1 of 45

Behaviour change to accelerate Net Zero transitions at �Monash University

Report on the Monash Net Zero Behaviour Prioritisation Project

Dr Alexander Saeri & Emily Grundy

1

2 of 45

What's the challenge?

  • Monash University has committed to Net Zero by 2030
  • In order to reach this goal, Monash must adopt new technologies and behaviours
  • 100% renewable energy and rebuilding Monash infrastructure will get us part of the way
  • Staff and student behaviour change is also needed to achieve net zero
  • There are many behaviours, so we need to prioritise the most important

Phase 1: Behaviour identification

Partners

  • Monash Sustainable Development Institute (MSDI)
  • Monash Net Zero Initiative
  • ENGIE Lab Crigen (Paris) & ENGIE Lab Singapore
  • Monash University Buildings & Property Division
  • ClimateWorks Centre

Phase 2: Behaviour prioritisation

Monash Net Zero Behaviour Prioritisation

Findings & Recommendations

What behaviours are relevant to accelerating net zero transitions on campus?

Systematic evidence review of university net zero literature

Methods

Outputs

Research question

High impact & easy behaviours incl. switching to remote work and habitual energy saving

Support facilities & operations staff to implement high impact installation / retrofit behaviours

Engage with climate and social trade-offs for remote vs. in-person attendance

Connect easier, lower impact behaviours to one-off & habitual higher impact ones

Assess Net Zero Initiative activities to maximise fit with high priority behaviours

Which behaviours should be targeted first to accelerate net zero transitions at Monash?

Survey of Monash staff & students, and net zero experts

Methods

Outputs

Research question

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

3 of 45

How to navigate this report

3

Executive summary

1 page overview of the project and its findings

Light blue pages

Key information about the project and a summary of activities

Whole document

'Deep dive' into the project methods and findings

Explore all project outputs in this Google Drive folder

4 of 45

Report contents

Executive summary………………………….3

Net Zero Behaviour Prioritisation project.....5

Behaviour identification……………….…….12

Behaviour prioritisation……………….…….21

Discussion……………………………….…..39

Authors

Alexander K Saeri, Emily A C Grundy

alexander.saeri@monash.edu

BehaviourWorks Australia�Monash Sustainable Development Institute�Monash University

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the project advisory team: Darren Sharp & Rob Raven at Monash Sustainable Development Institute, Monash University; Mures Zarea & Jonas Pigeon at ENGIE Lab Crigen, and Xiaoyang Peng at ENGIE Lab Singapore. The authors also thank Monash staff and students and ENGIE staff participants for contributing their experiences and expertise with net zero behaviours.

Declarations of Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts to declare.

Research Ethics

The research contained in this report has the approval of Monash University Human Research Ethics Committee (ID: 34506)

Citation

Saeri, A.K., Grundy, E.A.C. (2022). Behaviour change to accelerate Net Zero transitions at Monash. BehaviourWorks Australia, Monash University. 

Funding Declaration

This project was funded by the Monash-ENGIE Alliance Net Zero Solutions Fund.

4

5 of 45

The Net Zero Behaviour Prioritisation Project

5

6 of 45

Project Context

Monash Net Zero Initiative

Whole-of-University commitment to reach net zero carbon emissions (Scope 1, 2) by 2030

Net Zero Solutions Fund

Research, education and translation activities to address technology, economic, policy, and social barriers to achieving net zero emissions

Monash-ENGIE Alliance

Decarbonise Monash University by 2030 and support applied research to accelerate net zero transitions in precincts, urban districts, and cities

6

7 of 45

Pillars for Decarbonisation at Monash University

Energy efficiency measures

Fulfilling the goal of net zero emissions for Monash's built environment by 2030

Campus electrification

Renewable energy

Addressing residual emissions through offsetting

A sustainable microgrid

7

8 of 45

Why did we conduct the Net Zero Behaviour project?

