1 of 86

What is ISF?

Midwest PBIS Network

Content Exploration

1

8/27/26

2 of 86

UPDATED 10/18/24

www.midwestpbis.org

@midwestpbis

In partnership with

All youth achieve

social - emotional - behavioral

and academic success.

Our Vision

Collaborate with adults to create a safe, equitable, consistent, and positive learning environment for all youth.

Our Mission

The Midwest PBIS Network (MWPBIS) is a non-profit organization of education and human services leaders advancing systems change in youth-serving settings.

Our primary charge is to function as a hub of the Center on PBIS, a national technical assistance partnership funded from the U.S. Department of Education.

ABOUT MIDWEST PBIS NETWORK

The Center's model of capacity building emphasizes a cascade of implementation to assist state departments of education in the installation, fidelity, outcomes, and sustainability of PBIS. We encourage you to also access local technical assistance from your state and region

3 of 86

Community Agreements

Decision to be made about how to use subtitle/sections

Decision to be made about how to date and credit

3

Be Responsible

Be Engaged

  • Make yourself comfortable
  • Take care of your needs (water, food, restroom, etc.)
  • Share your questions with the group

Be Respectful

  • Turn cell phones off or to “vibrate”
  • Listen to others attentively by staying quiet while they are speaking
  • Follow up, and complete assigned tasks
  • Ask what you need to know to understand and contribute
  • Contribute to the team by sharing relevant information and ideas

4 of 86

Objectives

  • Describe an Interconnected Systems Framework
  • Identify how an integrated system could benefit your community/district/school needs
  • Identify tools and resources to support next steps

Footer

4

5 of 86

5

In the chat, share:

1) Role / Job Title

2) School/District/Agency

Let’s hear some voices:

What brought you to this session today?

6 of 86

Materials for Today

PBIS

7 of 86

Usable PowerPoint

8 of 86

8

9 of 86

Mental Health/Social-Emotional-Behavioral Well-Being

9

10 of 86

What if… ?

School Employed and Community Employed Staff use community and school data to assess the needs of young people in their school community and, together as an integrated team, select evidence-based practices that match specific needs.

This means moving away from co-located model…

PBIS

Community Partners

to a fully integrated system

Interconnected Systems Framework

11 of 86

Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

PBIS organizes our school, and integrates our initiatives, to achieve desired outcomes through understanding our data, implementing a continuum of practices, supporting staff through systems, and prioritizing equity.

Midwest PBIS Network 4/5/22

Adapted from: USDOE OSEP TA Center on PBIS (October 2015). PBIS Implementation Blueprint: Part 1 – Foundations and Supporting Information. Eugene, OR: University of Oregon, 5. https://www.pbis.org/blueprint/implementation-blueprint

12 of 86

When Implementing Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) with Fidelity

13 of 86

Alignment of Initiatives Related to PBIS is Guided by the Six MTSS Features

  1. Team based leadership and coordination
  2. Evaluation of implementation fidelity
  3. Three-Tiered Continuum of evidence-based practices
  4. Continuous data-based progress monitoring and decision-making
  5. Comprehensive universal screening
  6. On-going professional development including coaching with local content expertise

McIntosh, K.& Goodman, S. (2016). Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Blending RTI and PBIS. New York: Guilford Press.

  • Specific academic assessments and interventions
  • Use of published curricula selected by school or district
  • Use of direct assessment of skills
  • Periodic assessment through benchmarking periods
  • Focus on grade-level teaming
  • Described in IDEA as special education eligibility determination approach

  • Focus on teaming
  • Scientifically based �interventions
  • Instruction as prevention
  • Tiered continuum of supports with increasing intensity based on need
  • Regular screening for early intervention
  • Use of a problem-solving model and data-based decision rules
  • Emphasis on improving quality of implementation
  • Embedded into school improvement plan

  • Specific social behavior assessments and interventions
  • Use of free materials that are adapted to fit the school’s context
  • Use of indirect assessment of behavior
  • Continuous assessment of social behavior with existing data sources
  • Focus on schoolwide teaming
  • Described in IDEA as schoolwide prevention and individual intervention approach

