1 of 30

Assessments: What Did Students Learn?

2 of 30

Learning Objectives

By the end of this session, participants should be able to:

  • explain the purpose of assessment in our courses
  • define the difference between formative and summative assessment
  • describe strategies for each

3 of 30

What were the steps of the backward design process in order?�(Enter in the chat, but don’t press send until I say so.�Just send to me if you like)

4 of 30

Backward Design

  1. What do you want students to be able to do by the end of the class/course?�(Learning Objectives)
  2. How will you measure if students can do that?�(Aligned Assessment)
  3. How will you prepare students for assessments?�(Design Instruction)

5 of 30

Backward Design

  1. What do you want students to be able to do by the end of the class/course?�(Learning Objectives)
  2. How will you measure if students can do that?�(Aligned Assessment)
  3. How will you prepare students for assessments?�(Design Instruction)

6 of 30

What is the purpose of assessments?�(raise your hand or post in the chat)

7 of 30

Purpose of Assessment

8 of 30

Purpose of Assessment

  • Assign Grade/Measure Mastery

  • Identify what students already know (purpose here!)
  • Activate prior learning
  • Give feedback to instructor 🡪Adjust instruction
  • Motivate learning
  • Evaluate the teacher
  • Support program accreditation
  • Conduct education research

9 of 30

What is formative vs. summative assessment?

10 of 30

Formative vs Summative Assessment

  • Formative (Prognosis):
    • Ongoing assessment for feedback that is intended to improve individual student’s performance OR student learning outcomes at the course/program level
    • Allows for quick adjustment to contents or approach of a course
  • Summative (Diagnosis):
    • Measures whether or not overall learning objectives have been achieved
    • Assign grades

11 of 30

Purpose of Assessment

Summative Assessment

  • Assign Grade/Measure Mastery
  • Accreditation
  • Evaluate the teacher

Formative Assessment

  • Identify what students already know (purpose here!)
  • Recall prior learning
  • Give feedback to instructor 🡪Adjust instruction
  • Motivate learning

12 of 30

Formative Assessment Examples

What are examples of non-graded assessments to engage students and provide the instructor feedback?

13 of 30

Formative Assessment Examples

  • Minute Paper or Five-Minute Paper
  • Muddiest Point
  • Exit Ticket
  • Clickers/In-class voting
  • Quick starter quiz or pre-test
  • Directed Paraphrasing
  • Documented Problem Solutions

14 of 30

What are examples of a fun course project?

15 of 30

Well-designed Summative Assessment

16 of 30

Well-designed Summative Assessment

  • Authentic
  • Aligned with learning objectives
  • Achievable
  • Equitable
  • Support provided
  • Student choice
  • Engaging

17 of 30

Authentic: Global Social Change & Development Practicum

  • Sociology “hands on” research experience in the field of global social change and development
  • Focus on building competency with using various tools (GIS, databases, spreadsheets) and analyzing data
  • Assessment: Code newspaper articles based on pre-determined categories and contribute them to a research database. Analyze how social unrests are correlated to economic cycles.

18 of 30

Supporting: Scaffolding

Zone of Proximal Development�Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Readings on the development of children23(3), 34-41.

What I can’t do

What I can do with help

What I can do

19 of 30

Supporting: Scaffolding

  • Give clear, detailed instructions then pull back scaffold as students progress to later assignments
  • Assign projects in stages/integrate steps

20 of 30

Student Choice: Universal Design for Learning

21 of 30

Rubrics

22 of 30

Rubrics

  • A scoring tool that lays out expectations for an assignment
  • Divides assignment into its component parts
  • Provides a detailed description of what constitutes acceptable or unacceptable levels of performance for each part
  • Can be applied to papers, book/article critiques, discussion participation, lab reports, portfolios, group work, oral presentations, etc.

23 of 30

Parts of a Rubric

  1. Task Description: What is the assignment?
  2. Scale: How well or how poorly any given task is performed
  3. Dimensions: What are the distinct parts of how students will be evaluated

24 of 30

Why Rubrics?

  • Timely feedback
  • Detailed feedback
  • Helps prepare students to apply detailed feedback for improvement
  • Encourages critical thinking
  • Standardizes grading by multiple graders

25 of 30

Build a Rubric

Task description: You are a connoisseur of fast food and have been asked by the Huffington Post to evaluate all of the fast food restaurants in the Baltimore area for an upcoming blog. Your blog should include evaluation of the varieties of food, taste, appearance of food, service, and cleanliness of each restaurant. You decide to use a rubric.

Chadia

26 of 30

Debate Rubric

  1. Dimensions: What matters?

  • Scale: How many levels?

Chadia

27 of 30

Debate Rubric

 

Exceeds Expectations

Meets Expectations

Needs Improvement

Preparation

(10-5-0 points, respectively)

 

Uses literature sources/data to support position. Relates positions to information provided in class. Information is accurate.

Uses literature sources and data to support the positions with few inaccuracies. Some connections to course discussions made.

Uses only anecdotal evidence to support the position or provides inaccurate information.

Persuasiveness

(10-5-0 points, respectively)

Supports claims with evidence and presents all arguments in a logical manner.

Supports some claims with evidence and/or presents some arguments in a logical manner.

Does not use evidence to support claims or does not present any arguments logically.

Delivery

(10-5-0 points, respectively)

Speak clearly and audibly throughout the activity.

Speak clearly and audibly throughout most of the activity.

Speak unclearly or was inaudible throughout the activity.

Respect

(3-0 points, respectively)

 

N/A

Uses body language and words that are inclusive and respectful of others

 

Verbally or physically disrespectful of opposing team or team members, as opposed to arguing against ideas.

Peer Review

(5-3-0 points, respectively) 

Shared all research work equitably

 

Provided some input to research work

 

Did not contribute to research work

 

28 of 30

Summary

  • Assessment serves multiple purposes
    • Formative vs. summative
  • Examples and strategies
  • Challenging to do well, but can be motivate student learning

29 of 30

The Teaching Academy�Preparing Future Faculty

The Teaching Academy offers Ph.D. students and Post-doctoral Fellows from all divisions across Johns Hopkins University, college teacher training and academic career preparation opportunities through courses, workshops, teaching practicums, teaching-as-research fellowships, and individual consultation. 

Inspiring the Next Generation of Educators

PROVIDE OVERVIEW OF LOCAL CIRTL PROGRAMS & CROSS-NETWORK EVENTS

https://cer.jhu.edu/teaching-academy

Twitter: @JHUTeachAcad

30 of 30

Fast Food Restaurant Rubric

Dimensions

Very Good

Acceptable

Not Acceptable

Variety of food (15%)

5-10 choices

Food taste (30%)

Warm, acceptable taste, texture and flavor

Food appearance (15%)

Visually pleasing, wrapped appropriately

Service (20%)

Order taken and change given correctly

Cleanliness (20%)

Some crumbs, trash visible on tables or floors