1 of 44

EDA 1130EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENTChapter 1 & 2�Video A

Dr Kim Teng Siang

kskim2007@gmail.com

0124661131

2 of 44

Course Overview

1: Introduction- basic concepts, history & Assumptions

2. Edu. Ass. in the 21st Century

3: Meaning of Test scores-What to Assess 

4: Reliability for teachers – problem of bias

5. Validity for teachers

6. Item Analysis for teachers

7. Initial steps in developing classroom test

8. Development and use of Selective-Response- Objective

9: Development and use of Constructed-Response- Essay

10: Performance Ass. & Portfolio

3 of 44

Course Overview

11: Assigning Grades on the basis of classroom Ass.

- Reporting

12. The use of Aptitude Tests in Schools- history

13. Problem of Bias in Edu. Ass.

14. Best Practices in Edu. Ass.

4 of 44

Chapter 1: Overview

1.1 Basic Concepts-Differences between testing, evaluation and assessment

1.2 Assumptions and Participants in Assessment

1.3 Historical origins of educational assessment

1.4 Objectives of educational assessment

1.5 Types of Assessment

- Formative and summative assessment

- Criterion and norm-referenced tests

5 of 44

Introduction – important terms

  • Measurement
  • Evaluation
  • Testing
  • Assessment

  • Formative and Summative Assessment
  • Criterion and Norm-Reference tests

  • Can you differentiate them?

6 of 44

Measurement

  • assignment numbers (value) to a phenomenon / what you want to know
  • using instrument(s) to get that numbers
  • examples of instruments are tests, quiz, observational scales, questionnaires, attitudinal inventories for education

7 of 44

Testing

  • One of the methods of measuring using test as a tool
  • various types of test such as objective test, essay, exercises, quiz, oral test, diagnostic test etc

8 of 44

EVALUATION

  • From the numbers we determine the standards or grades
  • Do you make judgement to the number?

9 of 44

ASSESSMENT (using multi-source)

  • process of collecting information with the purpose of making decisions (judgement) about students
  • Data is collected using various tests, observations of students and interviews

10 of 44

Summary

  • Measurement – identify a certain value
  • Evaluation – make a decision after measured
  • Testing – a way to measure
  • Assessment – process of gathering info from multiple sources to understand what a person learned
  • Formative Assessment - Progressive
  • Summative Assessment – At the End
  • Criterion test – based on criteria
  • Norm-Reference test- based the norm

11 of 44

12 of 44

  • Psychological & educational constructs (ideas) exist
  • Psychological & educational constructs can be measured
  • Although we can measure constructs, our measurement is not perfect
  • There are different ways to measure any given construct
  • All assessment procedures have strengths & limitations
  • Multiple sources of information should be part of the assessment process
  • Assessment can provide information that helps educators make better educational decisions
  • Testing and assessment can benefit our educational institutions and society as a whole

1.2 Basic Assumptions of Educational Assessment

13 of 44

Participants in the Assessment Process

People who develop test / methods of assessment

People who use test / methods of assessment

People who take the test / methods of assessment

Other people involved in the assessment process

14 of 44

1.3 Historical Origin of Educational Assessment�

  1. The Imperial Examination in China

(keju, 科举制度) was a civil service examination system

in Imperial China for selecting candidates for the state

bureaucracy

- Initially Six arts -music, archery & horsemanship, arithmetic, writing and knowledge of the rituals and ceremonies in both public and private life.

- Later included Five studies

  • military strategy, civil law, revenue & taxation, agriculture and geography, and the Confucian classics.

15 of 44

Confucian’s Classics

  • Four Books and the Five Classics (四書五經)- classics of Chinese Confucianism.