Academic RTI

Schoolwide PBIS

Core Features of MTSS

14 of 86

Comprehensive School Mental Health Systems

  • Provide full array of supports and services
    • Promote positive school climate, social emotional learning, mental health, and well-being

  • Build on strong foundation of district and school professionals in partnership with students, families and community partners

  • Assess and address social and environmental factors

15 of 86

Romer, N., von der Embse, N., Eklund, K., Kilgus, S., Perales, K., Splett, J. W., Sudlo, S., Wheeler, D., (2020). Best Practices in Social, Emotional, and Behavioral Screening: An Implementation Guide. Version 2.0. Retrieved from www.smhcollaborative.org/universalscreening

  • Complete Mental Health is Social-Emotional-Behavioral
  • Mental Health is more than simply the absence of psychological problems. The absence of phycological problems does not infer wellness or happiness.
  • Therefore one’s mental health, or wellness, is strong when they are experiencing both low levels of SEB psychological problems, and high levels of SEB competencies.

What is Mental Health?

What is Wellness?

Rev 9/15/21 Midwest PBIS Network

16 of 86

17 of 86

School Mental Health

Co-location model

PBIS

School-Based Mental Health

School-based mental health services reach children in typical, every-day environments. The natural, non-stigmatizing location offers an early and effective environment for intervention.

18 of 86

Without a framework

With a framework

A framework is defined as a structure that is intended to serve as a

support or guide for the building of something that expands the structure

into something useful.

Barrett, 2020

19 of 86

20 of 86

Using MTSS Logic to Redesign the System

20

Simple Responses won’t be enough

Using MTSS logic

Hire social emotional experts

Participate in teams across tiers: Strengthen Tier 1 and focus on Tier 2 System.

Adapt role to include building capacity of ALL staff.

Select Social Emotional Behavioral (SEB) curriculum

Formal process, team-based decision. Data used to prioritize skills.

All instructional staff model, teach alongside academic content.

Train staff on trauma-informed practices

Team based training. Time to embed new learning. Time to develop evaluation plan.

Strengthen partnerships with families and community providers.

Expanded Team uses problem solving logic with school AND community data to inform efforts across all tiers.

21 of 86

MTSS is an �Operating System

for our School Initiatives

OUTCOMES

What organizational goal is supported by the initiative?

SYSTEMS

Which team is overseeing the initiative?

What PD & Coaching is being provided

PRACTICES

What continuum of evidence-based practices will be used?

DATA

What is the baseline data?

How will we know if it is working?

EQUITY

Is the initiative culturally responsive and equitable?

Midwest PBIS Network 4-10-22

22 of 86

Literature on why a MTSS should be used to install practices:

  • MTSS is essential to accurate, durable, and scalable implementation (Chafouleas, 2016)

  • MTSS represents a service delivery framework grounded in the public health model of prevention and consists of providing a continuum of evidence-based practices and making data-driven decisions (Cook, 2015)

  • MTSS provides a framework to more efficiently support students identified with needs (Splett, 2018)

23 of 86

23

2007

    • Collaboration of national leaders of PBIS and SMH

2009

    • White paper – Development of an ISF for SMH

2013

    • Monograph Volume 1: Advancing Education Effectiveness: Interconnecting School Mental Health and School-Wide Positive Behavior Support

2016-2019

    • National Targeted Workgroup and growing field examples

2016-2020

    • Randomized Control Trial conducted

2019

    • Monograph Volume 2 - Advancing Education Effectiveness: Interconnecting School Mental Health and School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: An Implementation Guide

24 of 86

Subsequent ISF Research Studies

  • Project RISE (Reducing Inequities in School Environments), funded by NIMHD Violence Prevention, Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Project EPIC (Enhancing Family-School-Community Partnerships through an ISF Collaboration), funded by OSEP Model Demonstration
  • ISF - Early Supports for Student Success, funded by IES, Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Project Thrive, funded by PCORI (Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute), Randomized Controlled Trial focused on teaming, screening, and using data for decision making

25 of 86

Center on PBIS. (March, 2021). Why prioritize behavior support? Eugene, OR: Center on PBIS, University of Oregon. Retrieved from: https://www.pbis.org/resource/why-prioritize-behavior-support

Supporting student behavior is critical to promoting full access to instruction for each and every student.

