1 of 33

Association Information SessionThursday, July 16, 2026

2 of 33

Meeting Agenda

Time

Description

Presenter

7:00

Introductions

Everyone

7:05

Officer Liaison Reports

Officer Liaison

7:10

Neighborhood Roundup

Heidi Pozzo

7:40

Concurrency and 174th Street Subdivision Decision

Heidi Pozzo

8:10

Resident Open House (time permitting)Share success, concerns, or anything that may interest your neighbors.

Everyone

8:30

Meeting Adjourned

3 of 33

Officer Liaison Reports

4 of 33

Neighborhood Roundup

Heidi Pozzo 

5 of 33

Neighborhood Roundup

Fairgrounds Park expansion — parcel acquisition at the corner of 11th & 164th to add to Fairgrounds Park, and long-term a connection point to Whipple Creek Park.

Mixed-use developments — can be 100% residential once conditions are met, and may use balconies to meet open-space requirements.

North County Transfer Station — likely to be sited around 10th, between 199th and 209th. A Council work session in August will address site selection.

I-5/179th Interchange Open House — WSDOT indicates the open house will likely be in December or January 2027

179th and Concurrency Work Session — Council will hold a work session on August 5

6 of 33

County Roundup

Heritage Farm Wetland Restoration The project restores a wetland at the headwaters of Cougar Creek that was ditched and drained more than a century ago, when such practices were commonplace. The restored wetland features eight “cells” that provide wetland functions and a 35-foot wetland buffer with native plants.

Northeast Hazel Dell Avenue and Burnt Bridge Creek Trail Crossing projectThis project will construct a 10-foot-wide multi-use sidewalk along the west side of Northeast Hazel Dell Avenue between the Burnt Bridge Creek Trail and the Discovery Trail. The project will also add an improved marked pedestrian crossing of Northeast Hazel Dell Avenue. 

Clark County has a higher survival rate than the national average for Cardiac Emergencies due to airway passage improvements. Watch recent EMS 2 meeting around minute 35.

  • Moving fast through a lot of material
  • Transportation and Capital Facilities Plan this week
  • School District & Fire Dept. Capital Facilities Plan and Impact Fee hearing this week with the Planning Commission

7 of 33

Revenue & Expense Gaps

Countywide funding shortfalls now under discussion

County budget — $10–$15 million projected shortfall in 2027; various taxes being evaluated.

Parks — funding below expense, with about 33% of daily tasks going undone; various taxes being evaluated.

Law & Justice — Jail, Sheriff, Public Defense, and Prosecutors funding needs; likely a bond and levy.

C-TRAN — projected funding needs; a combination of fee and sales-tax increases being evaluated.

Senior Exemption Expanding — based on income thresholds up to $94,579 starting in 2027 for various exemptions. Check with tax assessors office, explainer PDF link on home page.

Transportation — $585 million 20 year gap. Various solutions being evaluated as part of Comp Plan

8 of 33

NE 179th Street Corridor — Development Buildout

Approved and pre-application development, Clark County, Washington

APPROVED

PIPELINE (PRE-APP)

TOTAL

Housing units

single-family + apartments

3,304

924

4,228

PM peak-hour trips

vehicles in the evening peak

4,080

602

4,682

Daily trips (ADT)

average vehicle trips per day

42,889

6,348

49,237

Approved housing includes single-family homes and apartment units.

Pipeline trip figures are residential only — commercial/industrial pre-application trips are not documented, so pipeline and total trips are understated.

Source: 179th Development Pipeline workbook; Clark Regional Wastewater District corridor map, March 2026.

9 of 33

NE 179th Street Corridor — Approved & Pipeline Development

Every development drawn to its real acreage, on roads that are still two lanes.

Paste map screenshot here

(delete this box, then Insert → Picture, or paste over it)

Source: 179th Development Pipeline workbook; Clark Regional Wastewater District corridor map, March 2026.

10 of 33

Concurrency and 174th Street Subdivision Decision

Heidi Pozzo 

11 of 33

Concurrency & the 174th Street Subdivision Decision

How the County decides whether the roads can handle new development — and what happened at the 174th Street Subdivision hearing.