8

Monash has committed to achieving Net Zero carbon emissions by 2030

100% renewable energy and rebuilding Monash infrastructure will get us part of the way

Staff and student behaviour change is also needed to achieve this goal

BUT we don’t know what behaviours are needed OR what works to increase those behaviours

There are many behaviours, so we need to identify & prioritise the most important

To do this, we conducted a systematic literature review and prioritisation process

9 of 45

What is the value of this project?

Behaviour identification and prioritisation can help decide which behaviours should be targeted to reach net zero faster

9

10 of 45

Whose behaviour were we looking at?

Included in our project

There is a trade-off between decision-making power and group size

We tried to identify behaviours for all groups large enough for behaviour change interventions to work

We distinguish between "staff" and "facilities, operations and administrative staff"

We consider "staff" and "students" to have a very similar behaviour set when it comes to net zero

n~10, 'set a net zero goal for the university'

n~100, 'appoint a net zero champion in your business unit'

n~1000, 'commute using public transport'

n~10000, 'buy plant-based food on campus'

10

11 of 45

Project Methods

Identify behaviours

1. Create a long list of possible net zero behaviours through rigorous evidence review

Survey experts

2. To get estimates of the carbon emissions reduction potential of different behaviours (‘Impact’)

Survey staff and students

3. To understand current adoption of different behaviours (‘Adoption’) and perceptions of effort (‘Likelihood’)

Analyse data

4. Visualise findings using a decision-support tool: Impact-Likelihood matrix

11

12 of 45

Identifying net zero behaviours

12

13 of 45

SUMMARY: Identifying net zero behaviours

Results

  • Papers and reports: 25 (list)�
  • Staff / student behaviours: 27�
  • FAO staff behaviours: 45

Methods

  • Evidence review of academic and grey literature (protocol)�
  • Extracted staff, student, and FAO staff behaviours relevant to net zero�
  • Removed duplicate behaviours

Recommendations

  • Use behaviour list to brainstorm net zero interventions�
  • Incorporate behaviour list when measuring progress towards net zero�
  • Consult included reports as resources for interventions�
  • Consider 'deep dive' into full list of ~240 behaviours identified

Research question: What behaviours are relevant to accelerating net zero transitions on campus?

13

14 of 45

SUMMARY: Identified Net Zero behaviours

Staff & students (27)

Facilities, Administration & Operations staff (45)

14

Share energy-intensive equipment

Use digital documents not paper

Use campus shared space

Public transport commute

Remotely attend interstate/international events

Buy carbon offsets for air travel

Restrict HVAC to work hours

Test equipment to reduce energy use

Modify equipment to reduce energy use

Maintain vehicle fleets for fuel efficiency

Program for public transport commute

Buy carbon offsets for air travel (for others)

Assess refit / construction plans for energy efficiency

Buy energy-efficient appliances / equipment

Assess refit / construction plans for energy efficiency

Retrofit buildings to insulate HVAC

Install energy management system

Install sensors and display feedback on energy use

Give remote control to microgrid operator

Key

Energy use

Mobility

Retrofit and replacement

Sensors and automation

+ 21 more

+ 33 more

15 of 45

Why identify behaviours relevant to net zero on campus?

Reaching net zero / zero carbon on campus and in urban precincts & cities requires behaviour change (adoption, curtailment, innovation, …)

Most existing scholarly research focuses on household behaviours, only some of which are relevant to workplaces / university campuses

Some guides exist with ideas for behaviour change interventions on campus (e.g., the Little Book of Green Nudges)

Here we aim to create a comprehensive long list of behaviours that can be used to assess existing initiatives and help measure progress towards net zero.