Behavior continues to be the most likely reason students are excluded from their learning environment, including those from from marginalized groups, especially Black students, and students with disabilities, who are at highest risk of experiencing exclusionary discipline…

Not just SEL: Why we must focus on the Social, Emotional, and Behavioral (SEB) needs of students

Rev 9/15/21 Midwest PBIS Network

26 of 86

October 19, 2021. U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services. Supporting Child and Student Social, Emotional, Behavioral, and Mental Health Needs. Washington, DC, 2021. Available at: https://www2.ed.gov/documents/students/supporting-child-student-social-emotional-behavioral-mental-health.pdf

U.S.DOE Recommendations �on SEBMH

  • Prioritize wellness for each and every child, student, educator, and provider
  • Enhance mental health literacy and reduce stigma and other barriers to access
  • Implement a continuum of evidence-based prevention practices
  • Establish an integrated framework of educational, social emotional, and behavioral-health support for all
  • Leverage policy and funding
  • Enhance workforce capacity
  • Use data for decision making to promote equitable implementation and outcomes

27 of 86

Pause for Discussion and Questions

  • What messages did you hear that stuck out to you?

  • What did you hear that could be a challenge where you work?

  • What questions do you have?

28 of 86

Interconnected Systems Framework Defined

    • Structure and process for education and mental health systems to interact in most effective and efficient way.�
    • Guided by key stakeholders in education and mental health/community systems �
    • Who have the authority to reallocate resources, change role and function of staff, and change policy.

29 of 86

An Interconnected System Framework Applies MTSS Features to all A-SEB Interventions

    • Effective teams that include community mental health providers
    • Data-based decision making that include school data beyond ODRs and community data
    • Formal processes for the selection & implementation of evidence-based practices (EBP) across tiers with team decision making
    • Early access through use of comprehensive screening, which includes internalizing and externalizing needs
    • Rigorous progress-monitoring for both fidelity & effectiveness of all interventions regardless of who delivers
    • Ongoing coaching at both the systems & practices level for both school and community employed professionals

30 of 86

Traditional

MH counselor “sees” student at appointments

Clinicians only do “mental health”

Case management notes

An Interconnected Systems Framework

MH person on teams at all tiers. Interventions are defined (core features, dosage, frequency, outcomes)

MH is everyone’s job. Clinicians contribute to integrated plan

Fidelity AND outcome data determined before delivery; data monitored continuously by teams

31 of 86

Advantages of Implementing an ISF �(What will be different)

  • Move from co-located to single system of delivery for all s-e-b support
  • Deliberate application of PBIS for all social-emotional-behavioral interventions
  • Aligning all related initiatives through one system at the district and school level
  • Active participation of Family and Youth
  • Moving from a co-located school mental health model to an integrated model
  • All social-emotional-behavioral interventions are designed, delivered, and monitored through one set of teams
  • Clinicians actively participate in teams, share data and are part of system problem solving
  • District/community leadership team and identified coaches (from both education & mental health) support efforts within the schools

32 of 86

ISF Key Messages

Key Messages

1. Single System of Delivery

2. Access is NOT enough

3. Mental Health is �for ALL

4. MTSS essential to install SMH

One Set of Teams

Success is Defined by Outcomes

33 of 86

Implementation is not an event.

“These activities occur over time in stages that overlap and that are revisited as needed.”

34 of 86

1. Single System of Delivery�One set of teams�

What Does it Look Like?

Invest in one set of school “behavioral health” teams organized around tiers.

Flexibility of funding to allow community employed staff to serve on teams and assist serving ALL students.

Role and function of staff are explicitly stated in MOU.

ALL Requests for Assistance managed within one set of teams.

ALL school and community employed staff take part in teaching Social/Emotional/Behavioral (SEB) necessary to navigate social situations, school, family and work environments.

  • Community and School MH staff serve on leadership team and make decisions as a TEAM

  • Symmetry of Process
    • State
    • County
    • District
    • School

  • A seamless system for accessing interventions
    • Both school and community based supports

35 of 86

What Does it Mean to Integrate?

Change in routines and procedures?

(e.g. who needs to be available to participate in team meetings?)

