1 of 10

Banyan

Education

Unlocking opportunity through

higher education financing

▶️ Click to watch on Loom

2 of 10

Youth employment crisis: the education gap

Demographic pressure. Swelling youth population in sub-Saharan Africa. (UN WPP 2024) (ILO 2024)

Under-employment and Informality. Structural problems are disguised by employment rates (ILO 2025)

  • Many working far below skill level to survive, including working poverty
  • Informality by default – no contracts, no protections, no progression

New education chasm. Secondary completion is rising, but higher education enrollment lags severely.

⇒ Growing risks of instability. NEET (not in employment, education, and training) and under-engagement in global south is rising, and is the largest contributor to political instability (Demeke 2022)

2

98%

45%

9%

Banyan Education

3 of 10

Higher education: pathway to opportunity

Maximum impact: Higher education has the greatest private and public outcomes for families and communities (Shang 2017), unlocking the fullest value from decades of health, nutrition and education investment.

Financial barriers: limited student financing options (public or private) are a major barrier to improving enrolment rates.

Proven model: higher education financing in the global south has been implemented in multiple countries successfully. The model is now being replicated in more places by more providers.

⇒ Demand exceeds supply: loan providers access to capital is the primary restriction preventing more students accessing finance

Snapshot: Lumni (South America), Chancen (Africa)

  • 30,000+ students financed
  • 85% graduation rate
  • 78% formal employment rate
  • 51% female members
  • 95% from low income backgrounds
  • 3.5x Annual Median Income (Africa only)

3

Lumni

Chancen

Students

26,000

6,000

Graduation

83%

93%

Employment

75%

96%

Income

3.5x

Women

48%

65%

Low Income

96%

71%

Banyan Education

4 of 10

Income Sharing: borrowing from future earnings

New context, new challenges: Income Sharing Agreements (ISA) are the private adaption of publicly financed schemes. Comparison:

  • Similarity: ISA repayments are contingent on a living income to prevent hardship
  • Difference: Fixed number of repayments prevents debt lingering for an extended period of time
  • Difference: Total repayments capped to protect high earners from excessive repayments

Patient capital: obtaining qualifications and securing employment takes years. Time from loan origination to the first repayment can be 5 years.

⇒ Scale requires substantial and patient capital

Pioneered in Australia: developed by Bruce Chapman and launched in 1989, the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) is now deployed globally including in the UK, Netherlands, and Japan

  • HECS repayments are contingent on a living income to prevent hardship
  • Low interest loan
  • ⇒ Enrollments increased. Gender equity improved.
  • ⇒ Financially sustainable.

4

Banyan Education

5 of 10

Global Education Fund: sustainable impact

Private and philanthropic capital working together to provide higher education loans to hundreds of millions of young people. Providing investors with:

  • Diversification: exposure to many providers, schools, qualifications, countries and currencies
  • Security: investment will be secured by the loans of employed graduates, rewarding success
  • Reporting: impact, performance and reporting and accountability tools

“With 70% of the entire population under 30, youth are one of Africa’s greatest reasons for optimism” (UNESCO 2023)

Supporting the leading, local, ethical ISA providers will:

  • Improve cashflow: acquiring the income stream of specific loans transfers risks from originators to investors.
  • Unlock capital: existing risk tolerant capital can be reinvested many years earlier, so that providers can apply learnings and grow faster.
  • Transparent and collaborative: Banyan will aggregate and share data, technology, and knowledge with partners to learn and grow together.

Impact tithe: 10% impact tithe (performance fee) on yield above portfolio targets will support the development and flourishing of higher education in the global south for the most vulnerable.

5

Banyan Education

6 of 10

Pilot Investment

Partners

  • Launch: 2025
  • Size: USD $2m
  • Students: 500 across 4 countries, 2 providers
    • minimum 50% females
    • minimum 80% low income
    • 20% sponsor children–close the education loop
  • Target IRR: 6%

Pilot objectives:

  • Validate transaction structure, modelling, and data
  • Impact study and modelling to prepare for launch of US $100m Global Fund

6

Banyan Education

7 of 10

Sources

  • UN WPP (2024) – World Population Prospects (2024) - processed by Our World in Data. United Nations, “World Population Prospects” [original data].
  • ILO (2025) – World Employment and Social Outlook: Trends 2025. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • ILO (2024) – Global Employment Trends for Youth 2024. Geneva: International Labour Organization.
  • Shang (2017) – Gao, Shang; Darvas, Peter; Shen, Yijun; Bawany, Bilal. 2017. Sharing Higher Education's Promise beyond the Few in Sub-Saharan Africa: Elargir l’opportunité au-delà de l’élite. Directions in Development—Human Development;. © World Bank. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/27617
  • Demeke (2022) – Youth unemployment and political instability: evidence from IGAD member countries, Yemareshet Hailu Demeke, Cogent Economics & Finance (2022), 10: 2079211
  • UNESCO (2023) – https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/reinforcing-higher-education-africa

7

8 of 10

Team

8

Paul Dettmann

Co-Founder

Cassinia Community

James Ramsay

Banyan Education

Simba Marakera

Deputy Chief Investment Officer and Head of Private Assets

Brightlight

Ross Kelly

CEO

Cassinia Community

Banyan Education

9 of 10

Structure

9

10 of 10

[Preview] Investigations and Modelling

Banyan: TBD (less than 6%) - conservative

Approach:

  • Minority investor (< 50% of funding)
  • Prioritise low risk members (providers expect 60% of members to cover defaults, unemployment, etc)

Providers: target ~ 6% nominal

Risks:

  • Unemployment (e.g. 15%)
  • Default (e.g. 10%)
  • Currency deprecation (e.g. 6%)

10