15

16 of 45

Evidence review to identify net zero behaviours

SCOPUS database for systematic reviews of net zero and emissions reduction behaviours

Internal and public reports on net zero (e.g., ClimateWorks, ENGIE reports, Net Zero Initiative reports)

Many websites and databases (e.g., European Environment Agency, OECD, Green University Networks, International Sustainable Campus Network, C40 Cities)

Scholarly research

International reports & strategies

Monash relevant reports

Method & Evidence sources

16

We conducted a systematic search and review of scholarly research, international reports & strategies, and Monash-relevant reports.

17 of 45

PRISMA diagram

17

Records identified through grey literature searching

(n = 32)

Records identified through database searching

(n = 555)

Records after duplicates removed �(n = 674)

Records screened using Title & Abstract (n = 674)

Full-text articles assessed for eligibility (n = 62)

Papers & reports included (N = 25)

IDENTIFICATION

SCREENING

ELIGIBILITY

INCLUDED

Records excluded (n = 612)

Full-text articles excluded (n = 37):

11 Not right outcomes

1 Not in English

16 Not right study design

1 Not right setting

1 Not right population

3 Full text not available

4 Other

Records identified through Elicit

(n = 87)

Records identified through internal reports

(n = 9)

18 of 45

Results: list of included reports and papers

18

Scholarly papers

Peer reviewed scholarly reviews

Agent-Based Modelling of Urban District Energy System Decarbonisation—A Systematic Literature Review (Akhatova et al, 2022)

Organisational travel plans for improving health (Review) (Hosking et al, 2010)

Multilevel barrier and driver analysis to improve sustainability implementation strategies: Towards sustainable operations in institutions of higher education (Hueske & Guenther, 2020)

Carbon footprint in Higher Education Institutions: a literature review and prospects for future research (Valls-Val & Bovea, 2021)

International reports and strategies

A Behavioural Lens on Transportation Systems: The Psychology of Commuter Behaviour and Transportation Choices (Kim Ly, Saurabh Sati, and Erica Singer, 2017)

Five impactful actions cities can take to reduce building energy demand (C40 Cities, 2019)

How to drive electric vehicle uptake in your city (C40 Cities, 2021)

How to drive a modal shift from private vehicles to public transport, walking and cycling (C40 Cities, 2021)

The Playbook for Zero Emissions Mobility: Latin America and the Caribbean (C40 Cities, 2021)

How to achieve a walking and cycling transformation in your city (C40 Cities, 2021)

2013 WEF-ISCN Report: Signature Projects (International Sustainable Campus Network, 2013)

2014 WEF-ISCN Report: Best Practice in Campus Sustainability (International Sustainable Campus Network, 2014)

2015 WEF-ISCN Report: Developing Skills for Future Leaders (International Sustainable Campus Network, 2015)

2016 WEF-ISCN Report: Demonstrating Sustainable Development in Higher Education (International Sustainable Campus Network, 2016)

2017 WEF-ISCN Report: Educating for Sustainability (International Sustainable Campus Network, 2017)

2018 WEF-ISCN Report: Educating with Purpose (International Sustainable Campus Network, 2018)

Cities, Climate Change and Multilevel Governance (Corfee-Morlot et al., 2009)

Greening Universities toolkit (Osmond et al, 2013)

Greening Universities toolkit V2.0 (Dave et al, 2014)

The Little Book of Green Nudges (United Nations Environment Programme & GRIDArendal, 2020)

Monash-relevant reports

Behaviour in Microgrids: Stakeholder Dialogue Summary and Impact-Likelihood Matrix (Klemm, Tull, & Smith (BehaviourWorks Australia), 2021)

Identifying and targeting human behaviour in Microgrids. Literature and Practice Review (Klemm, Tull, & Smith (BehaviourWorks Australia), 2020)

Decarbonisation Futures: Solutions, actions and benchmarks for a net zero emissions Australia (Climateworks Centre, 2020)

Monash Net Zero Initiative (Monash University, 2020)

Net Zero Transport Strategy: Roadmap of Initiatives (Monash University, 2021)

