1 of 115

Subatomic Smoke Rings:�Polarization and toroidal vorticity in the QGP

Mike Lisa, Ohio State University

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

1

LBNL Heavy Hadron Ion Tea

2 of 115

Outline

  • Brief motivation and review of hyperon polarization in heavy ion collisions
    • Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci. 70 (2020) 395-423; arxiv:2003.03640

  • Interesting structures at forward rapidity in A+A – model calculations
    • Ivanov, Soldatov, Toneev, Fu, Xu, Huang, Song, Baznat, Gudima, Sorin, Teryaev, Usubov, Deng, Wei, Xia, Li, Tang, Wang, Zinchenko…

  • Interesting, uncharted directions – hydro calculations
    • p+A collisions - PRC104 (2021) 011901; arXiv:2101.10872
    • jets in expanding QGP fluid – PLB820 (2021) 136500; arXiv:2102.11919

  • Summary

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

2

3C Collaboration:

J. Barbon, D. Chinellato, W. Serenone, C. Shen, J. Takahashi, G. Torrieri, MAL

3 of 115

Standard model of H.I.C. : viscous hydrodynamics

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

3

& many more terms...

Phase structure, EoS, transport coefficients

movies by Bjorn Schenke

4 of 115

Standard model of H.I.C. : viscous hydrodynamics + Cooper-Frye

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

4

fluid cell

  • Dynamic evolution of locally equilibrated matter
  • Hadronization/freezeout driven by conservation laws (and…?)
  • emitted particles (measurable!) reflect properties of parent fluid cells

movies by Bjorn Schenke

hadrons

fluid

5 of 115

Standard model of H.I.C. : viscous hydrodynamics + Cooper-Frye

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

5

fluid cell

  • chemical potentials
  • temperature
  • Dynamic evolution of locally equilibrated matter
  • Hadronization/freezeout driven by conservation laws (and…?)
  • emitted particles (measurable!) reflect properties of parent fluid cells
  • Yields

movies by Bjorn Schenke

hadrons

  • flavors
  • yield

fluid

D. Magestro, PBM

Update: Andronic et al Nature 561 (2018) 7723, 321; arxiv 1710.09425

6 of 115

Standard model of H.I.C. : viscous hydrodynamics + Cooper-Frye

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

6

fluid cell

  • chemical potentials
  • temperature
  • collective velocity
  • Dynamic evolution of locally equilibrated matter
  • Hadronization/freezeout driven by conservation laws (and…?)
  • emitted particles (measurable!) reflect properties of parent fluid cells
  • Yields
  • longitudinal, transverse distributions

movies by Bjorn Schenke

hadrons

  • flavors
  • yield
  • momentum

fluid

Transverse momentum

Longitudinal momentum

7 of 115

Standard model of H.I.C. : viscous hydrodynamics + Cooper-Frye

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

7

fluid cell

  • chemical potentials
  • temperature
  • collective velocity
  • Dynamic evolution of locally equilibrated matter
  • Hadronization/freezeout driven by conservation laws (and…?)
  • emitted particles (measurable!) reflect properties of parent fluid cells
  • Yields
  • longitudinal, transverse distributions
  • azimuthal flow anisotropy

movies by Bjorn Schenke

hadrons

  • flavors
  • yield
  • momentum

fluid

Heinz & Snellings (2013)

finer

detail

8 of 115

Rotational substructure of noncentral collisions

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

8

fluid cell

  • chemical potentials
  • temperature
  • collective velocity
  • vorticity
  • Dynamic evolution of locally equilibrated matter
  • Hadronization/freezeout driven by conservation laws (and…?)
  • emitted particles (measurable!) reflect properties of parent fluid cells
  • Yields
  • longitudinal, transverse distributions
  • azimuthal flow anisotropy
  • polarization

hadrons

  • flavors
  • yield
  • momentum
  • polarization

fluid

finer

detail

J ~ 104 ħ

Becattini, Karpenko, MAL, Upsal, Voloshin, PRC 2017

9 of 115

Rotational substructure of noncentral collisions

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

9

fluid cell

  • chemical potentials
  • temperature
  • collective velocity
  • vorticity
  • Dynamic evolution of locally equilibrated matter
  • Hadronization/freezeout driven by conservation laws (and…?)
  • emitted particles (measurable!) reflect properties of parent fluid cells
  • Yields
  • longitudinal, transverse distributions
  • azimuthal flow anisotropy
  • polarization

hadrons

  • flavors
  • yield
  • momentum
  • polarization

fluid

finer

detail

Becattini, Karpenko, MAL, Upsal, Voloshin, PRC 2017

10 of 115

First observation of fluid vorticity-polarization coupling

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

10

“Spin hydrodynamic generation” Takahashi, et al. Nat. Phys. 12 (2016) 52

Friction with walls induces vorticity

Vorticity of bulk 🡪 polarization of constituents (& spin voltage etc)

