1 of 48

Immunological techniques in Diagnosis

M. Dankyau

August 2024

2 of 48

  • Based on WHO Laboratory training for Field Epidemiologists

3 of 48

Objectives of M3 posting

  • Expertise in detection & interpretation of abnormal physical signs
  • Ability to formulate a diagnosis & propose a logical management plan based on the diagnosis
  • Competence in specified practical procedures
  • Learn principles of treatment and relevant details of methods of treatment of common disorders
  • Complete a systematic study of selected medical diseases
  • Learn to work with other staff and take responsibility for some aspects of patient care
  • Understand importance of social/geographical factors in patient care

4 of 48

Outline

  • Introduction
  • Antigen-Antibody detection
  • Advanced techniques
  • Application implications
  • Discussion
  • Summary
  • Conclusion

5 of 48

Introduction

6 of 48

7 of 48

The Diagnostic-Therapeutic Cycle: A Simplified View

Patient

Data collection:

-History

-Physical examinations

-Laboratory and other tests

Decision

making

Planning

Information

Diagnosis/assessment

Therapyplan

Data

8 of 48

Brief history of antibodies

  • Study of antibodies began in 1890 when Emil von Behring and Shibasaburo Kitasato described antibody activity against diphtheria and tetanus toxins.
  • Behring and Kitasato put forward the theory of humoral immunity, proposing that a mediator in serum could react with a foreign antigen.

9 of 48

Brief history of antibodies 2

  • 1891: Term “Antikörper” coined by Paul Ehrlich
    • Substance in the blood that confers immunity
    • "if two substances give rise to two different antikörper, then they themselves must be different”
    • “Lock-and-Key” theory
  • 1920’s: Heidelberger and Avery identified antibodies as proteins
  • 1940’s: Linus Pauling confirms lock-and-key theory

10 of 48

Brief history of antibodies 23

  • 1948:Immunoprecipitation: use of antibodies for detection
  • 1956: Glick and Chang- Bursa of Fabricius: Antibodies come from B cells
  • 1962: Rodney Porter elucidated the structure of antibody gammaglobulin (IgG)
  • 1976: Hozumi and Tonegawa, antibody gene rearrangement

11 of 48

Useful characteristics of antibodies

  • Epitope: the portion of an antigen that makes contact with a particular antibody or T cell receptor
  • Specificity: Ability to recognize individual epitopes
  • Cross-reactivity:
    • Ability to bind to more than one epitope
    • Shared epitopes between different antigens

12 of 48

Epitope

13 of 48

Useful characteristics of antibodies 2

  • Strength of binding:
    • Affinity: Strength of binding between Fab and epitope
    • Avidity: Overall strength of binding of serum and antigen

14 of 48

15 of 48

Antigen-Antibody reactions

16 of 48

Antibody specificity

Good: recognize and identify related antigens

Bad: Confuse one antigen with a related antigen

17 of 48

Antibody types

  • Polyclonal antibodies:
    • Isolated from immune serum
    • Many different idiotypes
    • Recognize many different epitopes
      • Strong avidity
      • Highly sensitive
    • Cross reactive: Less specific
  • Monoclonal antibodies:
    • Single idiotype
    • Single epitope
    • Highly specific
    • Lower avidity

18 of 48

Immunological assays

  • Diagnostic:
    • Assay for antigen
    • Assay for antibody

  • Research:
    • Identify cells
    • Identify cell products
    • Isolate cells or macromolecules
    • Assay cell function

19 of 48

Examples

Diagnostic assays

  • Hemagglutination
  • Hemagglutination inhibition
  • Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA)
  • Radioimmunoassay (RIA)
  • Immunofluorescent assay (IFA)

Research techniques

  • ELISA
  • Immunohistochemistry
  • Flow cytometry
  • Cell sorting
  • ELIspot
  • Immunoblot
  • Immunoprecipitation
  • Mixed lymphocyte response
  • Chromium release assay

20 of 48

� �Antigen and antibody detection�

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

21 of 48

Detection

  • Detection of antigen-antibody complex
  • Antigen-antibody complex requires specific conditions
    • temperature
    • pH
  • Complex may be directly visible or invisible

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

22 of 48

Detection

Directly visible – agglutination

Invisible

  • requires specific probes (enzyme-labelled anti-immunoglobulin, isotope-labelled anti-immunoglobulin, etc.)
  • binds Ag-Ab complex and amplifies signals
  • signals can be measured by naked eyes or specific equipment e.g. ELISA, RIA, IFA

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

23 of 48

Methods for Ag-Ab detection

  • Precipitation
  • Agglutination
  • Hemagglutination and hemagglutination inhibition
  • Viral neutralization test

  • Radio-immunoassays
  • ELISA
  • Immunofluorescence
  • Immunoblotting
  • Immunochromatography

24 of 48

Precipitation

Principle

    • soluble antigen combines with its specific antibody
    • antigen-antibody complex is too large to stay in solution and precipitates

Examples

    • flocculation test
    • immuno-diffusion test
    • counter-immuno-electrophoresis (CIEP)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

25 of 48

Flocculation test �(precipitation reaction)

Principle

    • precipitate, a concentrate of fine particles, is usually visible (macroscopically or microscopically) because the precipitated product is forced to remain suspended

Examples

    • VDRL slide flocculation test
    • RPR card test
    • Kahn’s test for syphilis

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

26 of 48

Flocculation test �(A precipitation reaction)

RPR card test

(1) Non Reactive (2) Weakly Reactive (3,4) Reactive

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

27 of 48

Precipitation: Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • sensitive for antigen detection
  • Limited applications
  • Time taken - 10 minutes

