1 of 38

WIU Gifted Networking

2 of 38

3 of 38

Compliance and Best Practices

Compliance

Best Practice

  • State Regulations
  • MUST Provide
  • Not following may result in Corrective Action or Due Process
  • Evidence-Based
  • Ways to best meet the needs of gifted students
  • Not state regulated
  • Not following could lead to being out of compliance

4 of 38

Let’s learn about Carson Huey-You

5 of 38

01

03

02

04

Collaborating with General Education Teachers

Resources

Supporting Underachieving Gifted Students

Questions

6 of 38

Collaborating with General Education Teachers

7 of 38

8 of 38

Specially Designed Instruction

“Implementation of specially designed instruction requirements is the responsibility of both the gifted support staff and regular education teachers (22 Pa. Code §16.32(f)). All teachers must play a role when providing instructional adaptations and modifications for the gifted. Assessed student needs must be the basis for the specially designed instruction, not delivery of a single option or one-size-fits-all programs.”

Gifted Program Guidelines:

Specially Designed Instruction - Adaptations or modifications to the general curriculum, instruction, instructional environments, methods, materials or a specialized curriculum.

9 of 38

Collaboration, Coteaching, and Coaching

10 of 38

Gifted students are gifted all day every day, but often their needs are only addressed for a few hours a week when they attend a gifted enrichment class.

11 of 38

Types of Collaboration

Consultation

  • Shift in services from working with students to directly working with others who support students

Coplanning

  • Collaboratively developing differentiated instruction, may lead to coteaching

Coteaching

  • 2 or more professionals share in the responsibility of teaching

Coaching

  • Ongoing, purposeful collaborative approach to improve teaching and learning through the process of guided reflection

12 of 38

Obstacles

Communicate clear purposes and roles

Elicit administrative support

Build a toolkit

Plan to coplan

Implement differentiation together, not “different” activities

Reflect and continually evaluate the role of collaboration

13 of 38

Research shows that some students already know 40-50% of the material to be presented at grade level, experience no differentiation in the classroom 85% of the time, (Reis, 2007) and that they retain new information and skills better when the pace is quicker and there is less repetition. (Rogers, 2008)

14 of 38

In fact, children with high ability typically learn in one to three repetitions when it takes the average student ten or more repetitions to learn.

High ability students who have already mastered content need supports to continue to be challenged by new learning.

More work DOES NOT mean that an activity is more challenging or differentiated!

15 of 38

Questions, Roles, and Tasks for Coplanning

Coplanning Questions

Before Meeting

During Meeting

After Meeting

What are the lesson goals and objectives?

Classroom teacher shares lesson plan electronically before the meeting.

How might we preassess students? How will this impact grouping?

Plans for preassessment and groupings are discussed and decided on

Classroom teacher prepares preassessment and administers it

What differentiation strategies will we use to advance the content, build the buy-in, and create challenge?

Upon receiving the lesson plan the gifted education teacher considers a variety of materials and differentiation strategies

Both teachers decide which strategies will be used and how lesson materials will be prepared.

The gifted education teacher prepares differentiated materials to be used.

How will we assess student learning?

Both teachers have initial ideas based on lesson plan.

Assessment methods are selected together and will decide who will create assessments/rubrics.

Rubrics are created or modified.

What are the next steps in student learning?

After the lesson, both teachers review assessments and reflect.

Discuss how differentiation might apply in future lessons.

Continue to reflect and implement next steps.

16 of 38

ABCs of Differentiation

  • Accelerate the content and pace
  • Provide advanced resources
  • Introduce advanced vocabulary and concepts
  • Content-expert thinking
  • Build in choices
  • Harness motivation
  • Create task value
    • Identity
    • Interest
    • Future
    • Worth time and effort

A

B

C

Advance the Content

Build Buy-In

Create Challenge

  • Open inquiry
  • Depth/complexity
  • Critical Thinking
  • Creative Thinking
  • High-level thinking
  • Abstract thinking

17 of 38

Six Strategies for Challenging Gifted Learners

Speak to Student Interests

Enable Gifted Students to Work Together

Plan for Tiered Learning

Most Difficult First

Pre-test for Volunteers

Prepare to Take it Up

18 of 38

Depth and Complexity Framework

What is Depth and Complexity? The Depth and Complexity framework is a set of tools that allow teachers to differentiate for any grade level or content area in a way that is straightforward to implement and effective. It is composed of eleven elements represented by a set of icons or pictures.

19 of 38

Depth and Complexity Framework

20 of 38

Depth

21 of 38

Complexity

22 of 38

The Three Little Pigs

23 of 38

The Three Little Pigs

24 of 38

How are you collaborating with regular education teachers?

25 of 38

Toolkit Resources

26 of 38

27 of 38

Supporting Underachieving Students

28 of 38

What is underachievement?

Significant discrepancy between actual achievement and expected achievement

29 of 38

Potential causes of the advanced underachiever

Student’s perception that what they are learning does not have meaningful, relevant or useful real-life application.

Fear of being rejected for being different.

The lack of goals or a sense that goals are unattainable.

Fear of getting more of the same work for early completion.

Perfectionism

Work that is too easy or too difficult

The lack of opportunity for students to demonstrate what they know in ways that are compatible with their learning preference.

Lack of opportunity to learn about areas of interest.

Learning environment

30 of 38

31 of 38

GIEP Team

  • One or both of the student’s parents
  • Student (optional)
  • A representative of the district
  • One of more of the student’s current teachers
  • A teacher of the gifted

§ 16.32. GIEP.

(a) The GIEP team, in accordance with the requirements of this chapter shall, based upon the evaluation report, develop an initial GIEP and arrive at a determination of educational placement. Revisions to GIEPs, changes in educational placement, or continuation of educational placement for a student determined to be a gifted student shall be made by the GIEP team based upon a review of the student’s GIEP and instructional activities, present levels of educational performance, as well as on information in the most recent evaluation

32 of 38

Considerations

  • No one wants to be an underachiever.
  • Underachievement tends to be an issue of dignity not curriculum.
  • Every underachiever is good at and passionate about something.

33 of 38

Strategies

  1. Compare where a child is succeeding in school and where they are not.
  2. The underachieving child needs to be acknowledged for attempts, not just successes.
  3. Get away from questioning “who’s at fault” for underachievement and work towards resolving the situation where no one loses.

34 of 38

How have you dealt with underachieving students?

35 of 38

Resources

36 of 38

Resources

Gifted in PA Resources

Upcoming Webinars

Building Capacity to Support Higher Achieving Students - Feb 22 @ 9am

GIEP Goals Clinic - March 7 @ 9am

Statewide Gifted Webinar - March 28 @ 9am

https://giftedinpa.eventbrite.com

37 of 38

Questions?

38 of 38

Thanks!

Amy Davis McShane

Western PA Gifted Liaison

amy.mcshane@aiu3.net

@GiftedPa or @davisamyjo

@giftedinpa

CREDITS: This presentation template was created by Slidesgo, including icons by Flaticon, and infographics & images by Freepik.