Reproducing Racial Stereotypes?
A Mixed-methods Analysis of Racial Stereotypes Hidden in AI-Generated Educational Text
Shuai Shao1, Jue Wang2, Kristin Davin2, Alex Dornburg3
1 School of Data Science
2 Department of Middle, Secondary & K-12 Education
3 Department of Bioinformatics
UNC Charlotte
01 · OVERVIEW
Study Design & Analytical Pipeline
2 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
02 · SENTIMENT · PER PASSAGE
At first glance, the Al output appears completely benign
Figure 1 — Passage-level RoBERTa sentiment with confidence
What the model saw
• Neutral dominates across groups; confidence ~0.55–0.85
• Positive labels appear selectively: AA2, AA3, AA9 and ME4, ME7, ME10
• White American, Asian American, and baseline passages: uniformly neutral, high stable confidence
• No negative sentiment detected anywhere in the corpus
Uneven positive sentiment across groups hints at subtle differential affective tone, despite the absence of overt negativity.
3 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
03 · SENTIMENT · AGGREGATE
Positive labels cluster on minoritized groups
Figure 2 — Group-level neutral vs. positive distribution
Group profiles
40%
positive — African American�& Middle Eastern American
100%
neutral — Asian American,�White American, Baseline
• American Indian/Alaska Native & Hispanic American: 10% positive
• Negative sentiment: 0% across all groups
• Pattern may reflect stereotypically favorable framing rather than balanced portrayal
4 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
04 · ABSA · INNOVATION & CURIOSITY
Racial labeling tightens aspect confidence
Figure 3 — PyABSA aspect confidence by group
Key contrast
Racial groups: both aspects cluster at or above 0.97 with minimal variance.
Baseline: innovation IQR spans ~0.87–1.00 with outliers as low as 0.61.
Implication: when racial identity is named, the model relies on group-associated stereotypic cues to anchor themes.
5 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
05 · ABSA · ADVERSITY ASPECTS
Failure framing varies by group
Figure 4 — Perseverance, success, failure confidence
Where failure spreads widest
• Hispanic American: failure IQR ~0.65–0.93, whiskers to ~0.63
• Middle Eastern American: failure outliers near 0.61–0.65
• Perseverance & success: ≥0.99 across most groups
• Baseline: broadest spread across all three aspects
Differential framing of adversity emerges specifically for Hispanic American and Middle Eastern American passages.
6 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
06 · LEXICAL GEOMETRY · PCA
Shared core vocabulary, distinct outliers
Figure 6 — PCA projection of TF-IDF with group convex hulls
Spatial signal
• Most centroids cluster near origin → substantial shared vocabulary
• American Indian/Alaska Native: largest hull, distinct upper-PC2 position
• Hispanic American: greatest downward PC2 spread (to ~−0.23)
• Baseline centroid sits to the far left of racially labeled groups
7 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
07 · CLUSTERING · DENDROGRAM
Two macro-clusters of lexical neighborhoods
Figure 7 — Ward-linkage dendrogram of distinctive words
Cluster A (left)
Hispanic American + African American — cultural-linguistic and interpersonal vocabulary: empathy, exchange, interpretive, hierarchies, translation.
Cluster B (right)
Asian American + American Indian/Alaska Native — community and tradition vocabulary: traditions, oral, intersect, awareness.
Baseline contributes few, dispersed words — its race-neutral role.
8 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
08 · t-SNE · GROUP CONTRAST
Two contrasting lexical territories
Figure 8 — African American passages
Figure 9 — White American passages
AA: empathy, perspectives, transliteration, observes — cultural-literary engagement and affective awareness.
WA: practice, repetition, hesitant, memorization — process-oriented, individualized learning with little cultural anchoring.
9 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
09 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
African American — identity, community, hierarchy
AFRICAN AMERICAN
Protagonists engage with literature as a mirror for identity, community, and social position.
“
Jeremiah reflects on how the act of interpreting these texts cultivates empathy and self-awareness, as he connects the experiences of the characters to his own perceptions of identity.
— Identity formation via text
“
While analyzing contemporary Chinese literature, Nia …, prompting her to reflect on her own experiences navigating identity and community.
— Community as recurring frame
“
Malik reflects on how authors convey identity, hierarchy, and emotion through nuanced language.
— Social hierarchy invoked
“
Jamal finds parallels between the cultural challenges depicted and his own experiences navigating societal expectations.
— External societal expectations
10 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
09 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
African American — identity, community, hierarchy
10 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
White American & Asian American
WHITE AMERICAN
Autonomous individual learner — self-directed intellectual and cultural enrichment.