  • direction of vorticity known
  • atomic alignment measured

Takahashi knew direction of angular momentum

“This opens a door to the new field of fluid spintronics”

11 of 115

First observation of fluid vorticity-polarization coupling

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

11

“Spin hydrodynamic generation” Takahashi, et al. Nat. Phys. 12 (2016) 52

  • direction of vorticity known
  • atomic alignment measured

Takahashi knew direction of angular momentum

“This opens a door to the new field of fluid spintronics”

Second observation:

Nature 548 (2017) 62

12 of 115

Global Lambda Polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

12

  • Measured global polarization in good agreement with standard hydro predictions [1]
  • Three-fluid hydro, especially important at low root(s) [2]
  • Transport calculations (coarse-graining to calculate vorticity) [3,4] & kinetic+coalescence [5]

[1] Karpenko I, Becattini F. Eur. Phys. J. C77:213 (2017)

[2] Ivanov YB, Toneev VD, Soldatov AA. Phys. Rev. C100:014908 (2019)

[3] Li H, Pang LG, Wang Q, Xia XL. Phys. Rev. C96:054908 (2017)

[4] Vitiuk O, Bravina LV, Zabrodin EE arXiv:1910.06292 [hep-ph] (2019)

[5] Sun Y, Ko CM. Phys. Rev. C96:024906 (2017)

Lambda polarization is a well-understood/calibrated tool to access fluid substructure at the finest possible scale.

Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 70 (2020) 395

13 of 115

Consistency: other hyperons

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

13

AMPT calculation

  • mass & spin dependence

Wei, Deng, & Huang

PRC99 014905 (2019)

Consistent with common fluid vorticity

Hyperon polarization is a well-understood/calibrated tool to access fluid substructure at the finest possible scale.

STAR, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 162301 (2021); arxiv:2012.13601

14 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

14

(By symmetry, must be quadrupole)

naïve cartoon

+

+

-

-

15 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

15

(By symmetry, must be quadrupole)

naïve cartoon

+

+

-

-

16 of 115

Tension… and insight?

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

16

AMPT+hydro Wu, Pang, Huang, Wang PR Res 1(2019)033058

“Which kind of vorticity” to use?

theoretically favored[1]

“works”

[1] Becattini PRL108:244502 (2012)

17 of 115

Tension… and insight?

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

17

AMPT+hydro Wu, Pang, Huang, Wang PR Res 1(2019)033058

“Which kind of vorticity” to use?

theoretically favored[1]

“works”

[1] Becattini PRL108:244502 (2012)

Alzhrani, Ryu, Shen arxiv:2203.15718

New “shear-induced polarization” terms

BPP

LY

Becattini, Buzzegoli, Palermo PLB 820, 136519 (2021); arXiv:2103.10917

Liu and Yi Yin, JHEP 07, 188 (2021), arXiv:2103.09200

18 of 115

Circular polarization in central A+A

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

18

Xia, Li, Tang, Wang PRC 98, 024905 (2018)

19 of 115

Circular polarization in central A+A

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

19

quantifying smoke-ring structure

PRC104 (2021) 011901

Xia, Li, Tang, Wang PRC 98, 024905 (2018)

Xia, Li, Tang, Wang PRC 98, 024905 (2018)

these are vorticity vectors, not flow velocities

20 of 115

Rings at below-RHIC energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

20

Baznat, Gudima, Sorin, Teryaev PRC93, 031902(R) (2016)

Au+Au @ 5 GeV

  • Helicity separation in heavy-ion collisions (QGSM)�Baznat, Gudima, Sorin, Teryaev PRC88, 061901(R) (2013)
  • Vorticity and hydrodynamic helicity in heavy-ion collisions in the HSD model�Teraev & Usubov PRC92 014906 (2015)
  • Femto-vortex sheets and hyperon polarization in heavy-ion collisions (QGSM)�Baznat, Gudima, Sorin, Teryaev PRC93, 031902(R) (2016)
  • Vorticity in heavy-ion collisions at the JINR NICA (3FD)�Ivanov & Soldatov, PRC 95, 054915 (2017)
  • Vortex rings in fragmentation regions in heavy-ion collisions at √sNN = 39 GeV (3FD) �Ivanov & Soldatov PRC97, 044915 (2018)
  • Vorticity structure and polarization of Λ hyperons in heavy-ion collisions (PHSD)�Zinchenko, Sorin, Teryaev, Baznat DSPIN-2019 (2020)

  • Significant attention to structure in space
  • Focus of observable implications seems to center on
    • identifying forward rapidity as important
    • convolution with directed flow affecting global polarization

Teraev & Usubov PRC92 014906 (2015)

21 of 115

Same observations at higher energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

21

Ivanov & Soldatov PRC97, 044915 (2018)

Transverse flow should render the vortex rings themselves visible!

root(s) = 39 GeV

  • don’t just worry about “accidental” effect on global polarization!

