A Brief Introduction to the Advantage Framework
David Stevens, Ph.D.
© David Stevens, 2024
A Brief Introduction to the Advantage Framework
I developed the Advantage framework as part of my dissertation at the University of California, Berkeley. I began with a conceptual framework to define educational Advantage, relying heavily on the perspectives of educators, operationalized the model to generate individual-level measures of educational opportunity, and evaluated the Advantage framework using cross-sectional, longitudinal, and state-level data.
The three papers had the following goals:
I provide a brief introduction to the Advantage framework in the following slides.
What is Advantage?
Student achievement is a function of both their effort (i.e., merit) and their opportunities.
Educators regularly .
Measures of opportunity? Despite their role in a Advantage is a student-level measure of opportunity.
Students exposed to greater opportunity tend to demonstrate greater achievement.
© David Stevens, 2024
Unfortunately, whereas achievement is regularly evaluated and measured, opportunity is not.
© David Stevens, 2024
Achievement by High-Needs Status
© David Stevens, 2024
Achievement
© David Stevens, 2024
Opportunity (Advantage)
© David Stevens, 2024
A Conceptual Framework for Advantage
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
© David Stevens, 2024
A Comparison of Individual-centered vs. Group-centered methods:
Group-Centered (Gap Frameworks) | | Individual-Centered (Advantage Framework) |
✅ | Use a deficit perspective (Harper, 2015; Milner, 2012) | No |
✅ | Positions White or middle class as the norm or reference group | No |
✅ | Reinforces stereotypes (Quinn, 2022; Steele & Aronson, 1995) | No |
No | Does NOT omit groups with small numbers (Hafoka et al., 2020) | ✅ |
No | Includes multiple student characteristics (Gutiérrez, 2008; Stevens, 2024) | ✅ |
No | High predictive validity (Stevens, 2024) | ✅ |
No | Explains within-group heterogeneity and inequality (Lopez et al., 2018; Reardon & Galindo, 2009; Stevens, 2024) | ✅ |
No | Allows everyone to see salient aspects of themselves in conversations about inequality (Stevens, 2024) | ✅ |
© David Stevens, 2024
Using the Advantage framework to better understand and more effectively address inequality
© David Stevens, 2024
Advantage can examine inequality at three levels:
© David Stevens, 2024
Controlling for Advantage helps explain
group-based differences in proficiency
© David Stevens, 2024
Advantage (opportunity) varies widely within groups:
© David Stevens, 2024
Advantage and Achievement vary widely within groups:
© David Stevens, 2024
Advantage predicts achievement within groups
© David Stevens, 2024
Advantage helps to focus resources or intervention.
© David Stevens, 2024
Want to learn more?
Use the form below to send me a message or ask questions.
If you are interested in partnering or looking to hire, I am open for work!
You can view my CV using the link below.
The first paper for my dissertation was recently awarded first place in the 2025 AERA Division H Outstanding Publications Competition for Category 1: Methodology.
If you are attending AERA in Denver, come to my roundtable talk on Friday at 1:30 PM in the Four Seasons Ballroom 2–3 at the Colorado Convention Center.