GMEF
RACEFIN ONG SUCO
Local Government Operations Officer VI
DILG - Aklan
HGDG
GMEF
HGDG
Understanding �Gender Concepts �and Principles
GENDER RELATED TERMS
AND
DEFINITIONS
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER
SEX
Genetic : Chromosomes, hormones
Physical: body contour, features, genitals, reproductive organs
Label: female or male; man or woman; boy or girl
Sex is what you are born with.
Gender is what happens afterwards!
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER EQUITY
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER EQUALITY
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER RESPONSIVE
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER SENSITIVE
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER RELATIONS
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER GAP
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER BLIND
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER BIAS
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER ANALYSIS
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
SEX – GENDER DISAGGREGATED DATA
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER AWARENESS
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER BALANCE
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER FOCAL POINT
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER ROLES
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
FEMINISM
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER FOCAL POINT SYSTEM
PCW Memorandum Circular No. 2011-01
Guidelines for the creation, strengthening, and institutionalization of the Gender and Development (GAD) Focal Point System
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER FOCAL POINT SYSTEM
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER FOCAL POINT SYSTEM
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
WOMEN
EMPOWERMENT
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
CONSTRUCTIVE MEN’S ENGAGEMENT
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
WOMEN IN DEVELOPMENT (WID)
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT (GAD)
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER PLANNING
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER INTEGRATION
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER MAINSTREAMING
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER RELATED TERMS AND DEFINITIONS
GENDER MAINSTREAMING
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
IT IS MORE OF PUTTING A GENDER ENLIGHTENED PERSPECTIVE IN THE DIFFERENT FUNCTIONAL AREAS OF AN ORGANIZATION.
GENDER MAINSTREAMING
Is not….
Localization of Magna Carta of Women
GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK
G-M-E-F
National GAD Resource Program
Questions that Matter:
GENDER MAINSTREAMING EVALUATION FRAMEWORK
What is GMEF?
Levels of Gender Mainstreaming
ENTRY POINTS OF GENDER MAINSTREAMING
POLICY
PEOPLE
ENABLING MECHANISMS
PROGRAMS, ACTIVITIES AND PROJECTS
PARTS OF THE ENHANCED GMEF
PART 1:The Organizational Assessment Tool
PART II: The Scoring Guide
Let’s have an exercise…
H-G-D-G
HARMONIZED GENDER AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
National GAD Resource Program
Overview and Application of the Harmonized Gender & Development Guidelines
International commitments which the Philippines is a signatory to:
Why HGDG?
National Commitments
Why HGDG?
Self-assessment tool that provides assistance in:
2. Addressing the issues of inadequate sex—disaggregated data and statistics for development planning and programming.
Why HGDG?
Objectives of HGDG
Users of HGDG
Principles of HGDG
Harmonized
Gender and
Development
Guidelines
for Project Development,
Implementation, Monitoring,
and Evaluation
HGDG consist of 3 parts:
PART 1 - Program/Project Development Guidelines (Generic)
Set of guidelines in the form of questions which can be applied to project development in general regardless of sector or project type
Features of HGDG
HGDG consist of 3 parts:
Part 2 – Sector Specific Design Guidelines
Set of guidelines for the development of sector-specific programs or projects
Features of HGDG
Sector-Specific Checklists (separate pullouts)
• Agriculture and Agrarian Reform
• Natural Resource Management
• Infrastructure
• Private Sector Development
• Social Sector: Education
• Social Sector: Health
• Social Sector: Housing and Settlement
• Social Sector: Women in Areas under Armed Conflict
• Justice
• Information and Communication Technologies
• Microfinance
• Labor and Employment
• Child Labor
• Migration
HGDG consist of 3 parts:
Part 3 – Program/Project Implementation, Monitoring and Evaluation (PIMME)
Guidelines for the management, implementation, monitoring and evaluation of development projects.
