1 of 23

P.U.R.P. South

A Purple Urchin Removal Pilot Project

Led by

Commercial Fishermen of Santa Barbara (CFSB)

Updated February 2026

Kim Selkoe, Ph.D.

Executive Director, CFSB

Data Analysis and Plots by:

Conner Jainese, UCSB

2 of 23

Our Team

CFSB – Kim Selkoe, Chris Voss & Ava Schulenberg

Urchin Divers - Jonny Woodcock, Trent Petersen, Jeff Maassen, Harry Liquornik + support from Grant Downie

TNC – Tristin McHugh, Nora Eddy & Ben Grimes

Bay Foundation – Tom Ford & Heather Burdick

UCSB – Jenn Caselle, Ph.D., Conner Jainese & PISCO divers

Get Hooked Seafood / Marino Soil Foods – Kim Selkoe & Victoria Voss

The Cultured Abalone - Devin Spencer & Sadie Calhoun

SB City College – Michelle Paddack, Ph.D. & Interns Elliot Murray, Tim Wardlaw & Ana Sanchez, SBCC

Blue Oceans Productions - Jim Knowlton

3 of 23

Our Objectives for this 1-acre pilot project

Launch kelp restoration at the N. Channel Islands

Bridge efforts to our South and North

Engage the commercial fishing community in SB

Explore market support for purple urchin products

Funded by Eric and Wendy Schmidt for 24 months, 2025 – 2026

4 of 23

    • Commercial hand-harvest
    • Just purples, no reds allowed
    • No gear installation
    • All urchin landed on fish tickets by Get Hooked Seafood

Restoration technique: urchin removal

    • No CDFW permit needed
    • Drone permits from Marine Sanctuary & National Park

Permitting

Our Approach & Permits

5 of 23

Our Purple Urchin Removal Project Goals

BUILD TEAM & WORKFLOWS

UNDERSTAND REMOVAL COSTS

EVALUATE ECOSYSTEM RESPONSE

MOBILIZE MARKETS FOR URCHIN

DESIGN A LARGESCALE PROGRAM

RAISE AWARENESS

PURSUE GRANTS TO SCALE UP

6 of 23

Our site: �Tyler Bight, San Miguel Island

A consensus-based choice by the team

  • Highly-valued fishing grounds
  • Ranked high in Giraldo-Ospina et al. (2025). A site selection decision framework for effective kelp restoration ->
  • Sheltered, shallow
  • Existing kelp beds nearby
  • If we can do it here, we can do it anywhere!

7 of 23

Reasons for kelp decline

  • Warm Blob + Seastar die off
  • Fewer sheephead & lobsters at San Miguel generally due to lower temps

Near zero kelp from 2018-2023

Study Site

Q2 2025

Q2 2013

Control Site

KelpWatch imagery

8 of 23

Underwater Survey Design

  • All quads (N = 40)
    • Purple urchin abundance (adult, recruit)
    • Red urchin abundance (adult, recruit)
    • Macrocystis abundance (adult, juv)
    • Understory algae abundance
    • Relief measurement (to 5 cm)
  • Subset (N = 16)
    • Size purple urchin (nearest cm)
    • Size red urchin (nearest cm)

Leg length = 25m (x4)

Urchin and Algae counted and sized in quadrats

1-acre study site

9 of 23

Harvest �Stats: 

  • COST
    • $1500 per day
    • $0.75 per urchin
    • $9.25 per pound
  • TIME – 21 diver days (4 hr/day) 
  • MEAN SIZE – 13 grams

& 37 mm diameter

  • RATE
    • 48 lb per hr
    • 587 urchin per hr

3,000 lbs

of purples

Divers made multi-day trips, often combined with red harvest days, to maximize their gain.

June: 1,100 lbs (37%)

Sept: 1,900 lbs (63%)

{

Divers mapped their daily harvest area

10 of 23

Supply Chain �R&D

    • Great amino acid profile, high in Calcium
    • In farm trials now (mixed with wool)
    • Research on marketing and scaling in progress

Mean size at our site

Ranch-able sizes

All harvested urchin dried and powdered

11 of 23

Results: Urchin Response

Purple Urchin Densities

9.5

11.8

11.7

53.5

91.7

34.0

Red Urchin Densities

Control Site

Study Site

After Before After

12 of 23

Results: Algal Response

Drone Flight Data, Oct. 2025

1

27

84

Total Algae Count, all species

Control Site

Study Site

After Before After

Macrocystis Count: Study Site

Adult Juvenile Recruit

Before

After

13 of 23

Updated Results, as of late January

Purple Urchin Harvest

Purple Urchin Harvest

Purple Urchin Harvest

May Sept. Oct. Jan. Jan.

May Sept. Oct. Jan. Jan.

May Sept. Oct. Jan. Jan.

1-acre Control Site

Purple Urchin Density

Total Algae Count

Red Urchin Density

1-acre Study Site

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

2026

14 of 23

Urchin and Kelp Counts

Control Site (After) Study Site (Before) Study Site (After)

Purple Urchin

Kelp

15 of 23

A few challenges

  • Took 3 trips out to find a good 1-acre study site, which was slow and costly
  • Installing site markers (required a permit) would speed up the harvest work
  • CDFW reg changes mid-summer made underwater filming of harvesting difficult
  • Unsure if kelp response was caused by urchin removals or just dumb luck!

Three harvesters at the study site in June

16 of 23

Next Steps

  • Continue monitoring our 2 sites
  • Continue supply chain R&D
  • Finish our short film
  • Design larger scale program
    • Incorporate defensive harvest strategy?
  • Continue fundraising

Next Steps

Thank You!

Kim@CFSB.info

17 of 23

More photos

18 of 23

Harvesting

19 of 23

Starting densities

20 of 23

Restored Kelp in front of existing kelp bed

Restored Kelp at our site

21 of 23

Baby Kelps

22 of 23

Abalones

23 of 23

Ready for haul out

Ready for offload