Change in how interventions are selected and

monitored?

(e.g. team review of data/research vs individual clinician choice?)

Change in language we use?

(e.g. identifying specific interventions vs generic terms such as “counseling” or

“supports”?)

Changes in Roles/functions of staff?

(e.g. clinicians coordinating/overseeing some interventions that non-clinicians deliver?)

36 of 86

Symmetry of Process

State Leadership Team

Regional Leadership Team

District/Community Leadership Team

School Leadership Team

District/Community Leadership Team

School Leadership Team

Regional Leadership Team

District/Community Leadership Team

School Leadership Team

School Leadership Team

37 of 86

Academic MTSS Director

District Community Leadership Team

Implementation Team

Local MH provider/Core Service Agency

Student Supports Director

Administrative and Teacher�Representative

(Union)�

Social Services

Afterschool

Dept of Recreation Services

Special Education Director,

Law Enforcement

Juvenile Services Coordinator

Family Youth Community Leaders

School Improvement

Professional Development/Teacher Mentoring

Youth Move

Board Member

Who should be on the team?

38 of 86

Example (*EARLY CHILDHOOD)

  • DCLT identified large percentage of behavior problems occurring in kindergarten across 11 elementary buildings
  • DCLT decided to train kindergarten teachers in Prevent-Teach-Reinforce (PTR)
  • Individual students and families were identified to received Parent Child Interactive Therapy (PCIT) from mental health clinicians
  • Data 1 year later indicated need for more clarity around desired outcomes
  • DCLT decided to provide additional coaching and technical assistance to ensure fidelity and then check outcomes again

39 of 86

2. Access is NOT Enough�Success is defined by student impact

What Does it Look Like?

The District and School team includes community providers, families, students and persons who have authority to make structural changes within their organizations.

Teams works collaboratively with leaders to continuously assess student needs, implement programs, and eliminate, adjust, replace programs at all tiers to increase their impact on students.

Ineffective programs or practices are eliminated.

-

  • Interventions are evidenced based and matched to presenting problem using data

  • Interventions are progress monitored for fidelity and impact

  • Teams are explicit about intervention description (what, when, how long)

  • Skills taught in Tier 2/3 interventions are assessed across all tiers by ALL Staff across ALL settings linked to Tier 1 Social Emotional Behavioral (SEB) instruction

-

40 of 86

All change in practice monitored for impact

Identify need based on data

Select intervention

to match need

Progress Monitor

Assess Outcomes

30% of students are elevated for anxiety in SEB screening

Teach coping skills at Tier 1

  • Use my breathing technique
  • Listen to my signals

Trends in Request for Assistance

Frequency of nurse visits

Decrease in percentage of students with elevated risk for anxiety.

Increase instructional minutes

Decrease in trends of Request for Assistance

41 of 86

Daily Progress Report (DPR) Sample�

NAME:______________________ DATE:__________________

Teachers please indicate YES (2), SO-SO (1), or NO (0) regarding the student’s achievement� in relation to the following sets of expectations/behaviors.

EXPECTATIONS

1 st block

2 nd block

3 rd block

4 th block

Be Safe

2 1 0

2 1 0

2 1 0

2 1 0

Be Respectful

2 1 0

2 1 0

2 1 0

2 1 0

Be Responsible

2 1 0

2 1 0

2 1 0

2 1 0

Total Points

Teacher Initials

Adapted from Grant Middle School STAR CLUB

Adapted from Responding to Problem Behavior in Schools: The Behavior Education Program by Crone, Horner, and Hawken

Trauma-Informed

Tier 2 Group

Self-Check

Use calming strategy

Use your words

Use safe hands

Ask for help

Connect with safe person

42 of 86

Example

  • Community clinician joined Tier II team
  • Helped recognize that a group of students identified for support had likely experienced trauma.
  • Community clinician and school clinician collaborated to select an evidence-based trauma informed group.
  • Trauma informed group was added to school’s continuum of interventions
  • Community and school clinician co-facilitated the group
  • Students receiving intervention had improved academic and behavioral data as well as self-reporting feeling more connected to school.

43 of 86

Belonging

44 of 86

3. Mental Health is FOR ALL�From Few to ALL

What Does it Look Like?