19 of 45

19

Domain

Staff & Student behaviours

energy

Enable energy-saving features on computers and other equipment instead of the default settings

energy

Keep building windows closed while air conditioning / heating is on

energy

Purchase energy-efficient appliances and equipment when replacing old ones

energy

Rearrange work areas to maximise thermal comfort (e.g., avoid direct sunlight in summer)

energy

Set the temperature of air-conditioning in buildings and rooms to be energy-efficient (e.g., 18C in winter, 25C in summer) instead of the default settings

energy

Share energy-intensive equipment instead of purchasing your own

energy

Shift the time of day that energy intensive equipment and services are used (e.g., lab equipment, refrigeration, HVAC), to match renewable generation periods or off-peak periods

energy

Switch off computers and other equipment after use instead of leaving them switched on

energy

Switch off lights in empty rooms instead of leaving them on

energy

Turn off electrical appliances when not in use

energy

Use digital documents instead of printed documents

energy

Use laptop computer instead of desktop computer

energy

Use weather forecast to plan an energy-efficient day (e.g., clothes, travel mode)

energy

When on campus, work or study in large shared spaces (e.g., library) instead of small private spaces (e.g., office)

mobility

Compress work or study into fewer days to reduce travel to / from campus

mobility

Purchase carbon emissions offsets when booking air travel

mobility

Remotely attend interstate or international events instead of air travel

mobility

Remotely attend university activities instead of travelling to / from campus

mobility

Travel around campus using active transport (e.g., walking, cycling) instead of private vehicle

mobility

Travel around campus using an e-bike instead of private vehicle

mobility

Travel between building floors using stairs instead of elevators

mobility

Travel to / from campus using active transport (e.g., walking, cycling) instead of private vehicle

mobility

Travel to / from campus using carpooling instead of private vehicle

mobility

Travel to / from campus using public transport instead of private vehicle

mobility

Travel to / from regional events using bus or rail instead of air travel

other

Purchase plant-based food on campus instead of animal-based food

other

Sort recyclables and food waste on campus instead of putting it in general rubbish

Domain

Facilities, Administration & Operations behaviours

energy

Appoint a person to be responsible for getting to net zero within the work team / business unit

energy

Create guidelines for building occupants about what devices can be used and when

energy

Create or manage a program to REDUCE energy use by providing feedback to staff / students

energy

Enable energy-saving features on computers and other equipment instead of the default settings

energy

Modify existing equipment to use less energy (e.g., disable heaters in kitchenettes)

energy

Rearrange work areas to maximise natural light and reduce need for artificial lighting

energy

Rearrange work areas to maximise thermal comfort (e.g., avoid direct sunlight in summer)

energy

Require advanced reservation to heat and cool large spaces (e.g., auditoriums and lecture halls)

energy

Restrict heating and cooling operation to ordinary work hours

energy

Restrict lighting operation to ordinary work hours

energy

Set the temperature of air-conditioning in buildings and rooms to be energy-efficient (e.g., 18C in winter, 25C in summer) instead of the default settings

energy

Shift the time of day that energy intensive equipment and services are used (e.g., lab equipment, refrigeration, HVAC), to match renewable generation periods or off-peak periods

energy

Test that equipment is functioning properly to minimise electricity loss

energy

Turn off electrical appliances when not in use

energy

Use digital documents instead of printed documents

mobility

Compress work or study into fewer days to reduce travel to / from campus

mobility

Conduct environmental audits (e.g., assess building / equipment energy usage)

mobility

Conduct regular maintenance to optimise fleet motor vehicle fuel efficiency

mobility

Create or manage a program to INCREASE active transport (e.g., walking, cycling) use when staff / students travel to / from campus

mobility

Create or manage a program to INCREASE electric vehicle use when staff / students travel to / from campus

mobility

Create or manage a program to INCREASE public transport (e.g., bus, train) use when staff / students travel to / from campus

mobility

Create or manage a program to INCREASE staff / students remotely attending interstate or international events instead of air travel

