Assessments: What Did Students Learn?
Learning Objectives
By the end of this session, participants should be able to:
What were the steps of the backward design process in order?�(Enter in the chat, but don’t press send until I say so.�Just send to me if you like)
Backward Design
Backward Design
What is the purpose of assessments?�(raise your hand or post in the chat)
Purpose of Assessment
Purpose of Assessment
What is formative vs. summative assessment?
Formative vs Summative Assessment
Purpose of Assessment
Summative Assessment
Formative Assessment
Formative Assessment Examples
What are examples of non-graded assessments to engage students and provide the instructor feedback?
Formative Assessment Examples
What are examples of a fun course project?
Well-designed Summative Assessment
Well-designed Summative Assessment
Authentic: Global Social Change & Development Practicum
Supporting: Scaffolding
Zone of Proximal Development�Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children, 23(3), 34-41.
What I can’t do
What I can do with help
What I can do
Supporting: Scaffolding
Student Choice: Universal Design for Learning
Rubrics
Rubrics
Parts of a Rubric
Why Rubrics?
Build a Rubric
Task description: You are a connoisseur of fast food and have been asked by the Huffington Post to evaluate all of the fast food restaurants in the Baltimore area for an upcoming blog. Your blog should include evaluation of the varieties of food, taste, appearance of food, service, and cleanliness of each restaurant. You decide to use a rubric.
Chadia
Debate Rubric
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Chadia
Debate Rubric
| Exceeds Expectations | Meets Expectations | Needs Improvement |
Preparation (10-5-0 points, respectively)
| Uses literature sources/data to support position. Relates positions to information provided in class. Information is accurate. | Uses literature sources and data to support the positions with few inaccuracies. Some connections to course discussions made. | Uses only anecdotal evidence to support the position or provides inaccurate information. |
Persuasiveness (10-5-0 points, respectively) | Supports claims with evidence and presents all arguments in a logical manner. | Supports some claims with evidence and/or presents some arguments in a logical manner. | Does not use evidence to support claims or does not present any arguments logically. |
Delivery (10-5-0 points, respectively) | Speak clearly and audibly throughout the activity. | Speak clearly and audibly throughout most of the activity. | Speak unclearly or was inaudible throughout the activity. |
Respect (3-0 points, respectively)
| N/A | Uses body language and words that are inclusive and respectful of others
| Verbally or physically disrespectful of opposing team or team members, as opposed to arguing against ideas. |
Peer Review (5-3-0 points, respectively) | Shared all research work equitably
| Provided some input to research work
| Did not contribute to research work
|
Summary
The Teaching Academy�Preparing Future Faculty
The Teaching Academy offers Ph.D. students and Post-doctoral Fellows from all divisions across Johns Hopkins University, college teacher training and academic career preparation opportunities through courses, workshops, teaching practicums, teaching-as-research fellowships, and individual consultation.
Inspiring the Next Generation of Educators
PROVIDE OVERVIEW OF LOCAL CIRTL PROGRAMS & CROSS-NETWORK EVENTS�
https://cer.jhu.edu/teaching-academy
Twitter: @JHUTeachAcad
Fast Food Restaurant Rubric
Dimensions | Very Good | Acceptable | Not Acceptable |
Variety of food (15%) | | 5-10 choices | |
Food taste (30%) | | Warm, acceptable taste, texture and flavor | |
Food appearance (15%) | | Visually pleasing, wrapped appropriately | |
Service (20%) | | Order taken and change given correctly | |
Cleanliness (20%) | | Some crumbs, trash visible on tables or floors | |