ALL staff are trained and supported through PD plan/coaching process.

MOU defines roles of all staff working in schools.

Clinicians role includes support of systems and support of ALL adults as well as delivery of some interventions with students.

Teachers provide social emotional behavior (SEB) instruction along with academic content.

District Leadership prioritizes Staff Wellness

  • Integrate SEB competencies into PBIS Matrix

  • Vast majority of students will benefit from safe, predictable, positive nurturing environment, mentoring and academic support.

  • Universal Screening to identify ALL possible MH/Behavioral needs (externalizers and internalizers)

  • Need MH experts to triage and identify students with positive screen to determine next steps. However, not all interventions require clinical expertise

-

45 of 86

Role of Clinician within MTSS

Traditional

  • Adding more to plate without removing
  • Implementing continuum of interventions based on others recommendations
  • Clinicians working in silos
  • Students “referred” to clinician for support

Shift

  • Assessing what is working and need before adding new
  • Clinicians supporting teams to implement continuum of interventions that is data driven
  • Clinicians being part of teams
  • Data drives student intervention and progress

46 of 86

Moving from being the only response �to identified social emotional needs, to being �social emotional leaders of the building.

TO

Helping to build the capacity of the rest of the staff

Evolution to “Post MTSS”�

47 of 86

Clinician potential�role/partnership

Consultation

Coordination

Facilitation

48 of 86

Coordinator vs. Facilitator

Coordinator*

  • Organizes and/or oversees the specific interventions such as CICO, SEB Groups
  • Roles may include: scheduling meetings, reviewing & collecting data to share during team meetings, curriculum development, training, mentoring, etc…

Facilitator

  • Directly provides intervention support services to youth/families
  • Roles include: meeting with students for CICO, running groups, etc.

* This role is different than � your “building coordinators”

49 of 86

Teaching Matrix

INCORPORATE Coping Strategies for Managing Stress

All Settings

Halls

Playgrounds

Lunch

Library/

Computer Lab

Assembly

Bus

Respectful

Be on task.

Give your best effort.

Be prepared.

Walk.

Have a plan.

Study, read, compute.

Sit in one spot.

Watch for your stop.

Achieving

& Organized

Be kind.

Hands/feet to self.

Help/share with others.

Use normal voice volume.

Walk to right.

Share equipment.

Include others.

Whisper.

Return books.

Listen/watch.

Use appropriate applause.

Use a quiet voice.

Stay in your seat.

Responsible

Recycle.

Clean up after self.

Pick up litter.

Maintain physical space.

Use equipment properly.

Put litter in garbage can.

Push in chairs.

Treat books carefully.

Pick up.

Treat chairs carefully.

Wipe your feet.

Expectations

1. Expectations

2. NATURAL CONTEXT (Locations)

3. Rules or Specific Behaviors

Have a lunch plan and choose quiet or social lunch area

Invite friends to join me

Invite those sitting alone to join in

Use my breathing technique

Listen to my signals

50 of 86

MS Pyramid of Interventions

Individualization and Intensity of

Interventions Increases

A Few Students

>5%

ALL Students

100%

Some Students

>15%

Tier 1 Interventions & Supports- Structured Behavior Interventions for all students

  • PRIDE Expectation Matrix,
  • PRIDE Classroom Expectations & PRIDE Classroom Lessons
  • Guidance Services,
  • Homeroom Guidance
  • Continuum of Discipline Responses
  • Student/Parent Conferences,
  • Before & After School Program
  • Project Success (Substance Use)

Tier 2: Behavioral Interventions & Supports- Supports for some students who struggle with meeting the expectations

  • Simple Behavior Support Plans
  • Simple Functional Behavioral Assessments (FBA)
  • Targeted Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT)
  • Coping CAT
  • Academic Seminar
  • Check In/Check Out,
  • Mentoring

Tier 3: Individualized Supports -Structured Interventions for the

few students with the greatest need

  • Complex Functional Behavioral Assessment (FBA) and Behavior Support
  • 3 R (Respectful, Relevant, Realistic) Plan(s)
  • Individualized Family and Youth-Driven Planning and Support
  • Community Supports (WRAP, DCYF, Mental Health, and Child and Family Services)
  • Enhanced Academic Seminar

51 of 86

4. Use MTSS Framework�Need implementation science to guide the work

What Does it Look Like?

