GP contract changes: Context
Following the letter issued to general practice by the Secretary of State on 1 August, Dr Amanda Doyle and Dr Claire Fuller have provided additional information on how the funding and contract changes announced will be implemented:
1
GP ARRS Role: Funding and Reimbursement
How much is the funding for newly qualified GPs?
What is the reimbursable salary for a newly qualified GP?
Is the GP funding combined with the existing ARRS Funding? Can the funding for GPs be used for other ARRS roles?
Can any unclaimed funding be accrued into 2025/26?
Is this funding only available in the 2024/25 financial year?
When will the funding be released to systems?
If a PCN underspends their allocation, will this be reallocated to over-spending PCNs?
2
GP ARRS Role: Criteria for reimbursement
When can I claim for a newly qualified GP from?
How is it determined if a GP is ‘newly-qualified’?
Can newly qualified GPs already employed by a practice be claimed?
If a GP is within 2 years of CCT, but is employed as a partner as part of a new recruitment - is this allowed?
Are there any other criteria for ensuring eligibility for reimbursement?
Is there a cap to the FTE or headcount of newly qualified GPs that can be claimed for?
3
GP ARRS Role: Criteria for reimbursement
How many sessions is classed as full time?
Is there a minimum term that a GP role needs to be recruited for?
What terms should be used when recruiting the newly qualified GP?
Our PCN has 4 practices, could we split the funding (equating to 8 sessions) so that each practice could recruit a GP on 2 sessions each?
How should the PCN claim for a newly qualified GP?
4
Further FAQs
| Question | Answer |
1 | For a full-time GP reimbursed under the ARRS:GP Scheme, should all 9 sessions be service delivery? | PCNs must ensure that the GP is employed or engaged on terms and conditions which are no less favourable Model terms and conditions – paragraph 50 sets out that ‘…at least four hours per week on an annualised basis shall be protected for activities related to professional development…’ |
2 | Does ‘substantively employed as a General Medical Practitioner in general practice previously’ refer to a particular PCN or ICB boundary? | No – this applies to any previous employment as a GP in any practice. |
3 | Is there a requirement for the individual to carry out ‘PCN’ related work given the individual is newly qualified and will have to embed within Practice | A PCN can claim reimbursement by a GP ‘for the delivery of health services’ in line with other roles. |
4 | What does temporary capacity mean in practice? How do you determine this? | The characteristics employment or engagement should be considered based on individual circumstance – including being engaged through a locum agency or working under the Agency Workers Regulations would be an indicator of the arrangement being temporary. To be considered not of a temporary nature, employment or engagement should be centred around a named individual, providing regular hours, ensuring they can consistently support and complement the existing workforce and be able to meet the defined role requirements. |
5 | Does the ARRS:GP Sum need to be pro-rata? | The Additional Roles Reimbursement GP Sum (£1.303 X PCN Contractor Weighted Population on 1 January 2024) is the sum available from 1 October 2024 - 31 March 2025. No pro-rata is required. |
6 | The ready reckoner referenced in the guidance does not appear to show the new GP ARRS budget. Has the tool been adjusted to include this amount with the total ARRS allocation? | It is still anticipated that the primary care network (PCN) income ready reckoner will be updated with the 1 October 2024 contract changes. |
5
Scenarios
Dr A completed GP Training in August 2023. Since then, she has been undertaking locum work.
Eligible for ARRS GP Reimbursement?
Yes, if employed or engaged before August 2025
Dr B completed GP Training in August 2024 and immediately started a salaried position. This was offered in anticipation of the ARRS GP scheme.
No, unless the commissioner provides agreement on an exceptional basis
Dr C completed GP Training in August 2022 and has never held a substantive position.
No, beyond 2nd anniversary of CCT at the start of employment / engagement.
Dr D completed GP Training in February 2024 and was working under a fixed term to cover a maternity leave.
Yes, if employed or engaged before February 2026
Dr E completed GP Training in August 2024 and has been engaged by a locum agency and offered on a 6-month contract for the PCN to engage her for the ARRS scheme
Dependent on specifics – no, if the nature / characteristics are for temporary capacity including being subject to Agency Workers Regulations and engaged as a service.
Updated 14/10/2024
Note: Each scenario assumes all not mentioned criteria are met
6
Scenarios
Dr F – completed GP Training in August 2023 and entered Public Health Training. During this time Dr F has provided a locum session at the same GP Practice.
Eligible for ARRS GP Reimbursement?
Yes, if employed or engaged before August 2025.
Dr G completed GP Training in August 2023 and has been substantively employed in a Trust Grade role in A&E
Yes, if employed or engaged before August 2025.
Drs Ha & He completed GP Training in August 2024; a PCN wishes to substantively employ both for 0.2 FTE.
Yes, if employed or engaged before August 2026. Multiple GPs are permitted.
Dr J completed GP Training in August 2023 and has worked substantively in a different practice to the prospective PCNs member practices
Dr K completed GP Training in August 2024 and has been engaged by a federation and offered on a 6-month contract to the PCN for the ARRS scheme
Dependent on specifics – yes, if not intended to be for a temporary basis and engagement is for the individual
Updated 14/10/2024
Note: Each scenario assumes all not mentioned criteria are met
No, the GP has been substantively employed as a GP in general practice previously
Dr I completed GP Training in August 2023 and has worked substantively as a 0.4 FTE GP. Can the PCN claim for additional sessions to increase Dr I to 0.8 FTE.
No, the GP has been substantively employed as a GP in general practice previously
7