Economic Policy �and Communication�ECON5521
15 September 2025 (week 8), 2:00pm, G42 beside Café
1
Summary
2
1. Writing: Start early, revise often. Plain and simple style. Critical input from independent reader. Be fussy. Emphasise original ideas.
2. Slides: Plain and simple (again). Refine/simplify tables and graphs. Be fussy (again).
3. Oral presentation: Practice. Nerves. Clear and confident tone. Don’t read. Get timing right.
Overlap among the 3 areas.
Contents
0. Introduction
3
0. Introduction
4
�Why presenting is important�
5
0. Introduction
What’s the link?
6
0. Introduction
Getting started
7
0. Introduction
New ideas
8
0. Introduction
1. Writing
9
Proper presentation not�perfunctory packaging
10
1. Writing
Style in writing
McCloskey (1987):
“The influence of style is greater than you think…
The premise that you can split content from expression is wrong. They are yoke and white in a scrambled egg. Economically speaking, the production function for thinking cannot be written as the sum of two subfunctions, one ‘producing results’ and the other ‘writing them up’. The function is not separable.
You do not learn the details of an argument until writing it in detail, and in writing the details you uncover flaws in the fundamental.”
11
1. Writing
Simple but sophisticated
12
1. Writing
�Writing a paper�
High-level matters
Nuts and bolts
13
1. Writing
Effective writing in 5 steps
For effective writing use:
(i) A short, snappy title
(ii) Concrete language
(iii) Plain English
(iv) Short sentences, with at most one idea per sentence
(v) Active voice, preferably present tense, and declarative statements
Economist house style: “simplify and then exaggerate”
Not rules, simply guidelines
14
2. Slides
15
�Slides: Design�
16
Dark typeface on white background
2. Slides
�(Poor) elaborate layout I�
17
THE “AUDIENCE PROBLEM”: LISTENING AND ABSORBING SLIDES TOGETHER
COLOURS ARE IMPORTANT
WHITE TYPEFACE ON DARK BACKGROUND
LARGE FONT SIZE, AVOID UPPERCASE
AVOID DISTRACTIONS WITH ELABORATE LAYOUTS. PLAIN AND SIMPLE MOST EFFECTIVE
2. Slides
�(Poor) elaborate layout II�
18
THE “AUDIENCE PROBLEM”: LISTENING AND ABSORBING SLIDES TOGETHER
COLOURS ARE IMPORTANT
WHITE TYPEFACE ON DARK BACKGROUND
LARGE FONT SIZE, AVOID UPPERCASE
AVOID DISTRACTIONS WITH ELABORATE LAYOUTS. PLAIN AND SIMPLE MOST EFFECTIVE
2. Slides
Slides: Content
19
2. Slides
Bad graphs
20
Cluttered; legion problems; horizontal axis; vertical axis; colours
2. Slides
Bad graphs
21
Cluttered; legion problems; horizontal axis; vertical axis; colours
2. Slides
Good graphs
22
2. Slides
Good graphs
23
2. Slides
Evocative pic
24
Source: Economist 24 July 2023 202 Economist 20 July 2023
2. Slides
More effective pics from Economist��
25
2. Slides
Still more pics…�
Or
26
2. Slides
�Audience participation time
27
3. Fisher
3. Interlude
Digression, �Irving Fisher, 1867 -1947
28
3. Fisher
Fisher on money-prices link
29
3. Fisher
Fisher the inventor
Roller deck
Visible card-index system
30
3. Fisher
Visible card-index system
31
3. Fisher
Fortune made and lost
32
3. Fisher
Fisher’s reputation now recovered
33
End of interlude
3. Fisher
4. Tables and graphs
34
Tables
35
4. T & G
Model supervisors
36
Model of Supervision | Description | Recommended? |
Hands off | You produce ideas, content and a final draft thesis for my appraisal | |
The reverse | You produce this table IMMEDIATELY!, come back to me and I’ll issue instructions about the next | Only for those with limited ideas of their own |
Jig-saw puzzle | You work on one (smallish) piece of the puzzle, other stds work on other parts. I’m the only one with any idea of the overall picture | Only for those who don’t wish to know the answer |
The lazy supervisor | You work with little or no guidance and you face the music later when examination comes. I avoid the fallout and take whatever credit there is | Only for those who don’t want a PhD |
The reverse – the hyperactive supervisor. (Tends to be the younger academic, having recently completed their own PhD) | Because I suffered when doing my PhD, you must suffer too (and possibly more so) | Only for those who wish to take 10 years to complete |
The forbidden slide!