“
Mason had developed not only linguistic competence … he not only communicated with greater fluency.
— Linguistic improvement framing
“
An appreciation for how language functions as a medium through which culture, identity, and social norms are expressed.
— Meta-linguistic awareness
ASIAN AMERICAN
Caught between cultures, defined by others' assumptions and externally imposed identity.
“
Classroom discussions often highlighted implicit assumptions tied to heritage and fluency.
— Burden of presumption
“
Where her background influenced both her participation and others' perceptions of her … navigating multiple cultural frameworks.
— Bicultural in-betweenness
11 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
10 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
White American
10 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
Asian American
11 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
Hispanic American & Native American
HISPANIC AMERICAN
Bilingualism presupposed; learning framed as identity interrogation, not skill acquisition.
“
Prompting Carlos to consider parallels with his own bilingual experience.
— Assumed bilingual heritage
“
She realized that learning a new language was not merely an academic exercise; it was an opportunity to interrogate assumptions, explore diverse perspectives, and gain insight into her own identity.
— Critical reflection over performance
NATIVE AMERICAN
Culturally rooted, orally oriented learners inseparable from community tradition.
“
Ashkii often draws parallels between the oral traditions of his community and the new languages he studies.
— Oral heritage as anchor
“
How language can carry not only information but also values, history, and worldview … how it can bridge experiences, preserve memory, and articulate identity.
— Collective experience framing
12 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
11 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
Hispanic American
11 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
Native American
12 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
Middle Eastern American & Baseline
MIDDLE EASTERN AMERICAN
Bicultural identity as interpretive lens; cognition and affect interwoven.
“
Her own background shapes her interpretations.
— Background as filter
“
Not an academic exercise but an intricate process that intertwines cognitive skill with empathetic understanding.
— Cognition + affect interwoven
BASELINE (RACE-NEUTRAL)
Cognitive transformation — from mechanical skill to holistic communicative competence.
“
Marcus initially regarded participation as a mechanical exercise, confined to recitation and grammatical precision.
— Starting assumption
“
Language acquisition entails an integration of analytical skill and adaptive communication, rather than the mere accumulation of linguistic forms.
— Reframed endpoint
13 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
12 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
Middle Eastern American
12 · QUALITATIVE · GROUP REPRESENTATION
Baseline
13 · CLUSTER FREQUENCIES
Differential thematic vocabularies across groups
Group-specific signatures
• overall — highest in Hispanic American; lowest in Baseline
• grammar — Hispanic American leads, more than double most other groups
• oral — almost exclusively Native American
• idiomatic — concentrated in African American
14 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
13 · CLUSTER FREQUENCIES
Differential thematic vocabularies across groups
Group-specific signatures
• overall — White American is most diverse in Interactive Activities
• discussion/discussions — Middle Eastern American leads
• expression/expressions — almost exclusively Baseline and White American
• practice — nearly absent in most other groups except White American
14 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
13 · CLUSTER FREQUENCIES
Differential thematic vocabularies across groups
Group-specific signatures
• overall — White American leads in learning performance frequency
• memorization and fluency— higher frequency in White American
• mastery, proficiency, skill, and technical— higher frequency in Middle Eastern American
14 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
13 · CLUSTER FREQUENCIES
Differential thematic vocabularies across groups
Group-specific signatures
• overall —American Indian leads; while Baseline has the least,
• identity — lowest in Baseline;
• heritage, culture, community — American Indian shows the highest counts across these three words
• bilingual — highest in Hispanic American
14 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
13 · CLUSTER FREQUENCIES
Differential thematic vocabularies across groups
Group-specific signatures
• overall — there is no language mentioned in Baseline
• Spanish — heavily concentrated in Hispanic American
• French — evenly distributed across African American, Asian American, Hispanic American, and White American
• Chinese — appears exclusively in African American passages , while absent in Asian American
14 / 15
AI-Generated World Language Passages · Racial Representation Analysis
14 · SYNTHESIS
Three patterns of differential representation
1
Cultural-identity loading
Minoritized groups carry the heaviest cultural and identity-coded vocabulary; Baseline passages remain sparse and pedagogically neutral.
2
Group-specific schemas
Recurring stereotypic anchors: oral / community / heritage for Native American; Spanish / bilingual for Hispanic American; syntactic / proficiency for Middle Eastern American; hierarchies / assumptions for Asian American.
3
Whiteness as unmarked norm
White American passages emphasize repetition, practice, and memorization — procedural skill framing rather than cultural identity.
AI-generated content reproduces differential representational schemas that may embed structural racial bias into world language instruction.
15 / 15
Thanks!
The research is still ongoing,
Your valuable input is appreciated!