Presented by:
Mrs. Melissa Lane, Assistant Superintendent
Fenton Area Public Schools
Mrs. Deb Chapman, Secondary MTSS/Data Coach
Fenton Senior High School
Intentional MTSS: Connecting Tier 1, Intervention, and Enrichment
Building a coherent secondary system at Fenton Area Public Schools
Mr. Zach Bradley, Assistant Principal
Andrew G. Schmidt Middle School
Mrs. Sarah Foster, Secondary MTSS/Data Coach
Andrew G. Schmidt Middle School
Turn
and
Talk
How does evidence from classroom instruction determine who receives additional support or enrichment in your school?
To Meet the Needs
of All Students
Where They Are.
All Means All.
Tier 1
Evidence
Response
Review
Connecting the System
Identify essential learning, teach, differentiate, and check understanding.
Examine formative assessments, student work, student input, and broader indicators such as grades..
Adjust classroom instruction and match students with reteaching, targeted intervention, additional support, or extension.
Check learning again and decide whether to continue, change, intensify, or conclude the support.
Use what teachers learn to improve classroom instruction.
The Structures
to Support Learning
S. R. T.
What existing times, structures, or spaces within your school day could be leveraged to provide intervention and enrichment opportunities for students?
REFLECT
Using RTI Scheduler to Schedule
Intentional, Targeted, and Flexible Learning
65% or below: 66% or above:
Auto-Enrolled Student Choice/Teacher Enrolled
!
What are the types of SRT sessions staff can create?
Storytelling w/Bill Lepp)
for local hospital patients
How do we know the Support Worked?
SRT Data YTD
| 24-25 | 25-26 (EOY) |
Total Failed Courses YTD | AGS- 178 students, 752 courses FHS- 246 students,1178 courses | AGS- 103 students, 261 courses FHS- 233 students, 732 courses |
Intervention Opportunities Provided | Previous opportunities were after school, during lunch, or one on one as opportunities arose, but not systemic | AGS- 569 Sessions FHS- 436 Sessions |
Enrichment/Extension Opportunities Provided | Previous opportunities were Building wide/grade-level assemblies or activities ~10-15 per building | AGS- 224 Sessions FHS- 528 Sessions |
Amount of times students showed ownership over their SRT Support | AGS- Unknown FHS- Unknown | AGS- 14,562 times FHS- 16,949 times (students self-selected a session that they needed to attend) |
AGS: 75 less student failures, 491 less failed courses
FHS: 13 less student failures, 446 less failed courses
Decreased behavior referrals in both buildings
What we learned & What we are still building
Students need guidance to make purposeful choices.
Predictable posting and enrollment deadlines make flexible scheduling manageable.
Teacher review of rosters helps correct inappropriate placements.
A scheduled intervention needs a specific learning goal and a way to check progress.
Staff and student feedback should lead to visible adjustments.
Coaching, collaboration, and shared leadership sustain the system.
Our next phase is strengthening the connection among formative assessment, PLT decisions, targeted support, and progress monitoring.
CONTACT
Mrs. Deb Chapman
Fenton High School
Mrs. Sarah Foster
Andrew G. Schmidt Middle School
Mrs. Melissa Lane
Fenton Area Public Schools
Mr. Zachary Bradley
Andrew G. Schmidt Middle School