Social and Environmental Safeguard (SES) requirements for
PROCARIBE+ Co-Executing Partners
Ugo Ribet & Aracely Pazmino
December 2024
-> Where we are and where we need to go?
-> What do these requirements include?
-> What tools/documents to complete?
-> When does this need to be done?
-> How to go about doing this?
- Social and environmental screening procedure (SESP)
- Stakeholder Engagement identification table
- Gender Equality Integration identification
PEG SES session overview
1.
Roadmap of co-executing partners SES requirements
PROCARIBE+ SES Implementation: �Where we are and where do we need to go?
PROCARIBE+ Project preparation
PROCARIBE+ Project Inception
Agreements with co-executing partners
Pre-2024
2024
Dec 2024
Inception
Implementation
2025 …
Where we are now?
# | Co-executing partner | CA-signed | Safeguards Instruments | ||
SESP | Stakeholders | Gender | |||
1 | IOCaribe of IOC UNESCO | no | Not started | Not started | Not started |
2 | Cartagena Convention Secretariat | no | Initial conversations | Initial conversations | Initial conversations |
3 | UNOPS SGP Unit (NY) | yes | Initial conversations | Initial conversations | Initial conversations |
4 | UNDP-Country Offica in Venezuela | no | Draft ideas | Not started | Initial conversations |
5 | Institute of Marine Affairs (IMA) | yes | Final version | Draft ideas | Draft review |
6 | OSPESCA -SICA | no | Not started | Not started | Not started |
9 | Centro Nacional de Areas Protegidas (CNAP) | no | Initial conversations | Not started | Not started |
10 | Costa Rica (NGO) | no | Not started | Not started | Not started |
11 | Grant for Fisheries Replenishment Areas (MAR FUND) | no | Not started | Not started | Not started |
Revised version / Final version |
Draft review |
Draft ideas |
Initial �conversations |
Not started |
2.
PROCARIBE+ Social and Environmental Safeguard requirements and tools
UNDP Social and Environmental Standards (SES)�
UNDP Social and Environmental Standards��
Screening
Assessment
Management
Stakeholder Engagement & Disclosure
Principles and Standards
Risk Management System
Overarching Policy and Principles
Project-Level Standards
PROCARIBE+ Safeguard Implementation and Tools
Mainly due to potential risks of project activities including:
Exception: Co-executing partners without site activities (Pew, CRFM etc.)
(separate session on the GRM later today)
3.
Co-executing partner SES requirements, procedures and tools
Overview of Co-executing partners: requirements and responsibilities
Step 1: Complete the site level SESP (including GRM questions), stakeholder engagement list and gender activities list,
Step 2: Submission to PMCU for review and approval
Step 3: Preparation of agreed social and environmental assessments and management measures.
Step 4: Implementation of SES tools, monitoring and reporting
Step 1: Complete the required documents at agreement stage
What is the Social and Environmental Screening Procedure (SESP)?
-> Questionnaire (yes/no checklist)
-> Risk description, significance and
mitigation measures
Step 1
a) SESP
Link to: SESP template
All the ‘Yes’ answers to the checklist should then translate into risks
Yes/No
Completing the risk table of the SESP
QUESTION 2: What are the Potential Social and Environmental Risks? � | QUESTION 3: What is the level of significance of the potential social and environmental risks? | QUESTION 6: Describe the assessment and management measures for each risk rated Moderate, Substantial or High | ||
Risk Description (broken down by event, cause, impact) | Impact and Likelihood (1-5) | Significance (Low, Moderate Substantial, High) | Comments (optional) | Description of assessment and management measures for risks rated as Moderate, Substantial or High |
Risk 1 | | � | � | � |
Risk 2 | | | | |
| | | � | |
Example:
Risk x: Process of MSP may lead to access restrictions, causing economic displacement and loss of livelihoods of local stakeholders.
