1 of 36

Strontium Molecular Lattice Clock in the THz Frequency Regime

Brandon Iritani

February 3, 2025

1

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

1

2 of 36

Atomic Clocks – background and Applications

2

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

2

3 of 36

Atomic clocks

Microwave

Optical

3

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

3

4 of 36

Atomic Clocks - Progress

Significant progress since invention of optical frequency comb

​

N. Poli, C. W. Oates, P. Gill and G. M. Tino (2014)

4

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

4

5 of 36

Atomic clock applications

Zheng, X., …S. Kolkowitz. Nature 602, 425–430 (2022).

Bothwell, T., Kennedy, C.J., Aeppli, …J. Ye. Nature 602, 420–424 (2022).

Gravitational Redshift across mm-scale sample

McGrew, W.F., Zhang, X.,… Ludlow, A.  Nature 564, 87–90 (2018).

Geodesy below the cm level

Resolve Gravitational Redshift at 1 cm

Dark Matter Constraints

Colin J. Kennedy, … Jun Ye, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 201302 (2020)

5

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

5

6 of 36

Why make a molecular clock?

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

6

7 of 36

Quantum Chemistry

88Sr2 Molecular Clock – Motivation

THz Frequency Standard

​

Access long coherence times in molecules

​

7

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

7

8 of 36

88Sr2 Molecular Clock – Motivation

Time variation of fundamental constants

​

Tests of Non-Newtonian gravity or fifth forces at nm-scale distances

​

 

T. Zelevinsky, S. Kotochigova, J. Ye, PRL 100, 043201 (2008)

8

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

8

9 of 36

Experimental Scheme

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

9

10 of 36

Clock Scheme

32 THz Raman transition spanning ground state potential

 

K. H. Leung, B. Iritani, E. Tiberi, I. Majewska, M. Borkowski, R. Moszynski, and T. Zelevinsky Phys. Rev. X 13, 011047 (2023)

10

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

10

11 of 36

Magic Wavelength Lattice

Lattice Wavelength (nm)

  • Utilize X(0,0) -> 1u(9,1) transition to tune ground state polarizability

11

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

11

12 of 36

Clock Laser Locking Scheme

12

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

12

13 of 36

Referencing an atomic clock to absolute frequency (conventional method)

Lab Frequency Synthesizers and Counters

GPS Receiver

Local Time Base (Rb Clock)

13

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

13

14 of 36

Referencing Molecular Clock to absolute frequency

14

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

14

15 of 36

Referencing Molecular Clock to absolute frequency - Solution

  • GPS signal from NIST atomic clock
  • Local time base – Free-running Rb clock
  • Compare pps signals between GPS receiver and free-running Rb Clock
  • Correct differences in post-processing

​

​

​

15

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

15

16 of 36

Referencing Molecular Clock to absolute frequency

16

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

16

17 of 36

Improved timing precision

  • In the future, different local time base such as cesium clock/hydrogen maser
    • Rb Clock
      • 2 x 10-11
    • Cs clock
      • 5 x 10-13
    • Hydrogen maser
      • 6 x 10-14
  • Carrier phase work
    • Tracking exact phase of GPS signal, including fractional wavelength (down to 2 mm accuracy)
  • Two-way time transfer

​

​

​

17

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

17

18 of 36

Recent Clock Evaluation

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

18

19 of 36

Systematic Evaluation

Absolute Frequency = 31 825 183 207 592.8(5.1) Hz (1.6 x 10-13)

​

Total Systematic Uncertainty = 4.6 x 10-14

K. H. Leung, B. Iritani, E. Tiberi, I. Majewska, M. Borkowski, R. Moszynski, and T. Zelevinsky Phys. Rev. X 13, 011047 (2023)

19

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

19

20 of 36

Lattice Stark Shift - Hyperpolarizability

K. H. Leung, B. Iritani, E. Tiberi, I. Majewska, M. Borkowski, R. Moszynski, and T. Zelevinsky Phys. Rev. X 13, 011047 (2023)

Lattice Detuning (MHz)

*

*R. C. Brown, N. B. Phillips, … A. D. Ludlow, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119, 253001 (2017)

​

Lattice Stark Shift (Polarizability) = 100.1(3.4)*10-14

Lattice Stark Shift (Hyperpolarizability) = -50.8(1.9)*10-14

20

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

20

21 of 36

BBR Shift Systematic

BBR shift uncertainty will limit at 10-15-10-16 level (after Stark shifts)

K. H. Leung, B. Iritani, E. Tiberi, I. Majewska, M. Borkowski, R. Moszynski, and T. Zelevinsky Phys. Rev. X 13, 011047 (2023)

21

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

21

22 of 36

  • Measure polarizability at 1.95 μm using stark shift spectroscopy

​

B. Iritani, E. Tiberi, W. Skomorowski, R. Moszynski, M. Borkowski, and T. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 263201 (2023)

BBR Shift Systematic

Differential Polarizability (a.u.)

