Module 3
Syllabus: LTI system properties in terms of impulse response,
Fourier Representation of periodic signals
Krishna Teja
Interconnection of LTI systems
Krishna Teja
Parallel connection of LTI systems
Fig 1: Interconnection of two LTI systems. (a) Parallel connection of two systems (b) Equivalent systems
Krishna Teja
Identical results hold for discrete-time case
Distributive property
Krishna Teja
Cascade connection of LTI systems
Fig 1: Interconnection of two LTI systems. (a) Cascade connection of two systems (b) Equivalent systems
(c) Equivalent system: Interchange system order
Krishna Teja
Interchange the order of integration to obtain,
Krishna Teja
Substituting this relationship in to (3), we get
Hence the impulse response of an equivalent system representing two LTI systems connected in cascade is the convolution of their individual impulse responses.
Krishna Teja
A second important property for the cascade connection of LTI systems concerns the ordering of the systems.
Perform the change of variable,
Krishna Teja
Hence the convolution can be performed in either order. This corresponds to interchanging the order of LTI systems in cascade without affecting the result as shown in Fig 2(c).
Mathematically, we can say that convolution operation possesses the commutative property, or
Discrete time LTI systems and convolutions have properties that are identical to their continuous-time counterparts. Also, discrete-time convolution is associative, so that
and commutative, or
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Using the convolution sum,
Hence
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Using the convolution sum,
Hence
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Hence
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Ex 3: Consider the interconnection of four LTI systems, as depicted in Fig 1. The impulse responses of the system are
Sol:
Fig 3:
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Fig 3:
Sol:
The overall impulse response of the system is
Krishna Teja
Sol:
---------------> (2)
Krishna Teja
Now,
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Common overlap interval
Krishna Teja
Using the standard geometric series,
The overall impulse response of the system is
Krishna Teja
Relations between LTI system properties and impulse response
Krishna Teja
Memoryless LTI systems
(by exploiting the commutative property of convolution)
Expand the sum term by term
Krishna Teja
All memoryless LTI systems simply perform scalar multiplication on the input.
Krishna Teja
Causal LTI systems
Expand the sum term by term
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Note that causal systems are nonanticipatory; that is they cannot generate the output before the input is applied.
Requiring the impulse response to be zero for negative time is equivalent to saying that the system cannot respond with an output prior to the application of input.
Krishna Teja
Stable LTI systems
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Property | Discret-time LTI system | Continuous-time LTI system |
Memoyless | | |
Causality | | |
Stability | | |
Krishna Teja
Ex 5: For each of the following impulse responses, determine whether the corresponding systems is (i) memoryless, (ii) causal, and (iii) stable. Justify your answers.
Sol:
Hence the system is not memoryless.
Hence the system is not causal.
Krishna Teja
Hence the system is stable.
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Hence the system is not memoryless.
Krishna Teja
Hence the system is not causal.
Recall:
Hence the system is stable.
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Hence the system is not memoryless.
Hence the system is causal.
Krishna Teja
Hence the system is unstable.
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Hence the system is not memoryless.
Hence the system is not causal.
Hence the system is unstable.
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Hence the system is not memoryless.
Hence the system is not causal.
Krishna Teja
Hence the system is stable.
Krishna Teja
We emphasize that the system can be unstable even though the impulse response has finite value.
Sol:
Hence the system is not memoryless.
Krishna Teja
Hence the system is not causal.
Hence the system is not stable.
Krishna Teja
Invertible Systems and Deconvolution
Krishna Teja
This requirement implies that
Krishna Teja
Ex 7: The discrete-time model for a two path communication model is
Sol:
Krishna Teja
to obtain causal inverse system
Hence inverse system has impulse response
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Step Response
Now, since
Step response is the running sum of the impulse response.
Krishna Teja
Now, since
Hence the step response is
Krishna Teja
Step response of a continuous-time system is expressed as the running integral of the impulse response as
We may invert these relationship to express the impulse response in terms of the step response as
and
Krishna Teja
Ex 8: Find the step response of the first-order recursive system with impulse response
Sol:
Step Response,
Recall:
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Step response,
Krishna Teja
Hence the step response,
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Recall:
Hence the step response,
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Step Response,
Krishna Teja
Krishna Teja
Sol:
Step response,
Krishna Teja
Hence the step response
Krishna Teja