1 of 26

LEVANTE · COLOMBIA PILOT SITE

Pilot data collection

in Colombia

Context for interpreting and analyzing the data collected across the three Colombian application sites

Evaluation Center · Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá

Adaptation, qualitative validation and piloting of the LEVANTE child-development instruments · Funded by the Jacobs Foundation · Led by Stanford University

2 of 26

ABOUT THIS PRESENTATION

Why this context matters for the data

Objective

Provide the operational context needed to correctly interpret and analyze the data collected in Colombia. I will try to emphasize how the instruments were adapted and validated, under what conditions the data collection was done and what interests and incentives the different participants had.

Four sections

1 Expert review & adaptation

2 School enrollment

3 Children & teachers’ data collection

4 Caregivers’ data collection

The pilot’s guiding purpose

Evaluate the psychometric properties, validity, age appropriateness, and possibility of internationalizing the measures; as well as defining and reviewing data pipelines.

In Colombia, we sought to identify efficient schemes for data collection in schools.

Colombia’s role: LEVANTE pilot site — ages 5–12, three longitudinal rounds.

1

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

3 of 26

AT A GLANCE

LEVANTE in Colombia

Bogotá

Capital · Urban

4 schools baseline 3 (-1) follow-up

San Vicente del Caguán

Caquetá · Rural

1 school baseline and follow-up

Chiquinquirá

Boyacá · Rural / Urban

2

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

4 schools baseline

4 of 26

HOW THE WORK WAS ORGANIZED

The validation & piloting scheme

A three-stage process.

1

Expert review

Review of translations, instructions and formats; iterative preparation, adjustment and internal verification.

2

Validation

Informal think alouds with children – continuous process.

Focus groups with caregivers and teachers.

3

Pilot

Pilot application of the full set of instruments across schools and sites.

3

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

5 of 26

OVERVIEW

Timeline: from adaptation to three rounds

2023 – early 2024

First contacts with Bogotá school principals to invite them to participate in project.

Feb – Apr 2024

Expert review of translations, instructions & formats

Children task qualitative validation

May 2024 – May 2025

Teachers and caregivers’ questionnaires qualitative validation

Pilot Round 1 – Baseline:

Sep – Nov 2025

Pilot Round 2 follow-up and  3 new baseline schools

Second Children qualitative validation

2026 – 2027

Pilot Round 3

Extended caregiver outreach campaign

4

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

6 of 26

SECTION 1

Expert review & adaptation

Reviewing translations, items and delivery formats, validating them qualitatively, and iterating continuously with the Stanford team to report problems and agree adjustments.

5

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

7 of 26

EXPERT REVIEW & ADAPTATION

Reviewing translations, instructions & formats

Risk addressed — inadequate Spanish versions. Mitigated through EC review of the translation, a validation exercise with children across all age groups, and separate focus groups with caregivers and teachers to improve the translations.

6

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

Evaluation Center team

Revised translation of instructions, and items, and administration formats. Commented and proposed adjustments to the Spanish translation.

Stanford team

Prepared, adjusted and internally verified each version.

An iterative continuous cycle:

  • Initial verification Feb–Apr 2024.
  • New issues addressed in each application.

8 of 26

EXPERT REVIEW & ADAPTATION

What we adjusted — child-development instrument

Translation/adaptation

  • Corrected wording to Colombian usage
  • Changed Spanish words to better match the pictures and the sense of each task
  • Challenge: keep difficulty levels

Instructions

  • Added examples to avoid misinterpreting instructions
  • Aligned written and spoken instructions

Visual display

  • Adjusted the screen fit so students see all task information
  • Fixed non-visible information needed to complete tasks

7

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

9 of 26

EXPERT REVIEW & ADAPTATION

Qualitative validation with children

Objectives — explore:

  • Clarity of the instructions
  • Application times
  • Ease with which children can respond to the tasks
  • Different implementation schemes (computer/tablet, group sizes)

Apr 16–18

2024

47

children one school

5–12

years age range

24

sessions varied group sizes

2+2+2

team facilitators · assistants · Stanford observers

A/V

recorded video · audio · screen

8

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

10 of 26

EXPERT REVIEW & ADAPTATION

Findings: engagement, adjustments & group sizes

What we observed

  • High engagement across ages 5–12.
  • Children aged 7+ handle the tablet with little or no supervision.
  • Response times estimations per task.
  • New vocabulary and display issues were detected and reported.