  • Four Books: Great learning (大学), Doctrine of the mean (中庸), Analects (论语), & Mencius (孟子)

  • Five disciplines (wuke 五科) or books: Shijing 詩經, Shangshu 尚書, Yijing 易經, Liji 禮記 and Chunqiu 春秋

16 of 44

b) Development of Modern Educational Assessment – use of aptitude & intelligence Tests�

- Francis Galton- differential psychology and psychometrics

  • Alfred Binet – IQ testing
  • Lewis Terman - Stanford-Binet revision of IQ test
  • David Wechsler - Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
  • Charles Spearman- “g” and “s” factors in intelligence
  • Leon Thurstone – 7 mental abilities, first multi-factor approach to intelligence

17 of 44

1.4 OBJECTIVES OF EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT

Purpose

Examples

Diagnosis

Diagnostic Test

Exceptionality

Diagnostic Test, Observation, to determine students with unnormal ability or disability

Certification

Official Certificates: School or State level, National level like SPM, STPM, Degree

Placement

Streaming to Next Level, Class

Administration

Records of placement, certificates

Counselling

Counselling sessions to the parents, students,

Informing Parents

Report Card, Monthly Test Results – online

 Improving Teaching

Annual reports, Post-mortem reports

18 of 44

1.4 OBJECTIVES OF EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT- for the Learner

 

Types of Decisions

 

 

Help the Learner:

 

Questions to be Answered

Diagnosis for

Remedial action

 

Should the student be sent for remedial

classes so that difficulty in learning can be

overcome?

Diagnosis for

enrichment

 

Should the student be provided with

Enrichment activities?

Exceptionality

 

Does the student have special learning

needs that require special education

assistance?

Selection

 

Should the student be streamed to X or Y?

19 of 44

1.4 OBJECTIVES – For the Teacher, Improve Teaching

 

Improve Teaching:

 

Questions to be Answered

Objectives

 

Were the desired learning outcomes

achieved?

Teaching Method

 

Were the teaching methods employed

effective?

Prior Knowledge

 

Did students have the relevant prior

knowledge?

Teaching Materials

 

Were the teaching materials used

effective?

Teacher Differences

 

Were particular teachers more effective

than others?

20 of 44

1.4 OBJECTIVES OF EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT – for the Admin

 

Progress

To what extent the student is making

progress toward specific instructional

goals?

Communication to

parents

 

 

Certification

 

What is the strength and weakness in

the overall performance of a student in

specific areas assessed?

Administration &

 

How is the schooling performing in

Comparison to other schools?

Counselling

 

Why students should be referred for counselling?

21 of 44

1.5 Types of Assessment

  • Timing – throughout vs at the end
  • Method – formal & informal vs formal
  • Aim – assess progress vs grading
  • Example – Quizzes, exercises, test vs final exam

22 of 44

a. Formative and Summative Assessment

Formative

Summative

Timing

Conducted throughout the teaching-learning process

Conducted at the end of a teaching-learning phases (e.g. end of semester or year)

Method

Paper & pencil tests, observations, quizzes, exercises, practical sessions (group and individually)

Paper & pencil tests, oral tests administered to the group

(formally conducted)

Aim

 To assess progress and recommend remedial action for non-achievers

Remedial or enrichment

Grading to determine if the programme was successful.

 To certify students and improve the curriculum

Example

Quizzes, essays, diagnostic tests, lab reports and anecdotal records

Final exams, national examinations, qualifying tests.

23 of 44

Chapter 2��Educational Assessment in the 21st Century

24 of 44

Chapter 2: Overview

2.1 Changing Trends in Educational Assessment

2.2 Use of Computer and Technologies in � Assisting Assessment

2.3. Authentic and Holistic Assessment

2.4 Educational Accountability & High Stakes

Assessment

2.5 Trends in Assessment of Students with � Disabilities

2.6 Must Do for Future Educational Assessment

25 of 44

2.1 Changing Trends in Educational Assessment

  • Easing up (reducing) on Exams
  • More student involvement and choice in assessment
  • More group assessment- more collaborative learning
  • Objectives or expectations are stated explicitly and clearly
  • Shift to process-based instead of product-based assessment.

26 of 44

The 21st Century Assessment

27 of 44

Inlvoving Multi discipline and meta-learning

28 of 44

2.2. Use of Computer and Technologies in � Assisting Assessment

a. Computer Adaptive Testing

b. Technological-based assessment

29 of 44

a. Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT)�

  • A type of assessment where a question is displayed on a monitor.
  • Students use the mouse to select the answer.
  • Computer chooses next question based on previous responses (adaptive)
  • Next question is displayed on the monitor, or else the test ends.
  • System keeps track of each student’s pattern of responses.
  • Results learn more about an individual student.
  • We get the best possible information about the students.