The system models a Public Health Approach

All initiatives/programs are aligned and installed with core features of MTSS

The continuum of evidence-based interventions are linked across tiers, with dosage and specificity of interventions increasing from lowest to highest tiers.

  • Data-based decision making is used at all tiers with type of data matched to specifics and complexity of interventions.

  • A formal process for selecting and implementing evidence-based practices is established.

  • Comprehensive screening allows for early access to interventions.

  • Progress monitoring for both fidelity and effectiveness;

  • Skills taught in Tier 2/3 interventions are supported by ALL Staff across ALL settings linked to Tier 1 SEB instruction

  • Ongoing professional development and coaching to ensure fluency and to guide refinement of implementation.

-

52 of 86

What does it look like?

  • Integrated teams with youth and family participation
  • Defining a single continuum of interventions
  • Monitoring student outcomes together
  • Building staff’s competence and confidence to support SEB-MH.

One Integrated System of Supports

53 of 86

ISF Enhances MTSS Core Features

  1. Team based leadership and coordination
  2. Evaluation of implementation fidelity
  3. Three-Tiered Continuum of evidence-based practices
  4. Continuous data-based progress monitoring and decision-making
  5. Comprehensive universal screening (for systemic and early access)
  6. Ongoing professional development including coaching with local content expertise

Midwest PBIS Network 10-19-21. Adapted from: McIntosh, K.& Goodman, S. (2016). Integrated Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: Blending RTI and PBIS. New York: Guilford Press.

Academic RTI

Schoolwide PBIS

Core Features of MTSS

Systems

1. Expand membership of team-based leadership and coordination

6. Professional development, coaching, �and content expertise for both school and community

Data

2. Evaluation of fidelity for all interventions

4. Progress monitoring for all interventions

5. Universal screening for both internalizing and externalizing behaviors

Practices

3. Single three-tiered continuum of culturally relevant evidence-based interventions

54 of 86

Pause for Discussion and Questions

  • What messages did you hear that stuck out to you?

  • What did you hear that could be a challenge where you work?

  • What would be the same or different for your schools?

  • What questions do you have?

55 of 86

POSSIBLE NEXT STEPS

Where to start?

56 of 86

Design with STAGES of IMPLEMENTATION in mind�(Fixsen, Blasé, 2005)

Should we do this?

Exploration/

Adoption

Put resources and systems in place

Installation

Initial pilots and assess results

Initial Implementation

The practice was successful, adopt system- wide

Full Implementation

Adopt variations of the practice and assess results

Innovation

Make this the way of doing business

Sustainability

SAMPLE Model Demonstration from Center on PBIS 2019-2022

57 of 86

Stakeholder Engagement

Workforce Capacity

Policy

Funding and Alignment

LEADERSHIP TEAMING

Training

Coaching

Evaluation

Local Implementation Demonstrations

Executive Functions

Implementation Functions

58 of 86

EXPLORATION

59 of 86

Mental Health/Social-Emotional-Behavioral Well-Being

59

60 of 86

Exploration Steps

5. Determine benefit/decide to adopt or not

4. Establish shared understanding of the ISF

3. Assess related initiatives

2. Examine current partnerships

1. Establish an exploration team

61 of 86

Academic MTSS Director

District Community Leadership Team

Implementation Team

Local MH provider/Core Service Agency

Student Supports Director

Administrative and Teacher�Representative

(Union)�

Social Services

Afterschool

Dept of Recreation Services

Special Education Director,

Law Enforcement

Juvenile Services Coordinator

Family Youth Community Leaders

School Improvement

Professional Development/Teacher Mentoring

Youth Move

Board Member

Who should be on the team?

