Relative Flux Calibration
Using Reference Stars to
Correct Your Spectrum
S. Donnell
AAVSO Spectroscopy Special Interest Group Lead
Version 1.0, Jan 2025
Astronomical Spectroscopy
Factors Affecting the Quality of a Spectrum
Effect on the Spectrum
Both atmosphere and instrument introduce differences between the 1D profile you obtain and the ideal 1D profile obtained from a perfect instrument located outside of Earth’s atmosphere.�
Difference Between Corrected and Uncorrected Spectrum
4
Atmosphere - Extinction
Zenith Angle = 80 deg
Zenith Angle = 60 deg
Zenith Angle = 40 deg
Zenith Angle = 0 deg
Atmosphere - Extinction
Atmosphere - Dispersion
Atmosphere - Dispersion
Instrument - Telescope
Instrument - Spectrograph
Instrument - Camera
Instrument - Camera
The sensitivity of the sensor to incident light (AKA response or quantum efficiency) varies by wavelength
Sensors tend to be less responsive in the blue and red ends of the visible spectrum
Different sensors have different spectral response curves
12
Instrument Effects Corrected With Flat Field Images
13
Relative Flux Calibration Overview
Preferably:
Alternately:
14
Relative Flux Calibration - The Reference Star
15
Two Methods for Performing the Correction
The first method is easiest and doesn’t require acquiring and processing a spectrum of a reference star.
The second method requires more effort, but can provide a better correction based on the difference between the observed reference star and Miles library profile.
16
Differences Between Pickles and Miles and Between Two Miles Stars of the Same Spectral Type
Need to Correct by Instrument Type
18
Spectrograph Type | Reference Star Correction Needed? | Reason |
Slitless | Yes | Full spectrum image affected primarily by camera spectral response. |
Broad Spectrum | Yes | Full spectrum image subject to atmospheric and instrument effects. |
Narrow Spectrum | Maybe | Narrow wavelength range limits effect of atmospheric extinction and differential refraction. Sensor response may be nearly constant over narrow wavelength range. Vignetting may be negligible within the spectrograph. |
Echelle | Yes | Full spectrum image subject to atmospheric and instrument effects. |
Method 1:
Relative Flux Calibration Using Synthesized Spectra
Selecting the Reference Profile
20
del Aql (F1 IV) - No Reference Star Correction
Pickles F0 V Reference Profile
del Aql and Pickles A0V Reference Profiles
del Aql Profile Divided by Pickles Profile (Raw IR Curve)
Create Smoothed Response Curve
Create Smoothed Response Curve
Apply Response Correction to del Aql Profile
Apply Response Correction to del Aql Profile
del Aql Before and After Response Correction
Method 1 Summary
30
Method 2:
Relative Flux Calibration using Reference Star Observation
Selecting a Reference Star
32
Reference Star Finder
Francois Teyssier
http://www.astronomie-amateur.fr/DocsSpectro/ReferenceStarFinder_V3_en.xlsm
Miles Search
Paolo Berardi
http://quasar.teoth.it/html/varie/MILES_SEARCH_V1_4.zip
Spectro StarFinder (on-line tool)
Serge Golovanow
https://spectro-starfinder.net
Reference Star Selection Tools
33
Plotting Reference Stars in TheSky6
Reference HD 13324 (A0 V) Observed Profile
Reference HD 13324 (35 Aql A0 V) Observed Profile
HD 183324 (Observed) and HD 183324 (Miles Reference) Profiles
HD 183324 (Observed) Profile Divided by HD 183324 (Miles Reference) Profiles (Raw IR Curve)
Create Smoothed Response Curve
Create Smoothed Response Curve
Apply Response Correction to HD 183324 (Observed) Profile
Compare Corrected HD 183324 (Observed) Profile to HD 183324 (Miles) Profile
Difference Between Observed and Corrected Reference Star Profiles
Applying Response Curve to Target Star
Flux Calibrated del Aql
Method 2 Summary
47
Compare Both Methods
Planck Curve for 8000K
Differences Between Pickles and Miles and Between Two Miles Stars of the Same Spectral Type
Comparison of the Two Methods
Pickles Synthesized Spectrum | Observed Miles Reference Star |
Requires Pickles spectrum to be same type and luminosity class as target star. This may not be known, especially for variable stars. | Reference star observed is selected from the Miles database, so the star observed is the same as the reference profile. Knowledge of spectral type of the target star is not necessary. |
The pickles library does not include all spectral types and luminosity classes, so the one you need may not be there. | Reference star observed is selected from the Miles database, so the star observed is the same as the reference profile. |
Comparison of the Two Methods
Pickles Synthesized Spectrum | Observed Miles Reference Star |
Creating a profile for spectral types G and later can be difficult and error prone due to cluttered continuum. | Reference stars are typically type A and B and a good response profile can be generated reliably. |
Not a consideration for this method since no reference star is being observed. | Slit orientation for the observed reference star must be the same as for the target star to ensure consistency in the spectrum passed through the slit. |
Conclusions
Applying a correction for atmosphere and instrument response is a must for a properly calibrated 1D spectral profile
For Either Method, Use a Separate Reference Profile for Each Observation
Do not use a Miles reference profile for multiple observations unless the airmass is approximately the same for all observations and are close in azimuth
Do not use a Pickle’s library profile for multiple observations as the airmass AND spectral types will be different
Miles Reference Database
http://miles.iac.es/
No. Stars: 985
Spectral Range: 352.5 - 750.0 nm
Spectral Resolution: 0.25 nm (2.50 Å) FWHM
Spatial Coverage: -30 deg to +85 deg
Library at http://svocats.cab.inta-csic.es/miles/index.php?action=search
Questions, Comments, Discussion