Are current neutrino mass constraints reliable? insights from full-shape analyses
Hernan E. Noriega
henoriega@icf.unam.mx
ICF & IF - UNAM
5 Dec 2024
Cosmology on the Beach
Hernán E. Noriega, ICF & IF - UNAM
2/6
Taken from DESI Collaboration: 2404.03002, 2411.12022
Neutrino mass constraints
LCDM: places very tight constraints, creating tension with particle physics results.
Neutrino affects P(k) in two ways:
Such tight bounds are primarily due to strong constraints on H0 from DESI.
DESI gets a higher H0 compared to CMB [point (1)].
Hernán E. Noriega, ICF & IF - UNAM
Hernán E. Noriega, ICF & IF - UNAM
3/6
Results on individuals bins of (e)BOSS
Noiseless synthetic data: was generated based on Planck cosmology and has the same properties of the real data
Strong projection effects on the neutrino mass!
The distributions do not recover the expected values.
Insights from full-shape
Hernán E. Noriega, ICF & IF - UNAM
Hernán E. Noriega, ICF & IF - UNAM
4/6
Bayesian vs frequentist profile likelihood (PL) on the noiseless synthetic eBOSS data
Insights from full-shape
Hernán E. Noriega, ICF & IF - UNAM
5/6
Most of the neutrino information comes from the wiggles rather than the broadband, contrary to what has been believed for decades!
Frankenstein: Localization of the neutrino signal
BB00W00 and BB05W05 are control samples, while the rest are Frankensteins.
Hernán E. Noriega, UNAM: ICF & IF
Hernán E. Noriega, ICF & IF - UNAM
6/6
From full-shape insights
Broadband vs wiggles
Conclusions