mobility

Create or manage a program to INCREASE staff / students remotely attending university activities instead of travelling to / from campus

mobility

Create or manage a program to REDUCE private vehicle use when staff / students travel to / from campus

mobility

Provide student housing on campus to reduce commuting

mobility

Purchase carbon emissions offsets when booking air travel on behalf of other people

mobility

Purchase electric vehicles for university fleet when replacing old ones

retrofit and replacement

Assess plans for refurbishment and construction to ensure they meet energy efficiency standards

retrofit and replacement

Convert light fittings to LED

retrofit and replacement

Install renewable energy generation

retrofit and replacement

Introduce minimum energy efficiency standards for energy intensive appliances and equipment

retrofit and replacement

Purchase energy-efficient appliances and equipment when replacing old ones

retrofit and replacement

Purchase renewable energy

retrofit and replacement

Replace equipment and heating that uses fossil fuels (e.g., natural gas) with electric equipment and heating

retrofit and replacement

Replace equipment with more efficient equipment

retrofit and replacement

Retrofit buildings to add insulation between HVAC and some internal equipment / rooms

retrofit and replacement

Retrofit buildings to reduce energy loss (e.g., insulation, weather sealing, thermal barriers, shading, paint)

other

Create or manage a program to increase staff / students plant-based food consumption

other

Purchase plant-based food on campus instead of animal-based food

other

Sort recyclables and food waste on campus instead of putting it in general rubbish

sensors and automation

Install an energy management system to automate the use of energy in a building

sensors and automation

Install sensors / meters to provide feedback on the use of energy in a building

sensors and automation

Install sensors and automation for HVAC in building

sensors and automation

Install sensors and automation for lighting in building

sensors and automation

Permit electricity provider (e.g., microgrid operator) to remotely control building equipment

List of all identified behaviours

20 of 45

Outputs & recommendations

List of reports (access here)�

  • Use this list as resources and ideas for activities / interventions

List of behaviours (access here)�

  • Use this list (n = 72) as a starting point to help inspire / brainstorm interventions to accelerate net zero transitions
  • Select relevant behaviours from this list when surveying or measuring progress towards net zero
  • There is also a full list of ~240 behaviours extracted directly from the reports & papers

20

21 of 45

Prioritising net zero behaviours

21

22 of 45

SUMMARY: Prioritising net zero behaviours

Methods

  • We surveyed staff, students, and FAO staff to understand ease and current participation rates (survey materials)�
  • We surveyed net zero experts to inform impact ratings�
  • We also collected information about strategic fit and transformative potential

Criteria

  • We agreed on three criteria that formed the basis of our prioritisation: impact, ease, and participation

Motivation

  • We have a long list of net zero behaviours (from our review)�
  • As resources are limited, we cannot develop initiatives to target all of them�
  • Therefore, we need to prioritise the behaviours to understand which should be targeted first

Research question: Which behaviours should be targeted first to accelerate net zero transitions on campus precincts?

22

23 of 45

SUMMARY: Prioritising net zero behaviours

Results

  • Top behaviours included switching to remote work and habitual energy saving�
  • Many installation / retrofit behaviours were seen as high impact but hard to adopt�
  • Use interactive Impact-Likelihood Matrix to explore findings in more detail

Recommendations

  • Assess existing campus net zero activities against prioritisation results�
  • Plan research activities to investigate / change high impact, neglected behaviours (anonymised data)
  • Replicate and adapt prioritisation process in other settings and at precinct scale

Research question: Which behaviours should be targeted first to accelerate net zero transitions at Monash?

23

24 of 45

Why prioritise behaviours?

Monash needs to apply its resources efficiently in order to reach a goal of net zero by 2030.

Understanding which behaviours are most impactful, and which are easier to change, can help with strategic decision making about starting, stopping, or targeting initiatives / activities to accelerate transitions to net zero.