V

  • In good agreement with ab initio theory

22

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

22

23 of 36

BBR Shift Systematic

  • Measure polarizability at 1.95 μm using stark shift spectroscopy
  • In good agreement with ab initio theory

​

  • Ab initio calculation of polarizability at a range of wavelengths from DC to 1.25 μm

​

​

Differential Polarizability (a.u.)

V

B. Iritani, E. Tiberi, W. Skomorowski, R. Moszynski, M. Borkowski, and T. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 263201 (2023)

23

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

23

24 of 36

BBR Determination

B. Iritani, E. Tiberi, W. Skomorowski, R. Moszynski, M. Borkowski, and T. Zelevinsky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 263201 (2023)

Characterize BBR to <5*10-16

24

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

24

25 of 36

Q factor limit - lifetime of clock states

Current Limitation - Coherence Time

Off-resonant Lattice Scattering

Kondov, S.S., Lee, CH., Leung, K.H. et al.  Nat. Phys. 15, 1118–1122 (2019)

Lattice Wavelength (nm)

25

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

25

26 of 36

Q factor limit - lifetime of clock states

K H Leung et al 2021 New J. Phys. 23 115002

2-body collisional loss

1-body scattering loss

Limitation - Collisional Loss

Current Limitation - Coherence Time

Off-resonant Lattice Scattering

Kondov, S.S., Lee, CH., Leung, K.H. et al.  Nat. Phys. 15, 1118–1122 (2019)

26

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

26

27 of 36

Future Work: Constraining New Mass-dependent Fifth forces with Isotope Shifts

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

27

28 of 36

28

Isotope shifts as test of fundamental interactions

  • Ab initio quantum chemistry - <10-13 too challenging for heavy molecule
  • Remove Born Oppenheimer terms via isotope shifts - only ~10-6 needed for mass-dependent terms

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

​

  • Isotope shift = “Mass shift” + “Field shift”
  • With enough isotopes, can remove “Field shift”
  • Any non-linearities in King plot result from unknown atomic/nuclear physics or new electron-neutron interactions

J. J. Lutz and J. M. Hutson, JMS 330, 43 (2016), I. Counts et al., PRL 125, 123002 (2020)

88

86

84

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

28

29 of 36

Projected Constraints

Assuming:

  • ~5 Hz resolution in experiment
  • Theory matches experiment to ~1 Hz

​

Yukawa Potential

We project improved constraints for ranges less than 1.3 nm.

​

29

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

29

30 of 36

Second Generation Molecular Lattice Clock

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

30

31 of 36

Difficulty - Relative Abundance

  • 88Sr
    • 82.6% abundance
    • Molecules produced and v = 0 -> 62 transition measured
  • 86Sr
    • 9.86% abundance
    • Photoassociative spectroscopy, least bound state measured1
  • 84Sr
    • 0.56% abundance
    • Molecules produced via STIRAP, weakly bound binding energies measured2

1J. A. Aman, J. C. Hill, R. Ding, Kaden R. A. Hazzard, T. C. Killian, and W. Y. Kon, Phys. Rev. A 98, 053441 (2018)

2Simon Stellmer, Benjamin Pasquiou, Rudolf Grimm, and Florian Schreck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 115302 (2012)

​

31

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

31

32 of 36

Second generation setup

AOSense Sr source

Recessed MOT coil viewports

Gate valve for future extension

ZnSe viewports coated for 10 μm for precise BBR determination

Vertical lattice

32

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

32

33 of 36

Vertical build-up lattice cavity

Recessed viewport for high NA imaging

g

K. Kim, A. Aeppli, T. Bothwell and J. Ye Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 113203 (2023)

  • Longer coherence times:
    • Lower lattice intensity – less scattering
    • Larger lattice waist – less density and collisional loss

​

33

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

33

34 of 36

34

Interleaved measurement in Gen I experiment

88Sr MOT

86Sr MOT

34

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

34

35 of 36

Outlook

  • measured a V = 62 -> 0 transition to 10-14 in 88Sr
  • Constrained BBR uncertainty to 10-16
  • Plan to measure an isotope shift between 88Sr2-86Sr2 in order to constrain mass-dependent Yukawa forces at the nm scale
  • Second-Generation Apparatus:
    • Improved atomic flux
    • In-vacuum buildup cavity
  • Direct frequency standard with mixed isotopologues?

35

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

35

36 of 36

36

Theory Collaborators: Robert Moszynski, Wojciech Skomorowski, and Iwona Majewska

Debayan

Mitra

Wenwei

Xu

Jingjing

Huang

36

2025/02/03

OCP-TAP

36