NO MORE TRADE-OFFS:
REACHING VOTERS AT SCALE AND
ACCESSING PREMIUM CONTENT
Brought to you by:
Jesse
Contario
Delete & Replace with
Sponsor Logo / Branding
MiQ
Mark
Positano
i-360
Erica
Monteith
GMMB
MODERATOR
Brought to you by
NO MORE TRADE-OFFS:
REACHING VOTERS AT SCALE AND ACCESSING PREMIUM CONTENT
No more trade-offs:
Reaching voters at scale and accessing premium content
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Jesse Contario
Speaker slide template
RVP, Southeast and Political at MiQ
Erica Monteith
Managing Director, GMMB
Mark Positano
VP, Media, i360
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
CTV Mythbusting
Jesse Contario
Data driven cross-channel media planning
Erica Monteith
Analysis of current race
Mark Positano
Agenda
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Speaker slide template
Jesse Contario
RVP, Southeast and Political at MiQ
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Programmatic ad spending will outpace non-programmatic in 2024
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Myth busting programmatic CTV assumptions
Buying streaming does not inherently solve the challenge - HOW you buy streaming is extremely important given some of the nuances we just discussed
Buying streaming solves for the fragmented media environment that’s been created by changing consumption habits
Due to carriage right & revenue share agreements, streaming apps need to work with OEMs and programmatic platforms to get maximum distribution - 100% direct will never be feasible
Streaming apps want to fill 100% of impressions through direct deals, and programmatic is just remnant inventory
Buyer assumption
Reality
All programmatic CTV is created equal
With up to 114 paths to a single impression, WHERE you buy matters
Don't assume programmatic is "remnant", and don't assume a Direct IO is "premium"
It's impossible to know what content you run on if you buy programmatically
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Publishers want to fill 100% of impressions through direct deals, and programmatic is just remnant inventory
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Sales rights in CTV makes ad buying more complex - AMC example
AMC content
in AMC app
95%
5%
AMC content
in Hulu app
60%
30%
OEMs�10%
OEM/Device
70%
20%
OEMs�10%
90%
10%
AMC content
in Pluto app
AMC content
in Vizio
Note: Percentages are example
Advertisers need access to all content distributors to scale reach on broadcaster content and reach their entire audience.
Buying streaming solves for the fragmented media environment that’s been created by changing consumption habits
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Households have more subscriptions than ever before
93% of consumers are re-evaluating their subs, with 33% considering ad-supported platforms
Almost 20% of US consumers replaced an SVOD for an AVOD one in the past 6 months
US households now tune in to an average of 7 OTT apps
US OTT video viewership, by platform, 2023
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
The top ad-supported streaming apps have up to a�64%
64%
Leading to high average frequencies from reaching the same audience across multiple streaming apps, with the heaviest
20%
10-15
ads seen on average
audience overlap
80%�of your audience is only seeing
20-30%
of your ads
of CTV viewers seeing 70-80% of CTV ads
Streaming app A
Streaming app B
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
A holistic CTV strategy can achieve
average audience overlap
lower cost per unique HH reach
Better
data
Better tech enabled buying
Better supply and results
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
All programmatic CTV is the same and you never know where you actually ran
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Fragmentation of supply leads to challenges and opportunities. There are now up to 114 different supply paths to a TV app
...with price varying up to 250%
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Buyers can also diversify DSP choices in CTV to drive value
For a single TVE app bundle across the same SSP deal ID, there was a 10% clearing cost difference between DSPs.
Overall DSP clearing costs on CTV formats range even higher at average of 34% depending on the DSPs:
svod_appbundle
+3%
+7%
Media CPM
DSP 1
DSP 2
DSP 3
svod_appbundle
+3%
+7%
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Putting CTV supply chain insights into context
CTV App | Impressions | Media CPM |
g15352632941 | 3,238,952 | $ 38.30 |
Seller Domain Path (Schain) | Impressions | Media CPM |
1,828,009 | $ 41.25 | |
vizio.com>telaria.com | 584,538 | $ 38.55 |
458,420 | $ 30.26 | |
158,715 | $ 32.34 | |
79,073 | $ 36.11 | |
68,693 | $ 28.93 | |
xumo.com>telaria.com | 26,056 | $ 40.56 |
xumo.com>openx.com | 23,722 | $ 34.62 |
3,490 | $ 34.97 | |
spanglishmovies.com>pubmatic.com | 2,582 | $ 35.96 |
47samurai.com>telaria.com | 2,088 | $ 38.44 |
2,028 | $ 30.58 | |
its-newid.net>triplelift.com | 878 | $ 35.34 |
PrismRiotAds.com>pubmatic.com | 278 | $ 35.83 |
its-newid.net>pubmatic.com | 154 | $ 30.71 |
CTVBuyer.com>pubmatic.com | 100 | $ 30.50 |
its-newid.net>telaria.com | 50 | $ 42.40 |
32 | $ 35.94 | |
darkmattertv.com>pubmatic.com | 24 | $ 37.50 |
vizio.com>pubmatic.com | 14 | $ 40.71 |
its-newid.net>unrulymedia.com | 6 | $ 35.00 |
2 | $ 30.00 |
What can schain data inform about CTV Paths?