22 of 115

Same observations at higher energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

22

Ivanov & Soldatov PRC97, 044915 (2018)

Transverse flow should render the vortex rings themselves visible!

root(s) = 39 GeV

root(s) = 200, 2700 GeV

Xia, Li, Tang, Wang Phys. Rev. C 98, 024905 (2018)

  • don’t just worry about “accidental” effect on global polarization!

23 of 115

Development of toroidal vorticity in MUSIC

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

23

Au+Au at 200 GeV

Bjorken flow profile

MUSIC hydrodynamics, with baryon currents

Schenke, Jeon, Gale PRC82 (2010) 014903

Schenke, Shen, Tribedy PRC102 (2020) 044905

PRC104 (2011) 011901

color axis:

24 of 115

Rings predicted at all energies– can they be observed?

  • This is a unique predicted structure! Observation would represent a compelling demonstration of fluid structure at the extremes of rapidity & energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

24

  • Observable at HADES, STAR FXT�(NICA??)

Focused forward

  • in principle possible at STAR with forward tracking upgrade

Focused forward

  • difficult at STAR@RHIC or ATLAS/CMS/ALICE@LHC without forward tracking upgrade

Teraev & Usubov PRC92 014906 (2015)

Baznat, er al, PRC93, 031902(R) (2016)

Xia, Li, Tang, Wang PRC98, 024905 (2018)

Ivanov & Soldatov PRC97, 044915 (2018)

25 of 115

Seeing the rings

  • This is a unique predicted structure! Observation would represent a compelling demonstration of fluid structure at the extremes of rapidity & energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

25

Pb+Pb event

Note: No Event Plane Necessary!

Focused forward

  • Difficult at STAR@RHIC or ATLAS/CMS/ALICE@LHC without forward tracking upgrade
  • LHCb ideal to observe this structure

Michael Winn, ERICE, 2016

26 of 115

Polarization about a local disturbance

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

26

+

+

-

-

Helmholtz (1867): Persistent vortical toroids (smoke rings) are quintessential fluid behavior

Vortex rings about the jet direction:

  • Betz/Gyulassy/Torrieri, PRC76 (2007) 044901
  • Tachibana/Hirano, NPA904-905 (2013) 1023c
  • W. Matioli et al, PLB820 (2021) 136500

27 of 115

Jet-induced toroidal vorticity in MUSIC

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

27

28 of 115

Jet-induced toroidal vorticity

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

28

W. Matioli et al, PLB820 (2021) 136500

Experimentally challenging, but potentially rich!

  • early-stage fluid behaviour?
  • nature of energy loss in fluid
  • sensitivity to transport coefficients

Toroidal vorticity

t = jet direction

MUSIC hydro with embedded jet

29 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”

    • multi-particle correlation 🡪�though… not uniquely hydro prediction, �e.g.: Dusling et al, PRD 97, 016014 (2018)

    • with well-chosen initial conditions and �pre-equilibrium effects, hydro evolution�seems to reproduce 2-particle anisotropy!

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

29

Nagle & Zajc, Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci. 68 (2018)

30 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”
    • if everything is hydro, are we confident that anything is hydro?
    • much of the supporting evidence comes from vn… can we find a novel, hydro-characteristic test?

  • “Every time you break a symmetry, you learn something”* (v2, v1, polarization!)
    • broken forward/backward symmetry 🡪 potentially interesting initial state

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

30

p

Au

* Urs Wiedemann

31 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”
    • if everything is hydro, are we confident that anything is hydro?
    • much of the supporting evidence comes from vn… can we find a novel, hydro-characteristic test?

  • “Every time you break a symmetry, you learn something”* (v2, v1, polarization!)
    • broken forward/backward symmetry 🡪 potentially interesting initial state

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

31

proton

* Urs Wiedemann

32 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”
    • if everything is hydro, are we confident that anything is hydro?
    • much of the supporting evidence comes from vn… can we find a novel, hydro-characteristic test?

