1 of 22

The path to reforming peer review begins with community, works through equity, and ends in trust

OASPA Conference

September 23, 2021

2 of 22

This presentation can be accessed

bit.ly/PREreview-oaspa21

3 of 22

Monica Granados, PhD

PREreview Leadership Team

Samantha Hindle, PhD

Co-Founder, PREreview Leadership Team

Antoinette Foster, PhD

Former Open Reviewers Program Manager

Katrina Murphy

Project Manager

THE PREREVIEW TEAM

4 of 22

Daniela Saderi, PhD (she/her)

Italian-born and raised, Neuroscientist, Mom

Co-Founder and Director, PREreview

Twitter: @Neurosarda, @PREreview_

5 of 22

“The Portland Metro area rests on traditional village sites of the Multnomah, Wasco, Cowlitz, Kathlamet, Clackamas, Bands of Chinook, Tualatin, Kalapuya, Molalla, and many other tribes who made their homes along the Columbia River creating communities and summer encampments to harvest and use the plentiful natural resources of the area"

—Portland Indian Leaders Roundtable, 2018

I am here today because this land was occupied, and its

traditional people were killed and displaced by European colonists and settlers.

Please consider donating to Organizations supporting local Native American Nations

the Portland NAYA Family Center

SACNAS — Advancing Chicanos/Hispanics and Native Americans in Science

6 of 22

WHAT’S PREREVIEW?

OUR MISSION

A preprint review platform, resource center, and convener. We provide ways for feedback to preprints to be done openly, rapidly, constructively, and by a global community of peers.

To bring equity and transparency to scholarly peer review by supporting and empowering communities of researchers, particularly those at early stages of their career (ECRs) and historically excluded, to review preprints in a process that is rewarding to them.

7 of 22

WHAT DO WE NEED TO TRULY REFORM PEER REVIEW?

8 of 22

1

COMMUNITY

Community is somewhere members feel a sense of belonging, have a shared purpose, and get to shape culture together. –CSCCE Team

9 of 22

What are the needs, the pains & gains, the shared values of the people we are hoping to empower and engage in public preprint review?

WHO ARE WE REFORMING FOR?

10 of 22

11 of 22

Anonymous and Public Persona

12 of 22

PREREVIEW COMMUNITIES

Open Reviewers

Outbreak Science

RR:C19 Student Group

Plant Biologist ECRs

AfricArXiv Reviewers

Medical Students Reviewers

13 of 22

2

EQUITY

The degree to which scholars—meant in the broader sense—are free from historic and present-day barriers to full access and participation in research production, evaluation, and dissemination.

14 of 22

Patriarchy

White supremacy

Colonialism

Heteronormativity

15 of 22

A cohort-based training and mentoring program to train the next generation of socially-conscious peer reviewers.

OPEN REVIEWERS

CULTURE & PRACTICES

  • Providing a required mentor training created using a racial equity lens

  • Training all mentees on how to self-identify and address bias within their own peer review process

  • Intentionally integrating an educational focus on the intersection between colonialism, white supremacist culture, and science into the curriculum

INCREASING ACCESS

SYSTEMS & STRUCTURES

  • Reserving 50% of the mentees positions to racially underrepresented researchers

  • Offering an online and accessible training program free of charge

  • Creating a database of trained and diverse reviewers to be accessed by journal editors to identify and select qualified candidates*

*In progress

16 of 22

OPEN REVIEWERS TOOLKIT

17 of 22

Approaching partnership building from an opportunity perspective.

WHO ARE WE REFORMING FOR?

WITH

18 of 22

OPEN REVIEWERS

X

19 of 22

3

TRUST

The degree to which traditionally excluded scholars can rely on not being exploited, appropriated of their knowledge, tokenized, and instead can count on having their voice and needs centered, their contributions recognized and rewarded, their roles elevated to leadership.

20 of 22

Build it and they will come approach

WON’T WORK!

21 of 22

Our approach is imperfect and incomplete. And that is OK.

NO ONE KNOWS WHAT EQUITY LOOKS LIKE BECAUSE WE HAVE NEVER SEEN IT.

Allow for mistakes. Be open to feedback and change. Work together.

And always keep your eyes focused on EQUITY.

22 of 22

Advisory Committee

Samantha Hindle, Ph.D.

(Co-Founder, Leadership Team)

Monica Granados, Ph.D.

(Leadership Team)

Georgia Bullen

(Executive Director, Simply Secure)

Kristen Ratan

(Founder and Director, Stratos)

Lenny Teytelman, Ph.D.

(Co-Founder and CEO, protocols.io)

Sarah Greaves

(STM Publishing Consultant)

Former and current funders

Fiscal Sponsor

Contact

contact@prereview.org

@PREreview_

Staff

Katrina Murphy

(PREreview Project Manager)

Antoinette Foster, Ph.D.

(Former Open Reviewers Program Manager)