1 of 34

Differentiated Reading Support: An Overview of Tier 2 and Tier 3 Interventions at Homewood-Flossmoor Community High School

Lauren Freeman, Reading Department Lead

Jennifer Rudan, Director of Student Supports

2 of 34

Lauren Freeman, Reading Department Lead

Jennifer Rudan, Director of Student Supports

3 of 34

2025 International Literacy Association’s Exemplary Reading Program Award Recipient

4 of 34

Outcomes

  • Understand the neuroscience behind reading acquisition.
  • Learn how to operationalize Homewood Flossmoor’s structured literacy-based MTSS model.
  • Learn how our Tier 2 and Tier 3 reading interventions integrate explicit, systematic, and diagnostic instruction.
  • Examine research-based instructional strategies designed to enhance student engagement and literacy outcomes.

5 of 34

Homewood-Flossmoor Community High School

  • 1 school district located 25 miles south of Chicago in Flossmoor, IL
  • 2751 students
    • 73.6% African American
    • 9.7% Hispanic
    • 12.3% White
    • 4.4% Other
  • 14% Low Income
  • 13% IEPs
  • 89% Attendance Rate
  • 98% Graduation Rate

6 of 34

Reading Department Background

  • 2003 Adoption of School Board Procedure for Reading
  • 2004 Summer curriculum writing of reading courses
  • 2024-2005 Establishment of Reading Department & students began taking reading classes
  • 2019-2020 Established MTSS
  • 2021-2022 Co-Taught SS with Reading-Pilot
  • 2022-2023 Tiered Service Delivery Model for Reading- Full Implementation

7 of 34

MTSS Framework

8 of 34

MTSS and Literacy

  • Multi-tiered system of reading support rooted in the science of reading

  • Focus on students reading at/below 8th-grade level

  • College, career, and life ready

  • Equity

9 of 34

The Science of Reading

  • Reading is not innate: neuroscience perspective
  • Systematic, explicit instruction

10 of 34

11 of 34

Active View of Reading

12 of 34

13 of 34

Progress Monitoring & Assessment

  • Benchmarking (3x/year-Fall, Winter, Spring)
  • Survey-level diagnostics
  • Progress monitoring
  • Ongoing instructional adjustments based on data

14 of 34

Reader Profile

15 of 34

Tier 2: Co-Taught Social Science with Reading

  • Structure of co-taught World & U.S. History classes
  • Role of content teacher & reading specialists
  • Integrated literacy instruction

16 of 34

Tier 2 - Instructional Practices

  • Text sets and vocabulary development
  • Read-alouds and guided questioning
  • Modeling and writing in the content area
  • Data-driven instruction

17 of 34

Tier 3: Targeted Skill Acceleration

  • Individualized and small-group support
  • Designed for students with intensive reading needs
  • Emphasis on structured literacy instruction: phonology, orthography, morphology, syntax, semantics, pragmatics, and discourse

18 of 34

Tier 3 - Instructional Strategies

  • Multisensory: Tools - tiles, sound boxes, orthographic mapping
  • Decodable texts, repeated readings
  • Executive functioning: stamina and organization
  • Flexible grouping and diagnostic teaching

19 of 34

Resources and Curriculum Tools

  • Tier 2: US History Curriculum, Writing Revolution, Diffit, Morpheme Magic, and more
  • Tier 3: Wilson System, Rewards, Morpheme Magic, Scholastic UpFront Magazine, Diffit, and more
  • Lexia LETRS, science of reading/structured literacy alignment

20 of 34

Power of Collaboration

Interdisciplinary teams include:

  • Reading specialists�
  • Social science teachers�
  • Special education staff

  • Coordinator of English Learners

  • Student Support Team

Collaboration leads to:

  • Greater instructional consistency�
  • Increased student engagement�
  • Stronger alignment of literacy goals across subjects

21 of 34

Operationalizing Literacy and MTSS Framework

Identification System

Service Delivery Setup

Outcome Review

Student Monitoring System

05

01

02

03

04

22 of 34

Operationalizing Literacy and MTSS Framework

Established Entrance/Exit Criteria

Identification System

Service Delivery Setup

Outcome Review

Student Monitoring System

05

01

02

03

04

23 of 34

Identifying Students

  • Incoming Freshmen - April the previous year
  • Current Students - ongoing
  • Transfer Students - ongoing

24 of 34

Identifying Students

25 of 34

Collaboration with Special Education & ML Supports

  • Reading specialists + Special education staff
  • Tailored plans based on reader profiles and IEP data
  • Multilingual learner accommodations

26 of 34

Operationalizing Literacy and MTSS Framework

Established Entrance/Exit Criteria

Identification System

Service Delivery Setup

Outcome Review

Student Monitoring System

05

01

02

03

04

27 of 34

Service Delivery

Scheduling

Professional Growth and Training

28 of 34

Operationalizing Literacy and MTSS Framework

Established Entrance/Exit Criteria

Identification System

Service Delivery Setup

Outcome Review

Student Monitoring System

05

01

02

03

04

29 of 34

Progress Monitoring & Assessment

Progress Flow Chart

  • Benchmarking (3x/year-Fall, Winter, Spring)
  • Survey-level diagnostics
  • Progress monitoring
  • Ongoing instructional adjustments based on data

30 of 34

Operationalizing Literacy and MTSS Framework

Established Entrance/Exit Criteria

Identification System

Service Delivery Setup

Outcome Review

Student Monitoring System

05

01

02

03

04

31 of 34

Data

  • 146 students were serviced through HF reading intervention during the 2024-2025 school year.

  • Tier 2 co-taught social science with reading specialist:
    • 68 students serviced
      • 2025-2026 school year:
        • 29 students will come out of reading intervention (41%)
        • 30 students will remain in Tier 2 reading intervention (49%)
        • 7 students are recommended for Tier 3 reading intervention
        • 2 students have withdrawn from HF
  • Supported through an individualized education plan:
    • 63 students serviced

32 of 34

Data

  • Tier 3 Reading Intervention:
    • 78 students serviced
      • 63 are students with an IEP with an area of need in reading
      • 2025-2026 school year:
        • 39 students will move to Tier 2 reading intervention (50%)
        • 6 students will come out of reading intervention (8%)
        • 30 students will remain in Tier 3 reading intervention (38%)
        • 1 student has withdrawn from HF
        • 2 students graduated 2025

33 of 34

Best Practices & Takeaways

  • Science of Reading
  • Establish a Multi-tiered system of support for literacy
  • Embed structured literacy into content areas
  • Prioritize interdisciplinary collaboration
  • Use ongoing data for personalized support
  • Scaffold executive functioning alongside reading

34 of 34

Q&A + Discussion