Measuring current adoption and assessing transformational potential can help enrich this decision-making.

24

25 of 45

How we prioritised behaviours

25

Create long list of behaviours

Determine criteria for prioritisation

Rate each behaviour on each criterion

High priority behaviours

Consultation with Monash & ENGIE

Identified through systematic evidence review

Survey of staff, students, and net zero experts

Visualised with Impact-Likelihood matrix

26 of 45

Prioritisation criteria

26

Criterion

Surveyed

Question as it appeared on survey

Impact

Net zero experts

How much does [the behaviour] DIRECTLY contribute to reducing emissions at Monash university campus precinct?

Ease

Staff & students

How much effort is needed to do [the behaviour] each time you can?

Participation

Staff & students

How many out of 100 other [staff] would do [the behaviour] if they could?

Strategic fit

Net zero experts

Is influencing [the behaviour] consistent with the strategic goals of Monash University?

Transformational potential

Net zero experts

Will influencing [the behaviour] create pressure on the current system to change towards a net zero future?

Note. Strategic fit & transformational potential are not reported here, but available for additional analysis

27 of 45

Prioritisation survey

An online flexible Qualtrics survey

All participants rated at least 15 behaviours

Participants could choose to rate more behaviours if they had time / interest

27

Students and staff

Told us how easy or hard different behaviours are, and current participation rate

Up to 27 behaviours for staff & students

Up to 45 behaviours for FAO staff

Experts

Told us how impactful, strategic, and transformational different behaviours are

Up to 72 behaviours (27+45) in total

28 of 45

Prioritisation survey responses

Students

47 students participated

Most were undergraduate (64%)

Each student behaviour had ~20 ratings of ease & participation (by students)

Experts

38 net zero experts participated from Monash, ClimateWorks, and ENGIE

Nearly all worked directly or indirectly on reducing emissions towards net zero / zero carbon (92%)

Each behaviour had ~6 ratings of impact

Staff (regular & FAO)

47 regular staff and 21 FAO staff participated

Most were full time (77%)

Each regular staff behaviour had ~24 ratings of ease & participation (by regular staff)

Each FAO staff behaviour had ~9 FAO ratings of ease & participation (by FAO staff)

28

29 of 45

A decision-support tool for selecting behaviours

This decision-support tool helps allocate attention and resources to the most important behaviours

It visualises relationships and trade-offs between impact of a behaviour on an issue, and the likelihood of behaviour change

It also shows current participation for each behaviour

Impact-likelihood matrix

29

Kneebone et al (2021). Getting ready to deep dive - defining, identifying and prioritising behaviours. �doi: 10.26180/14515794

Kneebone et al (2017). The Impact-Likelihood Matrix: A policy tool for behaviour prioritisation. �doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.11.013

30 of 45

30

Low

High

Easier and higher impact

Harder and lower impact

Harder and higher impact

Easier and lower impact

EASE OF BEHAVIOUR CHANGE

DIRECT IMPACT

Low

High

Potential target for change, but resource-intensive diagnosis and careful intervention design required

Lowest priority 

Possible target for change to build momentum or leverage other behaviours

First priority for change, may already be a target for interventions

Interpreting an Impact-Likelihood Matrix

ADOPTION

Many

Few

Larger data points (‘bubbles’) represent a larger proportion of the target audience who are already doing the behaviour.