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

Presented by Heidi Pozzo

A plain-language overview — no traffic-engineering background needed.

12 of 33

2

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

What we’ll cover

1

What “concurrency” is

The promise that roads keep pace with new growth.

2

How the County measures it

Volume, capacity, and intersections — step by step.

3

The 174th Street Subdivision

100 new homes — and the issues raised at the hearing.

4

How the examiner ruled

The decision, and what it means for us.

13 of 33

3

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

What is “concurrency”?

New development must not outrun the public roads that serve it.

THE PURPOSE, IN STATE LAW

“The purpose of concurrency is to assure that those public facilities and services necessary to support development are adequate to serve that development at the time it is available for occupancy and use, without decreasing service levels below locally established minimum standards.”

— WAC 365-196-840(1)(a)

If the roads can’t keep up: the development is to be denied — or delayed until they can.

The timing rule: needed road improvements must be funded and scheduled for completion within six years of approval.

14 of 33

4

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

Two ways the County measures it

1

How FULL is the road?

Looks at a stretch of road (a “corridor”): how much of its capacity is being used. The limit is 90% full.

2

How LONG do you wait?

Looks at the intersections at each end of the corridor: how long drivers sit in delay.

15 of 33

5

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

Measuring stick #1: How full is the road?

The County measures how full a road is — from empty to completely full.

0% — empty

100% — completely full

LIMIT: 90% full

The limit is 90% full — past 90%, the segment is over the limit.

VOLUME

÷

CAPACITY

=

HOW FULL (%)

traffic on the road

what the road can carry

over 90% = over the limit

16 of 33

6

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

The top of the fraction: VOLUME

Volume is everything that will use the road, added up:

Traffic the new homes add (from the developer’s traffic study)

+

Traffic from developments already approved but not yet built

+

2% per year growth (the County’s set rate)

+

Any other volume not already counted

= VOLUME

The County measures to a 3-year build-out (the year 2028 in this case).

!

Where the decision let volume be UNDERSTATED�

Several nearby developments already approved (or in process) were left out of the study — and together they are enough to tip the corridor from PASS to FAIL.

17 of 33

7

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

The bottom of the fraction: CAPACITY

Capacity numbers come from the code (by road type). Which one you may count depends on three cases:

BUILT

The improvement is already built — count the code capacity for that road.

ON THE COUNTY’S 6-YEAR TIP

Not built, but funded & scheduled within six years on the County’s TIP — its capacity may be counted.

NOT ON THE 6-YEAR TIP

Don’t count it — use the existing road’s code capacity.

Where the decision let capacity be OVERSTATED:

!

NE 179th St (29th–50th): counted at full four-lane capacity — but the widening isn’t planned until after 2030 and isn’t on the County’s 6-Year TIP.

!

I-5 / NE 179th interchange: counted as capacity — but it’s a State (WSDOT) project and is not on the County’s 6-Year TIP that the code and manual require.

18 of 33

8

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

Measuring stick #2: How long do you wait?

Each intersection gets a grade from A to F, based on how long drivers wait:

A

under 10 sec

B

10–20 sec

C

20–35 sec

D

35–55 sec

E

55–80 sec

F

over 80 sec

less delay

more delay, growing lines of traffic

The letters describe how much delay drivers feel. That is the scale.

The concurrency measure is separate: a signalized intersection doesn’t “fail” until 4 minutes (240 seconds) — two full signal cycles — of delay.

19 of 33

9

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

Unsignalized intersections: where the failure sits

No traffic signal — all-way stops and roundabouts. Judged by a different rule than signals.

The standard: LOS E or better — or LOS D or better if a signal is warranted.

NE 179th / NE 50th (all-way stop) — LOS F

NE 159th / NE 72nd — LOS F

!

The mitigation doesn’t reach the standard. The volunteered fix at NE 179th / NE 50th cuts delay from 78 to 61 seconds — still LOS F. Not E. Not D. It was allowed only because it doesn’t make things worse, not because it meets the standard.

Roundabouts here were judged on the whole-intersection average.

