1 of 11

Technical Advisory Council Meeting

June 26, 2024

2 of 11

Antitrust Policy Notice

  • Linux Foundation Europe meetings involve participation by industry competitors, and it is the intention of the Linux Foundation to conduct all of its activities in accordance with applicable antitrust and competition laws. It is therefore extremely important that attendees adhere to meeting agendas, and be aware of, and not participate in, any activities that are prohibited under applicable US state, federal or foreign antitrust and competition laws.
  • Examples of types of actions that are prohibited at Linux Foundation Europe meetings and in connection with Linux Foundation activities are described in the Linux Foundation Antitrust Policy available at www.linuxfoundation.eu. If you have questions about these matters, please contact your company counsel, or if you are a member of the Linux Foundation, feel free to contact Andrew Updegrove of the firm of Gesmer Updegrove LLP, which provides legal counsel to the Linux Foundation.

3 of 11

Code of Conduct

“Be excellent to each other.”

tac.openwallet.foundation/governance/code-of-conduct/

4 of 11

TAC Voting Members

Member (alphabetical by first name)

Representing

David Zeuthen

Google

Jaehoon (Ace) Shim

At Large

Rolson Quadras

Gen

Pete Cooling

Visa

Stavros Kounis (vice chair)

At Large

Tracy Kuhrt (chair)

Accenture

Wenjing Chu

FutureWei Technologies

5 of 11

Agenda

  1. Announcements
  2. Review action items from last meeting
  3. Project Annual Reviews
    1. SD-JWT Kotlin Annual Review
  4. Discuss Approval Process for SIG output
  5. Review TAC Goals 2024
  6. Open discussion and next steps

6 of 11

Announcements

7 of 11

Action Items from Last Meeting

  • Onboard mdl.js – completed
  • Reach out to Fabian regarding new maintainership for sd-jwt-kotlin - Sean/Torsten
  • File PR against openwallet-foundation-labs/governance to update maintainership for sd-jwt-kotlin - Ace - completed

8 of 11

Project Annual Reviews

  • SD-JWT Kotlin Annual Review

9 of 11

Discuss Approval Process for SIG Updates

  • What should this process look like?
  • Does the output of the SIG represent the views of the organization?
  • Do we have any guidance/requirements for the SIG/TF on output? Example:
    • Must not be a specification as this is not in the remit of the OWF
  • Would a disclaimer at the beginning of any SIG/TF generated document be worthwhile to include? Example: Terms of Use section in ToIP document

10 of 11

Review TAC Goals 2024

  • Review progress on the TAC Goals for 2024
  • Determine how we want to proceed

11 of 11

Open Discussion and Next Steps

  • Next TAC Meeting July 10, 2024
    • Safe Wallet SIG Whitepaper review and vote
    • Architecture SIG update