Second validation exercise

With Prof. Nancy Palacio

  • Nov 5 - 2025
  • Quibdó, Chocó – North-pacific region
  • 1 school – 8 kids
  • Grades 0 & 1 (5-6 years-old)
  • Per kid: 1 facilitator & 2 observers
  • Recorded video · audio · screen

Main conclusion

Tasks worked as well as with kids from other parts of the country.

Difficulties encountered had already been reported or were equally valid for other regions.

17

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

How many children one facilitator can support

Practical rule:

  • grades 0–1 up to 2 children
  • grades 2–3 up to 4
  • grades 4+ up to 10 (3 facilitators per classroom)

11 of 26

EXPERT REVIEW & ADAPTATION

Caregiver/teacher validation

Caregiver & teacher focus groups

Held in September 2024 to validate content and improve translations of the caregiver and teacher questionnaires.

  • The caregivers’ questionnaire was particularly time-consuming.
  • Several wording adjustment needs were identified.
  • For many questions, the response options had to be adapted.
  • Some sections or questions were provisionally excluded due to ethical or cultural concerns.

9

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

12 of 26

SECTION 2

School enrollment

The enrollment process and our interactions with participating schools — the critical partners for the whole study.

10

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

13 of 26

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

How schools were enrolled

1

Reach out to organizations & schools

Partners: public and private schools attending low and middle-low SE level children.

Having participated in previous projects or having other links with the Evaluation Center.

2

Contact with principals

Presentation of objectives and participation requirements: logistics - schedules, space and information needs - caregiver consent forms.

3

Incentives

In return for their participation: results’ reports to compare their students’ development with that of other schools and contexts (no individual results). Also, pedagogical support and activities.

Enrollment strategy: meeting principals and coordinators and adapting to their availability.

11

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

14 of 26

SCHOOL ENROLLMENT

Schools are the critical partner

Provided the school is “on board”, the rest follows

  • Coordinate the application
  • Collect the consent forms
  • Provide the space for application
  • Convince caregivers to participate

Lessons from the 3 new schools (2025)

Logistics were prepared directly with principals, without coordinators.

This raised the consent-return rate and streamlined preparation of logistics.

Schools invited caregivers on-site to complete the questionnaires.

12

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

15 of 26

SECTION 3

Children & teachers’ data collection

The successive waves and rounds of data collection with children and teachers — the main difficulties encountered and the lessons learned.

14

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

16 of 26

KIDS & TEACHERS

Participation

16

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

Site

School

Area

Children

Teachers

1st round�May '24 - May '25

2nd round�Sept-Oct '25

1st round�May '24 - May '25

2nd round�Sept-Oct '25

Bogotá

A

Urban

61

0

0

0

B

Urban

191

160

7

8

C

Urban

238

206

 

6

D

Urban

206

153

 

6

San Vicente

E

Rural

148

125

7

15

Chiquinquirá

F

Rural

37

0

0

0

G

Rural

-

74

-

6

H

Urban

-

80

-

7

I

Rural

-

343

-

25

Total Urban

670

599

7

27

Total Rural

185

542

7

46

Overall total

855

1141

14

73

Administration was done in-person using tablets for all children and for all teachers except 7 from Bogotá in the 1st round.

17 of 26

KIDS & TEACHERS

Retention by school

% Children retained across both rounds

Overall retention ≈ 82%

15% attrition if grade 6 is excluded.

Counting the two schools that dropped out after Year-1 platform issues attrition rises to ≈ 30%.

16

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

< 20%

child attrition

18 of 26

KIDS & TEACHERS

Measures per task

Double and single measures per task

Bundles of tasks were used to distribute the tasks among kids and keep the administration time below 50 minutes.

Because bundles had to be used not all kids were administered the same tasks.

To produce useful information in the school reports, mathematics and language tasks were predominantly administered.

Up to this point many tasks have few longitudinal data. We intend to improve those numbers in 2026.