  • “Every time you break a symmetry, you learn something”* (v2, v1, polarization!)
    • broken forward/backward symmetry 🡪 potentially interesting initial state

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

32

(b) Radial-gradient flow profile

See also S. Voloshin, Hirschegg 2017

* Urs Wiedemann

33 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

33

(a)

(b)

See also S. Voloshin, Hirschegg 2017

(b) Radial-gradient flow profile

  • Basic observables are ~identical in these scenarios

34 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

34

  • Basic observables are ~identical in these scenarios
  • Vorticity is very different

(a)

(b)

See also S. Voloshin, Hirschegg 2017

(b) Radial-gradient flow profile

35 of 115

Relation to Takahashi geometry

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

35

(b) Radial-gradient flow profile

The experimental geometry was not this

It was flow thru capillary tube:

36 of 115

Jet-induced vorticity/polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

36

+

+

-

-

Willian Serenone’s talk

small stuff blasting through stuff

37 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

37

p+Au at 200 GeV

(a)

(b)

MUSIC hydrodynamics, with baryon currents

37

color axis:

38 of 115

Snaphots

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

38

smooth-on-smooth, b=0�collisions at RHIC

PRC104 (2021) 011901; arxiv: 2101.10872

39 of 115

Fluid ➞ particles (vorticity ➞ polarization)

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

39

alternative vorticities…

Becattini et al, Annal. Phys. 338 (2013) 32

Cooper-Frye

for spin

non-vortical

symmetric shear

Becattini et al (2021)

Liu & Yin (2001)

40 of 115

Observing the ”smoke tubes”

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

40

Bjorken flow profile

With radial gradients

  • similar effect for all vorticity “flavors”
  • hyperon and anti-hyperon are similar

Ring vorticity observable

PRC104 (2021) 011901; arxiv: 2101.10872

41 of 115

Observing the ”smoke tubes”

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

41

  • similar effect for all vorticity “flavors”
  • hyperon and anti-hyperon are similar

PRC104 (2021) 011901; arxiv: 2101.10872

Nontrivial dynamics for long lifetime

42 of 115

fluctuating initial conditions

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

42

[1] Shen, Alzhrani, PRC102 (2020) 014909 (2020)

  • Event-by-event calculation with lumpy initial conditions, following prescription in [1]�🡪 little difference with smooth initial conditions

  • reduced Rspin for more symmetric system

* note: pT>500 MeV here, increasing R 0.04 🡪 0.06 in p+Au

Chinellato, MAL, Serenone, Shen, Takahashi, Torrieri in preparation

Schenke, Shen, Tribedy, PRC102 (2020) 044905

43 of 115

Interpolating between the scenarios

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

43

f=100%

f=0%

f=15%

  • For Au+Au at 200 GeV (11 GeV), global polarization calls for f=15% (50%)
    • Ryu, Jupic, Shen: 2106.08125
  • unclear whether this translates to p+A

  • Even with low f, substantial signal

(1-f)✖️

+ f✖️

Dialing in the non-Bjorken flow. Schematically….

Reality may lie between the extremes…

Chinellato, MAL, Serenone, Shen, Takahashi, Torrieri in preparation

44 of 115

Effect of shear terms

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

44

[1] F. Becattini, M. Buzzegoli, and A. Palermo �Phys. Lett. B 820, 136519 (2021); arXiv:2103.10917

[2] Shuai Y. F. Liu and Yi Yin�JHEP 07, 188 (2021), arXiv:2103.09200

[1]

[2]

(c.f talks by Buzzegoli and Fu in session T02 Tuesday)

  • nontrivial / non-intuitive effect on R
  • Large difference in effects predicted by the two prescriptions
  • Effect at midrapidity remains

Chinellato, MAL, Serenone, Shen, Takahashi, Torrieri in preparation

45 of 115

Experimental issues

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

45

Challenge: large topological dependence of efficiency

  • artifacts complicated and ~10% (or more)
  • will affect any tracking detector
  • must flip B-field to cancel artifact

STAR PRC104 (2021) L061901

c/o Joey Adams

46 of 115

Experimental issues

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

46

Challenge: large topological dependence of efficiency

  • artifacts complicated and ~10% (or more)
  • will affect any tracking detector
  • must flip B-field to cancel artifact

STAR PRC104 (2021) L061901

Advantage:

  • no event plane needed!�🡪 measuring ~1% toroidal polarization is much easier than 1% global polarization (for same stats)