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

28 of 48

Direct agglutination

Principle

  • combination of an insoluble particulate antigen with its soluble antibody
    • forms antigen-antibody complex
    • particles clump/agglutinate
  • used for antigen detection

Examples

    • bacterial agglutination tests for sero-typing and sero-grouping e.g., Vibrio cholerae, Salmonella spp

Positive Negative

Ag-Ab complex

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

29 of 48

Agglutination:�Performance, applications

Advantages

    • sensitive for antibody detection

Limitations

    • Prozone phenomenon:
      • requires the right combination of quantities of antigen and antibody
      • handled through dilution to improve the match

Time taken

    • 10-30 minutes

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

30 of 48

Hemagglutination

Principle

    • many human viruses have the ability to bind to the surface structures on red blood cells from different species thereby causing agglutination

Example

    • influenza virus binds to fowl red blood cells

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

31 of 48

Hemagglutination:�Performance, applications

Advantages

    • highly specific
    • can be used as gold standard

Limitations

    • technically demanding
    • time consuming
    • cannot distinguish IgG from IgM

Time taken

    • 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

32 of 48

Radio-immunoassays

  • Principle
    • Radioactively labelled-antibody (or antigen) competes with the patient’s unlabelled antibody (or antigen) for binding sites on a known amount of antigen (or antibody)
    • Reduction in radioactivity of the antigen-patient antibody complex compared with control test is used to quantify the amount of patient antibody/antibody bound
    • Limited use due to the problems with handling radioisotope
  • Example
    • HBsAg
    • Thyroid function test

Response

Antibody

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

33 of 48

Radio-immunoassays:�Performance, applications

Adantages

    • highly sensitive
    • can be used for detection of small quantities
    • quantification possible

Limitations

    • expensive
    • requires isotopes

Time taken

    • 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

34 of 48

Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA)

Principle

    • use of enzyme-labelled immunoglobulin to �detect antigens or antibodies
    • signals are developed by the action of �hydrolyzing enzyme on chromogenic substrate
    • optical density measured by micro-plate reader

Examples

    • Hepatitis A (Anti-HAV-IgM, anti-HAV IgG)

Labeling technique

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

35 of 48

ELISA

Antibody

Response

Micro-plate reader

96-well micro-plate

Positive result

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

36 of 48

ELISA:�Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • Automated, inexpensive
    • Objective
    • Small quantities required
    • Class specific antibodies measurable
  • Limitations
    • Expensive initial investment
    • Variable sensitivity / specificity of variable tests
    • Cross contamination
  • Time taken - 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

37 of 48

Immuno-fluorescence

  • Principle
    • Use fluorescein isothiocyanate labeled-immunoglobulin to detect antigens or antibodies according to test systems
    • Requires a fluorescent microscope
  • Examples
    • Herpes virus IgM
    • Dengue virus
    • Rabies virus
    • Scrub and murine typhus

Labeling technique

Cell infected with Dengue virus

V. Cholerae

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

38 of 48

Immuno-fluorescence:�Performance, applications

  • Advantages
    • Sensitive and specific
    • Can be used for discrepant analysis
  • Limitations
    • Expensive (Reagents and equipment)
    • Subjective
    • Cross reactivity
    • Non-specific immuno-fluorescence
  • Time taken
    • 1 day

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

39 of 48

Application Implications

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

40 of 48

Interpretation of antigen detection tests

  • In general, detection of the antigen denotes a presence of the pathogen
  • More important in some parasitic and fungal diseases

Antigen test

Interpretation

Positive

  • Current or recent infection

Negative

    • No infection
    • Insufficient number of organisms
    • Sensitivity of testing is low �(Consider test by test)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

41 of 48

Interpretation of a single, acute IgM test

IgM test

Interpretation

Negative

  • No current infection

Positive (Newborn)

  • Congenital infection

Positive (Adult)

  • Primary or current infection

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

42 of 48

Interpretation of a single IgG test

* Collected between onset and convalescence

Test

Interpretation

Negative

  • No exposure or immuno-suppression

Positive (Newborn)

  • Maternal antibodies crossed the placenta

Positive (Adult)

  • Evidence of infection at some un-determined time
  • Infection in some cases (e.g., rabies, legionella, Ehrlichia)
  • May be significant if immuno-suppression (e.g., AIDS)

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

43 of 48

Interpretation of two, acute and convalescent IgG tests *

Test

Interpretation

Negative

  • No current infection
  • Past infection
  • Immuno-suppression

Positive �(4-fold rise or fall in titer)

  • Recent infection

* Convalescent serum collected 2-4 weeks after onset

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

44 of 48

Elements influencing the sensitivity and specificity of a given test kit

  • Test format
    • Precipitation versus IFA, Rapid test versus ELISA
  • Purity of the antigen used
    • Crude versus purified antigen versus synthetic peptides
  • Type of the antibody used
    • Polyclonal versus monoclonal antibodies
  • Interfering substances in the sample
    • Presence of rheumatoid factor in the serum of the patient
  • Similarity in antigenic composition of pathogens
    • Cross reactivity

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

45 of 48

Discussion

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

46 of 48

Summary

  • Precipitation
  • Agglutination
  • Radio-immunoassays
  • ELISA
  • Immunofluorescence

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

47 of 48

Conclusion

Laboratory Training for Field Epidemiologists

48 of 48

Bibliography

  • WHO. (2007). Antigen and antibody detection
  • Eaton K. (2016). Practical immunology