Fremont Parent University:
Standards-Based Grading
April 15, 2024
Objective for Tonight’s Session
Participants will:
What is a grade?
Why do we need a grade?
What should be included in a grade?
3
Why SBG?
4
No grading system is perfect
5
Minimize subjectivity
Pursue clear and informative grades
Our Goal
“The confusion starts with consistency, as in, there is none. At most schools, there’s no consistency about what’s included in a grade or what’s left out, even among teachers teaching the same subject in the same school to students in the same grade at the same level. This creates what is often called “grade fog” — we’re not sure what the grade means because we’re asking that A or that C+ to communicate too much disparate information.”
6
7
“The increased precision of percentage grades is truly far more imaginary than real.”
8
But in 1912, a study by two Wisconsin researchers seriously challenged the reliability and accuracy of percentage grades. Daniel Starch and Edward Charles Elliott found that 147 high school English teachers in different schools assigned widely different percentage grades to two identical student papers. Scores on the first paper ranged from 64 to 98, and scores on the second paper ranged from 50 to 97. One paper was given a failing mark by 15 percent of the teachers and a grade of over 90 by 12 percent of the teachers.
9
Hunter Brimi (2011) replicated Starch and Elliott's 1912 study and attained almost identical results. Brimi asked 90 high school teachers who had received nearly 20 hours of training in a writing 3 assessment program to grade the same student paper on a 100-point percentage scale. Among the 73 teachers who responded, scores ranged from 50 to 96. And that's among teachers who received specific professional development in writing assessment!
10
“Integer grades do not necessarily make grading easier; they simply make the process more accurate and honest.”
11
12
13
Remove extraneous factors
Not measuring:
Measuring Riding a Bike
14
Remove extraneous factors
Not measuring:
Measuring Understanding of Fractions
Our Journey
15
16
2018-2019
-District pilots
-Professional Development
-SBG Guidebook
2020-2021
Plan Paused
Pre-2018
FSD79 Grading Committee
2019-2020
Math Implementation
2021-2022
ELA Implementation
2022-2023
Full District Implementation
Ongoing
Continued Learning
SBG Committee
Our Place in the Journey - Continuous Growth
Top 3 Areas We Are Looking to Improve:
Currently: Taking part in extensive Professional Learning Community (PLC) professional development. Making connections - essential standards, rubrics, exemplars, common formative assessments, extensions, and more.
17
18
Purpose of Standards-Based Grading in FSD79
19
FSD79 Purpose
The purpose of the Fremont School District 79 report card is to communicate to parents/guardians and educators the learner’s level of progression through the standards to show evidence of learning and areas for continued growth.
20
Principle 1
Grades and Reports Should Be Based on Clearly Specified Learning Goals and Performance Standards.
21
Principle 2
Evidence Used for Grading Should Be Valid.
22
Principle 3
Grading Should Be Based on Established Criteria, Not on Arbitrary Norms.
23
Principle 4
Not Everything Should be Included in Grades.
24
Principle 5
Avoid Grading Based on (Mean) Averages.
25
Principle 6
Focus on Achievement and Report Other Factors Separately.
26
How is my child doing? How can I tell?
27
Academic Levels of Progression
28
Academic Levels of Progression
29
Level | Criteria |
4 - Extending | Student extends course expectations by deeply and independently applying and utilizing concepts and skills. |
3 - Meeting | Student demonstrates course expectations for concepts and skills. |
2 - Approaching | Student is progressing toward basic understanding of course concepts and skills with assistance. |
1 - Beginning | Student shows an emerging awareness of concepts and skills. |
N/A - Not Assessed | The specific area was not assessed during a specific grading term or there was not enough evidence collected to assign a performance level. |
* - Modified | Students who are working on standards measured on a modified curriculum. |
30
Level 4 (Extending)
What does this level mean? The student extends grade level expectations by deeply and independently applying and utilizing concepts and skills.
How is this different from the other levels? A student at a level 4 independently uses and applies knowledge in ways that demonstrate higher level thinking skills. A student who is able to consistently perform at Level 4 is one who independently demonstrates extensions of their knowledge and/or mastery of some accelerated standards. The student is “advanced” in that they are performing at a level above where we would expect them to be at a given point in time. Students may not have the opportunity for a level 4 on every assignment or assessment, but they should have enough opportunities to demonstrate a level 4 on their measured strands each term.
What does this level not mean? This level is not the equivalent to an “A” in a traditional letter grade system. While there is no direct comparison to a letter grade, any level 4 grades a student receives represents some deep and impressive understanding.
31
Level 3 (Meeting)
What does this level mean? The student demonstrates grade level expectations for concepts and skills.
How is this different from the other levels? A student at a Level 3 demonstrates understanding of grade level skills and concepts and requires minimal support. A level 3 throughout the school year indicates strong, excellent work at grade level. The 3 mark is the goal for the grade level and should be celebrated as "on grade level" or "right where we would expect them to be," yet students should continue to be pushed to strive for even further learning as appropriate. Level 3 represents those students who are independently able to meet the standards after instruction. Students receiving a mark of 3 are on track for college and career readiness for that subject.
