1 of 6

How ambiguous data protection law silences journalism

Lessons from strategic litigation in Hungary

HUNGARIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

NOVEMBER 2025

Two main goals:

  1. To demonstrate journalistic best practices through the Hungarian example;
  2. Highlight the importance of litigation: how human rights NGOs can be great allies.

1

Léna Perczel, legal officer at the Hungarian Civil Liberties Union (TASZ) 22 November, 2025

2 of 6

Background

2018 general data protection regulation (GDPR) was introduced (https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj/eng)

goal: to harmonize and set a high standard for data protection laws along the EU

collision of right to data protection vs. press freedom

GDPR expects reconciliation

Hungary did not reconcile constitutional vacuum

HUNGARIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

NOVEMBER 2025

2

3 of 6

Constitutional vacuum

unclear how the GDPR should be interpreted in the context of journalistic purposes and content (especially regarding legal basis)

  • up to courts and DPA

need for

  1. courageous publishers/journalists and
  2. strategic litigation

as a consequence HCLU achieved: from strict interpretation to one that takes into account the very nature of journalistic work

    • first relevant case: Barabás v Forbes (business owner’s challenging�Forbes’ rich list)

HUNGARIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

NOVEMBER 2025

3

4 of 6

Hungary’s approach

HUNGARIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

NOVEMBER 2025

4

GDPR requirement

Before litigation

After litigation

Relevant case

Legal basis

Only consent and legitimate interest [GDPR Art. 6(1)a and f]

Case by case, could be public interest too [GDPR Art. 6(1)e)]

Barabás v Forbes DPA’s decision challenged in court* (supreme court decision)

General privacy policy

Deemed insufficient

Accepted at times instead of fulfilling notification req.

Szetlik v Magyar Narancs DPA procedure*

Barabás v Forbes civil procedure* etc.

Notification

Preliminarily, proactively and individually (in detail) [GDPR Art. 14.]

Often: required (upheld)

Latest decision: not required [GDPR Art. 14(5)b]

Barabás v Magyar Narancs civil procedure*

Justification of compelling interest

Mandatory in case of objection

Mandatory in case of objection

all

*Litigation funded by Media Defence

5 of 6

HUNGARIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

NOVEMBER 2025

End note

uncertainty regarding different data protection approaches

  • can lead to self-censorship and abuse of laws (sparking SLAPPs)
  • publishers can be held under pressure - high fines

positive note: litigation can fill gaps - human rights NGOs can be great allies for journalists

5

6 of 6

Thank you for your attention!

HUNGARIAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION

NOVEMBER 2025

6

Q&A

get in touch:

Léna Perczel

Hungarian Civil Liberties Union

perczel.lena@tasz.hu