Banking Across Borders: Are Chinese Banks Different?��By Eugenio, Catherine, and Swapan-Kumar
Discussion by Valentina Bruno
2023 Basel Committee Research Group and OCC Workshop
And the answer is (w.r.t. AE banks)…
YES | NO |
Ownership and Asset structure | |
| |
Only 2.4% market share of AE cross-border lending | |
| |
Stronger trade-lending relationship with EMEs: importance of bilateral trade in explaining Chinese banks’ cross border lending | |
| |
Cross-border lending and portfolio investments to EMEs are negatively correlated | |
| |
And the answer is (w.r.t. AE banks)…
YES | NO |
| Global operations are similar to major AEs |
| Act more like US and European banks and their affiliates |
| |
| 24% market share of EME cross-border lending (Japan 11.2%) |
| Most important creditor for 66 out of 183 borrowers |
| |
Economic channels of foreign lending
The paper deals with a really important issue, which has taken on huge geopolitical importance recently.
The debt restructuring for developing economies, for example.
Bruno and Hauswald, RoF, 2014: Foreign lending alleviates financial constraints.
Foreign banks mitigate the consequence of informational and legal obstacles to lending, especially in developing credit markets.
A new distance measure
Huang, Panizza, Portes (2021)
Funding is channeled to risky sectors
50% of China lending (public debt) not captured by official statistics - Hidden Debt
(Horn, Reinhart, Trebesch, 2021)
Drilling down into Chinese lending
“Chinese-style” cross-border lending
“Chinese-style” cross-border lending
https://www.thedialogue.org/map_list/
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2022/702572/EXPO_BRI(2022)702572_EN.pdf
This is the true nationality measure of the lending.
Concluding remarks
“Distance measure” Chinese-style: Asymmetric information vs. Strategic investments. Geopolitical distance vs. Geographical distance.