47 of 115

Summary

  • A+A / p+A collisions generate complex flow structures; probed by vorticity at small scale
  • Circular vorticity pattern predicted for b=0 collisions at all energies
    • LHCb – take a look!
  • A hydro system with p+A initial conditions could naturally generate a vortical toroid configuration
    • similar to jet “blasting through”
    • Helmholtz (1867): Persistent vortical toroids (smoke rings) are quintessential fluid behavior
    • would be a compelling evidence for hydro nature of the smallest system
  • Experimentally observable (R)
    • distinct from hadronic processes by particle/antiparticle similarity, eta dependence
    • challenging to observe few % effect, but not daunting - flip B-field
  • We should explore this unique structure @ RHIC, LHC (while we can…)

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

47

João Prado Barbon, David Chinellato, Willian Serenone, Jun Takahashi, Giorgio Torrieri

University of Campinas (Unicamp)

Chun Shen

Wayne State University

48 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

48

49 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

49

50 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

50

51 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

51

52 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

52

53 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

53

Habich, Nagle, Romatschke, Eur. Phys. J. C (2015) 75:15

54 of 115

A new idea

arXiv:2101.10872

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

54

55 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”

    • multi-particle correlation 🡪�though… not uniquely hydro prediction, �e.g.: Dusling et al, PRD 97, 016014 (2018)

    • with well-chosen initial conditions and �pre-equilibrium effects, hydro evolution�seems to reproduce 2-particle anisotropy!

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

55

Nagle & Zajc, Ann.Rev.Nucl.Part.Sci. 68 (2018)

56 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”
    • if everything is hydro, are we confident that anything is hydro?
    • much of the supporting evidence comes from vn… can we find a novel, hydro-characteristic test?

  • “Every time you break a symmetry, you learn something”* (v2, v1, polarization!)
    • broken forward/backward symmetry 🡪 potentially interesting initial state

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

56

p

Au

* Urs Wiedemann

57 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”
    • if everything is hydro, are we confident that anything is hydro?
    • much of the supporting evidence comes from vn… can we find a novel, hydro-characteristic test?

  • “Every time you break a symmetry, you learn something”* (v2, v1, polarization!)
    • broken forward/backward symmetry 🡪 potentially interesting initial state

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

57

proton

* Urs Wiedemann

58 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

  • Do such collisions really form “the smallest droplet of QGP?”
    • if everything is hydro, are we confident that anything is hydro?
    • much of the supporting evidence comes from vn… can we find a novel, hydro-characteristic test?

  • “Every time you break a symmetry, you learn something”* (v2, v1, polarization!)
    • broken forward/backward symmetry 🡪 potentially interesting initial state

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

58

(b) Radial-gradient flow profile

See also S. Voloshin, Hirschegg 2017

* Urs Wiedemann

59 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

59

(b) Radial-gradient flow profile

Peek ahead: MUSIC

hydro calculations give

same dN/dη

(a)

(b)

See also S. Voloshin, Hirschegg 2017

60 of 115

What about p+A collisions…?

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

60

As in A+A collisions,

shear & continuity 🡪 vorticity

(b) Radial-gradient flow profile

See also S. Voloshin, Hirschegg 2017

61 of 115

Ubiquitous feature of fluid systems – toroidal vortex

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

61

Small “thrust” initial conditions 🡪 persistent expanding toroidal vortex

see also H. Helmholtz, Phil. Jour. Science 33 485 (1867)

62 of 115

Ubiquitous feature of fluid systems – toroidal vortex

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

62

Takahashi, et al, Nature Phys. 12 (2016) 52-56

63 of 115

Quantifying the ring structure

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

63

Non-relativistic:

[1] MAL, Barbon, Chinellato, Serenone, Shen, Takahashi, Torrieri

arxiv:2101.10872

64 of 115

Quantifying the ring structure

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

64

Non-relativistic:

[1] MAL, Barbon, Chinellato, Serenone, Shen, Takahashi, Torrieri

arxiv:2101.10872

Relativistic:

(thermal vorticity)

“Relevant” vorticity depends on mass of particle of interest, temperature, and hypersurface [1]

65 of 115

Hydro response - movie

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

65

Au+Au at 200 GeV

Bjorken flow profile

MUSIC hydrodynamics, with baryon currents

Schenke, Jeon, Gale PRC82 (2010) 014903

Schenke, Shen, Tribedy PRC102 (2020) 044905

66 of 115

Hydro response - movies

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

66

p+Au at 200 GeV

(a)

(b)

MUSIC hydrodynamics, with baryon currents

67 of 115

Hydro response - movies

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

67

p+Pb at 5.02 TeV

(a)

(b)

MUSIC hydrodynamics, with baryon currents

68 of 115

Snaphots

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

68

smooth-on-smooth, b=0�collisions at RHIC

arxiv:2101.10872

69 of 115

Experimental observable

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

69

(note, no “effective vorticity” or C)

Cooper-Frye with vorticity. Becattini et al, Annal. Phys. 338 (2013) 32; arXiv:1303.3431

recall

70 of 115

Observable

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

70

  • not trivial
  • antiLambda similar but not identical to Lambda
    • (baryon currents in MUSIC)
  • negative shift at LHC
  • ~2%, on same order as polarizations measured at RHIC
    • and no EP needed!