What does this level not mean? This level is not the equivalent to an “A” (or a “B”) in a traditional letter grade system. While there is no direct comparison to a letter grade, any level 3 grades a student receives should be recognized as commendable understanding and achievement.
32
Level 2 (Approaching)
What does this level mean? The student is progressing toward basic understanding of course concepts and skills with assistance.
How is this different from the other levels? A student at a Level 2 has not yet met the standards but is progressing toward achieving skills and learning course concepts. Some support from teachers, parents and/or peers is needed. The 2 mark indicates ongoing growth, but not quite where we would expect them to be at that given point in time. At Level 2, a student can correctly identify some concepts and/or vocabulary, and/or use some skills. A level 2 mark means that the student is not meeting course expectations. It requires both communication and action in order to help the student meet the course standards. It is important that we are honest about this marking with students and families.
What does this level not mean? This level does not mean a student is not growing. There may very well be opportunities to celebrate a level 2, depending upon how the student is progressing.
33
Level 1 (Beginning)
What does this level mean? The student shows an emerging awareness of concepts and skills.
How is this different from the other levels? A student at a Level 1 is currently not meeting the course standards. The student demonstrates an inconsistent understanding and application of knowledge. Intervention is needed from teachers and parents. Students at this level are beginning to identify subject area concepts, vocabulary, and/or use skills. They are unable to make connections among ideas or extend the information.
What does this level not mean? This level does not mean a student is not capable of achieving higher levels of performance. A deep exploration of the students academic performance, as well as their habits of success performance, can shed further light on the appropriate levers to focus on to promote future growth.
Habits of Success Levels of Progression
34
Behaviors and academics are both significant and reporting them separately communicates even more about the learner and how they can continue to grow without distorting a student’s actual achievement in learning.
35
Habits of Success Levels of Progression
36
Level | Criteria |
3 - Meeting | Frequently exhibits (Student demonstrates independence in meeting expectations) |
2 - Approaching | Occasionally exhibits (Student requires moderate assistance and redirecting) |
1 - Beginning | Rarely exhibits (Student requires considerable assistance and redirecting) |
Determining Grades
37
38
What Grade Would You Give…
A student recently completed first trimester in 3rd grade ELA. Their assessment scores under the “Reading: Foundational Skills” strand were as follows:
What grade would you give them for this strand?
What method did you use to determine this grade?
Sept. 1 | Sept. 6 | Sept. 14 | Sept. 20 | Sept. 24 |
1 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
Determining Grades
39
Determining Grades - Decaying Weights
We believe the most recent evidence of student learning should not be penalized by earlier attempts in learning. We use decaying weights instead of simply averaging.
This mode orders recent scores from newest to oldest, and calculates a score, based on assigned weights, allowing for more recent student performance to factor more greatly into the overall score
Ultimately, the teacher’s professional judgment is the most important component of grade determination.
40
Example: For scores 3, 2, 3, 1, 1 (newest to oldest) with corresponding weights 100, 80, 60, 40, and 20. |
Average = 2.0 Decaying Weight = 2.6 (TeacherEase would round to a 3) |
Determining Grades
41
TeacherEase (Gradebook)
42
TeacherEase Navigation Overview
43
The Role of Homework
44
The Role of Homework
We believe homework completion should not be incorporated into the academic grade.
Homework completion is an important behavior that should be measured by our habits of success grades.
45
Reassessment Practices
46
Reassessment Practices
Students should be given multiple opportunities to reach a standard. Our focus is on what a student learns rather than the speed in which they learn.
There are some limitations to reassessment as teachers are bound by certain timelines and systems that require a “final” grade to be reported at certain times in the year. Ultimately, we want to know what a student knows and we honor the fact that students do not all learn at the same pace in the same way.
47
For a real-life parallel, we know that not everyone passes their driver’s license exam the first time they try. Thankfully, the Department of Motor Vehicles embraces the concept of reassessment. Not everyone passes their driver’s license exam the first time and they are allowed to further prepare and take the exam again. Absent of this reassessment opportunity public transportation and bike lanes would take on a far more dominant role in our collective lives.
Unlike the DMV, our FSD79 educators require that some specific elements are in place to ensure students are making the most of their additional opportunities. In order to be provided the opportunity to reassess, students should be asked to show evidence they have done something additional and different to prepare. This additional commitment should also serve to motivate students to give their best effort the first time. These opportunities must also be reasonable in regards to the teacher availability to reteach, review, or reassess.
Reassessment Practices
48
Report Cards
49
Report Cards
50
Special Education
51
Special Education
It is important that students receiving special education services receive clear and accurate grade reporting.
52
53
Additional Resources
54
55
56
57
58
Key observations from our research
1. Contacts at profiled institutions report standards-based grading systems do not impact a student’s standing in the admissions process.
2. While use of standards-based grading does not impact admissions decisions at profiled institutions, contacts acknowledge several pros and cons associated with the grading system.
3. Admissions staff at all profiled institutions prioritize a student’s academic record when reviewing applications.
4. Like admissions decisions, standards-based grading does not affect scholarship allocation at profiled institutions.
Please fill out our survey :)
59
Thank You!