formerly a graduate student, postdoc, and scientist at a research institution
Program director for the NSF Atmospheric Chemistry Program 2005-2009
Some proposal basics
Follow-up to presentations by Jim Mazzouccolo, CU Research and Innovation Office
Proposal Basics
(Proposal Basics – continued)
Effective Proposals
You have ideas, skills, tools/equipment, and human resources (people)
Funding agencies or organizations have needs and missions – basic science and education, but also some very specific goals, or areas of science, technology, and products that they are interested in
Successful proposals and successful projects benefit both the PI(s) and the funders
Show (or pitch) your ability to conceptualize, carry out, and complete the project in a certain time and budget
In addition to the content, a good proposal is clearly written, structured and formatted so it is easy for a reviewer to read!
The box in the middle is usually the fullest. By far. Really it should be divided in two – some will be funded, some will be declined. You want to increase the chances of yours being in the “funded” part.
Cartoon image © Eoin O'Sullivan
Types of review – Individual “Mail” reviews, panels, combination
Evaluation by program officers
Types of proposals – “new” vs. “renewal”, also supplements, instrumentation, fellowships, meeting support, exploratory research, etc.
Contacting program officers – anything unusual and important, or if there is something you just don’t understand (and can’t get an answer elsewhere)
Always be willing to review proposals (and papers), serve on panels, when possible. Or even work for or with a granting agency or organization. In any case, read proposals that were funded or declined.
There is a lot of uncertainty and changes out there right now. Maybe some new opportunities.
Questions?