Characterization on the Mechanical Behavior of Gastrocnemius Using Analytical and Finite Element Analyses
11th Annual COE Graduate Poster Presentation Competition
Student: Shunafrica C. White1 (PhD)
Advisor: Dr. Matthew B.A. McCullough2
Cross-Disciplinary Research Area: Biomechanics
MOTIVATION
OBJECTIVE
Experimental Testing
Constitutive Modeling
Statistical Analysis
Advanced glycation end products deviate the normal behavior of diabetic soft tissues and diminishes the tissue’s structure.
However, investigations (e.g., analytical and FEA, experimental and FEA, and FEA only) on the mechanics of diabetic soft tissues mainly focus on plantar soft tissues and have been well documented.
Thus, there is a need for shifted interest in diabetic soft tissues of the knee, and so the purpose of the study was to develop an approach for modeling the material behavior of gastrocnemius (i.e., calf muscle) that will be applied in a future investigation on the mechanical behavior of the diabetic patellar tendon.
Predict the mechanical behavior of a gastrocnemius test coupon by (1) applying a curve fit technique to optimize the material constants of the Yeoh constitutive model and (2) simulating a tensile test and comparing the simulated and experimental solutions.
METHODOLOGY (CONT.)
Curve Fit
Mean squared and percentage error, and “fval” determined the error between the predicted and experimental values and between the simulated and experimental values.
RESULTS
Material Constants (MPa) | |
c1 | -1.5367 |
c2 | 3.63e04 |
c3 | -7.95e06 |
Error | |
Mean Squared Error | 2.6833e-04 |
Percentage Error | 4.45% |
“fval” | 0.0056 |
DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
BIOFABB Lab Group and Title III HBGI PhD Fellowship
REFERENCES
Table 1. The material constants of the Yeoh model (left) and error between the predicted and experimental stress (right).
Figure 2. Curves of Cauchy stress vs. Stretch as predicted by the Yeoh model, simulated during FEA, and as recorded during experimental testing.
METHODOLOGY
Load-deformation data, acquired from uniaxial tensile test of a gastrocnemius test coupon, were obtained from the literature [1].
Data Processing
Finite Element Analysis
Simulated values that were considered include deformation, and engineering strain and stress. The simulated values were used to calculate stretch and Cauchy stress.
Figure 1. Simulated tensile test with loading/boundary conditions.
Simulated Values | Error | |
| Mean Squared Error | Percentage Error |
Deformation | 1.2986e-32 | 1.9745e-14% |
Engineering Strain | 4.415e-09 | 0.478% |
Stretch | 5.129e-09 | 5.628e-03% |
Cauchy Stress | 3.931e-08 | 5.628e-03% |
Table 2. Error between the simulated and experimental deformation, engineering strain, stretch, and Cauchy stress.