  • Distinct from hadronic “production plane” polarization:
    • symmetry in rapidity
    • antiLambda signal

6

4

2

0

-2

71 of 115

Non-trivial dynamics takes over at large times

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

71

Also seen with X+Au

where X is smaller than Au but larger than proton

72 of 115

Reminder from 1970’s (through 2010’s)

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

72

production-plane polarization in p+A collisions.

  • Same observable as ours!
  • high-x signal
  • ~independent of target (p, Be, C, Cu, W)
  • ~independent of energy (only measured to ~40 GeV)
  • odd in rapidity for p+p, but also p+A
  • no signal for anti-Lambdas

HERA-B PLB638 (2006) 415

NA48 p+N(?) sqrt(sNN) = 29 GeV

E799 p+Be sqrt(sNN) = 39 GeV

HERA-B p+W,C sqrt(sNN) = 41.6 GeV

x

+

parameterization

73 of 115

Another geometry – “jet” through expanding plasma

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

73

image by Kalyan Dey

Willian Serenone, et al, arXiv:2102.11919

74 of 115

Example case

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

74

ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303

Willian Serenone, et al, arXiv:2102.11919

Smooth initial conditions by averaging 3D Trento ICs with b=0

  • energy density adjusted to reproduce measured multiplicity (in MUSIC)

“lost”: E=57.5 GeV, p=42.5 GeV/c

  • assume completely thermalized

Landau matching with fluid 🡪 bullet with

  • 𝛆 = 30 GeV/V at vx = 0.7
  • Rbullet = 0.5 fm.
  • initial position at center of plasma

75 of 115

Example case

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

75

ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303

Willian Serenone, et al, arXiv:2102.11919

“lost”: E=57.5 GeV, p=42.5 GeV/c

  • assume completely thermalized

Landau matching with fluid 🡪 bullet with

  • 𝛆 = 30 GeV/V at vx = 0.7
  • Rbullet = 0.5 fm.
  • initial position at center of plasma

76 of 115

Movie time

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

76

 

Willian Serenone, et al, arXiv:2102.11919

77 of 115

From fluid vorticity to hadron polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

77

 

 

78 of 115

Back to Back quenched jets

  • Back-to-back bullets start at the center
  • Two approaches:
    • Just add signal from a left-going jet�to the signal from a right-going jet
    • Perform a full hydrodynamic evolution �with two “bullets” in the initial condition

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

78

okay, you get the idea…..

these differ

  • nonlinear interaction between

smoke rings

79 of 115

Summary

  • Hyperon polarization is a sensitive probe of fine substructure of the fluid
    • a rare new direction in a mature field
    • simultaneously validates (predicted global) and challenges (azimuthal dependence) hydrodynamics
  • Important future measurements:
    • can we understand collisions at NICA/FAIR in hydrodynamic terms?
    • what drives the energy and rapidity dependence of polarization
    • unique ring-like structures, first predicted for low root(s), may be observed at highest energies at LHCb
  • Toroidal vortex patterns in p+A collisions & jet+QGP
    • novel fluid substructure
    • characteristic of (all) fluids (with similar initial conditions)
      • more compelling test of “tiny droplet” creation
      • more compelling test of jet-fluid interaction & sensitive to plasma viscosity
    • (in these cases) dominated by velocity gradients 🡪 not affected by “which vorticity is used”
    • much more study needed (and underway)
      • fluctuating initial conditions, size/energy scan, jet energy dependence
      • non-vortical contributions? (Becattini:2021, Fu:2021, Liu:2021)

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

79

80 of 115

Backup

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

80

81 of 115

LOOK AT THE EXPERIMENTS!

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

81

ATLAS, Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 379

How to estimate “bullet” parameters?

82 of 115

LOOK AT THE EXPERIMENTS!

  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

82

ATLAS, Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 379

How to estimate “bullet” parameters?

83 of 115

LOOK AT THE EXPERIMENTS!