30 of 44

b. Technology-Based Assessment In Education

The technology-based assessment generally refers to the use of electronic systems and software to assess and evaluate the progress of individual children in educational settings

31 of 44

b. Technology-Based Assessment In Education

  1. Access to assessment from any geographical location and at any time.
  2. Automatized administration allows students to undertake online tests many times and re-assess their knowledge.
  3. Enhancing static presentation of assessment items with interactive and media-enriched content.
  4. Computer data-processing capabilities such as automatic scoring and adaptive testing.
  5. Sophisticated reporting including both the easy gathering and analysis of student responses or behavioral data to allow the marker to refine and adapt assessment activities and instruction.
  6. Cost efficiencies emerging from scaling and automatization.

32 of 44

2.3 Authentic and Holistic Assessment

  • Authentic = real world problem solving - can be created by

computer software's

  • Holistic = overall – intellectual, emotional and physical

33 of 44

2.3 Authentic Assessments

34 of 44

Assessment Methods in Authentic Assessments

Authentic assessment can include the following:

  • Observation
  • Essays
  • Interviews
  • Performance tasks
  • Exhibitions and demonstrations
  • Portfolios
  • Journals
  • Teacher-created tests
  • Rubrics
  • Self- and peer-evaluation

35 of 44

2.4 Educational Accountability & High Stakes �Assessment

Accountability in education is concerned with keeping records of school activities and using such records to assess or appraise institutional performance in relation to the achievement of predetermined objectives.

36 of 44

Accountability systems

  • based on the expectation that students can & will achieve the goals of schooling.
  • Schools that accomplish the goal of all students achieving success are most likely to have a strong & stable teacher and administration.

Main types of accountability system

  1. Compliance with regulations
  2. Adherence to professional norms
  3. Results driven

  • Accountability systems should include 5 components:
  • Objectives
  • Assessments
  • Instruction
  • Resources
  • Rewards or Sanctions

37 of 44

High Stakes Assessment

PT3

SPM

STPM

MUET

O-LEVEL

A-LEVEL

Malaysia

UK

38 of 44

2.5 Trends in the Assessment of Students with � Disabilities�

  • Many students with disabilities were excluded from large-scale

assessments, such as those mandated by states.

  • Recent federal and state policy initiatives, including the most recent reauthorization of IDEA, require that the large majority of

students with disabilities be included in the statewide assessments

used in accountability systems.

  • Most observers agree that educational outcomes for students with disabilities were inadequate before the new policies were implemented; however, the research undergirding the new policies is limited.

39 of 44

Major Issues in Assessing Students With Disabilities�

• issues of identification and classification;

• questions about the appropriate use of accommodations;

• the problem of disabilities that are related to measured

constructs; and

• issues pertaining to test design.

40 of 44

2.5 Trends in the Assessment of Students with Disabilities

41 of 44

2.6 Future Educational Assessment Must Do

These 13 points

The Gordon Commission on the Future of Assessment in Education — http://www.gordoncommission.org

  • Randy Elliot Bennett 

42 of 44

2.6.Must Do for Future Educational Assessment

Suggestions

Comment

Provide meaningful information

For various stake holders or audience to understand and appreciate

Satisfy multiple purposes

For informing, diagnosis, teaching- learning improvement, prediction etc.

Use modern conceptions of competency as a design basis

Competency can have many meanings under different situations or requirements

Adopt modern methods for designing and interpreting complex assessments;

Use of suitable computer software, adopting new methods of analysis

Account for context

State under what situation / condition the assessment is made to give a better meaning / understanding

43 of 44

Design for fairness and accessibility

Open access using web or cloud- based storage for easy access

Design for positive impact

Give positive feed-back & information for encouragement

Design for engagement

Attractive and engaging the stake-holders: authorities, schools, parents & students

Incorporate information from multiple sources

Use various sources of evaluation to give a more complete picture of a person status

Respect privacy 

Very important esp. under this internet era where info can spread easily and subject to misused

Gather and share validity evidence

Gather & share with teachers, students and parents for professional development and planning

Use technology to achieve substantive goals

Very important in this IT era for various future need and advancement

44 of 44

Thank You