4. T & G
Model supervisors
37
Model of Supervision | Description | Recommended? |
Hands off | you produce ideas, content and a final draft thesis for my appraisal | |
The reverse | you produce this table IMMEDIATELY, come back to me and I’ll issue instructions about the next | Only for those with limited ideas of their own |
Jig-saw puzzle | you work on one (smallish) piece of the puzzle, other stds work on other parts. I’m the only one with any idea of the overall picture | Only for those who don’t wish to know the answer |
The lazy supervisor | you work with little or no guidance and you face the music later when examination comes. I avoid the fallout and take whatever credit there is | Only for those who don’t want a PhD |
The reverse – the hyperactive supervisor. (Tends to be the younger academic, having recently completed their own PhD) | Because I suffered when doing my PhD, you must suffer too (and possibly more so) | Only for those who wish to take 10 years to complete |
Model of Supervision | Description | |
Hands off | You produce ideas, content and a final draft thesis for my appraisal | |
Model of Supervision | Description | Recommended? |
Hands off | You produce ideas, content and a final draft thesis for my appraisal | |
Model of Supervision | Description | |
The reverse | You produce this table IMMEDIATELY, come back to me and I’ll issue instructions about the next | |
Model of Supervision | Description | Recommended? |
The reverse | You produce this table IMMEDIATELY, come back to me and I’ll issue instructions about the next | Only for those with limited ideas of their own |
Model of Supervision | Description | |
Jig-saw puzzle | You work on one (smallish) piece of the puzzle, other stds work on other parts. I’m the only one with any idea of the overall picture | |
Model of Supervision | Description | Recommended? |
Jig-saw puzzle | You work on one (smallish) piece of the puzzle, other stds work on other parts. I’m the only one with any idea of the overall picture | Only for those who don’t wish to know the answer |
Model of Supervision | Description | |
The lazy supervisor | you work with little or no guidance and you face the music later when examination comes. I avoid the fallout and take whatever credit there is | |
Model of Supervision | Description | Recommended? |
The lazy supervisor | You work with little or no guidance and you face the music later when examination comes. I avoid the fallout and take whatever credit there is | Only for those who don’t want a PhD |
Model of Supervision | Description | |
The reverse – the hyperactive supervisor. (Tends to be the younger academic, having recently completed their own PhD) | Because I suffered when doing my PhD, you must suffer too (and possibly more so) | |
Model of Supervision | Description | Recommended? |
The reverse – the hyperactive supervisor. (Tends to be the younger academic, having recently completed their own PhD) | Because I suffered when doing my PhD, you must suffer too (and possibly more so) | Only for those who wish to take 10 years to complete |
4. T & G
38
Forbidden table!
Needs retailing
4. T & G
Simplify graphs
39
4. T & G
40
Investment, I
A
B
Saving, S
i
r
Social opportunity cost of capital
Source: Harberger (1972)
4. T & G
41
Investment, I
A
B
Saving, S
i
r
Social opportunity cost of capital
Source: Harberger (1972)
4. T & G
5. Oral presentations
42
�Oral presentation in three phases�
Three phases:
43
5. Oral
�Phase I: Before oral presentation�
44
5. Oral
�Phase I: Before oral presentation�
45
5. Oral
46
5. Oral
�Phase I: Before oral presentation�
47
5. Oral
�Phase II: During oral presentation�
(i) loudly
(ii) confidently
(iii) clearly
48
5. Oral
�Phase III: After oral presentation�
Above all, practice
49
5. Oral
Three don’ts
****
Have I contravened any of these?
50
5. Oral
6. Final ideas
51
More on getting started
52
6. Wrap up
Finally
****
53
6. Wrap up
References
Blaug, M., and P. Lloyd, eds (2010). Famous Figures and Diagrams in Economics. Cheltenham, UK; Northhampton, MA, US: Edward Elgar.
Clements, K. W. (2017). “Notes on the Quantity Theory of Money.” Lecture notes.
Clements, K. W.. (2025). “Notes for PhDs in Economics and Finance on Getting a Job.” Australian Economic Review 58: 41-47.
Cochrane, J. H. (no date). “Writing Tips for PhD Students.” Graduate School of Business, University of Chicago http://gsbwww.uchicago.edu/fac/john.cochrane/research/Papers/
Dixit, A. (1994). “My System of Work (Not!).” American Economist 38: 10-16.
Economist (2023). “In Favour of Simple Writing.” 28 September.
Fisher, I. (1922). The Purchasing Power of Money: Its Determination and Relation to Credit, Interest and Crises. New and revised edition. New York: Macmillan. First ed 1911. http://files.libertyfund.org/files/1165/0133_Bk_Sm.pdf
Harberger, A. C. (1972). “On Measuring the Social Opportunity Cost of Public Funds.” In A. C. Harberger Project Evaluation. London: Macmillan. Pp. 94-122.
McCloskey, D. N. (1987). The Writing of Economics. New York: Macmillan, London: Collier Macmillan. Earlier version available as “Economical Writing.” Economic Inquiry 23 (1985): 187-222.
Schwabish, J. A. (2014). “An Economist’s Guide to Visualizing Data.” Journal of Economic Perspectives 28: 209-34.
Turabian, K. L. (2013). A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses and Dissertations: Chicago Style or Students and Techers. 8th ed revised by W. C. Booth, G. G. Colomb, J. M. Williams and the University of Chicago editorial staff. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Weisbach, M. S. (2021). The Economist’s Craft: An Introduction to Research, Publishing, and Professional Development. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Writing Studio (no date). “Writing in Economics.” Thompson Writing Program, Duke University. https://twp.duke.edu/sites/twp.duke.edu/files/file-attachments/econ.original.pdf
Zellner, A. (2002). “Keep it Sophisticatedly Simple.” In A. Zellner, H. A. Keuzenkamp and M. McAleer, eds, Simplicity, Inference and Modelling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chpt. 14, pp. 242-62.
54
7. References
This is optional reading
8. Additional material
55
Good graphs from the Economist
56
Source: Economist 19/6/2019, 2/7/2019, 1/8/2019,22/10/2019
8. Additional
Another good one
57
There’s no such thing as a free lunch
8. Additional
More bad graphs
58
8. Additional
What’s this mean?
59
8. Additional
Fisher’s money-and-prices diagram
60
8. Additional
Price index averages prices
61
8. Additional
Monetary expansion raises prices
What if money supply increases and velocity remains unchanged? To keep the balance balanced, this increase in the weight of the left-hand side needs to be matched by a corresponding increase of the right. There are three possibilities: (i) The weight of the basket must increase with its distance from the fulcrum unchanged. This corresponds to an increase in the volume of transactions (a rise in real economic activity) with prices unchanged. (ii) The weight of the basket is constant, but it moves further to the right, away from the fulcrum. Here, the price level increases with transactions constant. (iii) Any linear combination of cases (i) and (ii).
For more on the quantity theory, see Clements (2017).
62
8. Additional