  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

83

ATLAS, Phys. Lett. B774 (2017) 379

How to estimate “bullet” parameters?

84 of 115

LOOK AT THE EXPERIMENTS!

  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

84

ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303

How to estimate “bullet” parameters?

85 of 115

LOOK AT THE EXPERIMENTS!

  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

85

ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303

How to estimate “bullet” parameters?

86 of 115

LOOK AT THE EXPERIMENTS!

  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

86

ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 252303

How to estimate “bullet” parameters?

87 of 115

LANDAU MATCHING PROCEDURE

  •  
  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

87

88 of 115

LANDAU MATCHING PROCEDURE

  •  
  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

88

89 of 115

LANDAU MATCHING PROCEDURE

  •  
  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

89

90 of 115

Effect robust against changes in which vorticity couples to polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

90

91 of 115

Effect robust against changes in which vorticity couples to polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

91

92 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

92

93 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

93

yLfrac = 1.0

yLfrac = 0.0

94 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

94

yLfrac = 1.0

yLfrac = 0.0

95 of 115

Particlization hypersurface

  •  

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

95

W. Serenone, seminar@Dubna 10 march 2021

96 of 115

Back to Back quenched jets

  • Energy-momentum deposition on the center: partial quenching of both jets
  • Two approaches:
    • Superimpose single jet signal
    • Perform a full hydrodynamic evolution with two “bullets” in the initial condition
  • There are interaction between the two jets, reducing the overall amplitude

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

96

okay, you get the idea…..

97 of 115

Abstract

  • Subatomic smoke rings: Polarization and toroidal vorticity in the QGP

  • Over the past 5 years, there has been intense focus on hyperon polarization in heavy ion collisions, as it is believed to probe the vortical substructure of the fluid created in the collision. Both relativistic hydrodynamics and transport calculations, considered as a coarse-grained fluid, reproduce some experimental observations remarkably well, while they fail at others.
  • So far, studies have focused on polarization and vorticity in non-central symmetric (A+A) collisions. I will discuss recent suggestions to study flow fields with quite different structure. The first is that created in central p+A collisions, in which the (assumed) fluid may be initialized with a nontrivial longitudinal flow structure. The second corresponds to a jet locally injecting energy and momentum into the expanding fluid around it. In each case, toroidal vortex structures may result. Using viscous relativistic 3D hydrodynamics, implemented in the MUSIC package, I present calculations of these structures, including quantitative predictions of their manifestation in experiment.

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

97

98 of 115

Near-future focus – low energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

98

HADES, STAR FXT, NICA, FAIR

UrQMD

  • UrQMD Deng, Huang, Ma, Zhang, PRC101, 064908 (2020)
  • 3FD Ivanov, Toneev, Soldatov, PRC100, 014908 (2019)
  • hydro Csernai, Xie et al, PRC90 021 021904(R) (2014); PRC94 054907 (2016)

Fall of (midrapidity) polarization with energy attributed to angular momentum migrating to forward rapidity

Is there a peak polarization? Peak vorticity?

Can we “map” the vorticity migration?

This energy region is difficult to model, but important.

3FD

Look for STAR Measurement by Joey Adams (RSN)

99 of 115

Speaking of forward rapidity – part 1

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

99

Xie, Wang, Csernei EPJ(2020)80:39

Wei,Deng,Huang PRC99(2019)014905

Wu et al, PRRes1(2019)033058

Liang, et al arXiv:1912.10223

Deng, Huang PRC93(2016)064907

While most models reproduce midrapidity

polarization well, predictions in unexplored

kinematic regions vary significantly

Maybe something to be learned by breaking

new ground?

100 of 115

Speaking of forward rapidity – part 2

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

100

Several papers/groups using a variety of models:

  • vorticity is dominated by the surface layer between participants & spectators --> importance of forward rapidity
  • vortex rings or sheets

Baznat, Gudima, Sorin, Teryaev PRC93, 031902(R) (2016)

“femto-cyclones” on arxiv 🡪 “vortex sheet” in journal ☺

Au+Au @ 5 GeV

  • Helicity separation in heavy-ion collisions (QGSM)�Baznat, Gudima, Sorin, Teryaev PRC88, 061901(R) (2013)
  • Vorticity and hydrodynamic helicity in heavy-ion collisions in the HSD model�Teraev & Usubov PRC92 014906 (2015)
  • Femto-vortex sheets and hyperon polarization in heavy-ion collisions (QGSM)�Baznat, Gudima, Sorin, Teryaev PRC93, 031902(R) (2016)
  • Vorticity in heavy-ion collisions at the JINR Nuclotron-based Ion Collider fAcility (3FD)�Ivanov & Soldatov, PRC 95, 054915 (2017)
  • Vortex rings in fragmentation regions in heavy-ion collisions at √sNN = 39 GeV (3FD) �Ivanov & Soldatov PRC97, 044915 (2018)
  • Vorticity structure and polarization of Λ hyperons in heavy-ion collisions (PHSD)�Zinchenko, Sorin, Teryaev, Baznat DSPIN-2019 (2020)
  • Probing vorticity structure in heavy-ion collisions by local polarization (AMPT)�Xia, Li, Tang, Wang Phys. Rev. C 98, 024905 (2018)