Data Source: Supply Chain Object Logs (schain), MiQ Investment, February 2024
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Inventory in 3rd Party Deal Libraries vs. MiQ Curated Inventory
MiQ conducts app ID de-bundling to ensure your ad is
running on the right inventory, and for the right price
$27 “CTV” PMP Deal
Mostly AVOD and OLV
Optimal mix of TV network apps, SVOD, AVOD
Summary
WHERE you activate matters
A complex CTV landscape makes an efficient route to supply more important than ever, particularly to scale on the right inventory, against your target, in key states.
Programmatic scale
HOW you buy CTV matters
Evolving consumption habits require a more sophisticated CTV buying approach with efficiencies gained for buyers willing to take a new approach.
Programmatic allows you to scale, against your target audience, on the same inventory you can buy direct with greater control and precision.
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Speaker slide template
Erica Monteith
Managing Director at GMMB
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
22
New opportunities
Broader access to data across multiple channels
True cross-channel planning and execution, including:
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Our integrated approach
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Example output
Channels overlapping with LTV
Display
LTV
OTT
Video
Audio
10%
51%
1%
1%
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
52%
22%
Linear TV only
26%
OTT only
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Reporting example
1,679,577
9,243,473
45,467
Overlap
Linear TV reach
Incremental digital reach
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Whitmer for Gov. deep dive: Incremental reach in Michigan
GROUP 1
EXPOSED TO Linear TV ONLY
42%
MI households that saw a Whitmer TV commercial
140K
Total unique IPs reached
GROUP 3
EXPOSED TO Linear TV and CTV
14%
MI households that saw a Whitmer TV and OTT commercial
GROUP 2
EXPOSED TO CTV ONLY
58%
MI households that saw a Whitmer CTV commercial
190K
Total unique IPs reached
46K
Total unique IPs reached
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Whitmer deep dive:
Cross channel frequency analysis – flattening the frequency curve
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Whitmer deep dive:
Whitmer Deep Dive:
Cross Channel Frequency Analysis – Conquesting
Cross channel frequency analysis – Conquesting
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Speaker slide template
Mark Positano
VP, Media at i360
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Spotlight on Governor’s race
Frequency
% Impressions
Linear + CTV
Linear
CTV
Top 20%
Second 20%
Third 20%
Fourth 20%
Bottom 20%
Top 20%
Second 20%
Third 20%
Fourth 20%
Bottom 20%
0
0
50
20
100
40
150
60
200
80
% HHs reached in state: 40.65%
Average frequency: 7.9
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Top programs on Linear
Top shows on Linear
HHs reached
HHs reached
Top apps on CTV
Top devices on CTV
HHs reached
HHs reached
Spotlight on Governor’s race
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Spotlight on Governor’s race
I360 - Likely GOP primary voter audience
Frequency
% Impressions
Top 20%
Second 20%
Third 20%
Fourth 20%
Bottom 20%
0
50
100
150
200
% of target audience reached: 12.53%
Average frequency: 15
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
Leverage ACR + Voter Data to Solve The Challenge
NH Example
- We tackled this challenge recently!
- Co-mingling voter audience data AND ACR data we drove incremental reach to 10% of the electorate in the final 2 weeks for <$1 per HH.
- Applications for battleground Senate states are massive!
LTV + CTV Campaigns
- Analyze distribution among your target audience across full TV buy
- Adjust media mix accordingly
- Leverage ACR + Audience data to reach unexposed and under-exposed voters
CTV Only Campaigns
- Constantly be analyzing frequency distribution to your audience.
- Leverage programmatic to make real-time adjustments to drive more efficient frequency
- Reduce noise amongst heavy ad viewers
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides
37
Remember to change the footer – go to insert/header and footer, change the text and apply to all slides