20 of 33

10

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

So what should happen when a road is full?

Road is OVER the 90% limit

STOP

New development is denied — or delayed until the road is fixed.

This is the “stop-when-the-roads-are-full” mechanism many of us assumed was already in place.

21 of 33

11

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

What should happen if an intersection fails?

F

Intersection falls below its grade (worse than LOS E — or LOS D if a signal is warranted)

It must be brought back UP to the standard — or the development can’t be approved.

The fix has to restore the level of service — not just keep the delay from getting worse.

22 of 33

12

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

A real test: the 174th Street Subdivision

100 new homes: on about 25 acres near NE 174th Street & NE 40th Avenue

Hearing Examiner: Joe Turner

Key dates: Hearing April 23, 2026 • Decision July 9, 2026

The developer’s own traffic study is what raised the concurrency question.

23 of 33

13

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

What the developer’s study showed

Several nearby corridors are projected OVER the 90%-full limit in the build-out year:

NE 179th Street, near I-5

NE 10th Avenue

NE 15th Avenue

≈133%

of capacity on the worst segment (NE 10th Avenue)

— about a third more traffic than the road can carry.

So: if the roads are already over the limit, how can 100 more homes be approved?

24 of 33

14

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

The central question at the hearing

If a corridor is already over the 90% limit, how can more homes be approved? Two views:

Neighbors

90% is a hard limit. When the road measure is over the limit, the development should be denied.

County staff

Look at the intersections at each end of the corridor. If drivers are still moving through them, the corridor is working — so the over-limit measure alone shouldn’t block approval.

VS

The developer’s study reported the failing ratios; it was County staff that set them aside — the applicant took no position on the measures.

25 of 33

15

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

What the County’s own manual says

Clark County’s Concurrency Administrative Manual (2011):

Roads must be in place or funded before a development is approved.

If capacity isn’t adequate: the development is denied — or the developer adds capacity. Only two options.

The corridor test and the intersection test are separate — one does not cancel the other.

Capacity credit for a future fix applies to a County project funded & scheduled within six years.

!

Nowhere does the manual allow intersection performance to excuse a failing corridor. No memo, letter, or adopted document establishes that practice — it rests only on Staff’s statement that they have done it under the Public Works Director’s direction.

26 of 33

16

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

The ruling vs. the code

The examiner approved all 100 lots. How the ruling compares with the code:

What the code requires

What the ruling allowed

Corridor over 90% full

Deny the development, or add capacity.

Intersection performance (F(9)) can excuse the failing corridor.

The F(9) provision

Adjusts the volume counted; can’t waive the 0.9 limit.

Used to override the 0.9 limit — the argument wasn’t addressed.

A failing intersection

Must be restored to LOS E (or D if a signal is warranted).

May stay failing — only can’t be made worse.

Road capacity

Set by the code, by road type.

Staff may set it on judgment — no calculations shown.

Crediting a future road fix

Only if it’s on the County’s 6-year TIP.

WSDOT interchange counted — not on the County’s TIP.

27 of 33

17

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

The net effect

Taken together, the ruling leaves no real limit on what can be approved.

Staff can say the road has more capacity.

A failing intersection doesn’t have to be restored — it just can’t be made worse.

Staff can set aside the corridor limit as long as a signalized intersection stays under 4 minutes (2 cycles).

28 of 33

18

Four Creeks Neighborhood Association

Why this matters for Four Creeks

!

More approvals on full roads

Homes can be approved on corridors already measured over the 90% limit.

!

The “stop” didn’t stop this one

As interpreted here, the mechanism many assumed would pause development did not.

!

It can repeat

The same reasoning can apply to other projects along NE 179th and nearby corridors.

29 of 33

Early Version Failing Corridors Map Created by PLS

With 72nd and 78th at I-5 Interchange Shown as above .9

30 of 33

Submitted Version Failing Corridors Map Created by PLS

72nd not shown as failing and 78th relocated to Hazel Dell Ave

31 of 33

Questions & Discussion

Presented by Heidi Pozzo

32 of 33

Resident Open House

Time Permitting

33 of 33

Meeting Adjourned!