1 of 15

Private Luxury Jet Hangar Expansion at Hanscom Field

2 of 15

The proposed development would:

  • Expand infrastructure for private luxury jets
    • Jet Hangar count by 4X
    • Jet Hangar square ft by 2.3X
  • Add 37 acres of pavement
  • Represent the largest single development in Hanscom’s history
  • Relieve current luxury jet capacity constraints at the airport
  • Respond to the planned growth of private luxury jets

The largest private luxury Jet project known

3 of 15

Chapter 8 of the Acts of 2021:��Next Generation Roadmap for Mass. Climate Policy

  • Net-Zero requirement by 2050
  • Every sector will have declining emissions requirements

4 of 15

Nearby Towns Support the State Plan

5 of 15

Hanscom Plan: Private Luxury Jet Emissions

6 of 15

Jet hangar capacity vs time�including proposed project

Dramatic jet growth is clearly anticipated

Square

Feet

7 of 15

Calculating Hanscom Private Jet Emissions Today

  • 38,400 private jet operations per year (per Massport)
  • 2 hr estimated flight time
  • 330 gallons per hour (from aircraft tables)
  • 11.9 kg CO2 per gallon (basic chemistry)
  • 2 radiative forcing CO2e/CO2 for jet (per IPCC)
  • 610,000 Tons CO2e (product of above)

8 of 15

Private Luxury Jets:�High Environmental Cost, Low Societal Benefit

  • Hanscom Jet emissions today cancel out nearly 50% of the GHG gains from all 4 GW of Solar PV ever installed in Massachusetts.
  • Hanscom emissions growth alone completely cancels out the 2050 climate gains of local communities
  • Services only a few individuals
  • Services primarily resort destinations (Wall St. Journal)

310 Tons CO2e per trip vs rural person in India .5 Tons per year.

Emissions from one private jet round trip to Asia = Emissions of an entire rural family in India over their entire lifetime

9 of 15

Are private luxury jets necessary for the economy?

Most flights are to resort destinations

(Wall St Journal)

10 of 15

Are private luxury jets necessary for the economy?

Most flights are to resort destinations

(Wall St Journal)

11 of 15

Private Luxury Jets:�Benefit a few, subsidized by you

  • No sales tax on private jets, parts, or services (unlike your car)
  • No property tax on private jet facilities on Massport land
  • Tax laws provide major write-offs and tax breaks to incent jet ownership
  • State and local jet fuel tax prohibited by federal law*
  • Private jetports primarily paid for by commercial airline passengers (you)
  • 2023 FAA reauthorization bill proposes to provide federal dollars for private jet hangar construction.

*Local jet fuel excise tax for Hanscom was grandfathered under the federal law as pre-existing in 1984

12 of 15

Is Low Carbon Aviation Coming?

  • Electric Aircraft
    • Only replaces small propeller aircraft (US Aviation Climate Plan)
    • No potential to replace jets by 2050
  • Sustainable Aviation Fuels (biofuel petroleum substitute)
    • Still emit the same or more CO2e
    • Growth of bio source theorized to absorb some CO2 (offsetting emissions)
    • Research shows little or negative CO2e lifecycle benefit
    • Bio sources inadequate to supply jet requirements
    • Depends on future unknown technology

There is no known low GHG substitute for jet fuel. Planning based on some unknown magic technology is irresponsible

13 of 15

Effect of stopping this project on the luxury jet system

  • Hanscom is the largest private jetport in New England
  • Constraining Hanscom private luxury jet capacity, or reversing financial incentives, will make private flights inconvenient, with a direct effect on the entire system:
    • Current flights
    • Private jet purchases
    • Private jet production

Our policies have a ripple effect on emissions of the entire private luxury jet system

14 of 15

Who Can Regulate or Control Private Jet Growth at the State Level?

  • Towns have no regulatory authority
  • The Legislature has no regulatory authority
  • Massport has no power once facilities are built
  • Limiting infrastructure is the only control our state has
  • Massport reports only to the Governor

Past data indicates that hangar capacity will drive private jet flights

The Governor is the only option to stop this

15 of 15

No Private Luxury Jet infrastructure capacity should be built anywhere because it is antithetical to Massachusetts and federal emissions plans

“We must protect all from the vandalism of a few”

Henry David Thoreau