101 of 115

Rings – observable consequences…

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

101

Teraev & Usubov PRC92 014906 (2015)

Zinchenko, Sorin, Teryaev, Baznat DSPIN-2019 (2020)

b=0

In these papers….

  • Significant attention to structure in space
  • Focus of observable implications seems to center on�convolution with directed flow affecting global polarization

root(s) ~ 5 GeV

102 of 115

Same observations at higher energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

102

Ivanov & Soldatov PRC97, 044915 (2018)

Transverse flow should render the vortex rings themselves visible!

root(s) = 39 GeV

  • Significant attention to structure in space
  • Focus of observable implications seems to center on
    • identifying forward rapidity as important
    • convolution with directed flow affecting global polarization

103 of 115

Same observations at higher energy

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

103

Ivanov & Soldatov PRC97, 044915 (2018)

Transverse flow should render the vortex rings themselves visible!

root(s) = 39 GeV

  • Significant attention to structure in space
  • Focus of observable implications seems to center on
    • identifying forward rapidity as important
    • convolution with directed flow affecting global polarization

root(s) = 200, 2700 GeV

Xia, Li, Tang, Wang Phys. Rev. C 98, 024905 (2018); arxiv:1803.00867

104 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

104

105 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

105

yLfrac = 1.0

yLfrac = 0.0

106 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

106

yLfrac = 1.0

yLfrac = 0.0

107 of 115

Sheer velocity field, or density effect?

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

107

UrQMD+hydro Karpenko & Becattini EPJC (2017) 77: 213

Chun Shen, to be published

108 of 115

Azimuthal dependence of global polarization… not understood.

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

108

Karpenko & Becattini EPJC(2017)77:213

Wei, Deng, Huang, PRC99(2019)014905

Hydro

AMPT

Wu, Pang, Huang, Wang

PR Research 1(2019)033058

AMPT+hydro

Use of T-vorticity “works”?

Sign discrepancy

It will be very important for the

experiment to finalize this analysis

109 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

109

(By symmetry, must be quadrupole)

naïve cartoon

+

+

-

-

110 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

110

(By symmetry, must be quadrupole)

naïve cartoon

+

+

-

-

111 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

111

hydro: Becattini & Karpenko, PRL.120.012302 (2018)

AMPT: Xia, Li, Tang, Wang, PRC98.024905 (2018)

112 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

112

hydro: Becattini & Karpenko, PRL.120.012302 (2018)

+

+

-

-

AMPT: Xia, Li, Tang, Wang, PRC98.024905 (2018)

PICR hydro: Xie, Wang, Csernai EPJ80(2019)39

Chiral kinetic: Sun & Ko PRC99(2019)011903(R)

Sign agrees ☺

Sign disagrees ☹

113 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

113

hydro: Becattini & Karpenko, PRL.120.012302 (2018)

+

+

-

-

AMPT: Xia, Li, Tang, Wang, PRC98.024905 (2018)

PICR hydro: Xie, Wang, Csernai EPJ80(2019)39

Chiral kinetic: Sun & Ko PRC99(2019)011903(R)

Sign agrees ☺

Sign disagrees ☹

T-vorticity “works”?

AMPT+hydro Wu, Pang, Huang, Wang PR Res 1(2019)033058

114 of 115

In another direction – longitudinal polarization

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

114

hydro: Becattini & Karpenko, PRL.120.012302 (2018)

+

+

-

-

AMPT: Xia, Li, Tang, Wang, PRC98.024905 (2018)

PICR hydro: Xie, Wang, Csernai EPJ80(2019)39

Chiral kinetic: Sun & Ko PRC99(2019)011903(R)

Sign agrees ☺

Sign disagrees ☹

T-vorticity “works”?

AMPT+hydro Wu, Pang, Huang, Wang PR Res 1(2019)033058

Expect new results from LHC!

Experiment has given theory plenty to work on.

115 of 115

LBNL Hadron Ion Tea - by zoom - May 2022

115