1 of 14

ESTIMATING FIRE SEVERITY AND POST-FIRE FOREST RECOVERY USING MULTI-TEMPORAL VEGETATION INDICES DERIVED FROM LANDSAT 8 IMAGERY

Russell Zientek

https://www.uidaho.edu/news/climate-change/wildfire

2 of 14

INCREASING WILDFIRE LEVELS AND LONGER FIRE SEASONS

Source: NIFC

3 of 14

REMOTE SENSING FOR POST-FIRE ASSESSMENT AND MAPPING

https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Low-moderate-and-high-burn-severity-sites-in-California-CA-chaparral-Montana-MT_fig2_228354320

4 of 14

MEASURING RECOVERY

https://www.paysonroundup.com/news/forest_management_wildfires/hot-dry-forests-can-t-recover-from-wildfires/article_9e503660-9c86-5688-a5f8-ff9c66880dcc.html/

https://e360.yale.edu/features/does-a-fire-ravaged-forest-need-human-help-to-recover/

https://news.wisc.edu/drought-alters-recovery-of-rocky-mountain-forests-after-fire/

https://k96fm.com/um-study-suggests-climate-change-limits-forest-recovery-after-wildfires/

5 of 14

VEGETATION INDICES

  •  

Landsat 8 OLI/TIRS C2 L2 Bands

Red = Band 4 - µ0.64-0.67

NIR = Band 5 - µ0.85-0.88

SWIR1 = Band 6 - µ1.57-1.65

SWIR2 = Band 7 - µ2.11-2.29

6 of 14

PROJECT STUDY AREA

Wildfire

Start Date

Fire Size (acres)

Elevation Range (meters)

Elevation Mean (meters)

Vegeation Type

Boulder

8/11/2015

5,012

1550-2000

1750

Rocky Mountain Subalpine Mesic-Wet Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland

Crown

8/17/2015

33,518

1010-2420

1860

Rocky Mountain Subalpine Mesic-Wet Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland

Nothern Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Jay Point

8/17/2015

4,503

1020-2060

1490

Northern Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Nothern Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Snowy Summit & Pete Forks

8/14/2015

14,049

1230-1990

1600

Rocky Mountain Subalpine Mesic-Wet Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland

Northern Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Wash & Slide

8/15/2015

47,053

460-2100

1130

Northern Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Nothern Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

7 of 14

IMAGERY AND DATA

Landsat 8 Satellite Imagery

https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/

Description

Data

Pre-fire Satellite Imagery

LC080410282014090501T1-SC20201121160345

Post-fire Satellite Imagery

LC080410282015092401T1-SC20201121180827

Post-fire + 1YR Satellite Imagery

LC080410282016091001T1-SC20201121160335

Post-fire + 3YR Satellite Imagery

LC080410282018081501T1-SC20201121160344

Post-fire + 5YR Satellite Imagery

LC080410282020080401T1-SC20201121160333

Landfire

https://www.landfire.gov/

Description

Data

2014 Expected Vegetation Type

US_140EVT

2014 Canopy Base Density

US_140CBD

2014 Canopy Base Height

US_140CBH

2014 Mean Fire Return Interval

US_140MFRI

2016 Expected Vegetation Type

US_200EVT

2020 Canopy Base Density

US_200CBD_20

2020 Canopy Base Height

US_200CBH_20

Wildfire Perimeters

https://data-nifc.opendata.arcgis.com

Description

Data

Wildfire Perimeters all years

Interagency_Fire_Perimeter_History_All_Years.shp

Elevation

https://viewer.nationalmap.gov/basic/#/

Description

Data

30 Meter Digital Elevation Models

USGS_NED_13_n46w116_IMG

30 Meter Digital Elevation Models

USGS_NED_13_n47w115_IMG

30 Meter Digital Elevation Models

USGS_NED_13_n47w116_IMG

8 of 14

ARCGIS PRO PROCESSING

9 of 14

BURN SEVERITY MAPS

10 of 14

INDICES BY WILDFIRE

Greenness Indices

Wetness Indices

11 of 14

INDICES BY BURN SEVERITY

12 of 14

INDICES BY BURN SEVERITY

13 of 14

DISCUSSION

2014

Percent

EVT Classname

EVT Subclass

36%

Rocky Mountain Subalpine Mesic-Wet Spruce-Fir Forest and Woodland

Evergreen closed tree canopy

23%

Northern Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Evergreen closed tree canopy

23%

Northern Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Evergreen closed tree canopy

7%

Dry-mesic Montane Douglas-fir Forest

Evergreen open tree canopy

3%

Rocky Mountain Lodgepole Pine Forest

Evergreen closed tree canopy

2016

Percent

EVT Classname

EVT Subclass

27%

Recently Burned-Herb and Grass Cover

Perennial graminoid

21%

Northern Rocky Mountain Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Evergreen closed tree canopy

19%

Recently Burned-Shrub Cover

Mixed evergreen-deciduous shrubland

12%

Northern Rocky Mountain Dry-Mesic Montane Mixed Conifer Forest

Evergreen closed tree canopy

6%

Rocky Mountain Lodgepole Pine Forest

Evergreen closed tree canopy

14 of 14

CONCLUSIONS

Time-series vegetation indices derived from Landsat 8 imagery seem to provide one measure of recovery pertaining to vegetation cover.

Only NBR had longer recovery times and seemed to indicate that it may provide a good measure of forest structure and biomass recovery within the study area.

Field sampling is required to validate the results of the NBR findings.

While it is difficult for remote sensing to determine forest structure and dynamics, using remotely sensed imagery to aid in assessing recovery, especially over large areas, can be a useful tool.