62 of 86

Exploration with a Team

63 of 86

ISF Fact Sheets

64 of 86

Creating Common Language

65 of 86

66 of 86

  • Case study of one school’s experience with installation and implementation

  • Suggested TA strategies provided

67 of 86

INSTALLATION

68 of 86

Mental Health/Social-Emotional-Behavioral Well-Being

68

69 of 86

Stakeholder Engagement

Workforce Capacity

Policy

Funding and Alignment

LEADERSHIP TEAMING

Training

Coaching

Evaluation

Local Implementation Demonstrations

Executive Functions

Implementation Functions

70 of 86

Establish Integrated Teaming Structure – State, Regional, District, School

Assess Current Status of Mental Health and PBIS Systems

Reach Consensus on a Mission Statement

Establish Routines and Procedures

Develop an Integrated Action Plan

District Installation Steps

71 of 86

Purpose:  This guide is intended to be used by facilitators and coaches to support District/Community Leadership Teams to install structures/systems needed to support an Interconnected System Framework (ISF). The goal is for teams to examine current system using installation activities and generate actions to move toward a more efficient and effective service delivery model.

72 of 86

Purpose: Guide District Leadership Teams in the assessment, development, and execution of action plans that promote the implementation of multi-tiered social, emotional, and behavioral systems of support and practices.

• Guide for action planning, progress monitoring and annual evaluation.

73 of 86

ISF Initiative InventoryISF V2 Ch4: State/District Level Installation Guide (in press) - Step 2b: Conduct a Review of Current Initiatives

73

Adapted from NIRN Initiative Inventory

Purpose of this tool is to (a) provide an overall picture of existing social emotional behavioral related initiatives or programs available to the larger community, (b) determine the effectiveness, relevance, and fidelity for each, (c) determine funding and resource allocation, and (d) determine areas of redundancy. This process is led by the District Community Leadership Team with representation from both education and community stakeholders.

74 of 86

ISF Initiative InventoryISF V2 Ch4: State/District Level Installation Guide (in press) - Step 2b: Conduct a Review of Current Initiatives

District Example

75 of 86

Changing Roles of Staff:

District Level Discussion Guide

ISF V2 State/District Installation Guide – Step 2c: Conduct Staff Utilization Review

Purpose: This document is intended to support coaches in facilitating critical discussions around role changes within an integrated framework. The goal is to move from discussion to action planning around systems change to better support the social/emotional/behavioral needs of all youth. This document is broken into three topic areas to help with organization which each include guiding questions, prompts to consider other stakeholder voices, and potential activities to complete. It may be beneficial to review the Changing Roles of Staff: School Level Discussion Guide that is a partner to this document.

76 of 86

ISF School Installation GuideISF V2 Chapter 5 (in press)

Purpose: This guide is intended to be used by facilitators and coaches to support District/Community Leadership Teams to install structures/systems needed to support an Interconnected System Framework (ISF). The goal is for teams to examine current system using installation activities and generate actions to move toward a more efficient and effective service delivery model at the building level.

77 of 86

What: The ISF Implementation Inventory is intended to serve as an efficient and valid assessment of ISF implementation for the purposes of ongoing evaluation and action planning.

Who: PBIS/ISF Systems Planning Team(s)

Splett, Perales, & Weist, 2019

78 of 86

ISF Implementation Inventory

Tier 1

Tier 2

Tier 3

19 items

16 items

19 items

Implementation of SWPBIS: Are core features of SWPBIS implemented with fidelity?

Teaming: Do team members collaborate? Do team members include education and mental health system representatives, families, and students as indicated with active opportunities for participation and collaboration

Collaborative Planning and Training: Do all team members have PD and training across systems and core features of ISF, as well as intervention practices as appropriate?

Family and Youth Engagement: Are students and families included in teaming, decision making, intervention selection and implementation, intervention monitoring, and system processes?

Intervention Selection, Implementation and Progress: Are evidence-based interventions selected based on need, implemented with fidelity, progress monitored, and concluded after attainment of positive outcomes?

Data-Based Decision Making: Are data representative of school, home and community behavior collected, analyzed and used for decision making, including outcome/impact, process, and fidelity data?

79 of 86

Mental Health/Social-Emotional-Behavioral Well-Being

79

80 of 86

Find Your PBIS State Coordinator

81 of 86

81

82 of 86

82

83 of 86

83

84 of 86

84

85 of 86

85

86 of 86

Thank You!

Find all of your Midwest PBIS Network Team here:

https://www.midwestpbis2.org/home/contacts