CSC
2025-2026 School Budget
School Vision & Mission
Vision: As a diverse community of scholars, Florida Pitt Waller will build a strong school culture with continuity of instruction from ECE to 8th grade and a commitment to achievement. Visión: Como comunidad diversa de estudiantes, Florida Pitt Waller creará una sólida cultura escolar con continuidad de instrucción desde la educación inicial hasta el octavo grado y un compromiso con el logro.
Mission: Florida Pitt Waller ECE-8 empowers students to compete in any of our nation’s top high schools, colleges, and the world beyond. Misión: Florida Pitt Waller ECE-8 capacita a los estudiantes para competir en cualquiera de las mejores escuelas secundarias y universidades de nuestro país y en el mundo.
Objective & Outcomes/ Objetivo y resultados
A school’s Collaborative School Committee (CSC) is composed of the principal, teacher(s), parents, and community members and is intended to provide strategic direction. The CSC is a statutory requirement for all Colorado schools and should act as a guiding (not approving) body for a school’s budgetary plan.
Meeting Outcomes
El Comité Escolar Colaborativo (CSC) de una escuela está compuesto por el director, los maestros, los padres y los miembros de la comunidad y tiene como objetivo proporcionar una dirección estratégica. El CSC es un requisito legal para todas las escuelas de Colorado y debe actuar como un organismo orientador (no aprobador) para el plan presupuestario de una escuela.
Objetivo:
Resultados de la reunión
Norms/ normas
Key Principles of Budget Planning/Principios clave de la planificación presupuestaria
Feasibility
Alignment
Sustainability
Alineación Sostenibilidad Viabilidad
ANNUAL SCHOOL BUDGET CYCLE
School leader oversight
School Resumes
Aug
Ongoing: Budget management, reporting, monthly meetings and quarterly forecasting
Fall Adjustment
(impacts current year, based on enrollment)
October Count
(informs next year)
Budget Development
& Enrollment Projections
School Hiring
Sept
Nov-Jan
Feb
Oct
Feb-june
Projected Numbers Números proyectados
Per Pupil Allocations + Lump Sum Funds = School Budget
K | 75 |
1 | 80 |
2 | 96 |
3 | 100 |
4 | 100 |
5 | 110 |
6 | 85 |
7 | 80 |
8 | 75 |
***Not including ECE
Recommendations and Considerations
712k shortfall
712k déficit
Recommendations and Considerations
Process-
Reviewed staffings of two similar schools. They are both in the district and mirror us (Large ECE-8)
Met with ILT and SLT to review possible cuts, collect feedback and make recommendations
Proceso-
Personalidad revisada de do otro escuelas.. Son las únicas dos escuelas en el distrito que nos imitan (ECE-8 grande)
Se reunió con ILT y SLT para revisar posibles recortes, recopilar comentarios y hacer recomendaciones.
| Florida Pitt Waller | Comparison School 1 | Comparison School 2 |
Number of Projected Students | 801 projected students- expecting cuts | 779 projected students- expecting cuts | 790 projected students- expecting increases |
Assistant Principals | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Deans/Liaisons | 2 Deans of Culture, 1 Dean of Instruction 3 Student Support Liaisons | 3 Dean of Culture 1 Student Support Liaison | 1 Dean of Culture (adding a second) 1 Student Support Liaison 2 RJ coordinators |
Instructional Paras (not ECE, SPED, Native Language Tutors) | 13 | 7 | 13 |
Office staff | 1 Office Manager 4 Office Support | 1 Office Manager 2 Office Support | 1 Office Manager 3 Office Support |
Interventionists | 5 | 3 | 4 |
ELD Teachers | 3 | 5 | 1.5 (middle school only) |
Specials | 6.5 now- proposed (7.5) | 7.5 | 8 |
Mild /Moderate Special Education Teachers | 3.5 (Projected 52 students) | 4.5 (Projected 60 students) | 4.5 (Projected 57 students) |
Mental Health Team (Counselors, Social Worker, Psychologist) | 3.5 | 5 (1 grant funded) | 3 |
Recommendations and Considerations
Possible cuts
Cut an office staff person. Savings 50k.
Cut math fellows- Savings 118k
Cut JA math interventionist- savings 112k
Cut 2-4 para professionals- Savings 70-160k
Cut Liaison 70k
Posibles recortes
Recortar un empleado de oficina. Ahorros de 50 000.
Recortar becarios de matemáticas: ahorros de 118 000
Recortar intervencionista de matemáticas de JA: ahorros de 112 000
Recortar de 2 a 4 asistentes profesionales: ahorros de 70 000 a 160 000
Recortar enlace: 70 000
What Do We Gain and Lose With Each option? | Reasons For | What we would Lose |
Office Staff (50K) |
|
|
Liaison (70K) |
|
|
What Do We Gain and Lose With Each option? | Reasons For | What we would Lose |
Math Fellows (118K) |
|
|
JA Math Interventionist (112K) |
|
|
2-4 paraprofessionals (70-160K) |
|
|
Scenario- 1
Math Interventionist/ intervencionista 112k
Office Staff / oficina 50K
4 paraprofessionals/ assistentes 140-160k
Total 302-322
Scenario- 4
Math Fellows/Becarios de matematicas 118k
Office Staff/ oficina 50K
2 paraprofessionals/ assistentes 70-80k
Liaison / Relaciones 70K
Total- 308-318 1 Vote
Scenario- 2
Math Fellows/ Becarios de matematicas 118k
Office Staff /oficina 50K
4 paraprofessionals/ assistentes 140-160k
Total 308-328
13 Votes
Scenario- 3
Math Interventionist/ intervencionista 112k
Office Staff/ oficina 50K
2 paraprofessionals/ assistentes 70-80k
Liaison /Relaciones 70K
Total - 302-312
Do any of these scenarios make sense? Can we eliminate any? Do we want a new one?
Scenario- 5
Math Interventionist JA 112k
3 paraprofessionals/ assistentes 105-120k
Liaison / Relaciones 70K
Total - 287-302
Scenario- 6
Math Fellows/ Becarios de matematicas 118k
3 paraprofessionals/ assistentes 70-80k
Liaison / Relaciones 70K
Total - 293-308
Final recommendation- Using scenario 2 as a blueprint.
For 25/26- FPW recommends
Next Steps and Closure