In our visualisations, we have removed behaviours where most people (>80%) say they couldn't have done it in the past 12 months

31 of 45

Monash student behaviours

Top (easiest & highest impact) behaviours:

  1. Remotely attend university activities instead of travelling to / from campus
  2. Turn off electrical appliances when not in use
  3. Use digital documents instead of printed documents

31

Energy

Food & Waste

Mobility

32 of 45

Monash staff behaviours

Top (easiest & highest impact) behaviours:

  • Remotely attend university activities instead of travelling to / from campus
  • Use digital documents instead of printed documents
  • Turn off electrical appliances when not in use

32

Energy

Food & Waste

Mobility

33 of 45

Recommendations: Monash staff & student behaviours

Most mobility behaviours were rated as harder and higher impact

An exception was remote work / study, which was one of the easiest behaviours while still being higher impact. However, Monash has sought has encourage return to in-person attendance, so the trade-offs need to be engaged with

Less than 20% of students could do these even once in the past 12 months:

  • Travel around campus using an e-bike
  • Travel to / from regional events using bus or rail instead of air travel
  • Shift the time of day that energy intensive equipment and services are used (e.g., lab equipment, refrigeration, HVAC), to match renewable generation periods or off-peak periods

Leverage easy habitual behaviours (turning off lights / equipment) to drive shifts in other habits (e.g., shifting time of use of HVAC) and one-off behaviours (e.g., purchasing efficient equipment)

Engage with the climate, health, and social trade-offs for remote vs. in-person attendance

Check-in on why a few behaviours weren't possible for students

Connect easier, lower impact behaviours to one-off & habitual higher impact actions

33

34 of 45

Top (easiest & highest impact) behaviours:

  • Set the temperature of air-conditioning in buildings and rooms to be energy-efficient (e.g., 18C in winter, 25C in summer) instead of the default
  • Use digital documents instead of printed documents
  • Switch off computers and other equipment after use instead of leaving them switched on

Monash FAO staff behaviours (general)

34

Energy

Food & Waste

Mobility

35 of 45

Recommendations: FAO staff behaviours (energy & mobility)

Some higher impact behaviours involved changing equipment settings and schedules (e.g., HVAC & lighting)

Others involved programs to influence staff / student behaviour (e.g., digital documents, carbon offsets)

Changing FAO staff behaviour can have a multiplier effect

Less than 20% of FAO staff said they could do these behaviours in the past 12 months

  • Purchasing fleet EVs or maintaining fleet for fuel efficiency
  • Programs to manage staff & student mobility, including reducing car use, increasing EVs, and supporting remote work / study
  • Equipment programming, including requiring advanced reservations for HVAC of large spaces, shifting when energy intensive equipment gets used to match off-peak / renewables

Investigate similar behaviours across audiences to identify the right target audience

One example is that students and staff find HVAC settings harder to change; but FAO staff find this easy - so target FAO staff

Support FAO staff to implement central policies & adapt programs for their business unit

Explore accuracy of perceptions, because many FAO behaviours were seen as inaccessible

Consider the audience when assessing who needs to change behaviour

35

36 of 45

Monash FAO staff behaviours (infrastructure)

Top (easiest & highest impact) behaviours:

  • Purchase renewable energy
  • Introduce minimum energy efficiency standards for energy intensive appliances and equipment
  • Purchase energy-efficient appliances and equipment when replacing old ones

36

Retrofit and replacement

Sensors and automation

37 of 45

Recommendations: FAO staff behaviours �(automation & retrofits)

Most automation and retrofit behaviours were seen as inaccessible for FAO staff

We did not investigate barriers in this research (e.g., cost, approval to implement structural retrofits) but to scale up and accelerate net zero adoption across campus & precincts, FAO staff could be empowered to implement limited structural changes

Consider whether high impact / low risk retrofits could be 'owned' by FAO staff

Retrofit and replacement behaviours that <20% of FAO staff could do in past 12 months:

  • Assess refit / construction plans for energy efficiency
  • Electrify gas heating / equipment
  • Install renewable energy generation
  • Purchase renewable energy
  • Retrofit buildings to reduce passive energy loss
  • Retrofit buildings to insulate HVAC

Sensors and automation behaviours that <20% of FAO staff could do in past 12 months:

  • Install energy management system
  • Install HVAC sensors / automation
  • Give remote control to microgrid operator

All of the above behaviours were seen as 'higher impact' than the average (median) FAO staff behaviour