Features of HGDG
Element or Requirement | Things to Remember |
| Consult with women and men stakeholders |
| Secondary data can be used for analysis; if secondary data is unavailable, collect primary data
|
Elements of a Gender-Responsive Project Design
Element or Requirement | Things to Remember |
| Do gender analysis. Sample basic questions to ask:
|
Elements of a Gender-Responsive Project Design
Element or Requirement | Things to Remember |
| Formulate project goals/objectives which contributes to the following:
|
| Plan activities that will address gender issues identified in # 3 |
Elements of a Gender-Responsive Project Design
Element or Requirement | Things to Remember |
|
|
Elements of a Gender-Responsive Project Design
Element or Requirement | Things to Remember |
| Sample indicators and targets:
|
Elements of a Gender-Responsive Project Design
| Monitoring indicators should be sex-disaggregated |
Element or Requirement | Things to Remember |
| There should be budget allocation provided for the planned activities that will address the gender issues in #5 and facilitate integration of GAD in the project |
10. Planned coordination with PCW or the agency’s GAD plans | Proposed project should be in line with the LGU’s GAD efforts |
Elements of a Gender-Responsive Project Design
Let’s have an exercise…
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION STAGE
Element and item/question (col. 1) | Done | Score for an item/ element* (col. 3) | Gender issues identified (col. 4) | ||
No (2a) | Partly (2b) | Yes (2c) | |||
1.0 Involvement of women and men (max score: 2; for each item, 1) | | | | | |
1.1. Participation of women and men in beneficiary groups in problem identification (possible score: 0, 0.5, 1.0) > | | | | | |
1.2. Participation of women and men in beneficiary groups in project design(possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) > | | | | | |
2.0. Collection of sex-disaggregated data and gender- related information (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) > | | | | | |
3.0. Conduct of gender analysis and identification of gender issues (max score: 2; for each item, 1) | | | | | |
3.1. Analysis of gender gaps and inequalities related to gender roles, perspectives and needs, or access to and control of resources (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) > | | | | | |
3.2. Analysis of constraints and opportunities related to women and men’s participation in the project (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) > | | | | | |
TOTAL GAD SCORE – PROJECT IDENTIFICATION STAGE | | | | ||
PROJECT DESIGNING STAGE
Element and item/question (col. 1) | Done | Score for an item/ element* (col. 3) | Gender issues identified (col. 4) | ||
No (2a) | Partly (2b) | Yes (2c) | |||
4.0 Gender equality goals, outcomes and outputs (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the project have clearly stated gender equality goals, objectives, outcomes or outputs? > | | | | | |
5.0. Matching of strategies with gender issues (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Do the strategies and activities match the gender issues and gender quality goals identified? > | | | | | |
6.0. Gender analysis of likely impact of the project (max score: 2; for each item or question, 0.67) | | | | | |
6.1. Are women and girl children among the direct or indirect beneficiaries? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) > | | | | | |
6.2. Has the project considered its long-term impact on women’s socioeconomic status and empowerment? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) > | | | | | |
6.3. Has the project included strategies for avoiding or minimizing negative impact on women’s status and welfare? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) > | | | | | |
PROJECT DESIGNING STAGE
Element and item/question (col. 1) | Done | Score for an item/ element* (col. 3) | Gender issues identified (col. 4) | ||
No (2a) | Partly (2b) | Yes (2c) | |||
7.0 Monitoring targets and indicators (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the project include gender equality targets and indicators to measure gender equality outputs and outcomes? > | | | | | |
8.0. Sex-disaggregated database requirement (possible scores: 0, 1.0, 2.0) Does the project M&E system require the collection of sex-disaggregated data? > | | | | | |
9.0. Resources (max score: 2; for each question, 1.0) | | | | | |
9.1. Is the project’s budget allotment sufficient for gender equality promotion or integration? OR, will the project tap counterpart funds from LGUs/partners for its GAD efforts (possible scores: 0, 0.5, 1.0) > | | | | | |
9.2. Does the project have the expertise in promoting gender equality and women’s empowerment? OR, does the project commit itself to investing project staff time in building capacities within the project to integrate GAD or promote gender equality? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) > | | | | | |
PROJECT DESIGNING STAGE
Element and item/question (col. 1) | Done | Score for an item/ element* (col. 3) | Gender issues identified (col. 4) | ||
No (2a) | Partly (2b) | Yes (2c) | |||
10.0 Relationship with the agency’s GAD efforts (maximum score: 2; for each question or item, 0.67) | | | | | |
10.1 Will the project build on or strengthen the LGU’s commitment to the empowerment of women? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67)
IF THE AGENCY HAD NO GAD PLAN: Will the project help in the formulation of the implementing agency’s GAD plan? > | | | | | |
10.2. Will the project build on the initiatives of actions of other organizations in the area? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) > | | | | | |
10.3. Does the project have an exit plan that will ensure the sustainability of GAD efforts and benefits? (possible scores: 0, 0.33, 0.67) > | | | | | |
TOTAL GAD SCORE – PROJECT DESIGN STAGE | | | | ||
Guide for scoring
Interpretation of GAD Scores
Maximum score: 20 points
(Proposal to be returned)
? 4.0-7.9 : Has promising GAD
prospects
(“conditional pass”)
Equal Opportunities??
DIR - F03
90
To secure a fair selection you all get the same exercise: You must climb the tree.
Attribution to the GAD Budget
HGDG Score | Description | Corresponding Budget for the Year of the Program that may be Attributed to the LGU GAD Budget |
Below 4.0 | GAD is invisible | 0% or no amount of the program/project budget for the year may be attributed to the GAD budget |
4.0 – 7.9 | Promising GAD prospects (conditional pass) | 25% of the budget for the year of the program/project may be attributed to the GAD budget |
8.0 – 14.9 | Gender sensitive | 50% of the budget for the year of the program/project, may be attributed to the GAD budget |
15.0 – 19.9 | Gender-responsive | 75% of the budget for the year of the program/project may be attributed to the GAD budget |
20.0 | Fully gender- responsive | 100% of the budget for the year of the program may be attributed to the GAD budget |
Saeamat gid nga Abu…
When you want something you never had before….
You are willing to do some things you never had done before….
Racefin Ong Suco
#iamDILG #GADAdvocate&Champion