1 of 30

#openrepo2022

2 of 30

Instructions

Please find paste your slide into the slidedeck after your title sheet.

One slide is preferred!

3 of 30

Poster #1

Researcher Approved: a Multi-institutional Survey of Depositors to Six Academic Data Repositories

Sarah J. Wright1, Wanda Marsolek2, Hoa Luong3, Sophia Lafferty-Hess4, Jake Carlson5, Susan Braxton3

1: Cornell University; 2: University of Minnesota; 3: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 4: Duke University; 5: University of Michigan

4 of 30

Poster #1

Integrating Biodiversity Content: ICZN -> ZooBank -> IR -> IA

Sue Ann Gardner, Paul Royster

University of Nebraska-Lincoln, United States of America

5 of 30

Poster #2

Researcher Approved: a Multi-institutional Survey of Depositors to Six Academic Data Repositories

Sarah J. Wright1, Wanda Marsolek2, Hoa Luong3, Sophia Lafferty-Hess4, Jake Carlson5, Susan Braxton3

1: Cornell University; 2: University of Minnesota; 3: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign; 4: Duke University; 5: University of Michigan

6 of 30

Ethical. Reusable. Better.

datacurationnetwork.org

68%

participants said they expect their local repository staff to curate their dataset

Sent 568 survey emails

Received 239 responses

(42%)

98%

agreed that they were satisfied with the review that their dataset received

75%

reported changes had been made to their dataset as the result of the curatorial review

90%

agreed that they felt more confident sharing their data due to the curation process

95%

agreed the impact of data curation has on the data sharing process is worth the effort

Data Availability statement:

Results and survey instrument are available at the Data Repository for the University of Minnesota, https://doi.org/10.13020/DZQP-KS53

7 of 30

Poster #3

Research Data Management at TU Wien

Maximilian Johannes Moser, Tomasz Miksa

TU Wien, Austria

8 of 30

less manual input = more time for research!

Databases

Repository

Virtual

Research

Environment

Data

Management

Plans

Research

Data

Repository

Video Streaming

Platform

( 2a )

( 2b )

( 1 )

«Trust through Automation»

9 of 30

Poster #4

Recommendation and integration of bibliographical references and personal identifiers during import procedures - collaboratively with researchers

Johanna Staudinger, Steffen Illig, Florian Gantner

University of Bamberg, Germany

10 of 30

11 of 30

Poster #5

Information Policies of Institutional Repositories of Federal Universities in Brazil: the librarian who manages digital preservation

RONNIE ANDERSON DE FARIAS, ANGERLANIA REZENDE

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DA PARAÍBA, Brazil

12 of 30

Poster #6

Achimota Government Hospital And Patients Data Relationship At The Hospital

Kwame Opoku Sakyiamah

Student, Ghana

13 of 30

Poster #7

The United Colors of Bots: Seven Steps to Detect and Reduce Machine-Based Statistics in Open Institutional Repositories

Tal Ayalon

World Bank Group, United States of America

14 of 30

Poster #8

Audiovisual Accessibility Builds a Bridge to Diverse User Communities

Melissa Morrow1, Kristi L. Park2, Courtney C. Mumma2

1: Texas Tech University Library; 2: Texas Digital Library

15 of 30

16 of 30

Poster #9

The EOSC DIH “ELD Advance“ project

Andrea Bollini1, Irene Buso1, Susanna Mornati1, Giuseppe Digilio1, Luca Giamminonni1, Androniki Pavlidou2

1: 4Science, Italy; 2: OpenAIRE A.M.K.E.

17 of 30

Poster #10

Episciences: enhancing interoperability and metadata between an overlay journal platform, linked repositories and OpenAIRE open sciences tools and services

Raphaël Tournoy1, Silvio Peroni2, Jose Benito Gonzalez Lopez3

1: CNRS; 2: University of Bologna; 3: CERN

18 of 30

Poster #11

Finding the Right Fit: Streamlining Self-Archiving to Support Author Success

Hope Craf

Hope Craft

Iowa State University, United States of America

19 of 30

Poster #12

SQAaaS - Ensuring Software, Service and Data quality automatically in open repositories

Fernando Aguilar1, Pablo Orviz1, Isabel Bernal2

1: IFCA-CSIC, Spain; 2: URICI-CSIC, Spain

20 of 30

EOSC-SYNERGY in a nutshell

20

Promote EOSC High Quality Services

Software quality as a service, FAIRness evaluation and quality certification badges

Thematic Services Integration

10 thematic services addressing 4 scientific areas (Earth Observation, Environment, Biomedicine and Astrophysics)

Alignment at the Policy Level

Collaboration with regional projects on landscaping activities, gap analysis and contribution to EOSC policies

Skills development

Environment for tutorials with a dedicated MOOC platform, courses methodology and a Hackaton as a service platform

Capacity Expansion at the

Infrastructure level

Integration of services and resources from the RIs of the consortium partners

22 partners in 10 countries �(ES, PT, FR, UK, DE, NL, CZ, SK, PL and BR)

21 of 30

21

SQAaaS: architecture and components

SQAaaS Web Interface

SQAaaS API Server

Jenkins Pipeline Library (JePL)

Developers, computational scientists, RSE

Researchers and developers

Programmatic access

Jenkins

Badgr

Jenkins Pipeline

https://sqaaas.eosc-synergy.eu/

  • DevOps Approach
  • Software Quality
    • Code Style
    • License
    • Coverage - testing
  • Service Quality
    • Integration
  • Data Quality
    • FAIRness
    • FAIR EVA
  • Badge system

22 of 30

Poster #13

IMLS Grant Update - Fedora Migration Paths and Tools: A Pilot Project

Arran Griffith1, Robin Ruggaber2

1: LYRASIS, Canada; 2: University of Virginia

23 of 30

Poster #14

Using R to harvest metadata on individuals and publications associated with an organization

Clarke Iakovakis

Oklahoma State University, United States of America

24 of 30

25 of 30

Poster #16

Programmable Data Repositories

Cheng-Jen Lee, Tyng-Ruey Chuang

Academia Sinica, Taiwan

26 of 30

27 of 30

Poster #17

How can Artificial Intelligence increase the accessibility of electronic documents?

Łukasz Kobyliński, Łukasz Skonieczny

Sages sp. z o.o., Poland

28 of 30

29 of 30

30 of 30

watercolor painting of a hummingbird

grizzly bear splashing in the water