Activities related to MSP could limit or reduce access to existing resources or areas, ultimately leading to economic disruptions and loss of livelihoods for those who depend on them. Promoting new activities in the marine/coastal space could compete with more established sectors and potentially affect livelihoods. This could inadvertently exacerbate economic disparities and increased social inequalities among actors.
Depending on the measures adopted, some communities, in particular the most vulnerable (as identified in the SEP) could lose their livelihoods through a restriction of access rights to a specific resource or area.
Step 1
a) SESP
Completing the risk table of the SESP
QUESTION 2: What are the Potential Social and Environmental Risks? � | QUESTION 3: What is the level of significance of the potential social and environmental risks? | QUESTION 6: Describe the assessment and management measures for each risk rated Moderate, Substantial or High | ||
Risk Description (broken down by event, cause, impact) | Impact and Likelihood (1-5) | Significance (Low, Moderate Substantial, High) | Comments (optional) | Description of assessment and management measures for risks rated as Moderate, Substantial or High |
Risk 1 | | � | � | � |
Risk 2 | | | | |
Example: Risk x: Process of MSP may lead to access restrictions, causing economic displacement and loss of livelihoods of local stakeholders. | | | Activities related to MSP could limit or reduce access to existing resources or areas, ultimately leading to economic disruptions and loss of livelihoods for those who depend on them. Promoting new activities in the marine/coastal space could compete with more established sectors and potentially affect livelihoods. This could inadvertently exacerbate economic disparities and increased social inequalities among actors. Depending on the measures adopted, some communities, in particular the most vulnerable (as identified in the SEP) could lose their livelihoods through a restriction of access rights to a specific resource or area. � | |
�-> Once the risks are identified, their level of significance should be determined. To do this, screeners estimate both the potential impact (e.g. consequences if the risk were to occur) and likelihood (e.g. the chance of the risk occurring) for each identified risk.
�
I= 3
L= 4
Impact: (1) negligeable, (2) minor, (3) Intermediate, (4) extensive, (5) extreme
Likelihood : (1) not likely (2) low likelihood, (3) moderately likely (4) very likely (5) expected
Moderate
Step 1
a) SESP
Completing the risk table of the SESP
QUESTION 2: What are the Potential Social and Environmental Risks? � | QUESTION 3: What is the level of significance of the potential social and environmental risks? | QUESTION 6: Describe the assessment and management measures for each risk rated Moderate, Substantial or High | ||
Risk Description (broken down by event, cause, impact) | Impact and Likelihood (1-5) | Significance (Low, Moderate Substantial, High) | Comments (optional) | Description of assessment and management measures for risks rated as Moderate, Substantial or High |
Risk 1 | | � | � | � |
Risk 2 | | | | |
Example: Risk x: Process of MSP may lead to access restrictions, causing economic displacement and loss of livelihoods of local stakeholders. | I: 3 L: 4 | Moderate | Activities related to MSP could limit or reduce access to existing resources or areas, ultimately leading to economic disruptions and loss of livelihoods for those who depend on them. Promoting new activities in the marine/coastal space could compete with more established sectors and potentially affect livelihoods. This could inadvertently exacerbate economic disparities and increased social inequalities among actors. Depending on the measures adopted, some communities, in particular the most vulnerable (as identified in the SEP) could lose their livelihoods through a restriction of access rights to a specific resource or area. � | |
-> Provide a description of the assessment and management measures for each risk/ These can be measures already included in the project design, or additional measures/tools to develop for project implementation.
While economic displacement is usually avoided, where economic displacement cannot be avoided, the required assessments and management plans (Livelihood Action Plan, as part of the Environmental and Social Management Plan) will be prepared during project implementation.
Stakeholder engagement measures and participation
Etc.
Step 1
a) SESP
Screen for risks with SESP
Assign risk category
Analyze potential impacts
Develop management measures
Determine applicability of SES Standards
Implement, monitor, report
2. Assessment
3. Management
Moderate
High
Targeted Assess.