37

38 of 45

Explore the data using an interactive Prioritisation Matrix

38

These tabs let you customise the matrix or read more about the project

Choose the behavioural domains you want displayed

Choose the audience you want displayed

You can also display all behaviours, even if most people said they couldn't do them

39 of 45

Discussion

39

40 of 45

Strengths of the project

Our project included facilities, administrative, and operations staff

  • Most research looks only at general staff & students
  • FAO staff are highly influential (e.g., they make decisions on behalf of / that affect others) but are often overlooked

We created multiple outputs with different uses

  • Reports that discuss net zero behaviour
  • Long list of behaviours relevant to accelerating transitions to net zero at campuses and precincts
  • Prioritised behaviours displayed in an interactive impact-likelihood matrix

The survey involved a comprehensive recruitment strategy

  • We developed and used 54 leads / channels to reach staff, students, and net zero experts
  • This included advertising the prioritisation survey through mailing lists, staff meeting presentations, posts on workplace pages, snowballing, and professional connections

What did we do right? What worked out well?

40

41 of 45

Weaknesses of the project

We could have refined the long list of behaviours with audience input

  • Checking the long-list of behaviours with audiences would have made it more relevant
  • This would also have identified any gaps or context-specific information (e.g., "at Monash, students can't do X")

It’s difficult to get data about impact on emissions

  • We had no objective source for impact (e.g., amount of CO₂ emissions avoided) so had to rely on relative and subjective judgements (1 - 10)
  • The judgement task was especially difficult for external experts who were less familiar with the Monash context

We found it hard to get traction / engagement from some groups

  • Higher response rates, especially from experts and FAO staff, would have been ideal
  • Not having a research user who needed the outputs to make a pressing decision may have contributed to low response rates

What didn’t go so well? What would we do differently?

41

42 of 45

What could you be doing differently?

42

Implementers of net zero on campus / precincts

  • Assess existing Monash Net Zero Initiative activities using the prioritisation matrix to identify gaps in activities or to improve strategic use of resources
  • Read relevant reports and papers, or plan new research activities to investigate & change high impact, low participation behaviours
  • Engage with the climate, health, and social trade-offs for remote vs. in-person attendance
  • Devolve decision-making power to FAO staff in each business unit for high impact / low risk structural retrofit, upgrade, or automation changes

Advisors to organisations on �net zero

  • Replicate the prioritisation process with a new organisation using the full list of behaviours
  • Read the relevant reports and papers to improve understanding of existing knowledge and initiatives to accelerate net zero transition in universities and in districts / precincts

Facilities, operations, and administration staff

  • Use the prioritisation matrix and full list of behaviours to assess your business unit's current progress and to brainstorm new ideas for actions that can accelerate net zero
  • Request support or autonomy in decision-making power, especially over high impact / low risk structural retrofit, upgrade, or automation changes for your business unit

Staff and students

  • Explore the prioritisation matrix and try 1-2 high impact actions you aren't doing already
  • Reflect on the impact and ease of other pro-environmental behaviours you do: are they making a real difference?

Net zero & behaviour change researchers

  • Explore the prioritisation matrix to identify the higher impact and easier behaviours, then design and test interventions to change those behaviours
  • Replicate, adapt, and extend the prioritisation process in new contexts using the full list of behaviours and survey materials
  • Conduct additional analyses on the anonymised data to identify new areas for research

43 of 45

THANK YOU

43

44 of 45

Additional slides

44

45 of 45

Questions for discussion

  • Explore the list of behaviours or the impact-likelihood dashboard
  • Reflect on anything surprising, persuasive, what action you might take based on these findings
  • What actions should we take based on these results?
  • Do these results make you think we should start doing something (e.g., a particular initiative)?
  • Do these results make you think we should stop doing something (e.g., a particular initiative)?
  • How could these results be used?
  • How could we make the most of these results?

45