16

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

19 of 26

KIDS & TEACHERS

Difficulties & lessons learned

Difficulties

  • Some data got lost, particularly in the 1st round:
    • Platform / dashboard were unstable
    • Connectivity — tasks are internet-dependent; schools lack devices and good internet. 40–50 children answering at once.
    • Application failures — some children restarted or could not finish.
  • New necessary improvements: i.e. speaker button missing on some tasks; younger children (5–6) sometimes need audio playback.

Lessons learned for 2nd round

  • Upload all children’s data before the sessions.
  • Provide a fallback connection — a Starlink device now removes dependence on school internet.
  • Keep a robust participant registration & tracking system — critical to find data losses and longitudinal follow-up.

18

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

20 of 26

KIDS & TEACHERS

Teachers: process & lessons

Straightforward once the school is on

When the school commits, teachers reliably complete the requirements of the project.

Bogotá — by email

Contacted through the school by email (from Nov 2024).

At School B all 7 teachers responded per mail; other urban schools followed in later waves.

In person

Questionnaires applied on-site during the school visit (San Vicente del Caguán, Bogotá and Chiquinquirá 2025).

Rural teachers sometimes need help using the tablet.

19

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

21 of 26

SECTION 4

Caregivers’ data collection

The process with caregivers — the difficulties we faced, the lessons learned, and the adjustments made.

20

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

22 of 26

CAREGIVERS

Collection schemes & response pattern

How caregivers were reached

22

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

% Response rate by school and setting

Rural in-person sessions (often linked to mandatory school events) far outperform remote urban contact.

23 of 26

CAREGIVERS

The hardest challenge

Why caregivers are hard to reach

  • Urban (Bogotá): caregivers ask to be contacted by email and telephone but often do not respond, despite reminders from the team and the school.
  • Rural: low familiarity with tablets, reading and internet make it challenging.
  • Survey length & redundancy: reported at over an hour in early administrations; streamlined by Stanford for 2025 but still ~50 minutes on average.
  • About one quarter of submitted caregiver surveys contained only partial information (first module only).

~50 min

avg. survey length (2025)

~25%

partial submissions

Take-away: caregiver coverage is uneven — do not read it as a representative of the children sample without accounting for mode and setting.

21

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

24 of 26

CAREGIVERS

Incentives & the 2026 outreach campaign

San Vicente (Oct ’24)

Restaurant voucher (~11 CHF) → ~90% response.

Bogotá

One school initially declined using incentives — concern over setting expectations for future compensation.

Chiquinquirá rural

School kit (notebooks, pens, pencils) as a lower-key incentive.

2026

School kit (notebooks, pens, pencils)

2025–26 outreach campaign - Goal: 80%

Phone calls, WhatsApp, emails and personalized follow-up — including text introductions before calls and reassigning contacts when caregivers blocked communication.

High cost in time dedication.

Lessons

Include availability & contact preferences in consent forms.

Identify siblings before administration so caregivers are assigned all children at once.

In-person collection tied to school events works best; relying only on remote channels underperforms in urban settings.

23

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

25 of 26

READING THE DATA

Consider to interpret the Colombia data

Staggered timing — Rounds differ by site

   Bogotá May 2024/ Sept 2025

   San Vicente del Caguán Oct 2024/ Oct 2025

   Chiquinquirá Oct 2024 - 3 new Oct 2025

Mixed modes —

Children always in person.

Teachers in person and by email.

Caregivers by email (urban) vs. in person (rural).

Expect mode effects.

Evolving instruments —

2024: 6 bundles (2 for pre-readers)

2025: new bundles + adaptive tasks

Caregiver survey streamlined between rounds.

Year-1 platform caveats —

Dashboard instability, restarts and unsaved/incomplete records — treat some Year-1 data with caution.

Caregiver coverage skew —

 Urban ≈ 36% vs. rural ≈ 61%; ~25% partial.

Caregiver data is uneven across settings.

Attrition & constraints — Two schools dropped after Year-1 issues; attrition ≈ 21% (≈15% excl. grade 6). Individual-level data not authorized by the Steering Committee.

24

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia

26 of 26

Thank you

Pilot data collection in Colombia · LEVANTE

Evaluation Center · Universidad de los Andes

Funded by the Jacobs Foundation

25

LEVANTE · Pilot data collection in Colombia