Targeted Mngt Measures/
Plans
. Indigenous Peoples Plan (IPP)
. Livelihood Action Plan (LAP)
. Labour Action Plan
.Biodiversity Action Plan
Low
Substantial
X
X
Stakeholder engagement throughout
Scoped
ESIA/SESA
Scoped ESMP/
ESMF and plans
Full
ESIA/SESA
ESMP/
ESMF and plans
1. Screening
Why is the SESP important for the project?
Step 1
a) SESP
Step 1
a) SESP
SESP also includes a section on GRM
Question | Answer/description |
Does your organization have a mechanism or procedure for dealing with complaints or grievances from stakeholders? � | YES/NO |
If the answer is YES, please provide a description of the mechanism or procedure, and links to relevant documentation. | |
-> If the answer is NO, PMCU will discuss with co-executing partners to set up a procedure for to receive the complaint at project level, and transfer to PROCARIBE+ GRM
Questions on the SESP?
As part of the SEP and prior to the implementation of site level activities, the Co-executing partners need to identify the key stakeholders that are expected to be involved in implementation.
It is important that the key stakeholders are identified to assess how they will be involved and/or impacted in project activities.
Stakeholder engagement activities: map, assess and list engagement activities
Step 1
b) Stakeholders
For the stakeholder mapping and analysis, 5 steps should be followed:
Step 1: Listing stakeholders
Step 2: Identifying the key stakeholders
Step 3: Assess the level of interest and influence
Step 4: Assess how they will participate
Step 5: Final document with list of Stakeholders engagement activities +timeline + indicators for reporting
Step 1
b) Stakeholders
Step 2: Identify the “key ones”
-Review the list of all the actors and select the ones that will have direct relation to the project activities.
-Make a final list.
Step 1
b) Stakeholders
-Draft a list of all the actors that may be
involved in the project activities (type of
actor, scope of action, geographical location)
Step 1: Listing stakeholders
-Using the final list, indicate for each stakeholder, the level of interest and influence.
Step 3: Assess the level of Interest & influence
Answer these questions:
1. What level of interest will the stakeholder have in the project activities?
2. What level of influence will the stakeholder have over the project or the project activities?
Step 1
b) Stakeholders
Involve
Inform
Consult
Collaborate
Step 4: Asses how they will participate
Key Stakeholders at the moment
1.Based on the answers, and according to their level of influence and interest, the stakeholders should be classified
into four categories of engagement:
Step 1
b) Stakeholders
Step 4: Asses how they will participate
2. Fill the appropriate categories of engagement in the table.
Step 1
b) Stakeholders
Step 4: Asses how they will participate
3. Use the Report tab in the stakeholder mapping and assessment template to describe the findings based on the guiding questions to prepare a final document:
1.List the key stakeholders that are in the category of "collaboration”
2.Identify and list stakeholders that have low interest and influence but are key for project implementation
3.Briefly indicate how the stakeholders will participate in the project based on the categories identified
4. Make a final list of the activities that you will develop to engage the key stakeholders, timeline and indicators.
Document with the list of stakeholders' engagement
activities + timeline + indicators for reporting
Step 5: Final document
Step 1
b) Stakeholders
Step 1
c) Gender
Gender activities list: Identify gender activities for project-site interventions
To implement gender equality activities in the project site interventions there are 4 steps to follow:
Step 2: Propose specific
actions
Step 3: Budgeting
Step 1: Describe the context
Provide suggestions on how to address the barriers and enhance the opportunities for increasing participation in the project activities
Link to Gender Activities List Template
Indicate the budget that may be required
Document with the list of gender equality
activities + timeline + indicators for reporting
Step 4: Final document
Step 1
c) Gender
�
Step 2: Submission to PMCU for review and approval
Submission of SESP, Stakeholder activities list and Gender activities list to PMCU
Step 3: Preparation of agreed social and environmental assessments and management measures.
�
Step 4: Implementation of SES tools, monitoring and reporting
Thank you for your attention
Questions?